| Literature DB >> 35784862 |
Constance P Michel1, Laurent A Messonnier2, Benoit Giannesini1, Benjamin Chatel1,2, Christophe Vilmen1, Yann Le Fur1, David Bendahan1.
Abstract
Hydroxyurea (HU) is a ribonucleotide reductase inhibitor most commonly used as a therapeutic agent in sickle cell disease (SCD) with the aim of reducing the risk of vaso-occlusion and improving oxygen transport to tissues. Previous studies suggest that HU may be even beneficial in mild anemia. However, the corresponding effects on skeletal muscle energetics and function have never been reported in such a mild anemia model. Seventeen mildly anemic HbAA Townes mice were subjected to a standardized rest-stimulation (transcutaneous stimulation)-protocol while muscle energetics using 31Phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy and muscle force production were assessed and recorded. Eight mice were supplemented with hydroxyurea (HU) for 6 weeks while 9 were not (CON). HU mice displayed a higher specific total force production compared to the CON, with 501.35 ± 54.12 N/mm3 and 437.43 ± 57.10 N/mm3 respectively (+14.6%, p < 0.05). Neither the total rate of energy consumption nor the oxidative metabolic rate were significantly different between groups. The present results illustrated a positive effect of a HU chronic supplementation on skeletal muscle function in mice with mild anemia.Entities:
Keywords: anemia; hydroxyurea; magnetic resonance imaging; magnetic resonance spectroscopy; skeletal muscle energetics; skeletal muscle function
Year: 2022 PMID: 35784862 PMCID: PMC9240423 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.915640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.755
Muscles and body weights in HU and CON mice.
| CON ( | HU ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Body weight (g) | 30.91 ± 2.83 | 34.26* ± 1.94 |
| Gastrocnemius weight (mg) | 156.59 ± 24.36 | 158.31 ± 15.62 |
| Gastrocnemius weight/body weight (mg/g) | 5.09 ± 0.79 | 4.62 ± 0.33 |
| Muscle volume (mm3) | 154.76 ± 15.82 | 158.93 ± 15.41 |
Results are presented as means ± SD. *significantly different from CON.
T2 values in muscles of HU and CON mice.
| CON ( | HU ( | |
|---|---|---|
| Tibialis anterior | 25.74 ± 0.63 | 25.33 ± 0.55 |
| Whole GA | 30.79 ± 1.70 | 29.43 ± 0.84 * |
Results are presented as means ± SD. * significantly different from CON.
Metabolic index at rest and exercise.
| CON ( | HU ( | |
|---|---|---|
| pHirest | 7.25 ± 0.08 | 7.27 ± 0.09 |
| pHiend | 7.31 ± 0.11 | 7.24 ± 0.04 |
| PCr depletion (%) | −56.45 ± 6.14 | −58.68 ± 8.12 |
Results are presented as means ± SD. No significant variation was found.
FIGURE 1(A) pHi time course during the rest-stimulation-recovery protocol in CON and HU. Results are presented as means ± SEM. (B) Relative PCr time-course during the rest-stimulation-recovery protocol in CON and HU. Results are presented as means ± SEM.
FIGURE 2(A) PCrcost at the beginning of the moderate exercise in CON (grey, n = 9) and HU (black, n = 8). results are presented in boxplot. (B) PCrrec at the end of moderate exercise, results are presented in boxplot.
FIGURE 3Time dependent changes in specific peak force throughout the moderate exercise in CON (grey, n = 9) and HU-treated mice (black, n = 8). Results are presented as means ± SEM.
FIGURE 4Specific total force production from during the 6 minutes moderate exercise in CON (grey, n = 9) and HU (black, n = 8) groups, results are presented in boxplot. * significantly different from HU group.