The structural diversity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) offers exciting opportunities for their applications. Yet, selective synthesis of such conjugated networks poses a formidable challenge. Compared to the prominence of transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling and oxidative Scholl reactions, cationic rearrangement in the synthesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is an underexplored subject. In this study, we reveal that cationic intermediate generated from epoxy dibenzocycloheptanol can be transformed into acenes, azulene-embedded PAHs, and dibenzocycloheptanone derivatives. Reactive patterns, including Meinwald rearrangement, Nazarov cyclization, transannular aryl migration, and transannular Friedel-Crafts cyclization were identified. Both substrate structures and reaction temperature affect the reaction pathways in predictable and manageable manners. A mechanistic scheme was postulated as the working model to guide the reactivity for further application. Substrates containing heterocyclic and ferrocenyl groups exhibit similar reactivity profiles. The inquiry culminates in the selective synthesis of 5, 7, 12, 14-tetrasubstituted C 2h and C 2v pentacene derivatives. Our results demonstrate that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can be selectively prepared with this cation-initiated strategy by methodically tuning the reactivity.
The structural diversity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) offers exciting opportunities for their applications. Yet, selective synthesis of such conjugated networks poses a formidable challenge. Compared to the prominence of transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling and oxidative Scholl reactions, cationic rearrangement in the synthesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is an underexplored subject. In this study, we reveal that cationic intermediate generated from epoxy dibenzocycloheptanol can be transformed into acenes, azulene-embedded PAHs, and dibenzocycloheptanone derivatives. Reactive patterns, including Meinwald rearrangement, Nazarov cyclization, transannular aryl migration, and transannular Friedel-Crafts cyclization were identified. Both substrate structures and reaction temperature affect the reaction pathways in predictable and manageable manners. A mechanistic scheme was postulated as the working model to guide the reactivity for further application. Substrates containing heterocyclic and ferrocenyl groups exhibit similar reactivity profiles. The inquiry culminates in the selective synthesis of 5, 7, 12, 14-tetrasubstituted C 2h and C 2v pentacene derivatives. Our results demonstrate that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can be selectively prepared with this cation-initiated strategy by methodically tuning the reactivity.
In the last three decades,
the discoveries of fullerenes, carbon
nanotubes, and graphene ignited a rapid growth in the research of
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).[1] The vast structural and property diversity of the PAH derivatives
is a boundless reservoir of functions to solve real-life problems.
It is long recognized that selective construction of designated PAH
structures is only feasible through bottom-up stepwise synthesis.
To form the C–C bonds within PAH skeletons, Diels–Alder
reaction,[2] metal-catalyzed coupling,[3] and benzannulation[4] all play indispensable roles. Since Mullen’s synthesis of
hexabenzocoronene,[5] intramolecular Scholl
cyclization via radical cation intermediates has become the most prominent
protocol to connect multiple C–C bonds in the PAH structures.[6] Recently, several reports demonstrated that Scholl
cyclization can also lead to PAH products with skeletal rearrangements.[7] Inspired by these discoveries, we perceive cationic
rearrangement reactions present an alternative approach toward various
PAH skeletons. Yet, due to the capricious reactivity of cationic intermediates,
synthetic selectivity and efficiency with rearrangement strategy must
be managed via deeper mechanistic insights. This requires a systematic
analysis of substrate structures, reaction products, and reaction
conditions. In this manuscript, we reveal that the titled rearrangement
reaction can be guided through substrate and temperature control to
furnish several different classes of products, including acene derivatives,
azulene-embedded PAHs, and substituted dibenzocycloheptanone.We recently discovered an oxidative ring contraction reaction of
mesityl dibenzocycloheptenol to produce 9,10-disubstituted anthracene.[8] As shown in Scheme , the [6,7,6]-fused skeleton was converted
into anthracene in acidic medium. Mechanistically, this reaction is
peculiar because the presumed cation intermediate should be aromatic
and fairly stable. However, as indicated by its facile rearrangement,
this structure is readily oxidized by oxygen. Although a definitive
mechanism cannot yet be verified, an epoxy dibenzocycloheptenol (EDCH-mesityl)
intermediate is likely to undergo Meinwald rearrangement[9] to give the [6,6,6]-fused anthracene skeleton.
Dehydration then furnishes the anthracene product. Recognizing the
potential of this rearrangement, we launched an innovated synthesis
of a range PAH of derivatives employing this rearrangement. Since
the epoxy dibenzocycloheptenol (EDCH) is the proposed intermediate,
this key structural motif is directly utilized as the precursors in
the current investigation. As we were preparing this manuscript, Dr.
Ploypradith reported the synthesis of 9-anthracene carboxaldehyde
derivatives employing a very similar protocol (semipinacol under Dr.
Ploypradith’s nomenclature).[10] In
the present contribution, the substrate scope of this strategy was
greatly expanded to include PAH and heterocyclic substituents. Novel
reaction pathways, such as aryl migration and transannular cyclization,
were also revealed in more elaborated substrates. We found the selectivity
among different pathways is modulated by substrate structures as well
as reaction temperature. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that this
rearrangement can be applied to the selective synthesis of various
PAH motifs, including pentacene derivatives of C2 and C2 symmetries. Our study provides a more comprehensive assessment
of this versatile reaction and therefore is complementary to the prior
contribution from Dr. Ploypradith’s group.
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 10-Aryl
9-anthracene Carboxaldehyde via Ring Contraction
of [6,7,6]-Fused EDCH Scaffold
Results
and Discussion
The simpler EDCH derivatives with aryl (2 and 3), alkynyl (4), and alkyl
(5) substituents
were first tested. (Dr. Ploypradith’s team has extensively
explored such examples. The present four reactions offer moderately
improved yields with convenient reagents and conditions.) The required
starting compounds (2–5) were synthesized by the
addition of lithium reagents to EDCH-one (1), which is
prepared from dibenzocycloheptenone via epoxidation (mCPBA). Judged
from the simplicity of their 1H and 13C NMR
spectrum, all epoxy alcohols were produced as single diastereomers,
presumably the cis isomer from the lithium reagent attacking the ketone
from the opposite side of the epoxide. The cis-selectivity
was assumed for all subsequent epoxy alcohols intermediates, one of
which (14) was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. When
these epoxy alcohols were treated with boron trifluoride etherate
(BF3·OEt2) at room temperature, anthracene
aldehyde products (2a–5a) were obtained
in good to moderate yields. A small amount (<5%) of deformylated
anthracene products was also observed in these reactions. These anthracene
carboxaldehydes are convenient building blocks of more elaborated
conjugated systems for curiosity and function-driven research (Scheme ).
Scheme 2
Synthesis of 10-Substituted
9-Anthracene Carboxaldehyde from EDCH
Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement
Synthesis of 10-Substituted
9-Anthracene Carboxaldehyde from EDCH
Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) m-CPBA.
NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; (b) R-Li, tetrahydrofuran
(THF); (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2.After establishing the scope of
BF3·OEt2-catalyzed rearrangement to construct
anthracene derivatives with
aldehyde and simple substituents (2a–5a), we attempted to extend this protocol to systems where PAH groups
(naphthyl, anthryl, and pyrenyl) located at 10 position of 9-anthracene
carboxaldehyde. As shown in Scheme a, the required naphthalene-substituted 6 and 7 were prepared by nucleophilic addition to 1 with the corresponding 1- and 2-lithiated naphthalene. The
rearrangement of 6 gave the expected anthracene-naphthalene
dyad product (6a) in moderate yield. Yet, a peculiar
ketone product 6b (13C signal at 193.75 ppm)
with an AB-type methylene (4.88 ppm and 4.13 ppm, J = 14.3 Hz) and a triaryl methine (5.96 ppm) was also isolated in
comparable yield. Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) and
heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) two-dimensional (2D)
NMR spectroscopy (Figure S25) establish 6b’s hexacyclic framework where a [5,7]-fused azulene
core is surrounded by four annulated six-membered rings. This structure
is confirmed by X-ray crystallography. 6b is a secondary
product derived from the dibenzocycloheptanone intermediate after
the Meinwald rearrangement. The mechanism (Scheme b) is formally the Nazarov cyclization of
a triaryl cation[11] generated from the keto-alcohol
intermediate under the acidic condition. The ketone group in 6b is attached to the phenyl ring where the cyclization occurs.
