Literature DB >> 35785270

Exploring the Acid-Catalyzed Reactions of 10,11-Epoxy-Dibenzo[a,d]cycloheptan-5-ol as the Synthetic Modules toward Polycyclic Aromatic Scaffolds.

Cheng-Yi Hsu1, Cian-Jhe Zheng1, Ying-Yann Wu1, Wen-Hsuan Fan1, Chih-Hsiu Lin1.   

Abstract

The structural diversity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) offers exciting opportunities for their applications. Yet, selective synthesis of such conjugated networks poses a formidable challenge. Compared to the prominence of transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling and oxidative Scholl reactions, cationic rearrangement in the synthesis of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon is an underexplored subject. In this study, we reveal that cationic intermediate generated from epoxy dibenzocycloheptanol can be transformed into acenes, azulene-embedded PAHs, and dibenzocycloheptanone derivatives. Reactive patterns, including Meinwald rearrangement, Nazarov cyclization, transannular aryl migration, and transannular Friedel-Crafts cyclization were identified. Both substrate structures and reaction temperature affect the reaction pathways in predictable and manageable manners. A mechanistic scheme was postulated as the working model to guide the reactivity for further application. Substrates containing heterocyclic and ferrocenyl groups exhibit similar reactivity profiles. The inquiry culminates in the selective synthesis of 5, 7, 12, 14-tetrasubstituted C 2h and C 2v pentacene derivatives. Our results demonstrate that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons can be selectively prepared with this cation-initiated strategy by methodically tuning the reactivity.
© 2022 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society.

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35785270      PMCID: PMC9244947          DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c01024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACS Omega        ISSN: 2470-1343


Introduction

In the last three decades, the discoveries of fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, and graphene ignited a rapid growth in the research of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH).[1] The vast structural and property diversity of the PAH derivatives is a boundless reservoir of functions to solve real-life problems. It is long recognized that selective construction of designated PAH structures is only feasible through bottom-up stepwise synthesis. To form the C–C bonds within PAH skeletons, Diels–Alder reaction,[2] metal-catalyzed coupling,[3] and benzannulation[4] all play indispensable roles. Since Mullen’s synthesis of hexabenzocoronene,[5] intramolecular Scholl cyclization via radical cation intermediates has become the most prominent protocol to connect multiple C–C bonds in the PAH structures.[6] Recently, several reports demonstrated that Scholl cyclization can also lead to PAH products with skeletal rearrangements.[7] Inspired by these discoveries, we perceive cationic rearrangement reactions present an alternative approach toward various PAH skeletons. Yet, due to the capricious reactivity of cationic intermediates, synthetic selectivity and efficiency with rearrangement strategy must be managed via deeper mechanistic insights. This requires a systematic analysis of substrate structures, reaction products, and reaction conditions. In this manuscript, we reveal that the titled rearrangement reaction can be guided through substrate and temperature control to furnish several different classes of products, including acene derivatives, azulene-embedded PAHs, and substituted dibenzocycloheptanone. We recently discovered an oxidative ring contraction reaction of mesityl dibenzocycloheptenol to produce 9,10-disubstituted anthracene.[8] As shown in Scheme , the [6,7,6]-fused skeleton was converted into anthracene in acidic medium. Mechanistically, this reaction is peculiar because the presumed cation intermediate should be aromatic and fairly stable. However, as indicated by its facile rearrangement, this structure is readily oxidized by oxygen. Although a definitive mechanism cannot yet be verified, an epoxy dibenzocycloheptenol (EDCH-mesityl) intermediate is likely to undergo Meinwald rearrangement[9] to give the [6,6,6]-fused anthracene skeleton. Dehydration then furnishes the anthracene product. Recognizing the potential of this rearrangement, we launched an innovated synthesis of a range PAH of derivatives employing this rearrangement. Since the epoxy dibenzocycloheptenol (EDCH) is the proposed intermediate, this key structural motif is directly utilized as the precursors in the current investigation. As we were preparing this manuscript, Dr. Ploypradith reported the synthesis of 9-anthracene carboxaldehyde derivatives employing a very similar protocol (semipinacol under Dr. Ploypradith’s nomenclature).[10] In the present contribution, the substrate scope of this strategy was greatly expanded to include PAH and heterocyclic substituents. Novel reaction pathways, such as aryl migration and transannular cyclization, were also revealed in more elaborated substrates. We found the selectivity among different pathways is modulated by substrate structures as well as reaction temperature. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that this rearrangement can be applied to the selective synthesis of various PAH motifs, including pentacene derivatives of C2 and C2 symmetries. Our study provides a more comprehensive assessment of this versatile reaction and therefore is complementary to the prior contribution from Dr. Ploypradith’s group.
Scheme 1

Synthesis of 10-Aryl 9-anthracene Carboxaldehyde via Ring Contraction of [6,7,6]-Fused EDCH Scaffold

Results and Discussion

The simpler EDCH derivatives with aryl (2 and 3), alkynyl (4), and alkyl (5) substituents were first tested. (Dr. Ploypradith’s team has extensively explored such examples. The present four reactions offer moderately improved yields with convenient reagents and conditions.) The required starting compounds (2–5) were synthesized by the addition of lithium reagents to EDCH-one (1), which is prepared from dibenzocycloheptenone via epoxidation (mCPBA). Judged from the simplicity of their 1H and 13C NMR spectrum, all epoxy alcohols were produced as single diastereomers, presumably the cis isomer from the lithium reagent attacking the ketone from the opposite side of the epoxide. The cis-selectivity was assumed for all subsequent epoxy alcohols intermediates, one of which (14) was confirmed by X-ray crystallography. When these epoxy alcohols were treated with boron trifluoride etherate (BF3·OEt2) at room temperature, anthracene aldehyde products (2a–5a) were obtained in good to moderate yields. A small amount (<5%) of deformylated anthracene products was also observed in these reactions. These anthracene carboxaldehydes are convenient building blocks of more elaborated conjugated systems for curiosity and function-driven research (Scheme ).
Scheme 2

Synthesis of 10-Substituted 9-Anthracene Carboxaldehyde from EDCH Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) m-CPBA. NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; (b) R-Li, tetrahydrofuran (THF); (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2.

Synthesis of 10-Substituted 9-Anthracene Carboxaldehyde from EDCH Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) m-CPBA. NaHCO3, CH2Cl2; (b) R-Li, tetrahydrofuran (THF); (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2. After establishing the scope of BF3·OEt2-catalyzed rearrangement to construct anthracene derivatives with aldehyde and simple substituents (2a–5a), we attempted to extend this protocol to systems where PAH groups (naphthyl, anthryl, and pyrenyl) located at 10 position of 9-anthracene carboxaldehyde. As shown in Scheme a, the required naphthalene-substituted 6 and 7 were prepared by nucleophilic addition to 1 with the corresponding 1- and 2-lithiated naphthalene. The rearrangement of 6 gave the expected anthracene-naphthalene dyad product (6a) in moderate yield. Yet, a peculiar ketone product 6b (13C signal at 193.75 ppm) with an AB-type methylene (4.88 ppm and 4.13 ppm, J = 14.3 Hz) and a triaryl methine (5.96 ppm) was also isolated in comparable yield. Heteronuclear multiple bond correlation (HMBC) and heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) two-dimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopy (Figure S25) establish 6b’s hexacyclic framework where a [5,7]-fused azulene core is surrounded by four annulated six-membered rings. This structure is confirmed by X-ray crystallography. 6b is a secondary product derived from the dibenzocycloheptanone intermediate after the Meinwald rearrangement. The mechanism (Scheme b) is formally the Nazarov cyclization of a triaryl cation[11] generated from the keto-alcohol intermediate under the acidic condition. The ketone group in 6b is attached to the phenyl ring where the cyclization occurs. This unanticipated regioselectivity implies that 6b is derived from a destabilized cation intermediate. Hence, the selective formation of 6b is likely the result of kinetic control. To manage the selectivity between 6a and 6b, the reaction was also conducted at −78 °C. We found the Nazarov cyclization is shut down at a low temperature, while the oxo-bridged hemiketal 6c (hemiketal 13C chemical shift = 104.5 ppm) derived from the keto-alcohol intermediate becomes the major product (Scheme b). A similar product was previously observed in a much lower yield during the 3 → 3a transformation. Ploypradith et al. has also documented these products. When 6c is treated with BF3·OEt2 at a higher temperature (refluxed dichloroethane), 6b is produced in 75% yield. These results demonstrate that 6c can be reversibly converted into keto-alcohol intermediates. This intermediate then undergoes irreversible dehydration at higher temperatures to furnish the Nazarov cyclization product 6b. When 1-naphthyl-substituted 7 was put under identical condition, the anthracene derivative 7a and Nazarov cyclization product 7b were likewise obtained. However, when the rearrangement was performed at −78 °C, 7a becomes the sole product in slightly lower yields.
Scheme 3

(a) BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Naphthyl-EDCH (6 and 7) to Produce Anthracene Carboxaldehyde (6a and 7a), Azulene-Embedded PAHs (6b and 7b), and Oxo-Bridged Hemiketal (6c). (b) Meinwald Rearrangement toward Keto-Alcohol Intermediate and Subsequent Transformation to Various Products

(a) 1-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (b) 2-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.

(a) BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Naphthyl-EDCH (6 and 7) to Produce Anthracene Carboxaldehyde (6a and 7a), Azulene-Embedded PAHs (6b and 7b), and Oxo-Bridged Hemiketal (6c). (b) Meinwald Rearrangement toward Keto-Alcohol Intermediate and Subsequent Transformation to Various Products

(a) 1-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (b) 2-Bromonaphthalene, n-BuLi, THF −78 °C, then 1. (c) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C. To gather more information on the potential reaction pathways EDCH can undertake, EDCH containing anthryl and pyrenyl units (8 and 9) were synthesized and reacted with BF3·OEt2 at room temperature and −78 °C (Scheme ). Surprisingly, the yield for the expected bis-anthryl aldehyde 8a is only 1%. The overwhelming major products are those with the anthryl group shift to the other side of the seven-membered ring. In the low-temperature product 8c (carbonyl signal in 13C spectrum = 198.4 ppm. An alcohol type signal at 73.1 ppm is also present.) the epoxide ring opens via a concerted backside attack from the migrating anthryl moiety. This reaction pathway is consistent with the assumption that 8 is a cis-epoxy alcohol. The resulting trans stereoselectivity is confirmed by X-ray crystallography and 2D NMR (Figure S43). The room-temperature product 8b is the dehydrated form of 8c with an anthracene-dibenzocycloheptenone dyad architecture. Similar migratory reactivity was also observed for pyrene-substituted 9 (9b and 9c). Because the structural motif of 8b and 9b are also found in the skeleton of stilbenoid hemsleyanol and parviflorol, the transannular migration might be a convenient entry toward similar natural products.[12] The Meinwald rearrangement products, anthracene 9a and bridged hemiketal 9d (structure confirmed by X-ray crystallography), were also isolated in moderate yields. Notably, the yield of 9a at room temperature is uncharacteristically low despite being the sole identifiable product.
Scheme 4

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Anthryl-EDCH (8) and Pyrenyl-EDCH (9)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Anthryl-EDCH (8) and Pyrenyl-EDCH (9)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2, 25 and −78 °C. The BF3·OEt2-catalyzed rearrangement of phenanthrene-EDCH (10) reveals the most complicated reactivity pattern in this study. Fortunately, the combined yield of the seven identifiable products (10a–10g) is high enough (>85%) that a more comprehensive understanding of various reaction pathways can be extracted (Scheme ). Anthracene-phenanthrene dyad 10a and 10b are produced, yet the deformylated 10a is more prominent than in previous cases. Nazarov cyclization product (10c), bridged hemiketal (10d), and transannular aryl migration product (10e) were likewise observed. Two bridged cyclic products (10f and 10g) were identified by HMBC and HSQC 2D NMR spectroscopy (Figures S67 and S70). The bicyclic scaffolds in both compounds result from transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization. 10f is the straightforward Friedel–Crafts product (no carbonyl signal is observed in 13C spectrum and two alcohol type signals, 77.5 and 69.7 ppm, are present), while a late-stage semipinacol ring expansion leads to the [3.3.1] bicyclic ring system in 10g (carbonyl signal in 13C spectrum = 196.5 ppm. The presence of four sp3 13C signals indicates the B-ring of phenanthrene no longer contains the original olefin unit).
Scheme 5

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Phenanthrene-EDCH (10)

According to the results accumulated thus far, four reaction pathways are summarized in Scheme . Pathways A and B are the two modes of Meinwald rearrangement that produce the ring contraction aldehyde intermediate a and the dibenzocycloheptanone intermediate b. Pathways C and D are the two transannular reactions where intermediate c and d lead to the migratory and cyclization products, respectively. Several trends can be deduced from these results. (1) For substrates with nonaryl groups (4 and 5) or para-substituted phenyl groups (2 and 3) attached to EDCH, 9,10-disubstituted anthracene derivatives are the major products (pathway A). (2) Room-temperature condition usually increases the yields of the anthracene and the Nazarov cyclization products, while low temperatures enhance the production of bridged hemiketal. (3) With PAH groups attached to EDCH (8, 9, and 10), transannular reactions, including aryl migration (pathway C) and Friedel–Crafts cyclization (pathway D), can also take place. Crucial structure–activity relationships can be drawn from these trends. (1) All transformations are initiated by epoxide opening. (2) The formations of anthracene and Nazarov cyclization products are generally facilitated by higher temperatures. This observation can be attributed to the entropic factor because both reactions involve dehydration. Yet, this generic interpretation cannot explain the different product distributions between 6 and 7 (Scheme a). A more nuanced model should consider most cationic intermediates that lead to dehydration products are destabilized due to the orthogonal conformation of the aryl substituents. Consequently, these products are suppressed at lower temperatures. Yet the precursor cation toward 7a can adopt a more planar conformation, therefore the yield of 7a shows little temperature dependency. (3) On the other hand, the oxo-bridged hemiketal is favored at low temperatures because intermediate a and intermediate b are interconvertible when the former cannot dehydrate to form anthracene. (4) The pronounced temperature dependence of product distribution indicates that many intermediates are formed reversibly at low temperatures before collapsing to respective products. (5) When the ipso positions of the substituted PAH groups are nucleophilic (8 and 9), the aryl groups undergo transannular migration to furnish the aryl-substituted EDCH-one. (6) In 10 where the ortho sites of the aryl group at 6 position is also nucleophilic, transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization can take place to produce the [3.2.2] bicyclic 10f. (7) The rearrangement of 9 to 9a proceeds in low yield (11%) accompanied by substantial decomposition. The side products are attributed to the reactions between the excess nucleophilic sites (3, 6, 8 positions) and the endogenous cations.
Scheme 6

Diverse Reactivity of BF3·OEt2-Induced Skeletal Rearrangement of aryl-EDCH

A: Meiwald rearrangement + dehydration. B: Meiwald rearrangement + transannular hemiketal formation. C: Transannular aryl migration. D: Transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization.

