Literature DB >> 35785380

Peri-mitral flutter with epicardial bypass after surgical maze procedure.

Hitoshi Mori1, Kenta Tsutsui1, Daisuke Kawano1, Yoshifumi Ikeda1, Ritsushi Kato1.   

Abstract

Peri-mitral flutter with long epicardial bypass after surgical maze procedure.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Arrhythmia published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of the Japanese Heart Rhythm Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35785380      PMCID: PMC9237345          DOI: 10.1002/joa3.12690

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arrhythm        ISSN: 1880-4276


Although maze procedure has been used as a surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF), the incidence of arrhythmia recurrence is relatively high and peri‐mitral flutter (PMT) is a common cause of the recurrence. The reconnection of peri‐mitral block line has been observed in many cases after the surgical maze procedure and is related to the arrhythmia recurrence. Thus, the ablation target for this PMT after maze procedure is the residual conduction in the mitral isthmus area. We experienced a rare case of PMT after the surgical maze procedure in which the reentrant circuit bridged over the peri‐mitral isthmus block through an epicardial bypass via the coronary sinus. A 72‐year‐old woman was referred to our hospital for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of a drug resistance atrial tachycardia (AT). She underwent an open‐heart surgery for the treatment of atrial septal defect, partial anomalous pulmonary venous connection, and AF when she was 70 years old. Cryothermal maze procedure was performed as a part of the surgery. AT was firstly noted 2 years after the maze procedure. AT was sustained at the beginning of RFCA. The tachycardia cycle length (TCL) slightly varied in a range between 356 and 364 ms. Post‐pacing intervals (PPIs) at lateral aspect of the right atrium and at posterior wall of left atrium (LA) were 538 ms and 395 ms, respectively, and PPIs at the distal part and proximal part of CS equaled to the TCL. These findings indicated that the tachycardia originated from LA. A 3D map created by an ultra‐high‐density mapping system (Rhythmia™ Mapping System, Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) demonstrated that the total activation time in LA was 364 ms, also suggesting that the tachycardia originated from LA (Figure 1A‐E). Pulmonary vein isolation, left posterior isolation, and mitral isthmus (MI) line appeared all maintained in this map. Although the total activation time satisfied the tachycardia cycle length, Skyline showed a “valley” pattern (Figure 1C), which indicated the presence of an activation gap. The gap was identified at mitral isthmus and spatial and temporal gaps were 20.2 mm and 102 ms, respectively. Additional mapping of coronary sinus (CS) by IntellaNav Stable Point (Boston Scientific, Maple Grove, MN) filled the gap of the LA map, resulting in completion of the entire tachycardia circuit (Figures 2 and 3, supplemental video 1, 2). Although we did not perform the CS venography to confirm the presence of the vein of Marshall, the PPIs at the three different sites in CS were equal to the TCL. These findings led us to diagnose that the tachycardia was a PMT with epicardial bypass involving CS. Ablation was performed to the CS fiber within CS on the opposite side of the mitral isthmus scar (Figures 2 and 3, red tag) and the tachycardia was terminated immediately after the initiation of energy delivery. Creation of complete block line in the CS causes the CS stenosis and the arrhythmia induction was performed after the ablation. Any tachycardia was not induced by atrial pacing and the procedure was ended.
FIGURE 1

(A and B) Activation map of LA (the confidence mask revel was 0.03 mV). Skyline showed a valley pattern, which indicated the uncovered activation gap (C). (D and E) Voltage maps of LA. Low voltage zone was defined as ≤0.5 mV. Pulmonary vein isolation, left posterior isolation, and mitral isthmus line appeared all maintained in this map. The distance and activation gap of mitral isthmus were 20.2 mm and 102 ms, respectively

FIGURE 2

(A‐D) and (E‐F) Activation map with and without CS. The tachycardia turns around the mitral annulus with epicardial bypass involving CS. The red tag shows the ablation site. MVA, mitral valve annulus

FIGURE 3

(A‐D) and (E‐F) Activation map with and without CS from posterior angle. (I‐K) Local potential in CS and (K) local potential at the ablation site. These panels demonstrated that CS conducted the excitation of AT when the endocardial myocardium did not

(A and B) Activation map of LA (the confidence mask revel was 0.03 mV). Skyline showed a valley pattern, which indicated the uncovered activation gap (C). (D and E) Voltage maps of LA. Low voltage zone was defined as ≤0.5 mV. Pulmonary vein isolation, left posterior isolation, and mitral isthmus line appeared all maintained in this map. The distance and activation gap of mitral isthmus were 20.2 mm and 102 ms, respectively (A‐D) and (E‐F) Activation map with and without CS. The tachycardia turns around the mitral annulus with epicardial bypass involving CS. The red tag shows the ablation site. MVA, mitral valve annulus (A‐D) and (E‐F) Activation map with and without CS from posterior angle. (I‐K) Local potential in CS and (K) local potential at the ablation site. These panels demonstrated that CS conducted the excitation of AT when the endocardial myocardium did not To the best of our knowledge, this is the first to report a PMT with CS bypass after the surgical maze procedure. After the transcutaneous RF MI ablation, residual myocardial connections in the LA may be present and become the cause of arrhythmia recurrence. Epicardial bypass through the vein of Marshall sometimes causes arrhythmia recurrence after the MI ablation or maze procedure. , Our case demonstrates that the similar phenomenon across the CS can occur after the surgical maze procedure in which residual myocardial connections in the LA did not exist. The high‐density mapping was useful to show the detail tachycardia circuit.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose. Supplementary Video 1 Click here for additional data file. Supplementary Video 2 Click here for additional data file.
  5 in total

1.  Catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias after a Maze procedure: A single center experience.

Authors:  Takatsugu Kajiyama; Yusuke Kondo; Marehiko Ueda; Masahiro Nakano; Miyo Nakano; Michiko Watanabe; Goro Matsumiya; Yoshio Kobayashi
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2018-12-20

2.  Atrial arrhythmias after surgical maze: findings during catheter ablation.

Authors:  Oussama M Wazni; Walid Saliba; Tamer Fahmy; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy; Sergio Thal; Mohamed Kanj; David O Martin; J David Burkhardt; Robert Schweikert; Andrea Natale
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2006-09-12       Impact factor: 24.094

3.  High-density activation mapping during perimitral atrial tachycardia demonstrates epicardial connection through the vein of Marshall.

Authors:  Iwanari Kawamura; Seiji Fukamizu; Satoshi Miyazawa; Rintaro Hojo
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 6.343

4.  Marshall bundle reentrant atrial tachycardia after the Cox-Maze IV procedure: The last barrier of the conduction pathway between the coronary sinus and left atrium.

Authors:  Yasushi Wakabayashi; Takekuni Hayashi; Yoshitaka Sugawara; Takeshi Mitsuhashi; Hideo Fujita; Shin-Ichi Momomura
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2017-10-12

5.  Incidence, electrophysiological characteristics, and long-term follow-up of perimitral atrial flutter in patients with previously confirmed mitral isthmus block.

Authors:  Panagiotis Ioannidis; Evangelia Christoforatou; Theodoros Zografos; Panagiotis Charalambopoulos; Konstantinos Kouvelas; Georgios Christoulas; Periklis Syros; Georgios Tsitsinakis; Theodora Kappou; Andreas Tsoumeleas; Sotirios Floros; Dimitrios Tagoulis; Ioannis Ntarladimas; Ioannis Tagoulis; Dimitrios Avzotis; Antonis S Manolis; Charalambos Vassilopoulos
Journal:  J Arrhythm       Date:  2021-05-12
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.