This unanticipated regioselectivity implies that 6b is
derived from a destabilized cation intermediate. Hence, the selective
formation of 6b is likely the result of kinetic control.
To manage the selectivity between 6a and 6b, the reaction was also conducted at −78 °C. We found
the Nazarov cyclization is shut down at a low temperature, while the
oxo-bridged hemiketal 6c (hemiketal 13C chemical
shift = 104.5 ppm) derived from the keto-alcohol intermediate becomes
the major product (Scheme b). A similar product was previously observed in a much lower
yield during the 3 → 3a transformation.
Ploypradith et al. has also documented these products. When 6c is treated with BF3·OEt2 at
a higher temperature (refluxed dichloroethane), 6b is
produced in 75% yield. These results demonstrate that 6c can be reversibly converted into keto-alcohol intermediates. This
intermediate then undergoes irreversible dehydration at higher temperatures
to furnish the Nazarov cyclization product 6b. When 1-naphthyl-substituted 7 was put under identical condition, the anthracene derivative 7a and Nazarov cyclization product 7b were likewise
obtained. However, when the rearrangement was performed at −78
°C, 7a becomes the sole product in slightly lower
yields.
Scheme 3
(a) BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of
Naphthyl-EDCH (6 and 7) to Produce Anthracene
Carboxaldehyde (6a and 7a), Azulene-Embedded
PAHs (6b and 7b), and Oxo-Bridged Hemiketal
(6c). (b) Meinwald Rearrangement toward Keto-Alcohol
Intermediate and Subsequent Transformation to Various Products
(a) 1-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (b)
2-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C,
then 1. (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.
(a) BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of
Naphthyl-EDCH (6 and 7) to Produce Anthracene
Carboxaldehyde (6a and 7a), Azulene-Embedded
PAHs (6b and 7b), and Oxo-Bridged Hemiketal
(6c). (b) Meinwald Rearrangement toward Keto-Alcohol
Intermediate and Subsequent Transformation to Various Products
(a) 1-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (b)
2-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C,
then 1. (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.To gather more information on the potential reaction pathways EDCH
can undertake, EDCH containing anthryl and pyrenyl units (8 and 9) were synthesized and reacted with BF3·OEt2 at room temperature and −78 °C
(Scheme ). Surprisingly,
the yield for the expected bis-anthryl aldehyde 8a is
only 1%. The overwhelming major products are those with the anthryl
group shift to the other side of the seven-membered ring. In the low-temperature
product 8c (carbonyl signal in 13C spectrum
= 198.4 ppm. An alcohol type signal at 73.1 ppm is also present.)
the epoxide ring opens via a concerted backside attack from the migrating
anthryl moiety. This reaction pathway is consistent with the assumption
that 8 is a cis-epoxy alcohol. The resulting trans stereoselectivity
is confirmed by X-ray crystallography and 2D NMR (Figure S43). The room-temperature product 8b is
the dehydrated form of 8c with an anthracene-dibenzocycloheptenone
dyad architecture. Similar migratory reactivity was also observed
for pyrene-substituted 9 (9b and 9c). Because the structural motif of 8b and 9b are also found in the skeleton of stilbenoid hemsleyanol and parviflorol,
the transannular migration might be a convenient entry toward similar
natural products.[12] The Meinwald rearrangement
products, anthracene 9a and bridged hemiketal 9d (structure confirmed by X-ray crystallography), were also isolated
in moderate yields. Notably, the yield of 9a at room
temperature is uncharacteristically low despite being the sole identifiable
product.
Scheme 4
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of Anthryl-EDCH
(8) and Pyrenyl-EDCH (9)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of Anthryl-EDCH
(8) and Pyrenyl-EDCH (9)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.The BF3·OEt2-catalyzed
rearrangement
of phenanthrene-EDCH (10) reveals the most complicated
reactivity pattern in this study. Fortunately, the combined yield
of the seven identifiable products (10a–10g) is high enough (>85%) that a more comprehensive understanding
of various reaction pathways can be extracted (Scheme ). Anthracene-phenanthrene dyad 10a and 10b are produced, yet the deformylated 10a is more prominent than in previous cases. Nazarov cyclization product
(10c), bridged hemiketal (10d), and transannular
aryl migration product (10e) were likewise observed.
Two bridged cyclic products (10f and 10g) were identified by HMBC and HSQC 2D NMR spectroscopy (Figures S67 and S70). The bicyclic scaffolds
in both compounds result from transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization. 10f is the straightforward Friedel–Crafts product (no
carbonyl signal is observed in 13C spectrum and two alcohol
type signals, 77.5 and 69.7 ppm, are present), while a late-stage
semipinacol ring expansion leads to the [3.3.1] bicyclic ring system
in 10g (carbonyl signal in 13C spectrum =
196.5 ppm. The presence of four sp3 13C signals indicates
the B-ring of phenanthrene no longer contains the original olefin
unit).
Scheme 5
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of Phenanthrene-EDCH
(10)
According to the results
accumulated thus far, four reaction pathways
are summarized in Scheme . Pathways A and B are the two modes of Meinwald rearrangement
that produce the ring contraction aldehyde intermediate a and the dibenzocycloheptanone intermediate b. Pathways
C and D are the two transannular reactions where intermediate c and d lead to the migratory and cyclization
products, respectively. Several trends can be deduced from these results.
(1) For substrates with nonaryl groups (4 and 5) or para-substituted phenyl groups (2 and 3) attached to EDCH, 9,10-disubstituted anthracene derivatives are
the major products (pathway A). (2) Room-temperature condition usually
increases the yields of the anthracene and the Nazarov cyclization
products, while low temperatures enhance the production of bridged
hemiketal. (3) With PAH groups attached to EDCH (8, 9, and 10), transannular reactions, including
aryl migration (pathway C) and Friedel–Crafts cyclization (pathway
D), can also take place. Crucial structure–activity relationships
can be drawn from these trends. (1) All transformations are initiated
by epoxide opening. (2) The formations of anthracene and Nazarov cyclization
products are generally facilitated by higher temperatures. This observation
can be attributed to the entropic factor because both reactions involve
dehydration. Yet, this generic interpretation cannot explain the different
product distributions between 6 and 7 (Scheme a). A more nuanced
model should consider most cationic intermediates that lead to dehydration
products are destabilized due to the orthogonal conformation of the
aryl substituents. Consequently, these products are suppressed at
lower temperatures. Yet the precursor cation toward 7a can adopt a more planar conformation, therefore the yield of 7a shows little temperature dependency. (3) On the other hand,
the oxo-bridged hemiketal is favored at low temperatures because intermediate a and intermediate b are interconvertible when
the former cannot dehydrate to form anthracene. (4) The pronounced
temperature dependence of product distribution indicates that many
intermediates are formed reversibly at low temperatures before collapsing
to respective products. (5) When the ipso positions of the substituted
PAH groups are nucleophilic (8 and 9), the
aryl groups undergo transannular migration to furnish the aryl-substituted
EDCH-one. (6) In 10 where the ortho sites of the aryl
group at 6 position is also nucleophilic, transannular Friedel–Crafts
cyclization can take place to produce the [3.2.2] bicyclic 10f. (7) The rearrangement of 9 to 9a proceeds
in low yield (11%) accompanied by substantial decomposition. The side
products are attributed to the reactions between the excess nucleophilic
sites (3, 6, 8 positions) and the endogenous cations.