Diverse Reactivity of BF3·OEt2-Induced Skeletal Rearrangement of aryl-EDCH

A: Meiwald rearrangement + dehydration. B: Meiwald rearrangement + transannular hemiketal formation. C: Transannular aryl migration. D: Transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization. After establishing the basic guidelines to steer the selectivity of these cationic rearrangements, the principles were tested on substrates containing heterocycles and ferrocene (11–18). 2-Thienyl (11)- and 3-thienyl (12)-substituted EDCHs were synthesized[13] and underwent BF3·OEt2-catalyzed rearrangement at room temperature and −78 °C (Scheme ). The results strongly suggest that the selectivity principles for PAH systems (6–10) are equally applicable to thienyl-EDCH substrates. Since the thienyl unit in 11 was attached through the highly nucleophilic 2-position, the transannular thienyl migration product 11b dominates at low temperatures. At room temperature, the formyl anthracene derivative 11a was generated in low yield concomitantly with unidentified polymeric side products. This temperature-reactivity profile is similar to that of 9 where the pyrenyl moiety is connected through the nucleophilic 1-position. When 3-thienyl-EDCH 12 was treated with BF3·OEt2, at room temperature, the anthracene aldehyde 12a is produced in moderate yield. However, when the reaction temperature was lowered to −78 °C, three products were isolated. Anthracene aldehyde 12a is now the minor component. The nucleophilic 2-position of thiophene undergoes transannular cyclization to furnish 12c (40%, structure confirmed by X-ray crystallography) while transannular thienyl migration product 12b was also isolated (20%). These results reinforce the aforementioned principles including (1) the temperature dependence of selectivity, (2) the correspondence of transannular reactivity to the nucleophilic sites, and (3) the commutability of intermediates at low temperatures.
Scheme 7

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Thienyl-EDCH (11 and 12)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Thienyl-EDCH (11 and 12)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C. Two more electron-rich heterocyclic systems (dithiophene and carbazole) were appended to the ECHD system (13–15), and their rearrangement reactivity was investigated (Scheme ). The mono- and disubstituted dithiophene (13 and 14) can be synthesized via selective lithiation.[14] The reactivity of 13 is identical to those of 9 and 11. The low-temperature condition leads to the migratory product (13b) in moderate yield, while the anthracene derivative (13a) is produced in low yield at room temperature. For the rearrangement of dithiophene-EDCH2 substrate (14), only a double-migratory product 14a was observed at low temperatures. The crystal structure of 14 (Supporting Information, SI) confirms the cis-epoxy alcohol configuration and close contact between the ipso and epoxide carbon (∼3 Å). Both further validate the migratory reactivity. Likewise, because the 3-position of carbazole is highly nucleophilic, the ipso migration pathway dominates the rearrangement of 15 to furnish 15a at low temperatures.
Scheme 8

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Bisthiophene-EDCH1,2 (13 and 14) and Carbazole-EDCH (15)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Bisthiophene-EDCH1,2 (13 and 14) and Carbazole-EDCH (15)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C. To reverse the effect of electron-rich aryl groups, compound 16 (3-pyridyl-EDCH) was synthesized and put under the identical reaction condition (Scheme ). The product distribution is in stark contrast to previous examples. The transannular migration that dominates the electron-rich substrates (11–15) is completely absent. Instead, Meinwald rearrangements are the only detectable pathways with the electron-deficient pyridyl substituent. The anthracene aldehyde (16a) and bridged hemiketal (16b) were generated in about 70% combined yield, while the higher reaction temperature favors the anthracene product as already inferred from previous examples.
Scheme 9

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Pyridyl-EDCH (16)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Pyridyl-EDCH (16)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C. Ferrocene is an important building block for redox-active materials because of its robust electrochemical property. Yet, there are only a few reported ferrocene-PAH conjugated systems in the literature, which mostly employed the Suzuki–Miyuara coupling.[15] With this Meinwald rearrangement protocol, we perceive the opportunity to construct anthracene-ferrocene dyad or triad molecules. The mono- and di-EDCH-substituted ferrocene (17 and 18) was synthesized via lithiated ferrocene[16] in moderate yields (Scheme ). The rearrangement of 17 furnishes the ferrocenyl-anthracene aldehyde 17a as the major product (Scheme ). The transannular cyclization product 17b was also formed at low temperatures due to the nucleophilic nature of cyclopentadiene rings. However, transannular migration product was not observed. This exception to the prior trend is likely due to the large size of the ferrocenyl group, which renders the corresponding transition-state unattainable due to steric hindrance.
Scheme 10

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH (17)

(a) Tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), n-BuLi, THF; then 1. (b) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH (17)

(a) Tetramethylethylenediamine (TMEDA), n-BuLi, THF; then 1. (b) BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C. The rearrangement of bis-EDCH ferrocene 18 exhibits more complex reactivity than its mono-substituted counterpart 17. As depicted in Scheme , the bis-anthryl 18b and its deformylated secondary product 18a were formed in about 20% combined yield. The lower yields are anticipated because the rearrangement of mono-EDCH 17 only gave 46% yield. Three hybrid rearrangement products (18c, 18d, and 18e), where the substituents on the two cyclopentadiene units differ, were also isolated in low yields. The formation of bridged hemiketal containing 18c was expected. The structures of both 18d (isolated as a mixture with 18c) and 18e were determined by comparison with 17b and 2D NMR spectroscopy (HMBS and HSQC) to contain bicyclic moieties. A transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization installs the [3.2.2] bicyclic scaffold in 18d as in 17b. In compound 18e, a different [3.2.2] bicyclic scaffold is formed from the Meinwald rearrangement intermediate (a in Scheme ).
Scheme 11

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH2 (18)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C.

BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Ferrocenyl-EDCH2 (18)

BF3·OEt2, CH2Cl2 25 and −78 °C. After screening a variety of EDCH derivatives, it can be concluded that Meinwald rearrangement grants the anthracene products more cleanly with the simple phenyl substituents at room temperature. Endowed with a deeper understanding of the protocol, we set out to synthesize novel PAH derivatives that are hitherto inaccessible by other synthetic strategies. Pentacene is the benchmark compound among organic electronic materials. Pentacene derivatives possess excellent charge-transporting capacity which enables their widespread applications in various devices.[17] However, the syntheses of pentacene derivatives in the literature are limited in their scopes.[18] Especially, access to pentacene derivatives with C2 and C2 symmetry remains a challenge.[19] A selective synthetic strategy requires that the regiochemical feature of desired product encodes in its starting materials. Since [6,7,6]-fused EDCH has been established as a precursor to anthracene skeletons, a [6,7,6,7,6]-fused pentacyclic system could lead to pentacene derivatives under proper acid catalysis. The execution of this retrosynthetic vision is depicted in Scheme . The [6,7,6,7,6]-fused 19 was synthesized from dimethyl 2,5-dibromoterephthalate via a known procedure.[20] The C2 symmetry of 19 is inherited from that of starting material. The subsequent epoxidation (19 → 20) and aryl lithium (or alkynyl lithium) addition were carried out as in Scheme . After optimizing the double Meinwald rearrangement, C2 pentacene derivatives (21a-21e) with aryl, alkynyl, and aldehyde substituents at 5, 7, 12, 14 positions were produced. BF3·OEt2 is replaced by CF3COOH to provide cleaner products after the double-ring contraction. This strategy achieves the selective synthesis of several C2 pentacene derivatives in useful yields from a readily accessible common intermediate (20).
Scheme 12

Selective Synthesis of C2 Pentacene Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium or alkynyl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.

Selective Synthesis of C2 Pentacene Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium or alkynyl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2. When the identical reaction sequence (epoxidation, aryl lithium addition, and CF3COOH) was applied to a [6,7,6,7,6]-fused precursor with C2 symmetry, pentacene derivatives of C2 symmetry should emerge. The realization of this plan is presented in Scheme . Compound 22 was synthesized from dimethyl 4,6-dibromoisophthalate with the same protocol as that employed for 19. After 22 was treated sequentially with mCPBA, aryl lithium, and CF3COOH, three pentacene derivatives (23a, 23b, and 23c) were generated without isolating the intermediates. For these C2 pentacene derivatives, the protons at 6 and 13 positions show weak but measurable spin–spin coupling (J ∼ 1 Hz). The observation of such peculiar long-range J-5 couplings can be attributed to the pronounced aromatic character of the central ring.[21]
Scheme 13

Selective Synthesis of C2 Pentacene Derivatives via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.

(a) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, CH2Cl2. (b) Aryl lithium, THF, −78 °C. (c) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2. Two more PAH derivatives were synthesized to test the scope of this new strategy. As shown in Scheme , the synthesis of tetracene derivative 28 started from the Heck coupling of methyl 3-bromo-2-naphthoate (prepared via palladium-catalyzed ortho bromination)[22] with styrene. The olefin unit in 24 was then hydrogenated (25) to facilitate the subsequent Friedel–Crafts cyclization. After the methyl ester was hydrolyzed, Friedel–Crafts cyclization (SOCl2/AlCl3) furnished the [6,6,7,6]-fused 26. The double bond was then reinstated (N-bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide/Et3N) to give 27. The standard reaction sequence (epoxidation, aryl lithium addition, CF3COOH) was then conducted to furnish tetracene 28 in moderate yield.
Scheme 14

Selective Synthesis of Tetracene Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) Styrene, Pd(OAc)2, P(o-tolyl)3, Et3N, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). (b) 10% palladium on charcoal, H2. MeOH/THF. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-Bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N, (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, (g) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.

Selective Synthesis of Tetracene Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement

(a) Styrene, Pd(OAc)2, P(o-tolyl)3, Et3N, N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF). (b) 10% palladium on charcoal, H2. MeOH/THF. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-Bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N, (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, (g) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2. Compound 33 was chosen as the next target to test whether it is feasible to construct angular fused PAH through ring contraction. As shown in Scheme , methyl 2-bromobenzoic acid and 1-naphthyl acetylene first undergo Sonogashira coupling to produce 29. The hydrogenation of triple bond inevitably leads to the partial reduction of naphthalene units, which was rearomatized (DDQ) to give 30. The subsequent steps (hydrolysis, Friedel–Crafts cyclization, bromination, elimination, epoxidation, aryl lithium addition, and CF3COOH-induced rearrangement) are identical to those in Scheme to generate benz[a]anthracene derivative 33 in good yield. These examples demonstrate that a range of PAH aldehydes can be conveniently constructed with the rearrangement tactic.
Scheme 15

Selective Synthesis of Benz[a]anthracene Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement

1-Ethynylnaphthalene, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, Et3N. (b) 10% palladium on charcoal, H2, MeOH/THF, then DDQ, reflux toluene. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N. (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, THF, (g) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2.

