| Literature DB >> 35785136 |
Yared Andargie1, Woretaw Sisay1, Mulugeta Molla1, Muluken Adela1.
Abstract
Background: Natural products have been utilized by human beings for thousands of years to relieve a variety of ailments, including diarrhea. Conventional antidiarrheal drugs are associated with multiple adverse effects and contraindications. Traditionally, Rumex nepalensis by crushing the root, mix with water and then drunk the juice is extensively used for treating diarrhea. However, no scientific research has been done yet to support its antidiarrheal efficacy and safety. Hence, the aim of the study was to evaluate the antidiarrheal activity and safety profile of the plant in mice.Entities:
Keywords: Antidiarrheal activity; CO, Castor oil; COX, Cyclooxgenase; Castor oil; GI, Gastrointestinal; Mice; Root; Rumex nepalensis; WHO, World health organization
Year: 2022 PMID: 35785136 PMCID: PMC9243151 DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2022.100197
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabol Open ISSN: 2589-9368
Preliminary phytochemical screening of hydro-methanolic root extract of Rumex nepalensis.
| Bioactive phytochemicals | Tests employed for screening | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Alkaloids | Wagner's test | + |
| Glycosides | Glycoside test | – |
| Saponins | Honey comb test | + |
| Tannins | Lead acetate test | + |
| Flavonoids | Shinoda test | + |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski's test | + |
| Phenols | Lead acetate test | + |
| Plant steroids | Salkowski's test | + |
| Anthraquinones | Borntrager's test | – |
Note: - (+): present, (−): absent.
Estimation of total phenolic, flavonoid, tannin, and alkaloid contents of R. nepalensis root extract.
| Test extract | Phenolic content (mg/g) | Flavonoid content (g) | Tannin content (mg/g) | Alkaloid content (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 81.45 (8.1%) | 0.18 (7.2%) | 51.32 (5.1%) | 0.12 (4.8%) |
Effect of the methanolic root extract of Rumex nepalensis on castor oil-induced diarrhea in mice.
| Group | Onset of diarrhea (min) | No of wet feces | Total no of feces | Wt. of wet feces (g) | Wt. of total feces (g) | % inhi. of defecation | %WWFO | %WTFO |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 43.6 ± 2.10 | 13.8 ± 1.01 | 15.7 ± 0.67 | 5.4 ± 0.30 | 5.8 ± 0.30 | – | – | – |
| RNRE100 | 45.9 ± 2.34 | 9.7 ± 1.41a* | 14.0 ± 1.73 | 4.4 ± 0.18a* | 4.3 ± 0.36a** | 29.7% | 81.5% | 74.1% |
| RNRE200 | 56.8 ± 1.78a** | 8.2 ± 0.60a** | 11.2 ± 0.48a* | 4.2 ± 0.17a** | 3.4 ± 0.20a*** | 40.6% | 77.8% | 58.6% |
| RNRE400 | 63.7 ± 1.89a*** | 6.8 ± 0.70a*** | 9.5 ± 0.76a** | 3.8 ± 0.10a*** | 3.1 ± 0.08a*** | 50.7% | 70.4% | 53.4% |
| LPR3 | 67.6 ± 1.52a*** | 2.5 ± 0.76a*** | 3.5 ± 0.76a*** | 2.7 ± 0.32a*** | 2.3 ± 0.12a*** | 81.9% | 50% | 39.7% |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using one way ANOVA followed by Post Hoc Tukey test. aCompared with negative control. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P<.001. NC = negative control, RNRE = Rumex nepalensis root extract, LPR3 = loperamide 3 mg/kg, min= minute, Wt. = weight, g = gram, WWFO = weight of wet fecal output, WTFO = weight of total fecal output, and % inhi. = percent inhibition.
Effect of the methanolic root extract of Rumex nepalensis on intestinal fluid accumulation in mice.
| Group | Volume of Intestinal Content (ml) | % Inhibition | Weight of Intestinal Content (g) | % Inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 2.3 ± 0.12 | – | 2.0 ± 0.09 | – |
| RNRE100 | 2.2 ± 0.12 | 4.3% | 1.8 ± 0.05 | 10% |
| RNRE200 | 1.5 ± 0.06a** | 34.8% | 1.6 ± 0.06a** | 20% |
| RNRE400 | 1.4 ± 0.19a** | 39.1% | 1.5 ± 0.08a*** | 25% |
| LPR3 | 1.1 ± 0.16a*** | 52.2% | 1.4 ± 0.07a*** | 30% |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using one way ANOVA followed by Post Hoc Tukey test. aCompared with negative control. **P < .01, ***P<.001. NC = negative control, RNRE = Rumex nepalensis root extract, LPR3 = loperamide 3 mg/kg, ml = millimeter, and g = gram.
Effect of the methanolic root extract of Rumex nepalensis on gastrointestinal transit in mice.
| Group | Length of small intestine (cm) | Distance travelled by charcoal meal (cm) | Peristaltic index (%) | % Inhibition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | 63.2 ± 0.95 | 52.3 ± 0.76 | 82.9 ± 1.40 | – |
| RNRE100 | 60.7 ± 0.88 | 45.7 ± 0.88a* | 75.3 ± 1.03a* | 12.6 |
| RNRE200 | 60.3 ± 0.88 | 42.7 ± 1.23a** | 70.8 ± 1.05a** | 18.4 |
| RNRE400 | 60.2 ± 0.98 | 38.8 ± 1.25a*** | 64.5 ± 1.15a*** | 25.8 |
| ATR3 | 57.7 ± 1.23a* | 35.3 ± 1.12a*** | 61.2 ± 0.71a*** | 32.5 |
Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed using one way ANOVA followed by Post Hoc Tukey test. aCompared with negative control. *P < .05, **P < .01, ***P<.001. NC = negative control, RNRE = Rumex nepalensis root extract, ATR3 = atropine 3 mg/kg, and cm = centimeter.
Effect of the methanolic root extract of Rumex nepalensis on in vivo antidiarrheal indices in mice.
| Group | Dfreq | Gmeq | Pfreq | ADI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NC | – | – | – | – |
| RNRE100 | 5.3 | 12.6 | 29.7 | 12.6 |
| RNRE200 | 30.3 | 18.4 | 40.6 | 28.3 |
| RNRE400 | 46.1 | 25.8 | 50.7 | 39.2 |
| POC | 55.1 | 32.5 | 81.9 | 52.7 |
Note: NC = negative control, RNRE = Rumex nepalensis root extract, POC = positive control, Dfreq = Delay in defecation time; Gmeq = Gut meal travel reduction; Pfreq = Purging frequency or % reduction in number of wet stools, and ADI = antidiarrheal index.