Scheme 6
Diverse
Reactivity of BF3·OEt2-Induced
Skeletal Rearrangement of aryl-EDCH
Diverse
Reactivity of BF3·OEt2-Induced
Skeletal Rearrangement of aryl-EDCH
A: Meiwald rearrangement + dehydration.
B: Meiwald rearrangement + transannular hemiketal formation. C: Transannular
aryl migration. D: Transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization.After establishing the basic guidelines to steer
the selectivity
of these cationic rearrangements, the principles were tested on substrates
containing heterocycles and ferrocene (11–18). 2-Thienyl (11)- and 3-thienyl (12)-substituted EDCHs were synthesized[13] and underwent BF3·OEt2-catalyzed rearrangement
at room temperature and −78 °C (Scheme ). The results strongly suggest that the
selectivity principles for PAH systems (6–10)
are equally applicable to thienyl-EDCH substrates. Since the thienyl
unit in 11 was attached through the highly nucleophilic
2-position, the transannular thienyl migration product 11b dominates at low temperatures. At room temperature, the formyl anthracene
derivative 11a was generated in low yield concomitantly
with unidentified polymeric side products. This temperature-reactivity
profile is similar to that of 9 where the pyrenyl moiety
is connected through the nucleophilic 1-position. When 3-thienyl-EDCH 12 was treated with BF3·OEt2, at
room temperature, the anthracene aldehyde 12a is produced
in moderate yield. However, when the reaction temperature was lowered
to −78 °C, three products were isolated. Anthracene aldehyde 12a is now the minor component. The nucleophilic 2-position
of thiophene undergoes transannular cyclization to furnish 12c (40%, structure confirmed by X-ray crystallography) while transannular
thienyl migration product 12b was also isolated (20%).
These results reinforce the aforementioned principles including (1)
the temperature dependence of selectivity, (2) the correspondence
of transannular reactivity to the nucleophilic sites, and (3) the
commutability of intermediates at low temperatures.
Scheme 7
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Thienyl-EDCH
(11 and 12)
BF3·OEt2,
CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Thienyl-EDCH
(11 and 12)
BF3·OEt2,
CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.Two more electron-rich heterocyclic systems (dithiophene
and carbazole)
were appended to the ECHD system (13–15), and
their rearrangement reactivity was investigated (Scheme ). The mono- and disubstituted
dithiophene (13 and 14) can be synthesized
via selective lithiation.[14] The reactivity
of 13 is identical to those of 9 and 11. The low-temperature condition leads to the migratory product
(13b) in moderate yield, while the anthracene derivative
(13a) is produced in low yield at room temperature. For
the rearrangement of dithiophene-EDCH2 substrate (14), only a double-migratory product 14a was
observed at low temperatures. The crystal structure of 14 (Supporting Information, SI) confirms
the cis-epoxy alcohol configuration and close contact
between the ipso and epoxide carbon (∼3 Å). Both further
validate the migratory reactivity. Likewise, because the 3-position
of carbazole is highly nucleophilic, the ipso migration pathway dominates
the rearrangement of 15 to furnish 15a at
low temperatures.
Scheme 8
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of Bisthiophene-EDCH1,2 (13 and 14) and Carbazole-EDCH
(15)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement
of Bisthiophene-EDCH1,2 (13 and 14) and Carbazole-EDCH
(15)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.To reverse the
effect of electron-rich aryl groups, compound 16 (3-pyridyl-EDCH)
was synthesized and put under the identical
reaction condition (Scheme ). The product distribution is in stark contrast to previous
examples. The transannular migration that dominates the electron-rich
substrates (11–15) is completely
absent. Instead, Meinwald rearrangements are the only detectable pathways
with the electron-deficient pyridyl substituent. The anthracene aldehyde
(16a) and bridged hemiketal (16b) were generated
in about 70% combined yield, while the higher reaction temperature
favors the anthracene product as already inferred from previous examples.
Scheme 9
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Pyridyl-EDCH
(16)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Pyridyl-EDCH
(16)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.Ferrocene is
an important building block for redox-active materials
because of its robust electrochemical property. Yet, there are only
a few reported ferrocene-PAH conjugated systems in the literature,
which mostly employed the Suzuki–Miyuara coupling.[15] With this Meinwald rearrangement protocol, we
perceive the opportunity to construct anthracene-ferrocene dyad or
triad molecules. The mono- and di-EDCH-substituted ferrocene (17 and 18) was synthesized via lithiated ferrocene[16] in moderate yields (Scheme ). The rearrangement of 17 furnishes
the ferrocenyl-anthracene aldehyde 17a as the major product
(Scheme ). The transannular
cyclization product 17b was also formed at low temperatures
due to the nucleophilic nature of cyclopentadiene rings. However,
transannular migration product was not observed. This exception to
the prior trend is likely due to the large size of the ferrocenyl
group, which renders the corresponding transition-state unattainable
due to steric hindrance.
Scheme 10
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed
Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH
(17)
(a) Tetramethylethylenediamine
(TMEDA), n-BuLi, THF; then 1. (b) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and
−78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed
Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH
(17)
(a) Tetramethylethylenediamine
(TMEDA), n-BuLi, THF; then 1. (b) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and
−78 °C.The rearrangement of bis-EDCH
ferrocene 18 exhibits
more complex reactivity than its mono-substituted counterpart 17. As depicted in Scheme , the bis-anthryl 18b and its deformylated
secondary product 18a were formed in about 20% combined
yield. The lower yields are anticipated because the rearrangement
of mono-EDCH 17 only gave 46% yield. Three hybrid rearrangement
products (18c, 18d, and 18e), where the substituents on the two cyclopentadiene units differ,
were also isolated in low yields. The formation of bridged hemiketal
containing 18c was expected. The structures of both 18d (isolated as a mixture with 18c) and 18e were determined by comparison with 17b and
2D NMR spectroscopy (HMBS and HSQC) to contain bicyclic moieties.
A transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization installs the [3.2.2]
bicyclic scaffold in 18d as in 17b. In compound 18e, a different [3.2.2] bicyclic scaffold is formed from
the Meinwald rearrangement intermediate (a in Scheme ).
Scheme 11
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH2 (18)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH2 (18)
BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.After screening a variety of EDCH derivatives, it
can be concluded
that Meinwald rearrangement grants the anthracene products more cleanly
with the simple phenyl substituents at room temperature. Endowed with
a deeper understanding of the protocol, we set out to synthesize novel
PAH derivatives that are hitherto inaccessible by other synthetic
strategies.Pentacene is the benchmark compound among organic
electronic materials.
Pentacene derivatives possess excellent charge-transporting capacity
which enables their widespread applications in various devices.[17] However, the syntheses of pentacene derivatives
in the literature are limited in their scopes.[18] Especially, access to pentacene derivatives with C2 and C2 symmetry remains a challenge.[19] A selective synthetic strategy requires that
the regiochemical feature of desired product encodes in its starting
materials. Since [6,7,6]-fused EDCH has been established as a precursor
to anthracene skeletons, a [6,7,6,7,6]-fused pentacyclic system could
lead to pentacene derivatives under proper acid catalysis. The execution
of this retrosynthetic vision is depicted in Scheme . The [6,7,6,7,6]-fused 19 was
synthesized from dimethyl 2,5-dibromoterephthalate via a known procedure.[20] The C2 symmetry of 19 is inherited from that of starting
material. The subsequent epoxidation (19 → 20) and aryl lithium (or alkynyl lithium) addition were carried
out as in Scheme .