Selective Synthesis of Benz[a]anthracene Carboxaldehyde via Meinwald Rearrangement

1-Ethynylnaphthalene, Pd(PPh3)2Cl2, CuI, Et3N. (b) 10% palladium on charcoal, H2, MeOH/THF, then DDQ, reflux toluene. (c) NaOH, H2O/EtOH, then SOCl2, then AlCl3, CH2Cl2. (d) N-bromosuccinimide, benzoyl peroxide, then Et3N. (e) m-CPBA, NaHCO3, (f) p-Li-C4H4-Cl, THF, (g) CF3COOH, CH2Cl2. In summary, we have broadly explored the acid-catalyzed rearrangement of EDCH as a module to synthesize various aromatic scaffolds. The accessible rearrangement pathways include Meinwald ring contraction, Nazarov cyclization, transannular aryl migration, and transannular Friedel–Crafts cyclization. Structures of representative products (7b, 8c, 9d, 12c, 18b) from each pathway were confirmed by X-ray crystallography. The reactivity is chiefly modulated by substrate structures. Furthermore, reaction temperature also has a pronounced influence on product distribution. By screening these factors, useful mechanistic insights were acquired. The information thus obtained can be utilized to further the scope of this protocol. By employing this approach on more elaborated substrates, tetracene, benz[a]anthracene, and pentacene derivatives were prepared in a selective manner. Most notably, pentacene derivatives of C2 and C2 symmetry can be selectively prepared. The aldehyde group resulting from the rearrangement can serve as the handle for further functionalization. With the versatility and adaptability of the acid-catalyzed rearrangement, the EDCH can serve as the launching board toward many valuable yet hard-to-access PAH systems.

Experimental Section

1a,10b-Dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-one (1)

A solution of 5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (0.10 g, 0.48 mmol, 1 equiv) and mCPBA (0.6 g, 2.42 mmol, 5 equiv) in dry CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was then extracted with 1 N NaOH solution. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude compound was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 1:1) to give 1 (90 mg, 87%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3070, 1671, 1601, 1299, 1158, 933, 753, 635; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.63 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.56–7.50 (m, 4 H,), 7.44 (dt, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 4.46 (s, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.9, 138.4, 134.8, 131.4, 129.8, 129.3, 128.4, 61.7; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C15H11O2: 223.0759; found: 223.0755.

6-(4-Methoxyphenyl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (2)

To a solution of p-bromoanisole (0.22 mL, 1.45 mmol, 3 equiv) in THF (10 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.58 mL, 1.45 mmol, 3 equiv) at −78 °C and the reaction was stirred for 1 h. To the mixture was added 1 (0.11 g, 0.48 mmol, 1 equiv) and the reaction was slowly warmed back to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The mixture was quenched by water and concentrated. The mixture was partitioned between saturated aqueous NH4Cl solution and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was then washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to furnish 2 (0.32 g, 70%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2838, 1609, 1509, 1418, 1252, 1025, 725, 608; 1H NMR (500 MHz; CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.95–7.94 (m, 2 H), 7.52–7.50 (m, 2 H), 7.35–7.29 (m, 4 H), 7.04–7.01 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 6.82–6.79 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2 H), 3.97(s, 3H), 3.69 (s, 2H), 2.17 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 145.8, 142.2, 131.7, 131.3, 128.1, 127.9, 124.2, 114.1, 78.4, 57.2, 55.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C22H18O3: 330.1256; found: 330.1258.

10-(4-Methoxyphenyl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (2a)

To a solution of 2 (0.14 g, 0.42 mmol, 1 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) was added boron trifluoride ethyl etherate (0.21 mL, 0.85 mmol, 2 equiv) at −78 °C and the reaction was stirred for 0.5 h. The mixture was then diluted and extracted with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated under reduced pressure. The crude compound was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 4:1) to give 2a (54 mg, 41%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2839, 1672, 1604, 1511, 1247, 1034, 831, 764; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.6 (s, 1H), 9.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.77 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.68–7.64 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.33–7.30 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.15–7.12 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 193.4, 159.4, 145.5, 131.8, 131.8, 130.3, 130.2, 128.6, 128.1, 125.4, 124.9, 123.5, 113.9, 55.4; HRMS (EI) m/z for [M+] calcd for C22H16O: 312.1150; found: 312.1146.

6-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta [1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (3)

To a solution of 4-bromobenzotrifluoride (0.34 mL, 2.4 mmol, 2 equiv) in THF (25 mL) was added 2.5M n-BuLi (1.0 mL, 2.5 mmol, 2 equiv) at −78 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. 1 was then added to the reaction (0.27 g, 1.2 mmol, 1 equiv, in 2.0 mL THF). The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched by saturated NH4Cl solution and concentrated. The residue was redissolved in CH2Cl2, and the solution was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 3 (0.16 g, 44%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3072, 1620, 1418, 1329, 1170, 907, 849, 755; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.94–7.93 (m, 2H), 7.57 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.52 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 4H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.66 (s, 2H), 2.28 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 153.1, 144.6, 131.9, 131.0, 130.2 (q, J = 32.7 Hz), 128.5, 128.4, 127.2, 127.1, 126.0 (q, J = 24.8 Hz), 124.1, 123.8 (q, J = 273.3 Hz), 78.5, 57.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C22H16F3O2: 369.1102; found: 3369.1100.

10-(4-(Trifluoromethyl)phenyl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (3a)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 3 (0.10 g, 0.27 mmol, 1 equiv, in 5 mL) was added boron trifluoride etherate (0.14 mL, 0.54 mmol, 2 equiv) at room temperature, and the reaction was stirred for 0.5 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution and diluted with CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 4:1) to give 3a (67 mg, 70%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 1678, 1616, 1327, 1169, 1121, 1068, 837, 621; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.58 (s, 1H), 9.00 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.66 (m, 2 H), 7.60 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.54 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.46–7.43 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.4, 143.1, 142.2, 131.4, 131.1, 130.4 (q, J = 32.6 Hz), 129.6, 128.7, 127.4, 126.0, 125.8, 125.3 (q, J = 3.6 Hz), 124.2 (q, J = 317.8 Hz), 123.6; HRMS (EI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C22H14F3O: 351.0997; found: 351.0989.

6-((Triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta [1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (4)

To a solution of TIPS acetylene (0.33 mL, 3.636 mmol, 3 equiv) in THF (25 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (1.45 mL, 3.6 mmol, 3 equiv) at 0 °C and the mixture was stirred for 1 h. To the reaction mixture was added 1 (0.27 g, 1.2 mmol, 1 equiv, in 2 mL solution). The reaction was warmed back to room temperature and stirred for 3 h. The reaction was quenched with water and concentrated. The residue was diluted with CH2Cl2, and the solution was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 4 (0.37 g, 77%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2944, 2863, 1650, 1466, 1169, 880, 748, 677; 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ (ppm) 7.85 (m, 2H), 7.58–7.56 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.26 (m, 4H), 6.16 (s, 1H), 4.54 (s, 2H), 1.07–1.06 (m, 21H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 145.8, 132.9, 129.1, 128.9, 123.8, 112.8, 86.0, 70.6, 58.9, 19.1, 12.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C26H33O2Si: 405.2250; found: 405.2250.

10-((Triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (4a)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 4 (0.15 g, 0.37 mmol in 5 mL, 1 equiv) was added boron trifluoride etherate (0.19 mL, 0.75 mmol, 2 equiv) at room temperature, and the reaction was stirred for 0.5 h. The reaction was quenched with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution and diluted with CH2Cl2. The organic layer was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude compound was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 4a (84 mg, 59%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2946, 2863, 2137, 1681, 1463, 1263, 1078, 882; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.48 (s, 1H), 8.93–8.91 (m, 2H), 8.75–8.73 (m, 2H), 7.70–7.67 (m, 2H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 2H), 1.29–1.27 (m, 21H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.04, 132.27, 131.16, 128.89, 127.73, 126.72, 125.68, 125.194, 123.84, 108.05, 102.83, 18.84, 11.46; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C26H31OSi: 387.2144; found: 387.2141.

6-Butyl-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (5)

To a THF solution of 1 (0.27 g, 1.2 mmol in 25 mL, 1 equiv) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.48 mL, 1.2 mmol, 1 equiv) at −78 °C. The reaction was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 2 h. The mixture was quenched by water, and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the solution was washed with saturated aqueous NH4Cl and brine. The solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 5 (0.10 g, 30%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2963, 2858, 1464, 1375, 1174, 976, 909, 758; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.76–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 4H), 4.50 (s, 2H), 2.44–2.41 (m, 2H), 2.29 (s, 1H), 1.31–1.25 (m, 2 H), 1.23–1.17 (m, 2 H), 0.85 (t, 3 H, J = 7.3 Hz); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 145.8, 132.4, 130.5, 128.4, 127.5, 123.9, 57.7, 46.1, 26.3, 22.8, 13.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H20O2: 280.1463; found: 280.1458.

10-Butylanthracene-9-carbaldehyde (5a)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 5 (0.04 g, 0.14 mmol in 5 mL, 1 equiv) was added boron trifluoride etherate (0.072 mL, 0.28 mmol, 2 equiv) at room temperature, and the reaction was stirred for 0.5 h. The mixture was diluted before being extracted with saturated aqueous NaHCO3 solution. The organic portions were further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 4:1) to give 5a (27 mg, 72%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2960, 2874, 1737, 1673, 1595, 1292, 932, 762. 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.50 (s, 1H), 8.99 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 8.37 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 3.68 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 1.86–1.81 (m, 2H), 1.67–1.61 (m, 2H), 1.05 (t, 3H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.5, 145.0, 131,8, 129.1, 128.3,125.7, 125.2, 124.2, 124.1, 33.6, 28.8, 23.5, 14.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H18O: 262.1358; found: 262.1357.

General Procedure for the Reaction of Polycyclic Aryl Lithium and Dibenzocycloheptanone Epoxides (1)

Aryl bromide was dissolved in THF (∼1.0 g/20 mL), and to this solution was added 1 equiv of n-BuLi dropwise at −78 °C. A THF solution of 1 (0.5 equiv, 1.0 g/40 mL) was added after 1 h. The reaction was then warmed to room temperature and stirred overnight. The reaction was quenched with ammonia chloride solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography to give the desired product.

General Procedure for the BF3·OEt2-Catalyzed Rearrangement of Aryl Dibenzocycloheptanol Epoxides ()

To a CH2Cl2 solution of aryl dibenzocycloheptanol epoxides (6–17, 0.1 g/5 mL) was added BF3·OEt2 (2 equiv) at room temperature or −78 °C. The reaction was diluted and quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution after 30 min. The organics layer was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product(s) was purified by flash column chromatography to give various products.

6-(Naphthalen-1-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (6)

65%, 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.13(brs, 1H), 7.97 (brs, 1H), 7.81 (dd, J = 8.0, 3.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (brs, 2H), 7.40–7.32 (m, 5H), 7.29 (brs, 2H), 7.14 (t, J =7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.68 (brs, 1H), 3.21 (brs, 1H), 2.64 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 147.5, 146.9, 143.2, 135.2, 131.6, 130.4, 130.1, 129.1, 128.7, 128.0, 126.9, 126.0, 125.7, 125.7, 124.8, 123.5, 79.8, 58.3, 55.5 (The extra signal is due to rotamers.); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C25H18O2: 350.1307; found: 350.1306.

10-(Naphthalen-1-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (6a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.63 (s, 1H), 9.03 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (m, 1H), 7.64 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.50–7.44 (m, 4H), 7.30 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.22–7.17 (m, 1H), 6.97 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.7, 143.9, 135.9, 133.7, 133.1, 131.8, 130.8, 128.9, 128.8, 128.5, 128.2, 126.8, 126.4, 125.9, 125.6, 123.7 (3 signals missing); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C25H17O = 333.1279, found: 333.1274.

10,15b-Dihydro-11H-benzo[a]benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2,3-jk]fluoren-11-one (6b)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.05–7.95 (m, 5H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.54–7.45 (m, 3H), 7.39 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.16 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.95 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.70 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 5.96 (s, 1H), 4.88 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H), 4.13 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.7, 149.0, 141.1, 139.0, 138.7, 138.4, 134.0, 133.7, 131.5, 130.9, 130.0, 129.6, 129.3, 128.3, 127.4, 127.3, 126.9, 126.9, 126.2, 125.9, 125.7, 124.6, 119.0, 51.6, 51.5; HRMS (ESI) m/z [M+Na+] calcd for C25H16ONa: 355.1093; found: 355.1091.

5-(Naphthalen-1-yl)-5,11-dihydro-10H-5,10-epoxydibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-10-ol (6c)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.28 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.46 (m, 3H), 7.38 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.34 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.21 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.57 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 3.69 (1H, d, J = 16.3 Hz), 3.51 (1H, s), 3.04 (1H, d, J = 16.3 Hz); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.6, 142.9, 141.1, 135.3, 132.9, 132.8, 131.9, 130.4, 130.0, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 127.8, 126.9, 126.8, 126.5, 125.7, 125.7, 124.6, 124.0, 122.8, 121.6, 104.5, 89.3, 39.2; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C25H19O2: 351.1385, found: 351.1382.

6-(Naphthalen-2-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (7)

82%, 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.99 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (s, 1H), 7.52 (dd, J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (td, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (td, J = 7.5, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 3.61 (2H, s), 2.23 (1H, s); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.0, 145.6, 133.4, 132.9, 131.9, 131.4, 129.2, 128.5, 128.5, 128.2, 127.8, 126.8, 126.6, 125.7, 125.0, 124.4, 79.2, 57.3; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C25H18O2: 350.1307; found: 350.1297.

