| Literature DB >> 35785284 |
David Moe Almenningen1, Veslemøy Minge Engh1, Eivind Andreas Strømsodd1, Henrik Erring Hansen2, Audun Formo Buene3, Bård Helge Hoff1, Odd Reidar Gautun1.
Abstract
The geometry of a dye for dye-sensitized solar cells (DSSCs) has a major impact on its optical and electronic properties. The dye structure also dictates the packing properties and how well the dye insulates the metal-oxide surface from oxidants in the electrolyte. The aim of this work is to investigate the effect of planarizing the geometry of the common triarylamine donor, frequently used in dyes for DSSC. Five novel dyes were designed and prepared; two employ conventional triarylamine donors with thiophene and furan π-spacers, two dyes have had their donors planarized through one sulfur bridge (making two distinct phenothiazine motifs), and the final dye has been planarized by forming a double phenoxazine. The synthesis of these model dyes proved to be quite challenging, and each required specially designed total syntheses. We demonstrate that the planarization of the triarylamine donor can have different effects. When planarization was achieved by a 3,7-phenothiazine and double phenoxazine structures, improved absorption properties were noted, and a panchromatic absorption was achieved by the latter. However, an incorrect linking of donor and acceptor moieties has the opposite effect. Further, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy revealed clear differences in charge recombination depending on the structure of the dye. A drawback of planarized dyes in relation to DSSC is their low oxidation potentials. The best photovoltaic performance was achieved by 3,7-phenothazine with furan as a π-spacer, which produces a power conversion efficiency of 5.2% (J sc = 8.8 mA cm-2, V oc = 838 mV, FF = 0.70).Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35785284 PMCID: PMC9245111 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03163
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1(a) Molecular structures and design concepts of the five different dyes reported in this paper. The degree of planarization is postulated from the out-of-plane angle between the three central phenyl rings based on crystallographic data of 2-chloro-10-phenylphenothiazine,[31] triphenylamine,[32] and benzo[5,6][1,4]oxazino[2,3,4-kl]phenoxazine.[33] (b) Staining solutions of the dyes; the concentration of each dye is 0.5 mM in a mixture of acetonitrile and THF (43:57, v/v). (c) Energy levels of the frontier orbitals of the dyes, TiO2, and the I–/I3– redox shuttle.
Scheme 1Synthesis of TAA-Th and TAA-Fu
Scheme 2Synthesis of 10
Scheme 3Synthesis of 3,7-PTZ-Fu
Scheme 4Our Original Synthesis of Key Intermediate 24
Scheme 5Synthesis of POZPOZ-Th
Figure 2(a) UV/vis spectra of the dyes in dichloromethane (2 × 10–5 M). (b) UV/vis spectra of the dyes sensitized on a TiO2 film (2.5 μm, GreatcellSolar, 18NR-T).
Photophysical and Electrochemical Properties of Dyes in the Series
| dye | λabs | ε (M–1 cm–1) | Em | λabs | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 504 | 33,800 | 639 | 464 | 2.24 | 1.13 | –1.11 | |
| 503 | 37,100 | 638 | 462 | 2.24 | 1.10 | –1.14 | |
| 461 | 10,500 | 591 | 461 | 2.33 | 0.91 | –1.42 | |
| 485 | 20,300 | 591 | 466 | 2.26 | 0.97 | –1.29 | |
| 530 | 14,500 | 639 | 522 | 2.11 | 0.96 | –1.15 |
Maximum of the most red-shifted peak.
Emission when the ICT band is excited in DCM solution.
Maximum of the most red-shifted peak on TiO2 (2.5 μm, GreatcellSolar 18NR-T).
Calculated from the intersection of the absorption and normalized emission spectra.
Measured vs Fc+/Fc on stained TiO2 electrodes in acetonitrile with 0.1 M LiTFSI, converted to V vs SHE by 0.624 V. Scan rate 10 mV s–1.
Calculated from Eox – E0–0.
Shoulder.
Photovoltaic Performance of all Dyes under 1 sun AM 1.5G Illumination and from IPCE Measurementsa
| dye | IPCE | FF | PCE (%) | dye loading (10–8 mol cm–2) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9.05 | 7.5 ± 0.2 | 829 ± 4 | 0.66 ± 0.01 | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 22 ± 1.4 | |
| 8.43 | 7.7 ± 0.0 | 869 ± 4 | 0.70 ± 0.02 | 4.7 ± 0.1 | 31 ± 0.4 | |
| 5.25 | 4.9 ± 0.0 | 839 ± 9 | 0.77 ± 0.01 | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 25 ± 0.4 | |
| 10.82 | 8.8 ± 0.2 | 838 ± 10 | 0.70 ± 0.00 | 5.2 ± 0.1 | 29 ± 0.5 | |
| 7.56 | 5.8 ± 0.2 | 673 ± 0 | 0.59 ± 0.03 | 2.3 ± 0.1 | 33 ± 0.5 | |
| 13.61 | 11.8 | 742 | 0.72 | 6.3 |
Results from dye loading experiments are also included.
Otained by integration of the IPCE spectrum over the 1 sun AM 1.5 G spectrum.
Average values of three separate devices.
Values averaged of two desorbed TiO2 electrodes.
Values from the best-performing device.
Figure 3J–V curves of the best performing DSSC device for each dye and the reference sensitizer N719.
Figure 4IPCE spectra of the best performing DSSC device for each dye and the reference sensitizer N719.
Figure 5(a) Recombination resistance of the DSSC devices as a function of applied voltage. (b) Ratio of effective electron diffusion length to TiO2 film thickness as a function of applied voltage.