After optimizing the double Meinwald rearrangement, C2 pentacene derivatives (21a-21e) with aryl, alkynyl, and aldehyde substituents
at 5, 7, 12, 14 positions were produced. BF3·OEt2 is replaced by CF3COOH to provide cleaner products
after the double-ring contraction. This strategy achieves the selective
synthesis of several C2 pentacene derivatives in useful yields from a readily accessible
common intermediate (20).
Scheme 12
Selective Synthesis
of C2 Pentacene Derivatives
via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium
or alkynyl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH,
CH2Cl2.
Selective Synthesis
of C2 Pentacene Derivatives
via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium
or alkynyl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH,
CH2Cl2.When the identical
reaction sequence (epoxidation, aryl lithium
addition, and CF3COOH) was applied to a [6,7,6,7,6]-fused
precursor with C2 symmetry,
pentacene derivatives of C2 symmetry should emerge. The realization of this plan is presented
in Scheme . Compound 22 was synthesized from dimethyl 4,6-dibromoisophthalate with
the same protocol as that employed for 19. After 22 was treated sequentially with mCPBA, aryl lithium, and
CF3COOH, three pentacene derivatives (23a, 23b, and 23c) were generated without isolating
the intermediates. For these C2 pentacene derivatives, the protons at 6 and 13 positions show
weak but measurable spin–spin coupling (J ∼
1 Hz). The observation of such peculiar long-range J-5 couplings can be attributed to the pronounced aromatic character
of the central ring.[21]
Scheme 13
Selective Synthesis
of C2 Pentacene Derivatives
via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium,
THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.Two more PAH derivatives were synthesized
to test the scope of
this new strategy. As shown in Scheme , the synthesis of tetracene derivative 28 started from the Heck coupling of methyl 3-bromo-2-naphthoate
(prepared via palladium-catalyzed ortho bromination)[22] with styrene. The olefin unit in 24 was then
hydrogenated (25) to facilitate the subsequent Friedel–Crafts
cyclization. After the methyl ester was hydrolyzed, Friedel–Crafts
cyclization (SOCl2/AlCl3) furnished the [6,6,7,6]-fused 26. The double bond was then reinstated (N-bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide/Et3N) to give 27. The standard reaction sequence (epoxidation, aryl lithium
addition, CF3COOH) was then conducted to furnish tetracene 28 in moderate yield.
Scheme 14
Selective Synthesis of Tetracene
Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) Styrene, Pd(OAc)2, P(o-tolyl)3, Et3N, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). (b) 10% palladium
on charcoal, H2. MeOH/THF. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH,
then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-Bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide,
then Et3N, (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, (g) CF3COOH,
CH2Cl2.
Selective Synthesis of Tetracene
Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement
(a) Styrene, Pd(OAc)2, P(o-tolyl)3, Et3N, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). (b) 10% palladium
on charcoal, H2. MeOH/THF. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH,
then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-Bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide,
then Et3N, (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, (g) CF3COOH,
CH2Cl2.Compound 33 was chosen as the next target to test
whether it is feasible to construct angular fused PAH through ring
contraction. As shown in Scheme , methyl 2-bromobenzoic acid and 1-naphthyl acetylene
first undergo Sonogashira coupling to produce 29. The
hydrogenation of triple bond inevitably leads to the partial reduction
of naphthalene units, which was rearomatized (DDQ) to give 30. The subsequent steps (hydrolysis, Friedel–Crafts cyclization,
bromination, elimination, epoxidation, aryl lithium addition, and
CF3COOH-induced rearrangement) are identical to those in Scheme to generate benz[a]anthracene derivative 33 in good yield. These
examples demonstrate that a range of PAH aldehydes can be conveniently
constructed with the rearrangement tactic.
Scheme 15
Selective Synthesis
of Benz[a]anthracene Carboxaldehyde
via Meinwald Rearrangement
1-Ethynylnaphthalene, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, Et3N. (b) 10%
palladium on charcoal, H2, MeOH/THF, then DDQ, reflux toluene.
(c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-bromosuccinimide,
benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N. (e) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, THF, (g)
CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.
Selective Synthesis
of Benz[a]anthracene Carboxaldehyde
via Meinwald Rearrangement
1-Ethynylnaphthalene, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, Et3N. (b) 10%
palladium on charcoal, H2, MeOH/THF, then DDQ, reflux toluene.
(c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-bromosuccinimide,
benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N. (e) m-CPBA,
NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, THF, (g)
CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.In summary, we have broadly explored the acid-catalyzed rearrangement
of EDCH as a module to synthesize various aromatic scaffolds. The
accessible rearrangement pathways include Meinwald ring contraction,
Nazarov cyclization, transannular aryl migration, and transannular
Friedel–Crafts cyclization. Structures of representative products
(7b, 8c, 9d, 12c, 18b) from each pathway were confirmed by X-ray crystallography.
The reactivity is chiefly modulated by substrate structures. Furthermore,
reaction temperature also has a pronounced influence on product distribution.
By screening these factors, useful mechanistic insights were acquired.
The information thus obtained can be utilized to further the scope
of this protocol. By employing this approach on more elaborated substrates,
tetracene, benz[a]anthracene, and pentacene derivatives
were prepared in a selective manner. Most notably, pentacene derivatives
of C2 and C2 symmetry can be selectively prepared.
The aldehyde group resulting from the rearrangement can serve as the
handle for further functionalization. With the versatility and adaptability
of the acid-catalyzed rearrangement, the EDCH can serve as the launching
board toward many valuable yet hard-to-access PAH systems.
To a solution of
p-bromoanisole (0.22 mL, 1.45 mmol, 3 equiv) in THF (10 mL) was added
2.5 M n-BuLi (0.58 mL, 1.45 mmol, 3 equiv) at −78
°C and the reaction was stirred for 1 h. To the mixture was added 1 (0.11 g, 0.48 mmol, 1 equiv) and the reaction was slowly
warmed back to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The mixture was
quenched by water and concentrated. The mixture was partitioned between
saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was then washed with brine, dried over
anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure.
The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to furnish 2 (0.32 g, 70%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2838, 1609, 1509,
1418, 1252, 1025, 725, 608; 1H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.95–7.94 (m, 2 H), 7.52–7.50 (m, 2
H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 4 H), 7.04–7.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.82–6.79 (d, J = 7.5 Hz,
2 H), 3.97(s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 2.17 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 145.8, 142.2,
131.7, 131.3, 128.1, 127.9, 124.2, 114.1, 78.4, 57.2, 55.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C22H18O3: 330.1256; found: 330.1258.
To a solution of 4-bromobenzotrifluoride (0.34 mL, 2.4 mmol, 2
equiv) in THF (25 mL) was added 2.5M n-BuLi (1.0
mL, 2.5 mmol, 2 equiv) at −78 °C and the mixture was stirred
for 1 h. 1 was then added to the reaction (0.27 g, 1.2
mmol, 1 equiv, in 2.0 mL THF). The reaction was warmed to room temperature
and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched by saturated NH4Cl solution and concentrated. The residue was redissolved
in CH2Cl2, and the solution was washed with
brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The
crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 3 (0.16 g, 44%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3072, 1620, 1418,
1329, 1170, 907, 849, 755; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.94–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 4H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.28 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1,
144.6, 131.9, 131.0, 130.2 (q, J = 32.7 Hz), 128.5,
128.4, 127.2, 127.1, 126.0 (q, J = 24.8 Hz), 124.1,
123.8 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 78.5, 57.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C22H16F3O2: 369.1102; found:
3369.1100.
To a solution of TIPS acetylene (0.33 mL, 3.636 mmol,
3 equiv)
in THF (25 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (1.45 mL, 3.6
mmol, 3 equiv) at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. To
the reaction mixture was added 1 (0.27 g, 1.2 mmol, 1
equiv, in 2 mL solution). The reaction was warmed back to room temperature
and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with water and concentrated.