10-(Naphthalen-2-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (7a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.60 (s, 1H), 9.02 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.91–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (td, J = 7.5, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (td, J = 7.2, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (dd, J = 8.2, 1.6 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (dd, J = 6.7, 0.8 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (dd, J = 6.4, 0.9 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.5, 145.5, 135.8, 133.3, 133.0, 131.8, 130.2, 129.8, 128.8, 128.7, 128.2, 128.1, 126.9, 126.7, 125.7, 125.3, 123.6 (missing two signals); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C25H17O: 333.1279; found: 333.1278.

8,13b-Dihydro-9H-benzo[c]benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2,3-jk]fluoren-9-one (7b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.71 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 8.48 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.03 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 8.0 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 1H), 7.60 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (t, J =7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.21–7.16 (m, 1H), 7.05 (m, 2H), 5.66 (s, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 14.2 Hz, 1H), 4.07 (d, J = 14.3 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.8, 149.2, 141.6, 141.6, 138.5, 136.0, 134.0, 132.9, 130.1, 129.8, 129.6, 128.8, 128.4, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 127.3, 126.4, 126.0, 124.9, 124.1, 123.7, 52.2, 51.5 (one signal missing); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C25H16O: 332.1201; found: 332.1207.

6-(Anthracen-9-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (8)

(71%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.45 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.35 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.15 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.05 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 6.92 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 3.43 (s, 1H), 2.26 (s, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 150.9, 138.0, 132.1, 131.3, 130.2, 130.0, 129.7, 128.7, 128.6, 127.5, 125.6, 124.7, 124.2, 122.1, 79.9, 55.8; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1468.

[9,9′-Bianthracene]-10-carbaldehyde (8a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.70 (s, 1H), 9.07 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.70 (s, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.64 (dd, J = 6.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 6.0, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.12 (m, 6H), 6.99 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.8, 142.5, 132.2, 131.8, 131.5, 131.4, 131.4, 129.0, 128.1, 128.1, 128.0, 126.5, 126.4, 126.2, 125.9, 125.6, 123.9; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C29H19O: 383.1436; found: 383.1437.

10-(Anthracen-9-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (8b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.55 (s, 1H), 8.17 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 8.06 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.48 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 3H), 7.35 (t, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.23 (s, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.4, 140.0, 139.3, 138.8, 137.3, 136.5, 135.0, 134.5, 132.1, 131.9, 131.7, 130.8, 130.4, 129.8, 129.8, 129.2, 129.1, 128.7, 127.4, 126.5, 126.4, 125.5 (1 signal missing); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C29H19O: 383.1436; found: 383.1437.

10-(Anthracen-9-yl)-11-hydroxy-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (8c)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.50 (s, 1H), 8.41 (brs, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 8.10 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (dd, J = 7.0, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (brs, 1H), 7.54 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 1H), 7.49–7.42 (m, 1H), 7.42–7.36 (m, 3H), 7.30 (brs, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.09 (td, J = 8.1, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.02 (brs, 1H), 6.66 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 6.21 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 5.93 (dd, J = 8.6, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 1.82 (d, J = 2.2 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.4, 142.9, 140.7, 139.3, 136.6, 133.0, 131.8, 131.7, 131.1, 130.3, 129.7, 129.5, 128.8, 128.1, 127.4, 127.3, 127.3, 126.6, 125.6, 125.4, 125.2, 124.8, 123.7, 123.6, 123.5, 73.1, 52.1 (Some extra signals are due to the presence of rotamers.); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1457.

6-(Pyren-1-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (9)

(55%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.23 (brs, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.05–7.99 (m, 3H), 7.97 (m, 2H), 7.88 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.73 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (brs, 1H), 7.46–7.38 (m, 2H), 7.29 (brs, 3H), 3.57 (brs, 1H), 3.0 (brs, 1H), 2.83 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 140.8, 131.7, 131.3, 130.3, 128.7, 128.4, 128.3, 128.0, 127.2, 126.4, 126.3, 126.1, 125.6, 125.4, 124.7, 124.5, 124.4, 123.5, 80.1, 58.0, 55.7 (lack 3 signals, due to the signal overlapping); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C31H20O2: 424.1463; found: 424.1458.

10-(Pyren-1-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (9a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.68 (1H, s), 9.08 (d, J = 9.1 Hz, 2H), 8.38 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (m, 2H), 8.12 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.28–7.20 (m, 3H, overlapping with CHCl3 signal); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.7, 144.3, 133.1, 131.8, 131.6, 131.5, 131.1, 131.1, 130.5, 129.0, 128.8, 128.4, 128.3, 128.25, 128.18, 127.5, 126.5, 126.0, 125.9, 125.7, 125.4, 124.9, 124.8, 123.8, 123.7; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C31H19O: 407.1436; found: 407.1437.

10-(Pyren-1-yl)-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (9b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.26 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.21 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.15–8.11 (m, 4H), 8.05 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.0 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.64 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (s, 1H), 7.23 (m, 2H), 6.92 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.6, 141.5, 140.2, 139.3, 138.8, 136.8, 134.5, 134.1, 132.0, 131.5, 131.5, 131.2, 131.0, 130.8, 130.4, 129.5, 129.1, 129.1, 129.0, 128.1, 128.1, 127.9, 127.5, 126.4, 125.6, 125.4, 125.3, 125.1, 125.0, 124.9 (one signal missing); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C31H19O: 407.1436; found: 407.1445.

10-Hydroxy-11-(pyren-1-yl)-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (9c)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.61 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 8.28–8.22 (m, 3H), 8.19 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.41–7.36 (m, 2H), 7.25 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.11–7.08 (m, 1H), 6.90 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.83 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 6.24 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.18 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 1H), 2.76 (brs, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 197.2, 140.6, 140.2, 139.2, 138.1, 134.6, 133.4, 133.3, 131.5, 130.9, 130.8, 130.2, 130.0, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.2, 127.6, 127.5, 127.1, 126.2, 125.7, 125.3, 125.1, 124.9, 124.80, 122.2, 76.8, 52.9; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C31H20O2: 424.1463; found: 424.1458.

5-(Pyren-1-yl)-5,11-dihydro-10H-5,10-epoxydibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-10-ol (9d)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.77 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.22 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.18 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 8.12–8.09 (m, 3H), 7.98 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.26 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.50 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 3.87 (brs, 1H), 3.75 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.6, 143.6, 141.1, 132.9, 132.3, 131.3, 130.6, 130.4, 130.1, 129.1, 128.3, 127.9, 127.4, 127.4, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.3, 126.2, 125.7, 125.4, 124.7, 124.2, 124.1, 122.9, 121.6, 104.8, 89.7, 39.3; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M + H+] calcd for C31H20O2: 424.1463; found: 424.1462.

6-(Phenanthren-9-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (10)

(74%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.68 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 8.63 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 8.16 (brs, 1H), 8.0 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 2H), 7.69–7.60 (m, 3H), 7.53 (m, 3H), 7.38 (m, 3 Hz), 7.30–7.19 (3H, m), 3.68 (1H, brs), 3.23 (1H, brs), 2.89 (1H, s); 13C {1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.2, 146.7, 141.3, 131.9, 131.6, 130.7, 130.4, 129.3, 129.2, 128.7, 128.3, 128.1, 127.7, 127.0, 126.9, 126.4, 126.1, 123.6, 123.2, 122.4, 79.8, 58.1, 55.2 (The two broad signals at 58.12 and 55.20 are due to rotamers); HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1468.

9-(Anthracen-9-yl)phenanthrene (10a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.85 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.59 (s, 1H), 8.09 (2d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (s, 1H), 7.75 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.22 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.12(d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H) The spectrum is identical with the reported values; HRMS (FAB): m/z [M+] calcd for C28H18: 354.1409; found: 354.1404.

10-(Phenanthren-9-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (10b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.65 (s, 1H), 9.04 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.86 (d, J = 8.3, 3.6 Hz, 2H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (1H, s), 7.69 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.67–7.62 (m, 3H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.31–7.26 (m, 3H), 7.04 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.7, 143.8, 134.6, 132.2, 131.8, 131.5, 130.8, 130.6, 130.6, 129.7, 129.0, 128.9, 128.2, 127.42, 127.4, 127.3, 127.2, 127.1, 126.0, 125.7, 123.8, 123.1, 122.9; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C29H19O: 383.1436; found: 383.1442.

12,17b-Dihydro-13H-dibenzo[3,4:7,8]azuleno[1,2-l]phenanthren-13-one (10c)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.90–8.85 (m, 1H), 8.83–8.80 (m, 1H), 8.79 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.50 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.99 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.80–7.75 (m, 2H), 7.74 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (m, 2H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.89 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.58 (d, J =7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.86 (s, 1H), 4.84 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H), 4.14 (d, J = 14.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.8, 149.9, 141.7, 139.4, 138.8, 135.1, 134.0, 131.6, 131.2, 130.7, 129.9, 129.1, 128.9, 128.4, 127.6, 127.4, 127.4, 127.1, 127.0, 126.8, 126.7, 126.4, 126.4, 124.5, 124.0, 123.6, 51.6, 51.5; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C29H18O: 383.1436; found: 383.1434.

5-(Phenanthren-9-yl)-5,11-dihydro-10H-5,10-epoxydibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-10-ol (10d)

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.76–8.66 (m, 2H), 8.56 (s, 1H), 8.0 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.62 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.55 (m, 2H), 7.44 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.37 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.10–6.99 (m, 2H), 6.80 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.70 (d, J = 16.3 Hz, 1H), 3.65 (s, 1H), 3.04 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 147.4, 142.6, 141.0, 132.8, 132.0, 131.3, 131.2, 130.9, 130.2, 130.1, 129.6, 129.4, 129.1, 128.7, 127.9, 127.7, 127.0, 126.9, 126.5, 126.4, 126.1, 123.9, 122.9, 122.8, 122.6, 121.6, 104.7, 89.2, 39.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1464.

10-Hydroxy-11-(phenanthren-9-yl)-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (10e)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.76 (d, J = 9.4 Hz, 1H), 8.58 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.43 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 8.25–8.21 (m, 1H), 7.77–7.70 (m, 2H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.52 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.40–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (td, J = 7.5, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.13–7.10 (m, 1H), 6.93 (td, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 6.61 (s, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 5.89 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 5.48 (d, J = 5.6 Hz, 1H), 2.74 (brs, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 197.1, 140.5, 139.8, 139.4, 138.0, 135.3, 133.3, 131.3, 131.1, 130.8, 130.5, 130.1, 129.9, 129.6, 129.0, 128.6, 128.6, 127.5, 127.5, 127.1, 126.8, 126.7, 126.7, 126.6, 123.8, 123.4, 123.3, 75.9, 52.9; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1461.

14,15-Dihydro-9H-9,15-[1,2]benzenobenzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-l]phenanthrene-9,14-diol (10f)

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 9.44 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 8.73–8.65 (m, 2H), 8.51 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.19 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 7.71 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.65 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61–7.51 (m, 3H), 7.35–7.28 (m, 3H), 7.22 (m, 1H), 7.13 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (d, J = 3.4 Hz, 1H), 4.88 (dd, J = 11.0, 3.4 Hz, 1H), 3.06 (1H, s), 1.92 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.8, 141.6, 141.1, 136.6, 133.3, 132.4, 131.2, 130.7, 130.6, 129.1, 128.6, 128.5, 127.9, 127.7, 127.6, 127.5, 127.3, 126.9, 126.6, 126.2, 126.2, 123.5, 123.4, 123.4, 121.8, 121.2, 77.5, 69.7, 47.5; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1457

15-Hydroxy-14,14a-dihydro-9H-8b,14-([1,2]benzenomethano)benzo[f]tetraphen-9-one (10g)

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 9.20 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.76 (m, 2H), 7.71 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.62–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.37 (m, 3H), 7.37–7.25 (m, 3H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08–6.96 (m, 2H), 5.35–5.25 (m, 1H), 4.57–4.49 (brs, 1H), 4.17 (s, 1H), 1.40 (d, J = 11.7, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 196.5, 139.8, 137.3, 136.1, 134.8, 134.7, 134.0, 133.8, 133.4, 131.9, 131.0, 130.2, 129.4, 128.8, 128.7, 128.5, 128.2, 128.1 (×2), 127.7, 127.6, 127.5, 125.6, 125.2, 124.3, 65.9, 51.6, 43.8, 41.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C29H20O2: 400.1463; found: 400.1463.

6-(Thiophen-2-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (11)

Thiophene (340 mg, 4.05 mmol) was dissolved in THF (10 mL) at −78 °C. n-BuLi (1.6 M, 2.53 mL, 4.05 mmol) was slowly added under N2 at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C before a THF solution of 1 (450 mg, 2.03 mmol in 10 mL) was added. The mixture was then stirred for 3 h at room temperature before being quenched with NH4Cl solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography to give the desired product 11 (455 mg, 74%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.94–7.90 (m, 2H), 7.55–7.50 (m, 2H), 7.32–7.30 (m, 4H), 7.26 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 6.91 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (dd, J = 3.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 2H), 2.35 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 155.7, 145.7, 132.0, 131.9, 128.5, 128.3, 127.1, 126.6, 125.9, 123.9, 75.1, 57.5; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H14O2S: 306.0715; found: 306.0708.