The residue was diluted with CH2Cl2, and the
solution was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography
(hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 4 (0.37
g, 77%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2944,
2863, 1650, 1466, 1169, 880, 748, 677; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
acetone-d6) δ (ppm) 7.85 (m, 2H),
7.58–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 4H), 6.16 (s, 1H),
4.54 (s, 2H), 1.07–1.06 (m, 21H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ
145.8, 132.9, 129.1, 128.9, 123.8, 112.8, 86.0, 70.6, 58.9, 19.1,
12.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C26H33O2Si: 405.2250;
found: 405.2250.
To a THF solution
of 1 (0.27 g, 1.2 mmol in 25 mL, 1 equiv) was added 2.5
M n-BuLi (0.48 mL, 1.2 mmol, 1 equiv) at −78
°C. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for
2 h. The mixture was quenched by water, and the solvent was removed
under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the solution was washed with saturated aqueous
NH4Cl and brine. The solution was dried over anhydrous
MgSO4 and concentrated. The crude product was purified
by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 =
2:1) to give 5 (0.10 g, 30%).IR (KBr, cast) ν
(cm–1) 2963, 2858, 1464, 1375, 1174, 976, 909, 758; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.76–7.73
(m, 2H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 4H), 4.50
(s, 2H), 2.44–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.29 (s, 1H), 1.31–1.25
(m, 2 H), 1.23–1.17 (m, 2 H), 0.85 (t, 3 H, J = 7.3 Hz); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.8, 132.4, 130.5, 128.4, 127.5, 123.9, 57.7,
46.1, 26.3, 22.8, 13.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H20O2: 280.1463; found: 280.1458.
10-Butylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde
(5a)
To a CH2Cl2 solution
of 5 (0.04
g, 0.14 mmol in 5 mL, 1 equiv) was added boron trifluoride etherate
(0.072 mL, 0.28 mmol, 2 equiv) at room temperature, and the reaction
was stirred for 0.5 h. The mixture was diluted before being extracted
with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The organic portions
were further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 4:1) to give 5a (27 mg, 72%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2960, 2874, 1737, 1673, 1595, 1292, 932, 762. 1H NMR
(600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.50 (s, 1H), 8.99 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H),
7.66 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.68 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.81
(m, 2H), 1.67–1.61 (m, 2H), 1.05 (t, 3H); 13C NMR
(150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.5, 145.0, 131,8, 129.1, 128.3,125.7,
125.2, 124.2, 124.1, 33.6, 28.8, 23.5, 14.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H18O: 262.1358; found: 262.1357.
General Procedure for the
Reaction of Polycyclic Aryl Lithium
and Dibenzocycloheptanone Epoxides (1)
Aryl
bromide was dissolved in THF (∼1.0 g/20 mL), and to this solution
was added 1 equiv of n-BuLi dropwise at −78
°C. A THF solution of 1 (0.5 equiv, 1.0 g/40 mL)
was added after 1 h. The reaction was then warmed to room temperature
and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with ammonia chloride
solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were
washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude product was purified by column
chromatography to give the desired product.
General Procedure for the
BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Aryl
Dibenzocycloheptanol Epoxides ()
To a CH2Cl2 solution of aryl dibenzocycloheptanol
epoxides (6–17, 0.1 g/5 mL) was added
BF3·OEt2 (2 equiv) at room temperature
or −78 °C. The
reaction was diluted and quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution after 30 min. The organics layer was washed with brine,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product(s) was purified by flash column chromatography
to give various products.
Thiophene (340
mg, 4.05 mmol) was dissolved in THF (10 mL) at −78 °C. n-BuLi (1.6 M, 2.53 mL, 4.05 mmol) was slowly added under
N2 at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred
for 1 h at −78 °C before a THF solution of 1 (450 mg, 2.03 mmol in 10 mL) was added. The mixture was then stirred
for 3 h at room temperature before being quenched with NH4Cl solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions
were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography to give the desired product 11 (455 mg,
74%).1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ
(ppm) 7.94–7.90 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.30
(m, 4H), 7.26 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 3.6,
1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 2H), 2.35 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 155.7, 145.7, 132.0,
131.9, 128.5, 128.3, 127.1, 126.6, 125.9, 123.9, 75.1, 57.5; HRMS
(EI) m/z [M+] calcd for
C19H14O2S: 306.0715; found: 306.0708.
3-Bromothiophene
(403 mg, 2.48 mmol) was dissolved in diethyl ether (5 mL) at −78
°C. n-BuLi (2.5 M, 1 mL, 2.61 mmol) were slowly
added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C.
A THF solution of 1 (500 mg, 2.25 mmol in 5 mL) was transferred
into the reaction. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature.
It was then quenched with ammonia chloride solution and extracted
with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were washed with brine,
dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography
to give 12 (490 mg, 71%).1H NMR (600
MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.98–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.53
(m, 2H), 7.37–7.31 (m, 4H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.98–6.95
(m, 1H), 6.78–6.75 (m, 1H), 3.83 (s, 2H), 2.37 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.0, 145.9,
131.9, 131.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.0, 126.9, 123.7, 123.1, 75.2, 57.3;
HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ calcd
for C19H14O2S: 306.0715, found: 306.0708.12 (100 mg, 0.33 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), then BF3·OEt2 (93
mg, 0.65 mmol) was added at different temperatures (room temperature
or −78 °C). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min
before being quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution. The
mixture was then extracted with CH2Cl2. The
combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting
crude mixture was purified by column chromatography to give 12a, 12b, and 12c.
To a THF of bisthiophene (200 mg, 1.20 mmol in
1.5 mL) were added TMEDA (0.2 mL) and n-BuLi (2.5
M, 0.48 mL, 1.20 mmol) at −78 °C. The reaction mixture
was then stirred for 30 min at room temperature before a THF solution
of 1 (220 mg, 0.99 mmol in 1.5 mL) was added. The reaction
was stirred at room temperature for 16 h before being quenched with
NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The
combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product
was purified by flash column chromatography to give 12 (195 mg, 51%).1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.96–7.88 (2H, m), 7.57–7.51 (2H,
m), 7.35–7.28 (4H, m), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 5.0
Hz), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 3.2 Hz), 6.97–6.93 (2H,
m), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 3.7 Hz), 4.0 (2H, s), 2.48 (1H,
s); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3):
δ 154.1, 145.2, 138.6, 137.0, 132.1, 131.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.0,
126.5, 124.9, 124.1, 123.9, 123.4, 123.3, 75.3, 57.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C23H16O2S2: 388.0592; found: 388.0590.10-([2,2′-Bithiophen]-5-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (13a; Due to its low yield, 13a cannot be fully
purified. Therefore, its 13C NMR spectrum is not obtained.)1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.56 (s,
1H), 8.93 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (dt, J = 8.9, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (td, J = 6.5,
1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (td, J = 6.5, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 7.37
(d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.09
(d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.02 (m, 2H).
To a hexane solution of bisthiophene (200 mg,
1.20 mmol in 6 mL) were added TMEDA (0.45 mL, 3.01 mmol) and n-BuLi (2.5 M, 1.15 mL, 1.20 mmol). The mixture was heated
was refluxed for 1 h before a THF solution of 1 (670
mg, 3.01 mmol in 6 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature. The
reaction was stirred for 16 h at room temperature and quenched with
NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc, and
the combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product
was purified by flash column chromatography to give 14 (442 mg, 60%).1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 7.86–7.82 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.45
(m, 4H), 7.34–7.30 (m, 8H), 7.03 (d, J = 3.8
Hz 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 6.42 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.95
(s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 154.2, 146.0, 136.3, 131.9, 131.7,
128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 126.4, 123.1, 73.9, 54.9 (A few extra signals
in the 13C spectrum indicates the presence of impurities.);
HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C38H27O4S2: 611.1351; found: 611.1353.
To a THF solution of TIPSA (0.40 mL, 1.80
mmol, 6 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5M n-BuLi (0.72
mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv) at 0 °C, and the reaction was stirred
for 1 h. To the mixture was added diepoxide 20 (0.11
g, 0.30 mmol, 1 equiv in 2 mL THF). The reaction was warmed back to
room temperature and stirred for 2.5 h. The mixture was quenched by
water, and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was partitioned
between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion
was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to furnish the crude product. The intermediate
diol was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), and to
the solution was added TFA (0.046 mL, 0.60 mmol, 2 equiv). The reaction
was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. After the solvent was
removed under reduced pressure, the crude product was purified by
flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 21a (25 mg, 12%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2941, 2866, 2151, 1683, 1464, 1075, 884, 676; 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.71 (s, 2H), 10.62 (s,
2H), 8.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 2H),
1.36–1.35 (m, 42H); 13C {1H} NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.14, 133.6, 132.6, 131.1, 129.8,
128.2, 128.1, 127.1, 126.6, 124.9, 124.5, 124.2, 110.9, 103.1, 18.9,
11.5; UV (λmax, nm) = 687; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C46H55O2Si2: 695.3741; found: 695.3732.
To a THF solution of 4-bromotoluene (0.22
mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.72 mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv) at −78 °C and the
reaction was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was added 20 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol, 1 equiv) and stirred for 2.5 h. The mixture
was then quenched with water, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between water and
CH2Cl2. The organic portion was dried over anhydrous
MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to get
the crude intermediate. The diol intermediate was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and to the solution was added TFA (0.046
mL, 0.60 mmol, 2 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature
for 10 min, and the solvent was removed in vacuo.
The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 21b (41 mg, 45%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2970, 1652, 1425,
1280, 1156, 1024, 817, 752; 1H NMR (500 Mhz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.41 (s, 2H), 9.80 (s, 2H), 9.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m,
2H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.31 (m, 2H), 2.63 (s, 6 H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 192.3, 147.4, 138.4,
134.8, 133.6, 130.7, 130.3, 130.1, 129.6, 129.5, 128.6, 128.1, 125.4,
124.6, 123.9, 123.5, 21.6; UV (λmax, nm) = 667; HRMS
(MALDI) m/z [M+] calcd
for C38H26O2: 514.1933; found: 514.1941.
To a DMF solution of dimethyl
4,6-dibromoisophthalate (3.60 g, 10.3
mmol, 1 equiv in 30 mL) were added tri-n-octylphosphine
(0.38 g, 1.03 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Pd(OAc)2 (0.23 g, 1.0
mmol, 0.1 equiv). Styrene (4.72 mL, 41.2 mmol, 4 equiv) and Et3N (14.4 mL, 103 mmol, 10 equiv) were then added, and the mixture
was heated for 2 h at 110 °C. The mixture was cooled and filtered
through celite. The solvent was removed in vacuo,
and the residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 22 (2.7 g, 65%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 1716, 1634,
1435, 1290, 1231, 1105, 962; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.57 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, J =
16.5 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.2 Hz,
4H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 3.96
(s, 6H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 142.9, 137.0, 133.9, 133.3, 128.8, 128.4, 127.1,
126.7, 126.6, 125.5, 52.3; HRMS (APCI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C26H22O4: 398.1518; found: 399.1592.
Dimethyl 4,6-Diphenethylisophthalate
Dimethyl 4,6-di((E)-styryl)isophthalate (6.02
g, 15.1 mmol, 1 equiv) was
dissolved in THF (80 mL) and MeOH (50 mL), and to the solution was
added 10% Pd/C (3.24 g). A hydrogen balloon was connected to the flask,
and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solution
was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified with flash chromatography
(hex/EtOAc = 40:1) to give the reduced product as a colorless oil
(4.41 g, 70%).1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz)
δ (ppm) 8.50 (s, 1H), 7.28 (m, 4H), 7.19 (m, 6H), 6.90 (s, 1H),
3.96 (s, 6H), 3.24 (m, 4H), 2.83 (m, 4H), 13C NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.1, 147.8, 141.7, 134.8, 134.0,
128.8, 128.5, 127.2, 126.1, 52.2, 37.8, 36.8. HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C26H27O4: 403.1909, found: 403.1914.
4,6-Diphenethylisophthalic
Acid
To a THF solution of
diester (4.41 g, 10.9 mmol in 50 mL) was added 5% aqueous sodium hydroxide
(20 mL). The solution was stirred and refluxed at 80 °C overnight.
Tetrahydrofuran was removed in vacuo, and the residue
was extracted with EtOAc. The aqueous layer was acidified (pH1) with
hydrochloric acid. The white solid suspension was collected and dissolved
in EtOAc. The solution was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent
was removed to give the diacid as a white solid (3.46 g, 75%). The
crude compound was used in the next step with further purification.1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) δ (ppm) 8.56
(s, 1H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (m, 6H),
6.82 (s, 1H), 4.50 (br, 2H), 3.20 (m, 4H), 2.78 (m, 4H), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.8, 147.3, 141.5, 134.3,
134.3, 128.3, 127.9, 127.2, 125.6, 37.3, 36.4.
To a CH2Cl2 solution of diacid (3.46 g, 9.25
mmol, in 50 mL) were added a few drops of DMF and thionyl chloride
(5 mL) at 0 °C. The solution was stirred at a reflux temperature
for 2 h. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure to give
the intermediate acyl chloride. To a CH2Cl2 suspension
of AlCl3 (2.0 g in 10 mL) was added a CH2Cl2 solution of acyl chloride intermediate (15 mL over 40 min)
at 0 °C. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C for another 30
min before being warmed back to room temperature. The reaction was
quenched with hydrochloric acid after 16 h. The solution was extracted
with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic portions
were dried over MgSO4 before being concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography
to give the pentacyclic product as a yellow solid (0.50 g, 13.6%).1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.699 (s,
1H), 8.01 (dd, J = 7.8, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (m, 2H),
7.33 (m, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.5, 2H), 7.10 (s, 1H),
3.20 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ
194.3, 146.0, 141.6, 138.5, 137.2, 134.2, 132.6, 130.8, 130.5, 129.3,
126.9, 35.0, 34.7; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H19O2: 339.1385, found: 339.1392.
22
To a solution
of the product from the last step
(0.50 g, 1.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane was added N-bromosuccinimide (0.62 g, 3.5 mmol, 2.3 equiv) and benzoyl
peroxide (30 mg). The solution was stirred at 95 °C for 18 h.
The solvent was removed in vacuo to give the brominated
intermediate. The crude mixture was dissolved in benzene (10 mL),
and to the solution was added trimethylamine (2 mL). The reaction
was refluxed for 16 h. The volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with dichloromethane. After the organic
portion was concentrated, the crude mixture was purified by flash
chromatography to give 23 as a pale yellow solid (120
mg, 25%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.98
(s, 1H, Ph), 8.26 (dd, J = 8, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (m,
3H), 7.57 (m, 4H), 7.07 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.02
(d, J= 10 Hz, 2H), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.1, 138.7, 138.4, 137.3, 134.6, 134.1, 133.9,
133.1, 132.4, 131.3, 130.5, 130.4, 129.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H15O2: 335.1072, found: 335.1065.