10-(Thiophen-2-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (11a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.55 (s, 1H), 8.93 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.68–7.61 (m, 3H), 7.46 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.31 (dd, J = 5.0, 2.7 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (d, J = 2.7 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.7, 138.1, 137.4, 131.7, 131.4, 129.9, 128.8, 127.8, 127.4, 126.4, 126.1, 123.6 (one signal missing); HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C19H13OS: 289.0687; found: 289.0692.

10-Hydroxy-11-(thiophen-2-yl)-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (11b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.07 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.47 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.35–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.28 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.06–7.01 (m, 2H), 6.71 (dd, J = 5.1, 3.6 Hz, 1H), 6.40 (d, J = 3.5 Hz, 1H), 5.29–5.26 (m, 1H), 5.16 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 2.47 (brs, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.6, 143.9, 139.1, 138.9, 138.2, 137.6, 132.9, 132.7, 131.7, 130.3, 129.7, 129.4, 128.8, 127.6, 126.5, 126.1, 124.9, 77.8, 52.2; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H14O2S: 306.0715; found: 306.0713.

6-(Thiophen-3-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (12)

3-Bromothiophene (403 mg, 2.48 mmol) was dissolved in diethyl ether (5 mL) at −78 °C. n-BuLi (2.5 M, 1 mL, 2.61 mmol) were slowly added. The reaction mixture was stirred for 1 h at −78 °C. A THF solution of 1 (500 mg, 2.25 mmol in 5 mL) was transferred into the reaction. The mixture was stirred overnight at room temperature. It was then quenched with ammonia chloride solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude product was purified by column chromatography to give 12 (490 mg, 71%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.98–7.94 (m, 2H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.31 (m, 4H), 7.30–7.27 (m, 1H), 6.98–6.95 (m, 1H), 6.78–6.75 (m, 1H), 3.83 (s, 2H), 2.37 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 152.0, 145.9, 131.9, 131.5, 128.3, 128.1, 127.0, 126.9, 123.7, 123.1, 75.2, 57.3; HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ calcd for C19H14O2S: 306.0715, found: 306.0708. 12 (100 mg, 0.33 mmol) was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), then BF3·OEt2 (93 mg, 0.65 mmol) was added at different temperatures (room temperature or −78 °C). The reaction mixture was stirred for 30 min before being quenched with saturated NaHCO3 solution. The mixture was then extracted with CH2Cl2. The combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The resulting crude mixture was purified by column chromatography to give 12a, 12b, and 12c.

10-(Thiophen-3-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (12a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.54 (s, 1H), 8.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.81 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.67–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.60 (dd, J = 4.9, 3.0 Hz, 1H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.38 (dd, J = 3.0, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (dd, J = 4.9, 1.2 Hz, 1H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 140.8, 138.0, 131.7, 130.6, 130.6, 128.8, 128.0, 126.1, 125.8, 125.6, 125.4,123.6; HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ calcd for C19H12OS: 288.0609, found: 288.0606.

10,11-Dihydro-5H-5,10-[2,3]thiophenodibenzo[a,d][7]annulene-5,11-diol (12b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85–7.80 (m, 1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.31–7.27 (m, 1H), 7.27–7.23 (m, 1H), 7.20 (td, J = 7.3, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.18–7.12 (m, 2H), 7.11 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 7.01 (d, J = 5.0 Hz, 1H), 4.82 (dd, J = 11.0, 4.2 Hz, 1H), 4.39 (d, J = 4.2 Hz, 1H), 3.19 (s, 1H), 1.85 (d, J = 11.0 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 151.3, 148.7, 142.4, 136.4, 134.7, 134.1, 132.7, 128.7, 127.8, 127.6, 127.5, 127., 123.5, 122.3, 121.2, 120.7, 75.3, 70.6, 48.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ calcd for C19H14O2S: 306.0715, found: 306.0711.

10-Hydroxy-11-(thiophen-3-yl)-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (12c)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.05 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.44 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.36 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.20 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.06–7.02 (m, 1H), 6.97–6.92 (m, 1H), 6.59 (s, 1H), 6.49–6.45 (m, 1H), 5.22 (s, 1H), 5.0–4.96 (m, 1H), 2.52 (s, 1H); 13C NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 196.2, 141.5, 139.4, 139.3, 138.7, 137.9, 133.0, 132.7, 131.7, 130.2, 129.5, 128.9, 128.7, 127.4, 127.4, 125.8, 122.9, 77.2 (merged with CDCl3 signal), 52.71; HRMS (EI) m/z [M]+ calcd for C19H14O2S: 306.0715, found: 306.0712

6-([2,2′-Bithiophen]-5-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (13)

To a THF of bisthiophene (200 mg, 1.20 mmol in 1.5 mL) were added TMEDA (0.2 mL) and n-BuLi (2.5 M, 0.48 mL, 1.20 mmol) at −78 °C. The reaction mixture was then stirred for 30 min at room temperature before a THF solution of 1 (220 mg, 0.99 mmol in 1.5 mL) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h before being quenched with NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic phase was washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography to give 12 (195 mg, 51%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.96–7.88 (2H, m), 7.57–7.51 (2H, m), 7.35–7.28 (4H, m), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 5.0 Hz), 7.07 (1H, d, J = 3.2 Hz), 6.97–6.93 (2H, m), 6.60 (1H, d, J = 3.7 Hz), 4.0 (2H, s), 2.48 (1H, s); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 154.1, 145.2, 138.6, 137.0, 132.1, 131.8, 128.7, 128.4, 128.0, 126.5, 124.9, 124.1, 123.9, 123.4, 123.3, 75.3, 57.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C23H16O2S2: 388.0592; found: 388.0590. 10-([2,2′-Bithiophen]-5-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (13a; Due to its low yield, 13a cannot be fully purified. Therefore, its 13C NMR spectrum is not obtained.) 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 11.56 (s, 1H), 8.93 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.04 (dt, J = 8.9, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (td, J = 6.5, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.50 (td, J = 6.5, 1.1 Hz, 2H), 7.37 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.30–7.25 (m, 2H), 7.09 (d, J = 3.6 Hz, 1H), 7.07–7.02 (m, 2H).

10-([2,2′-Bithiophen]-5-yl)-11-hydroxy-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-5-one (13b)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.07 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.73 (m, 1H), 7.47 (td, J = 8.0, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.34–7.30 (m, 2H), 7.29 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.11 (dd, J = 5.1, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.04 (m, 1H), 6.96–6.93 (m, 1H), 6.90 (dd, J = 5.0, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.76 (d, J = 3.7 Hz, 1H), 6.28 (d, J =3.2 Hz, 1H), 5.23 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H), 5.08 (d, J = 5.9 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.8, 143.1, 139.2, 138.9, 138.0, 137.7, 137.3, 137.0, 133.1, 132.9, 131.9, 130.4, 129.8, 129.5, 128.9, 127.8, 127.8, 127.0, 124.4, 123.6, 123.2, 77.6, 52.5; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C23H16O2S2: 388.0592; found: 388.0589.

6,6′-([2,2′-Bithiophene]-5,5′-diyl)bis(1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta [1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol) (14)

To a hexane solution of bisthiophene (200 mg, 1.20 mmol in 6 mL) were added TMEDA (0.45 mL, 3.01 mmol) and n-BuLi (2.5 M, 1.15 mL, 1.20 mmol). The mixture was heated was refluxed for 1 h before a THF solution of 1 (670 mg, 3.01 mmol in 6 mL) was added dropwise at room temperature. The reaction was stirred for 16 h at room temperature and quenched with NH4Cl solution. The mixture was extracted with EtOAc, and the combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography to give 14 (442 mg, 60%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ (ppm) 7.86–7.82 (m, 4H), 7.49–7.45 (m, 4H), 7.34–7.30 (m, 8H), 7.03 (d, J = 3.8 Hz 2H), 6.68 (s, 2H), 6.42 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 3.95 (s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, DMSO-d6): δ 154.2, 146.0, 136.3, 131.9, 131.7, 128.0, 127.8, 127.7, 126.4, 123.1, 73.9, 54.9 (A few extra signals in the 13C spectrum indicates the presence of impurities.); HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C38H27O4S2: 611.1351; found: 611.1353.

11,11′-([2,2′-Bithiophene]-5,5′-diyl)bis(10-hydroxy-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo [a,d] [7] annulen-5-one) (14a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.04 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.77–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.46 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 7.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.33–7.29 (m, 4H), 7.26–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.09–7.04 (m, 2H), 6.55(d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 6.19 (d, J = 3.8 Hz, 2H), 5.23 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 5.03 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 2.42 (s, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 195.5, 142.9, 139.0, 138.8, 137.9, 137.7, 136.7, 133.0, 132.7, 132.0, 130.4, 129.9, 129.6, 129.0, 127.9, 126.9, 122.9, 77.6, 52.5; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C38H27O4S2: 611.1351; found: 611.1355.

6-(9-Methyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b] oxiren-6-ol (15)

(54%). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.03 (dd, J = 7.8, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.92 (dt, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 1.8 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.48–7.44 (t, J =7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.39 (m, 5H), 7.27 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.20 (dd, J = 8.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.15 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.82 (s, 3H), 3.61 (s, 2H), 2.22 (s, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.5, 141.6, 141.1, 140.5, 131.9, 131.7, 128.3, 128.0, 126.3, 125.0, 124.5, 123.1, 122.7, 120.6, 119.3, 118.7, 108.9, 108.8, 79.4, 57.4, 29.3: HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C28H21NO2: 403.1572; found: 403.1562.

10-(9-Methyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (15a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.61 (s, 1H), 9.04 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 8.11 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (dd, J = 8.6, 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.46–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.37 (dd, J = 8.8, 8.7 Hz, 2H), 7.24 (td, J = 8.2, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.99 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 147.0, 141.7, 140.8, 132.0, 130.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.5, 126.5, 125.5, 123.7, 123.6, 123.0, 122.7, 122.6, 120.7, 119.5, 108.9, 108.6, 29.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C28H20NO: 386.1545; found: 386.1543

10-Hydroxy-11-(9-methyl-9H-carbazol-3-yl)-10,11-dihydro-5H-dibenzo[a,d][7] annulen-5-one (15b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.15 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.69 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.59 (s, 1H), 7.42 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.32 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19–7.16 (m, 2H), 7.10 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.77 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 6.72 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.26 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 5.14 (d, J = 5.8 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (s, 3H), 2.58 (brs, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 197.2, 141.3, 140.3, 140.3, 140.0, 139.2, 137.7, 133.4, 133.0, 131.5, 131.2, 129.8, 128.9, 128.5, 128.1, 126.9, 126.9, 125.9, 122.8, 122.5, 121.0, 120.3, 119.0, 108.6, 108.4, 78.3, 57.4, 29.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C28H21NO2: 403.1572; found: 403.1571.

6-(Pyridin-3-yl)-1a,10b-dihydro-6H-dibenzo[3,4:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-6-ol (16)

(22%), 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.29 (dd, J = 4.8, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.97–7.90 (m, 3H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.39–7.35 (m, 1H), 7.34–7.28 (m, 4H), 7.11 (dd, J = 8.0, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (brs, 1H), 3.60 (s, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 148.6, 148.2, 145.4, 144.8, 135.1, 132.1, 131.0, 128.6, 128.5, 124.4, 123.8, 77.3, 57.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C20H16NO2: 302.1181; found: 302.1182.

10-(Pyridin-3-yl)anthracene-9-carbaldehyde (16a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.57 (1H, s), 8.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.84 (brs, 1H), 8.66 (brs, 1H), 7.75 (td, J = 8.5, 1.8 Hz, 2H), 7.67 (td, J = 8.5, 1.3 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.59–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.45 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.43 (dd, J = 6.5, 1.1 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 151.1, 149.6, 140.8, 138.4, 134.3, 131.5, 130.3, 128.8, 127.4, 126.3, 123.9, 123.6 (1 signal missing); HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C20H14NO2: 284.1075; found: 284.1073.

5-(Pyridin-3-yl)-5,11-dihydro-10H-5,10-epoxydibenzo[a,d][7]annulen-10-ol (16b)

1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.53 (d, J = 4.8 Hz, 1H), 8.32 (brs, 1H), 7.95 (dt, J = 7.9, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.29 (dd, J = 7.9, 4.8 Hz, 1H), 7.19 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.12 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (t, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.04 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.99 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.80 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 3.58 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H), 3.01 (d, J = 16.4 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.6, 148.9, 146.4, 142.2, 140.7, 138.4, 135.1, 134.0, 130.4, 129.3, 127.6, 127.4, 125.9, 124.2, 123.5, 121.9, 120.5, 104.7, 86.7, 39.3; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C20H16NO2: 302.1181; found: 302.1179 17 and 18: Ferrocene (500 mg, 2.69 mmol) was dissolved in ether (6 mL), and TMEDA (1.1 mL, 7.38 mmol) and n-BuLi (2.5 M, 2.95 mL, 7.38 mmol) were slowly added at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was stirred for 16 h at room temperature before a THF solution of 1 (1.64 g, 7.38 mmol in 6 mL) was added. After another 16 h, the reaction was quenched with NH4Cl solution and extracted with EtOAc. The combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography to give the desired products (17: 154 mg, 14%; 18: 195 mg, 12%).

FeCp2-EDCH (17)

(14%) 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 8.06 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.47 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.30 (m, 4H), 4.27 (5H, s), 4.19 (t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H), 4.07(t, J = 1.9 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (2H, s), 3.67 (1H, s); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.6, 131.7, 131.5, 128.0, 127.7, 124.0, 108.1, 72.4, 69.1, 68.6, 67.7, 57.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C25H20O2Fe: 408.0813; found: 408.0818.

FeCp2-EDCH2 (18)

(12%) 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.92 (4H, d, J = 7.9 Hz), 7.45 (4H, d, J = 7.2 Hz), 7.32–7.24 (8H, m), 4.17–4.19 (m, 8H), 3.81 (4H, s), 3.54 (2H, s); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 146.2, 131.9, 131.5, 128.3, 128.0, 123.8, 108.3, 72.6, 69.6, 67.9, 57.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C40H30O4Fe: 630.1493; found: 630.1502.

Ferrocene Anthryl-CHO (17a)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.48 (s, 1H), 9.19 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 8.93 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.61 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (t, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (s, 2H), 4.62 (s, 2H), 4.19 (s, 5H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 142.5, 131.9, 130.6, 128.7, 128.4, 124.6, 124.3, 123.6, 83.9, 74.3, 70.3, 68.7; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C25H18OFe: 390.0707; found: 390.0700.

(17b)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 7.76–7.73 (m, 2H), 7.40 (dd, J = 7.2, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.33–7.28 (m, 2H), 7.27–7.24 (m, 1H), 7.14–7.08 (m, 2H), 4.68 (dd, J = 11.3, 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.33–4.31 (m, 1H), 4.22–4.19 (m, 1H), 4.0–3.97 (m, 2H), 3.67 (s, 5H), 2.50 (brs, 1H), 1.77 (d, J = 11.3 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} 1NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 149.3, 142.7, 136.9, 135.6, 132.8, 128.0, 127.5, 127.3, 127.2, 126.6, 120.6, 120.5, 97.7, 84.7, 73.3, 72.0, 68.8, 66.3, 65.3, 60.9, 47.2; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C25H20O2Fe: 408.0813; found: 408.0811.

(18a)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.41 (s, 1H, s), 9.0 (brs, 4H), 8.81 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.35 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.7 Hz, 2H), 7.27 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 6.95 (brs, 2H), 6.81 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 4.77 (s, 4H), 4.72 (s, 2H), 4.66 (s, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 149.9, 144.6, 142.9, 141.5, 140.9, 134.4, 131.7, 131.7, 128.6, 128.6, 128.4, 127.3, 125.0, 124.4, 124.2, 123.3, 86.5, 85.4, 76.2, 75.8, 70.0, 69.4; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C39H26OFe: 566.1333; found: 566.1328.

(18b)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.39 (2H, s), 8.90 (brd, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 8.76 (4H, d, J = 8.0 Hz), 7.35–7.39 (m, 4 H), 6.84 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 4.80–4.78 (m, 4H), 4.77–4.75 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 140.4, 131.5, 130.0, 128.2, 128.0, 124.8, 124.2, 123.2, 86.0, 76.5, 69.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C40H26O2Fe: 594.1282; found: 594.1280

(18c)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.50 (s, 1H), 9.11 (brs, 2H), 8.93 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.46 (t, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H), 7.26–7.24 (m, 1H), 6.99 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.89 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 6.81–6.76 (m, 2H), 6.62 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 4.79 (s, 1H), 4.61 (s, 1H), 4.51 (s, 1H), 4.49 (s, 1H), 4.46 (s, 1H), 4.43 (s, 1H), 4.37 (s, 1H), 4.34 (s, 1H), 3.39 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H), 3.20 (s, 1H), 2.93 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.5, 141.6, 133.1, 131.8, 130.4, 129.4, 128.6, 128.5, 128.4, 128.3, 128.2, 127.3, 127.2, 125.8, 124.4, 124.2, 123.5, 123.4, 123.1, 120.4, 119.4, 104.0, 89.0, 85.4, 84.0, 75.9, 75.3, 71.1, 70.9, 70.3 (×2), 69.4, 68.9, 38.8; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C40H28O3Fe: 612.1388; found: 612.1389.

(18d)

1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.51 (s, 1H), 8.99 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 8.94 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 2H), 7.65–7.60 (m, 3H), 7.51–7.46 (m, 2H), 7.41 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.06 (m, 2H), 6.98–6.93 (m, 2H), 6.84–6.80 (m, 2H), 4.59 (dd, J = 11.1, 3.9 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (s, 1H), 4.35 (s, 1H), 4.27 (s, 1H), 4.20 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 4.10 (dd, J = 8.8, 1.0 Hz, 2H), 3.77 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 2.28 (s, 1H), 1.61 (d, J = 11.1 Hz, 1H); 13C NMR spectrum is unavailable because 18d is obtained as a mixture with 18c. Yet, a comparison with 17b confirms the presence of the [2,2,3] bicyclic system. HRMS (EI) m/z [H+] calcd for C40H28O3Fe: 612.1388; found: 612.1381.

(18e)

1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ (ppm) 11.52(s, 1H), 9.06 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 8.97 (d, J = 8.9 Hz, 2H), 7.65 (td, J = 8.8, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (td, J = 8.9, 1.2 Hz, 2H), 7.48 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.27 (dd, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 7.14–7.18 (m, 2H), 7.13–7.07 (m, 2H), 6.83 (td, J = 7.6, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (dd, J = 11.2, 4.1 Hz, 1H), 4.47–4.43 (m, 2H), 4.33–4.30 (m, 2H), 4.19–4.15 (m, 1H), 4.02 (t, J = 2.5 Hz), 3.93–3.90 (m, 1H), 3.69–3.66 (m, 1H), 2.52 (s, 1H), 1.50 (d, J = 11.2 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3): δ 193.6, 148.6, 148.5, 141.9, 136.0, 133.8, 131.9, 130.5, 129.1, 128.7, 128.6, 127.3, 127.2, 127.1, 126.8, 126.5, 124.7, 124.6, 123.7, 120.6, 120.0, 95.4, 84.6, 81.7, 74.3, 74.0, 72.1, 70.4, 70.2, 70.1, 68.3, 66.7, 54.0, 29.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C40H28O3Fe: 612.1388; found: 612.1381.

(20)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 19 (0.20 g, 0.60 mmol, 1 equiv in 60 mL) were added mCPBA (1.47 g, 6.0 mmol, 10 equiv) and NaHCO3 (0.50 g, 6.0 mmol, 10 equiv), and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was then extracted with 1 N NaOH. The organic layer was washed with brine, combined, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 1:1 to 1: 5) to give 20 (0.10 g, 46%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 1684, 1345, 1232, 1185, 959, 868, 755, 718; 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 7.79 (s, 2H), 7.67 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 2H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.49 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 4.49 (s, 4 H).; 13C {1H} NMR (150 MHz, CDCl3) δ 196.3, 140.5, 137.7, 136.0, 134.8, 132.0, 130.2, 130.1, 129.6, 128.6, 61.9, 61.1; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C24H15O4: 367.0970; found: 367.0961.

7,14-Bis((triisopropylsilyl)ethynyl)pentacene-5,12-dicarbaldehyde (21a)

To a THF solution of TIPSA (0.40 mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5M n-BuLi (0.72 mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv) at 0 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h. To the mixture was added diepoxide 20 (0.11 g, 0.30 mmol, 1 equiv in 2 mL THF). The reaction was warmed back to room temperature and stirred for 2.5 h. The mixture was quenched by water, and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to furnish the crude product. The intermediate diol was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), and to the solution was added TFA (0.046 mL, 0.60 mmol, 2 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. After the solvent was removed under reduced pressure, the crude product was purified by flash chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 21a (25 mg, 12%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2941, 2866, 2151, 1683, 1464, 1075, 884, 676; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.71 (s, 2H), 10.62 (s, 2H), 8.98 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 8.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.67–7.63 (m, 2H), 7.59–7.56 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.35 (m, 42H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.14, 133.6, 132.6, 131.1, 129.8, 128.2, 128.1, 127.1, 126.6, 124.9, 124.5, 124.2, 110.9, 103.1, 18.9, 11.5; UV (λmax, nm) = 687; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C46H55O2Si2: 695.3741; found: 695.3732.

7,14-Di-p-tolylpentacene-5,12-dicarbaldehyde (21b)

To a THF solution of 4-bromotoluene (0.22 mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.72 mL, 1.80 mmol, 6 equiv) at −78 °C and the reaction was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was added 20 (0.10 g, 0.30 mmol, 1 equiv) and stirred for 2.5 h. The mixture was then quenched with water, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to get the crude intermediate. The diol intermediate was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL) and to the solution was added TFA (0.046 mL, 0.60 mmol, 2 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 10 min, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 21b (41 mg, 45%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2970, 1652, 1425, 1280, 1156, 1024, 817, 752; 1H NMR (500 Mhz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.41 (s, 2H), 9.80 (s, 2H), 9.01 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.75 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m, 2H), 7.53 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 4H), 7.42 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 4H), 7.31 (m, 2H), 2.63 (s, 6 H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 192.3, 147.4, 138.4, 134.8, 133.6, 130.7, 130.3, 130.1, 129.6, 129.5, 128.6, 128.1, 125.4, 124.6, 123.9, 123.5, 21.6; UV (λmax, nm) = 667; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M+] calcd for C38H26O2: 514.1933; found: 514.1941.

7,14-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)pentacene-5,12-dicarbaldehyde (21c)

(34%); IR (KBr, cast), ν (cm–1) 2923, 1657, 1606, 1512, 1249, 1176, 1027, 827. 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.43 (s, 2H), 9.82 (s, 2H), 9.00 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m, 2 H), 7.46 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 4H), 7.32 (m, 2 H), 7.25 (d, 4 H, J = 8.7 Hz, 4H), 4.04 (s, 6 H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.3, 159.8, 147.1, 133.7, 132.0, 130.5, 130.3, 129.9, 129.6, 128.5, 128.1, 125.4, 124.6, 123.9, 123.5, 114.2, 55.4; UV (λmax, nm) = 667; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C38H26O4: 546.1831; found: 546.1823.

7,14-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)pentacene-5,12-dicarbaldehyde (21d)

(39%); IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2919, 1651, 1534, 1261, 1057, 830, 749, 534; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.44 (s, 2H), 9.81 (s, 2H), 8.94 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.69 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.62–7.58 (m, 2H), 7.49 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.36–7.33 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.1, 145.3, 136.3, 134.8, 133.9, 132.2, 130.3, 130.0, 129.6, 129.2, 128.1, 127.6, 125.9, 124.7, 124.5, 123.2; UV (λmax, nm) = 668; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C36H20Cl2O2: 554.0840; found: 554.0844.

7,14-Bis(4-(trifluoromethyl)phenyl)pentacene-5,12-dicarbaldehyde (21e)

(22%); IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 1660, 1537, 1323, 1172, 1105, 1068, 1018, 840; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.43 (s, 2H), 9.78 (s, 2H), 9.00 (d, J = 9.5 Hz, 2H), 8.02 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.69 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 7.62–7.59 (m, 4H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 2H).; 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.0, 144.8, 141.8, 134.0, 131.3, 130.9 (q, J = 55.7 Hz,), δ 130.1, 129.8, 129.6 (×2), 127.9, 127.3, 126.1, 125.9 (q, J = 4.2 Hz), 124.7, 123.1; UV (λmax, nm) = 659; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M+] calcd for C38H20F6O2: 622.1367; found: 622.1234.

Dimethyl 4,6-Di((E)-styryl)isophthalate

To a DMF solution of dimethyl 4,6-dibromoisophthalate (3.60 g, 10.3 mmol, 1 equiv in 30 mL) were added tri-n-octylphosphine (0.38 g, 1.03 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Pd(OAc)2 (0.23 g, 1.0 mmol, 0.1 equiv). Styrene (4.72 mL, 41.2 mmol, 4 equiv) and Et3N (14.4 mL, 103 mmol, 10 equiv) were then added, and the mixture was heated for 2 h at 110 °C. The mixture was cooled and filtered through celite. The solvent was removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 22 (2.7 g, 65%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 1716, 1634, 1435, 1290, 1231, 1105, 962; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.57 (s, 1H), 8.08 (d, J = 16.5 Hz, 2H), 8.03 (s, 1H), 7.61 (d, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.39 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 4H), 7.31 (t, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H), 7.17 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 2H), 3.96 (s, 6H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 142.9, 137.0, 133.9, 133.3, 128.8, 128.4, 127.1, 126.7, 126.6, 125.5, 52.3; HRMS (APCI) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C26H22O4: 398.1518; found: 399.1592.