To a MeOH solution of 3-bromo-2-naphthoic
acid (0.34 g, 1.37 mmol, 1 equiv) were added SOCl2 (2.0
mL, 27.3 mmol, 20 equiv) and a few drops of DMF. The reaction was
stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed under
reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine,
dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in
vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography
(hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give the methyl ester
(0.26 g, 73%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2950, 1732, 1454, 1280, 1200, 1111, 996, 747; 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H),
7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 2H), 3.99 (s, 3 H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6,
135.2, 133.0, 132.2, 131.0, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 127.1, 126.7, 117.0,
52.5; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C12H9BrO2: 264.9864;
found: 264.9863.
Methyl (E)-3-Styryl-2-naphthoate
(24)
To a DMF solution of methyl 3-bromo-2-naphthoate
(0.23
g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) were added tri-o-tolylphosphine (26
mg, 0.086 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Pd(OAc)2 (19 mg, 0.086 mmol,
0.1 equiv). After styrene (0.15 mL, 1.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and Et3N (1.2 mL, 8.6 mmol, 10 equiv) were added, the reaction was
refluxed at 110 °C for 2 h. The mixture was filtered through
a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2= 5:1 to 2:1) to give 24 (1.70
g, 68%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949,
1716, 1447, 1270, 1120, 1131, 1062, 743; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (t, J = 7.8 Hz,
2H), 7.63–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.49
(m, 1H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.29
(m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
167.8, 137.6, 135.5, 134.9, 132.0, 131.6, 130.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4,
127.9, 127.7, 126.9, 126.8, 126.5, 126.0, 52.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H16O2: 288.1150; found: 288.1153.
Methyl 3-Phenethyl-2-naphthoate
(25)
To
a MeOH/THF solution of 24 (1.31 g, 4.54 mmol in 10 mL/30
mL) was added 10% Pd/C (0.54 g). The reaction was stirred at room
temperature for 4 h with a H2 balloon attached. The mixture
was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was evaporated.
The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2= 5:1 to 2:1) to give 25 (1.05
g, 80%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949,
1721, 1454, 1282, 1203, 1131, 1059, 699; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.51 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s,
1H), 7.57–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.33–7.27
(m, 4H), 7.24–7.20 (m, 1H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 3.45–3.42
(m, 2H), 3.01–2.98 (m, 2H); 13C {1H}
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 142.0, 139.0, 135.0,
132.2, 131.1, 129.4, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 127.9, 127.1, 126.0,
125.8, 52.1, 38.3, 36.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H18O2: 290.1307; found: 290.1306.
3-Phenethyl-2-naphthoic Acid
To
an EtOH solution of 25 (0.84 g, 2.88 mmol in 40 mL) in
EtOH (40 mL) was added
40 mL of 10% NaOH solution (40 mL). The reaction was stirred at a
reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was evaporated in
vacuo, and the residue was acidified to pH∼1. The
acidic aqueous suspension was extracted with EtOAc, and the combined
organic portions were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give crude
acid (0.74 g, 93%). The material is used in the subsequent cyclization
reaction without further purification.IR (KBr, cast) ν
(cm–1) 2927, 1683, 1464, 1289, 1210, 1137, 745,
698; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.71
(s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 1H),
7.53–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.31–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.22–7.19
(m, 1H), 3.51–3.47 (m, 2H), 3.04–3.01 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
172.0, 142.1, 139.6, 135.5, 133.7, 131.1, 129.7, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6,
128.4, 127.1, 126.3, 126.2, 125.9, 38.3, 37.1.; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H16O2: 276.1150; found: 276.1154.
To a CH2Cl2 solution
of the acid (0.41 g, 1.47 mmol in
15 mL) were added SOCl2 (4.26 mL, 58.7 mmol) and a few
drops of DMF. The reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for
3 h. The solvent was evaporated to furnish the chloride intermediate.
To a suspension of AlCl3 (0.29 g, 2.20 mmol, 1.5 equiv)
in CH2Cl2 (150 mL) was added the acyl chloride
intermediate (dissolved in 10 mL of CH2Cl2)
at 0 °C, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for
16 h. The mixture was then washed with 1 N HCl. The organic phase
was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and
concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified
by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 =
5:1 to 2:1) to give 26 (0.26 g, 69%).IR (KBr,
cast) ν (cm–1) 2916, 1652, 1445, 1288, 1255,
943, 747, 478; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
(ppm) 8.49 (s, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H),
7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.44
(m, 2H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0
Hz, 1H), 3.37–3.29 (m, 4H); 13C {1H}
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.6, 142.6, 138.0, 137.9,
137.7, 135.2, 132.5, 131.7, 131.5, 131.0, 129.8, 129.3, 128.1, 126.9,
126.7, 126.6, 126.0, 35.8, 35.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H14O: 258.1045; found: 258.1041.
To a dichloroethane
solution of 26 (0.22 g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL)
were added N-bromosuccinimide (0.15 g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv) and benzoyl
peroxide (28 mg, 0.086 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and the reaction was stirred
at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed with saturated Na2S2O3 solution, 1 N NaOH. The organic layer was further
washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was redissolved in benzene (10 mL),
and to this solution was added Et3N (1.44 mL, 10.3 mmol,
12 equiv). The reaction was stirred at reflux temperature for another
16 h. The solvent then was removed in vacuo, and
the residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The
crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1 to 1:1) to give 27 (150
mg, 67%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3053,
1620, 1418, 1324, 1279, 888, 749, 475; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.22 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.95
(s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62–7.47
(m, 6H), 7.14 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125
MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.8, 138.1, 137.1, 134.9, 134.5,
132.5, 132.1, 132.0, 131.8, 131.2, 130.6, 130.5, 130.2, 130.0, 129.2,
128.4, 128.3, 127.6, 126.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H12O: 256.0888;
found: 256.0893.
12-(4-Chlorophenyl)tetracene-5-carbaldehyde
(28)
To a CH2Cl2 solution
of 27 (0.13 g, 0.50 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) were added
mCPBA (0.61 g,
2.48 mmol, 5 equiv) and NaHCO3 (0.21 g, 2.48 mmol, 5 equiv).
The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture
was then diluted with CH2Cl2 and extracted with
1 N NaOH. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous
MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give
the intermediate epoxide. To a THF solution of 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene
(0.28 g, 1.48 mmol, 3 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.60 mL, 1.50 mmol, 3 equiv) at −78 °C, and the
reaction was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was transferred to the crude
epoxide intermediate, and the reaction was stirred for 2.5 h at room
temperature. The mixture was quenched with water, and the solvent
was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned
between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion
was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude epoxide alcohol. This intermediate
was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL), and to this
solution was added TFA (0.038 mL, 0.5 mmol, 1 equiv). The reaction
was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The solvent was evaporated,
and the crude product was purified by flash column chromatography
(hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 28 (0.16
g, 88%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3052,
1669, 1489, 1090, 1016, 821, 740, 570; 1H NMR (500 MHz,
CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.72 (s, 1H), 9.83 (s, 1H), 8.97
(d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H),
7.68–7.61 (m, 4H), 7.51–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.40
(m, 3H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 1H); 13C {1H}
NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.0, 144.6, 136.9, 134.4,
133.4, 133.1, 132.2, 131.2, 129.2, 129.0, 128.8, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4,
127.9, 126.8, 126.7, 126.1, 125.3, 124.6, 123.4, 123.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C25H15ClO: 366.0811, found: 366.0804.
Methyl 2-(Naphthalen-1-ylethynyl)benzoate
(29)
Methyl 2-bromobenzoate (0.85 g, 3.94 mmol,
1 equiv), ethynylnaphthalene
(0.9 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.5 equiv), CuI (75 mg, 0.39 mmol, 0.1 equiv),
and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.28 g, 0.39 mmol,
0.1 equiv) were dissolved in Et3N (40 mL) in a sealed tube
under nitrogen. The reaction was refluxed for 16 h. The mixture was
filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was evaporated.