Dimethyl 4,6-Diphenethylisophthalate

Dimethyl 4,6-di((E)-styryl)isophthalate (6.02 g, 15.1 mmol, 1 equiv) was dissolved in THF (80 mL) and MeOH (50 mL), and to the solution was added 10% Pd/C (3.24 g). A hydrogen balloon was connected to the flask, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The solution was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude product was purified with flash chromatography (hex/EtOAc = 40:1) to give the reduced product as a colorless oil (4.41 g, 70%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ (ppm) 8.50 (s, 1H), 7.28 (m, 4H), 7.19 (m, 6H), 6.90 (s, 1H), 3.96 (s, 6H), 3.24 (m, 4H), 2.83 (m, 4H), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 167.1, 147.8, 141.7, 134.8, 134.0, 128.8, 128.5, 127.2, 126.1, 52.2, 37.8, 36.8. HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C26H27O4: 403.1909, found: 403.1914.

4,6-Diphenethylisophthalic Acid

To a THF solution of diester (4.41 g, 10.9 mmol in 50 mL) was added 5% aqueous sodium hydroxide (20 mL). The solution was stirred and refluxed at 80 °C overnight. Tetrahydrofuran was removed in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with EtOAc. The aqueous layer was acidified (pH1) with hydrochloric acid. The white solid suspension was collected and dissolved in EtOAc. The solution was dried over MgSO4, and the solvent was removed to give the diacid as a white solid (3.46 g, 75%). The crude compound was used in the next step with further purification. 1H NMR (CD3OD, 500 MHz) δ (ppm) 8.56 (s, 1H), 7.12 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.19 (m, 6H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 4.50 (br, 2H), 3.20 (m, 4H), 2.78 (m, 4H), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 168.8, 147.3, 141.5, 134.3, 134.3, 128.3, 127.9, 127.2, 125.6, 37.3, 36.4.

Dibenzo-2,3,9,10-tetrahydrobenzo[1,2:4,5]di[7]annulene-1,11-dione

To a CH2Cl2 solution of diacid (3.46 g, 9.25 mmol, in 50 mL) were added a few drops of DMF and thionyl chloride (5 mL) at 0 °C. The solution was stirred at a reflux temperature for 2 h. The volatiles were removed under reduced pressure to give the intermediate acyl chloride. To a CH2Cl2 suspension of AlCl3 (2.0 g in 10 mL) was added a CH2Cl2 solution of acyl chloride intermediate (15 mL over 40 min) at 0 °C. The reaction was stirred at 0 °C for another 30 min before being warmed back to room temperature. The reaction was quenched with hydrochloric acid after 16 h. The solution was extracted with CH2Cl2, and the combined organic portions were dried over MgSO4 before being concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash chromatography to give the pentacyclic product as a yellow solid (0.50 g, 13.6%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.699 (s, 1H), 8.01 (dd, J = 7.8, 2.5 Hz, 2H), 7.43 (m, 2H), 7.33 (m, 2H), 7.22 (d, J = 7.5, 2H), 7.10 (s, 1H), 3.20 (m, 8H). 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 194.3, 146.0, 141.6, 138.5, 137.2, 134.2, 132.6, 130.8, 130.5, 129.3, 126.9, 35.0, 34.7; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H19O2: 339.1385, found: 339.1392.

22

To a solution of the product from the last step (0.50 g, 1.5 mmol, 1 equiv) in 1,2-dichloroethane was added N-bromosuccinimide (0.62 g, 3.5 mmol, 2.3 equiv) and benzoyl peroxide (30 mg). The solution was stirred at 95 °C for 18 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give the brominated intermediate. The crude mixture was dissolved in benzene (10 mL), and to the solution was added trimethylamine (2 mL). The reaction was refluxed for 16 h. The volatiles were removed in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with dichloromethane. After the organic portion was concentrated, the crude mixture was purified by flash chromatography to give 23 as a pale yellow solid (120 mg, 25%). 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 8.98 (s, 1H, Ph), 8.26 (dd, J = 8, 1.5 Hz, 2H), 7.66 (m, 3H), 7.57 (m, 4H), 7.07 (d, J = 10 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (d, J= 10 Hz, 2H), 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3): δ 192.1, 138.7, 138.4, 137.3, 134.6, 134.1, 133.9, 133.1, 132.4, 131.3, 130.5, 130.4, 129.6; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H]+ calcd for C24H15O2: 335.1072, found: 335.1065.

12,14-Di-p-tolylpentacene-5,7-dicarbaldehyde (23a)

(29%): IR (KBr, cm–1) 2922, 1781, 1668, 1506, 1284, 1052, 821, 753; 1H NMR (CDCl3, 500 MHz) δ 11.76 (s, 2H), 11.21 (d, J = 1 Hz, 1H), 9.00 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.31 (d, J = 1Hz, 1H), 7.77 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 7.58 (m, 2 H), 7.28 (m, 2 H), 7.25 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 4H), 7.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H), 2.52 (s, 6H).; 13C NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 192.7, 147.4, 137.5, 134.5, 134.4, 130.6, 129.9, 129.7, 129.6, 129.3, 128.7, 128.5, 125.1, 123.9, 123.4, 119.4, 119.4, 21.3; UV (λmax, nm) = 698.; HRMS (MALDI) calcd for C38H26O2(M+): 514.1933; found: 514.1930.

12,14-Bis(4-methoxyphenyl)pentacene-5,7-dicarbaldehyde (23b)

(48%); IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2917, 1665, 1606, 1293, 1252, 1176, 1027, 756; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.77 (s, 2H), 11.23 (d, J ∼ 1 Hz. 1H), 9.02 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 2H), 8.32 (d, J ∼ 1 Hz, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 2H), 7.60 (m, 2 H), 7.30 (m, 2 H), 7.20 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 6.99 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 4H), 3.97 (s, 6 H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 192.7, 159.4, 147.1, 134.6, 131.9, 130.0, 129.7, 129.7, 129.5, 129.5, 128.7, 128.5, 125.1, 123.9, 123.4, 119.4, 113.7, 55.3; UV (λmax, nm) = 683; HRMS (MALDI) m/z [M+] calcd for C38H26O4: 546.1831; found: 546.1833

12,14-Bis(4-chlorophenyl)pentacene-5,7-dicarbaldehyde (23c)

(58%); IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2970, 1630, 1488, 1391, 1282, 1090, 1016, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.78 (s, 2H), 11.24 (d, J = 1 Hz, 1H), 9.00 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 8.12 (d, J = 1 Hz. 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.62 (t, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 7.50–7.47 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4 H), 7.34 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.21 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 4H); 13C NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 192.7, 145.1, 135.8, 134.6, 134.3, 132.2, 131.9, 129.7, 129.3, 128.5, 128.3, 127.9, 125.7, 124.6, 123.5, 120.1; UV (λmax, nm) = 678; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C36H20Cl2O2: 554.0840; found: 554.0841

Methyl 3-Bromo-2-naphthoate

To a MeOH solution of 3-bromo-2-naphthoic acid (0.34 g, 1.37 mmol, 1 equiv) were added SOCl2 (2.0 mL, 27.3 mmol, 20 equiv) and a few drops of DMF. The reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give the methyl ester (0.26 g, 73%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2950, 1732, 1454, 1280, 1200, 1111, 996, 747; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.33 (s, 1H), 8.13 (s, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.74 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.59–7.51 (m, 2H), 3.99 (s, 3 H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.6, 135.2, 133.0, 132.2, 131.0, 129.1, 128.8, 128.6, 127.1, 126.7, 117.0, 52.5; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C12H9BrO2: 264.9864; found: 264.9863.

Methyl (E)-3-Styryl-2-naphthoate (24)

To a DMF solution of methyl 3-bromo-2-naphthoate (0.23 g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) were added tri-o-tolylphosphine (26 mg, 0.086 mmol, 0.1 equiv) and Pd(OAc)2 (19 mg, 0.086 mmol, 0.1 equiv). After styrene (0.15 mL, 1.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) and Et3N (1.2 mL, 8.6 mmol, 10 equiv) were added, the reaction was refluxed at 110 °C for 2 h. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2= 5:1 to 2:1) to give 24 (1.70 g, 68%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 1716, 1447, 1270, 1120, 1131, 1062, 743; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.52 (s, 1H), 8.12 (s, 1H), 8.07 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.63–7.61 (m, 2H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.40 (t, J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.32–7.29 (m, 1H), 7.10 (d, J = 16.0 Hz, 1H), 4.00 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 167.8, 137.6, 135.5, 134.9, 132.0, 131.6, 130.9, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 127.9, 127.7, 126.9, 126.8, 126.5, 126.0, 52.2; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H16O2: 288.1150; found: 288.1153.

Methyl 3-Phenethyl-2-naphthoate (25)

To a MeOH/THF solution of 24 (1.31 g, 4.54 mmol in 10 mL/30 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (0.54 g). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 4 h with a H2 balloon attached. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was evaporated. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2= 5:1 to 2:1) to give 25 (1.05 g, 80%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 1721, 1454, 1282, 1203, 1131, 1059, 699; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.51 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.57–7.54 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.47 (m, 1H), 7.33–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.24–7.20 (m, 1H), 3.99 (s, 3H), 3.45–3.42 (m, 2H), 3.01–2.98 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 142.0, 139.0, 135.0, 132.2, 131.1, 129.4, 128.7, 128.6, 128.3, 128.1, 127.9, 127.1, 126.0, 125.8, 52.1, 38.3, 36.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H18O2: 290.1307; found: 290.1306.

3-Phenethyl-2-naphthoic Acid

To an EtOH solution of 25 (0.84 g, 2.88 mmol in 40 mL) in EtOH (40 mL) was added 40 mL of 10% NaOH solution (40 mL). The reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was acidified to pH∼1. The acidic aqueous suspension was extracted with EtOAc, and the combined organic portions were washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give crude acid (0.74 g, 93%). The material is used in the subsequent cyclization reaction without further purification. IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2927, 1683, 1464, 1289, 1210, 1137, 745, 698; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.71 (s, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 7.9 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (s, 1H), 7.60–7.57 (m, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 1H), 7.31–7.27 (m, 4H), 7.22–7.19 (m, 1H), 3.51–3.47 (m, 2H), 3.04–3.01 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.0, 142.1, 139.6, 135.5, 133.7, 131.1, 129.7, 129.0, 128.7, 128.6, 128.4, 127.1, 126.3, 126.2, 125.9, 38.3, 37.1.; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H16O2: 276.1150; found: 276.1154.

12,13-Dihydro-5H-benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-b]naphthalen-5-one (26)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of the acid (0.41 g, 1.47 mmol in 15 mL) were added SOCl2 (4.26 mL, 58.7 mmol) and a few drops of DMF. The reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The solvent was evaporated to furnish the chloride intermediate. To a suspension of AlCl3 (0.29 g, 2.20 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (150 mL) was added the acyl chloride intermediate (dissolved in 10 mL of CH2Cl2) at 0 °C, and the reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was then washed with 1 N HCl. The organic phase was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 5:1 to 2:1) to give 26 (0.26 g, 69%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2916, 1652, 1445, 1288, 1255, 943, 747, 478; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.49 (s, 1H), 8.16 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.93 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.79 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.66 (s, 1H), 7.56–7.52 (m, 1H), 7.49–7.44 (m, 2H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 1H), 7.25 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 3.37–3.29 (m, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 195.6, 142.6, 138.0, 137.9, 137.7, 135.2, 132.5, 131.7, 131.5, 131.0, 129.8, 129.3, 128.1, 126.9, 126.7, 126.6, 126.0, 35.8, 35.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H14O: 258.1045; found: 258.1041.

5H-Benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-b]naphthalen-5-one (27)

To a dichloroethane solution of 26 (0.22 g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) were added N-bromosuccinimide (0.15 g, 0.86 mmol, 1 equiv) and benzoyl peroxide (28 mg, 0.086 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and the reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed with saturated Na2S2O3 solution, 1 N NaOH. The organic layer was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was redissolved in benzene (10 mL), and to this solution was added Et3N (1.44 mL, 10.3 mmol, 12 equiv). The reaction was stirred at reflux temperature for another 16 h. The solvent then was removed in vacuo, and the residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1 to 1:1) to give 27 (150 mg, 67%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3053, 1620, 1418, 1324, 1279, 888, 749, 475; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.73 (s, 1H), 8.22 (dd, J = 7.5, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.01 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.95 (s, 1H), 7.90 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.62–7.47 (m, 6H), 7.14 (d, J = 12.2 Hz, 1H), 6.94 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.8, 138.1, 137.1, 134.9, 134.5, 132.5, 132.1, 132.0, 131.8, 131.2, 130.6, 130.5, 130.2, 130.0, 129.2, 128.4, 128.3, 127.6, 126.9; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H12O: 256.0888; found: 256.0893.