The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the
solution was extracted with water. The organic portion was washed
with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1 to 2:1) to
give 29 (1.09 g, 96%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 2210, 1728, 1486, 1294, 1086, 756, 567; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.61 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (dd, J = 8.3,
1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.82 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz,
1H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.46
(m, 1H), 7.44–7.40 (m, 1H), 4.00 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 134.2, 133.5,
133.2, 131.7, 130.7, 130.6, 129.0, 128.2, 128.0, 126.8, 126.5, 126.4,
125.3, 123.8, 121.0, 93.0, 92.6, 52.3; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C20H15O2: 287.1072; found: 287.1064.
Methyl 2-(2-(Naphthalen-1-yl)ethyl)benzoate
(30)
To a THF solution of 29 (0.54
g, 1.09 mmol,
1 equiv in 10 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (0.26 g). The mixture was placed
in a sealed autoclave that was pressurized to 150 psi of H2. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 h. The solution
was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give the reduced product. To rearomatize the
product, the raw material and DDQ (2.40 g, 10.5 mmol, 3 equiv) were
dissolved in toluene (40 mL) and the solution was refluxed for 3 h.
The reaction was filtered, and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was then purified by flash column
chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 30 (0.52 g, 51%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2950, 1715, 1599, 1434, 1258, 1127, 966, 753; 1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H),
7.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 1
H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.42 (s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0,
143.6, 138.0, 133.8, 132.0, 131.9, 131.2, 130.7, 129.6, 128.7, 126.7,
126.3, 126.1, 125.8, 125.6, 125.4, 123.9, 51.9, 35.8, 35.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H18O2: 290.1307; found: 290.1302.
2-(2-(Naphthalen-1-yl)ethyl)benzoic
Acid (30′)
To an EtOH solution of 30 (0.42 g, 1.45 mmol, 1 equiv
15 mL) was added 20% NaOH solution (15 mL), and the reaction was stirred
at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was acidified with 12N HCl to pH ∼
1 before being extracted with EtOAc. The organic portion was washed
with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give 30′ (0.41 g, 99%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3064, 1688, 1599,
1398, 1266, 1085, 777, 749; 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ (ppm) 8.38 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H),
7.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.76 (m, 1H),
7.56–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.39
(m, 3H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 1H), 3.41 (s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ
169.1, 144.8, 139.4, 135.0, 133.1, 133.0, 132.3, 131.8, 130.7, 129.5,
127.6, 127.2, 127.1, 126.8, 126.6, 126.4, 125.1, 37.1, 36.1; HRMS
(FAB) m/z [M+] calcd
for C19H16O2: 276.1150; found: 276.1151.
30′ (0.40 g, 1.45 mmol, 1 equiv) and SOCl2 (2.1 mL,
29.1 mmol, 20 equiv) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). A few drops of DMF were added, and the mixture was stirred
at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed in
vacuo to give the acyl chloride intermediate. To a suspension
of AlCl3 (0.29 g, 2.18 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (140 mL) was added a CH2Cl2 solution
of aforementioned acyl chloride (in 5 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction
was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was diluted
with CH2Cl2 and washed with 1 N HCl. The organic
portion was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product
was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1) to give 31 (0.22 g, 57%).IR (KBr,
cast) ν (cm–1) 3061, 1652, 1425, 1316, 1141,
905, 752, 524; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ
(pm) 8.21–8.19 (m, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz,
1H), 7.88–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz,
1H), 7.58–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.44 (td, J = 7.4,
1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.26
(m, 1H), 3.70–3.68 (m, 2H), 3.33–3.30 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
197.8, 140.8, 139.9, 139.2, 136.3, 135.2, 132.0, 131.3, 129.2, 128.7,
128.6, 127.6, 127.0, 126.71, 126.66, 126.0, 124.2, 33.6, 29.9; HRMS
(FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd
for C19H15O: 259.1123, found: 259.1127.
To a dichloroethane
solution of 31 (0.19 g, 0.76 mmol, 1 equiv in 20 mL)
were added N-bromosuccinimide (0.15 g, 0.83 mmol,
1.1 equiv) and benzoyl peroxide (24 mg, 0.076 mmol, 0.1 equiv). The
solution was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The mixture
was diluted with CH2Cl2 and extracted with saturated
Na2S2O3 solution, 1 N NaOH. The organic
portion was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue
was redissolved in benzene (10 mL). To this solution was added Et3N (1.27 mL, 9.10 mmol, 12 equiv), and the reaction was stirred
at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine,
dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in
vacuo. The crude compound was purified by flash column chromatography
(hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1 to 2:1) to give 32 (0.19 g, 97%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 1640, 1593, 1457, 1330, 957, 805, 774, 716; 1H NMR (500
MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.50 (d, J =
8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.13–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.99–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.69–7.55
(m, 5H), 7.34 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.7,
140.1, 138.1, 134.8, 134.6, 132.0, 131.5, 130.7, 129.8, 129.6, 129.2,
129.1, 128.7, 127.8, 127.3, 125.8, 125.7, 125.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C19H13O: 257.0966, found: 257.0971.
To a CH2Cl2 solution of 32 (60 mg, 0.24 mmol,
1 equiv in 5 mL) were added mCPBA (0.25 g, 1.19 mmol, 5 equiv) and
NaHCO3 (1.0 g, 1.19 mmol, 5 equiv), and the reaction was
stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted and
extracted with 1 N NaOH. The organic portion was then washed with
brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column
chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 1:1 to 1:4) to
give 32′ (15 mg, 26%).1H NMR
(500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.33 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.69–7.62 (m, 2H),
7.61–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.52–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.42
(m, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H) (Some extra signals are due to decomposition); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ
198.6, 139.1, 136.5, 134.8, 134.7, 131.8, 131.2, 130.6, 129.4, 129.3,
129.2, 129.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 124.4, 122.7, 62.1, 57.8; HRMS
(EI) m/z [M+] calcd for
C19H12O2: 272.0837; found: 272.0836.
7-(4-Chlorophenyl)tetraphene-12-carbaldehyde (33)
To a THF solution of 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene (14 mg, 0.073
mmol, 2 equiv in 5 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.046
mL, 0.073 mmol, 2 equiv) at −78 °C, and the reaction was
stirred for 1 h at that temperature. To the mixture was added 32′ (10 mg, 0.037 mmol, 1 equiv in 2 mL THF), and the
reaction was stirred for 2.5 h at room temperature. The reaction was
quenched with water and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and
the solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The intermediate epoxy alcohol was dissolved in
CH2Cl2 (5 mL), and TFA (0.003 mL, 0.04 mmol,
1.1 equiv) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature
for 10 min before the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 5:1) to give 33 (9 mg, 68%).IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2922, 1674, 1489,
1263, 1090, 1016, 805, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 10.62 (s, 1H), 9.35 (d, J = 9.2
Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.77–7.69 (m, 4H), 7.57–7.62
(m 3H), 7.55 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ
194.3, 141.1, 136.8, 134.2, 133.5, 132.5, 132.3, 131.8, 130.6, 129.4,
129.2, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.2, 128.1, 127.6, 127.0, 126.6,
126.4, 125.2, 124.8; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C25H16ClO: 367.0890;
found: 367.0888.
Authors: Martine Keenan; Michael J Abbott; Paul W Alexander; Tanya Armstrong; Wayne M Best; Bradley Berven; Adriana Botero; Jason H Chaplin; Susan A Charman; Eric Chatelain; Thomas W von Geldern; Maria Kerfoot; Andrea Khong; Tien Nguyen; Joshua D McManus; Julia Morizzi; Eileen Ryan; Ivan Scandale; R Andrew Thompson; Sen Z Wang; Karen L White Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Marek Grzybowski; Bartłomiej Sadowski; Holger Butenschön; Daniel T Gryko Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2019-12-03 Impact factor: 15.336