12-(4-Chlorophenyl)tetracene-5-carbaldehyde (28)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 27 (0.13 g, 0.50 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) were added mCPBA (0.61 g, 2.48 mmol, 5 equiv) and NaHCO3 (0.21 g, 2.48 mmol, 5 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was then diluted with CH2Cl2 and extracted with 1 N NaOH. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give the intermediate epoxide. To a THF solution of 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene (0.28 g, 1.48 mmol, 3 equiv in 10 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.60 mL, 1.50 mmol, 3 equiv) at −78 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h. The mixture was transferred to the crude epoxide intermediate, and the reaction was stirred for 2.5 h at room temperature. The mixture was quenched with water, and the solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was partitioned between water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo to give the crude epoxide alcohol. This intermediate was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (10 mL), and to this solution was added TFA (0.038 mL, 0.5 mmol, 1 equiv). The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 10 min. The solvent was evaporated, and the crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 28 (0.16 g, 88%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3052, 1669, 1489, 1090, 1016, 821, 740, 570; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 11.72 (s, 1H), 9.83 (s, 1H), 8.97 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 8.27 (s, 1H), 8.09 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 9.3 Hz, 1H), 7.68–7.61 (m, 4H), 7.51–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.43–7.40 (m, 3H), 7.38–7.35 (m, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 193.0, 144.6, 136.9, 134.4, 133.4, 133.1, 132.2, 131.2, 129.2, 129.0, 128.8, 128.8, 128.5, 128.4, 127.9, 126.8, 126.7, 126.1, 125.3, 124.6, 123.4, 123.0; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C25H15ClO: 366.0811, found: 366.0804.

Methyl 2-(Naphthalen-1-ylethynyl)benzoate (29)

Methyl 2-bromobenzoate (0.85 g, 3.94 mmol, 1 equiv), ethynylnaphthalene (0.9 mL, 5.8 mmol, 1.5 equiv), CuI (75 mg, 0.39 mmol, 0.1 equiv), and Pd(PPh3)2Cl2 (0.28 g, 0.39 mmol, 0.1 equiv) were dissolved in Et3N (40 mL) in a sealed tube under nitrogen. The reaction was refluxed for 16 h. The mixture was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was evaporated. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the solution was extracted with water. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1 to 2:1) to give 29 (1.09 g, 96%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2949, 2210, 1728, 1486, 1294, 1086, 756, 567; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.61 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 8.04 (dd, J = 8.3, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.88–7.86 (m, 2H), 7.82 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.78 (dd, J = 7.4, 1.1 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 2H), 7.50–7.46 (m, 1H), 7.44–7.40 (m, 1H), 4.00 (s, 3H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 166.8, 134.2, 133.5, 133.2, 131.7, 130.7, 130.6, 129.0, 128.2, 128.0, 126.8, 126.5, 126.4, 125.3, 123.8, 121.0, 93.0, 92.6, 52.3; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C20H15O2: 287.1072; found: 287.1064.

Methyl 2-(2-(Naphthalen-1-yl)ethyl)benzoate (30)

To a THF solution of 29 (0.54 g, 1.09 mmol, 1 equiv in 10 mL) was added 10% Pd/C (0.26 g). The mixture was placed in a sealed autoclave that was pressurized to 150 psi of H2. The mixture was stirred at room temperature for 40 h. The solution was filtered through a pad of celite, and the solvent was removed in vacuo to give the reduced product. To rearomatize the product, the raw material and DDQ (2.40 g, 10.5 mmol, 3 equiv) were dissolved in toluene (40 mL) and the solution was refluxed for 3 h. The reaction was filtered, and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The crude product was then purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 2:1) to give 30 (0.52 g, 51%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2950, 1715, 1599, 1434, 1258, 1127, 966, 753; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.24 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.89 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.75 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.57 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.53–7.50 (m, 1 H), 7.45–7.40 (m, 2H), 7.34–7.29 (m, 2H), 7.26 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.42 (s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 168.0, 143.6, 138.0, 133.8, 132.0, 131.9, 131.2, 130.7, 129.6, 128.7, 126.7, 126.3, 126.1, 125.8, 125.6, 125.4, 123.9, 51.9, 35.8, 35.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C20H18O2: 290.1307; found: 290.1302.

2-(2-(Naphthalen-1-yl)ethyl)benzoic Acid (30′)

To an EtOH solution of 30 (0.42 g, 1.45 mmol, 1 equiv 15 mL) was added 20% NaOH solution (15 mL), and the reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo. The residue was acidified with 12N HCl to pH ∼ 1 before being extracted with EtOAc. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo to give 30′ (0.41 g, 99%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3064, 1688, 1599, 1398, 1266, 1085, 777, 749; 1H NMR (500 MHz, acetone-d6) δ (ppm) 8.38 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 8.02 (dd, J = 8.0, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.78–7.76 (m, 1H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.48 (m, 2H), 7.43–7.39 (m, 3H), 7.37–7.34 (m, 1H), 3.41 (s, 4H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, acetone-d6) δ 169.1, 144.8, 139.4, 135.0, 133.1, 133.0, 132.3, 131.8, 130.7, 129.5, 127.6, 127.2, 127.1, 126.8, 126.6, 126.4, 125.1, 37.1, 36.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H16O2: 276.1150; found: 276.1151.

12,13-Dihydro-7H-benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-a]naphthalen-7-one (31)

30′ (0.40 g, 1.45 mmol, 1 equiv) and SOCl2 (2.1 mL, 29.1 mmol, 20 equiv) were dissolved in CH2Cl2 (15 mL). A few drops of DMF were added, and the mixture was stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The solvent was removed in vacuo to give the acyl chloride intermediate. To a suspension of AlCl3 (0.29 g, 2.18 mmol, 1.5 equiv) in CH2Cl2 (140 mL) was added a CH2Cl2 solution of aforementioned acyl chloride (in 5 mL) at 0 °C. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 16 h. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and washed with 1 N HCl. The organic portion was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1) to give 31 (0.22 g, 57%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 3061, 1652, 1425, 1316, 1141, 905, 752, 524; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (pm) 8.21–8.19 (m, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.88–7.84 (m, 2H), 7.78 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.58–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.44 (td, J = 7.4, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 7.33 (td, J = 7.6, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 7.28–7.26 (m, 1H), 3.70–3.68 (m, 2H), 3.33–3.30 (m, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 197.8, 140.8, 139.9, 139.2, 136.3, 135.2, 132.0, 131.3, 129.2, 128.7, 128.6, 127.6, 127.0, 126.71, 126.66, 126.0, 124.2, 33.6, 29.9; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C19H15O: 259.1123, found: 259.1127.

7H-Benzo[4,5]cyclohepta[1,2-a]naphthalen-7-one (32)

To a dichloroethane solution of 31 (0.19 g, 0.76 mmol, 1 equiv in 20 mL) were added N-bromosuccinimide (0.15 g, 0.83 mmol, 1.1 equiv) and benzoyl peroxide (24 mg, 0.076 mmol, 0.1 equiv). The solution was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The mixture was diluted with CH2Cl2 and extracted with saturated Na2S2O3 solution, 1 N NaOH. The organic portion was further washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The residue was redissolved in benzene (10 mL). To this solution was added Et3N (1.27 mL, 9.10 mmol, 12 equiv), and the reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 16 h. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo, and the residue was extracted with water and CH2Cl2. The organic portion was washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude compound was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 3:1 to 2:1) to give 32 (0.19 g, 97%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 1640, 1593, 1457, 1330, 957, 805, 774, 716; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.50 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 8.13–8.10 (m, 2H), 7.99–7.91 (m, 3H), 7.69–7.55 (m, 5H), 7.34 (d, J = 12.5 Hz, 1H); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 194.7, 140.1, 138.1, 134.8, 134.6, 132.0, 131.5, 130.7, 129.8, 129.6, 129.2, 129.1, 128.7, 127.8, 127.3, 125.8, 125.7, 125.1; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C19H13O: 257.0966, found: 257.0971.

11b,12a-Dihydro-7H-benzo[3,4]naphtho[2′,1′:6,7]cyclohepta[1,2-b]oxiren-7-one (32′)

To a CH2Cl2 solution of 32 (60 mg, 0.24 mmol, 1 equiv in 5 mL) were added mCPBA (0.25 g, 1.19 mmol, 5 equiv) and NaHCO3 (1.0 g, 1.19 mmol, 5 equiv), and the reaction was stirred at a reflux temperature for 3 h. The mixture was diluted and extracted with 1 N NaOH. The organic portion was then washed with brine, dried over anhydrous MgSO4, and concentrated in vacuo. The crude product was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 1:1 to 1:4) to give 32′ (15 mg, 26%). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 8.33 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.90–7.88 (m, 2H), 7.69–7.62 (m, 2H), 7.61–7.58 (m, 3H), 7.52–7.48 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 1H), 5.42 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H), 4.73 (d, J = 4.0 Hz, 1H) (Some extra signals are due to decomposition); 13C {1H} NMR (125 MHz, CDCl3) δ 198.6, 139.1, 136.5, 134.8, 134.7, 131.8, 131.2, 130.6, 129.4, 129.3, 129.2, 129.1, 127.6, 127.5, 127.4, 124.4, 122.7, 62.1, 57.8; HRMS (EI) m/z [M+] calcd for C19H12O2: 272.0837; found: 272.0836.

7-(4-Chlorophenyl)tetraphene-12-carbaldehyde (33)

To a THF solution of 1-bromo-4-chlorobenzene (14 mg, 0.073 mmol, 2 equiv in 5 mL) was added 2.5 M n-BuLi (0.046 mL, 0.073 mmol, 2 equiv) at −78 °C, and the reaction was stirred for 1 h at that temperature. To the mixture was added 32′ (10 mg, 0.037 mmol, 1 equiv in 2 mL THF), and the reaction was stirred for 2.5 h at room temperature. The reaction was quenched with water and the solvent was evaporated in vacuo. The residue was dissolved in CH2Cl2, and the solution was dried over anhydrous MgSO4 and concentrated in vacuo. The intermediate epoxy alcohol was dissolved in CH2Cl2 (5 mL), and TFA (0.003 mL, 0.04 mmol, 1.1 equiv) was added. The reaction was stirred at room temperature for 10 min before the solvent was removed in vacuo. The crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography (hex/CH2Cl2 = 5:1) to give 33 (9 mg, 68%). IR (KBr, cast) ν (cm–1) 2922, 1674, 1489, 1263, 1090, 1016, 805, 750; 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ (ppm) 10.62 (s, 1H), 9.35 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 8.15 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.92 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.77–7.69 (m, 4H), 7.57–7.62 (m 3H), 7.55 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.45 (d, J = 9.2 Hz, 1H), 7.38 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 2H); 13C {1H} NMR (CDCl3, 125 MHz) δ 194.3, 141.1, 136.8, 134.2, 133.5, 132.5, 132.3, 131.8, 130.6, 129.4, 129.2, 128.9, 128.8, 128.7, 128.6, 128.2, 128.1, 127.6, 127.0, 126.6, 126.4, 125.2, 124.8; HRMS (FAB) m/z [M + H+] calcd for C25H16ClO: 367.0890; found: 367.0888.
  28 in total

1.  The acenes: is there a relationship between aromatic stabilization and reactivity?

Authors:  P von Ragué Schleyer; M Manoharan; H Jiao; F Stahl
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2001-11-15       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  Graphenes as potential material for electronics.

Authors:  Jishan Wu; Wojciech Pisula; Klaus Müllen
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Analogues of fenarimol are potent inhibitors of Trypanosoma cruzi and are efficacious in a murine model of Chagas disease.

Authors:  Martine Keenan; Michael J Abbott; Paul W Alexander; Tanya Armstrong; Wayne M Best; Bradley Berven; Adriana Botero; Jason H Chaplin; Susan A Charman; Eric Chatelain; Thomas W von Geldern; Maria Kerfoot; Andrea Khong; Tien Nguyen; Joshua D McManus; Julia Morizzi; Eileen Ryan; Ivan Scandale; R Andrew Thompson; Sen Z Wang; Karen L White
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 7.446

4.  Pd(II)-catalyzed monoselective ortho halogenation of C-H bonds assisted by counter cations: a complementary method to directed ortho lithiation.

Authors:  Tian-Sheng Mei; Ramesh Giri; Nathan Maugel; Jin-Quan Yu
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 15.336

5.  Advanced Molecular Nanocarbons: Fertile Ground for Discovery, Creation, and Invention.

Authors:  Nazario Martin; Graham Bodwell
Journal:  Acc Chem Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 22.384

6.  A ferrocenyl kaleidoscope: slow interconversion of six diastereo-atropisomers of 2,6-di-tert-butyl-9,10-diferrocenyltriptycene.

Authors:  Kirill Nikitin; Jimmy Muldoon; Helge Müller-Bunz; Michael J McGlinchey
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2015-02-12       Impact factor: 5.236

7.  Synthesis of electron deficient acene derivatives via a bidirectional iterative elongation reaction.

Authors:  Yi-Chun Lin; Chih-Hsiu Lin; Chan-Yu Chen; Shih-Sheng Sun; Bikash Pal
Journal:  Org Biomol Chem       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 3.876

8.  Formation of Azulene-Embedded Nanographene: Naphthalene to Azulene Rearrangement During the Scholl Reaction.

Authors:  Yi Han; Zibo Xue; Guangwu Li; Yanwei Gu; Yong Ni; Shaoqiang Dong; Chunyan Chi
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 15.336

Review 9.  Synthetic Applications of Oxidative Aromatic Coupling-From Biphenols to Nanographenes.

Authors:  Marek Grzybowski; Bartłomiej Sadowski; Holger Butenschön; Daniel T Gryko
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 15.336

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.