Tamer M Gamal El-Din1, Thomas Zimmer2, Mohamed Chahine3. 1. Department of Pharmacology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States. 2. Institute of Physiology, University Hospital Jena, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany. 3. Department of Medicine, and CERVO Brain Research Centre, Laval University, Québec, QC, Canada.
Abstract
Entities:
Keywords:
VSD; drug design; druggability of voltage-gated sodium channels; fenestrations; pore domain
Voltage-gated ion channels play crucial roles in both excitable and non-excitable cells. Therefore, they constitute interesting drug targets. About 15–20% of the drugs used to treat human diseases target ion channels (Overington et al., 2006). High blood pressure calcium channel blockers, antiarrhythmics, antiepileptics, and local anesthetics, which target voltage-gated sodium channels, are all examples of drugs that target voltage-gated ion channels. Most of these drugs use the same mechanism in inhibiting ion channels’ activity, which is blocking the central pore (Gamal El-Din et al., 2018). A small number of medications target other areas of the channels and allosterically enhance the collapse of the pore (Tang et al., 2016; Zhao et al., 2019). The main disadvantage of pore blocker drugs that target voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels is that they are not specific for one type of voltage-gated ion channels. This may engender serious side effects that sometimes can be fatal. So, the aim is to develop a drug that specifically targets one type of a voltage-gated ion channel with high specificity and low toxicity that would be beneficial to patients who suffer from drugs’ side effects. The purpose of this Frontiers in Pharmacology Research Topic is to shed light on the subtle structural differences between different isoforms of voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels, which could be used as a marker to target one subtype of each ion channel. It will also help medicinal chemists, biophysicists, and structural biologists interested in structure-based drug design to use these differences into their considerations during the rational drug design process. We also aimed to focus on discussing the potential druggability of each structural component of the voltage-gated sodium and calcium channels. Recently, new channels’ areas have been proposed to play a role in channelopathy, drug access and binding (Gamal El-Din et al., 2018; Gamal El-Din and Lenaeus). In this Research Topic, Wisedchaisri and Gamal El-Din explored in their review classical drug receptors in voltage gated sodium and calcium channels that have recently been structurally characterized by cryo-electron microscopy with natural neurotoxins and clinical drugs (Clairfeuille et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2021; Wisedchaisri et al., 2021). They also examined recent drug discoveries for voltage-gated sodium channels and discuss opportunities to use distinct, state-dependent receptor sites in the voltage sensors as unique drug targets. In the final part of their review, they explored potential new receptor sites that are currently unknown for sodium channels but may be valuable for future drug discovery. On the other hand, Nguyen and Yarov-Yarovoy focused on current challenges and future opportunities to target pain sodium channels (Nav1.7, Nav1.8, and Nav1.9) with small molecules and peptides to design highly potent and selective NaV inhibitors. They explored the strengths of using computational tools like Rosetta and Alpha fold in structural guided development of pain therapeutics. Körner et al. reviewed the history of local anesthetics (LAs) to layout new perspectives in the use of these drugs clinically and in basic ion channel research. They also provided insights into different modelling approaches that will help to identify the exact molecular binding orientation, access pathways and pharmacokinetics (O’Leary and Chahine, 2018).Understanding how tumor therapeutics interact with voltage gated sodium channels was the topic of the research article presented by Fuchs et al. They showed that imipridone TIC10/ONC201, which belongs to a novel class of anti-cancer compounds, interacts with the Nav1.5 cardiac sodium channel, which is found to be expressed in a variety of diverse malignancies including breast cancer, colon cancer, ovarian cancer, melanoma, astrocytoma, or neuroblastoma. They found that TIC10/ONC201 acts as a strong blocker of Nav1.5 and thus might contribute to the anti-tumor activity of the drug. In the same direction of looking at the side effects/novel mechanisms of using some drugs to treat certain diseases, Föhr et al. found that atomoxetine, a neuroactive drug, approved for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) blocks human cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 with high affinity. They reasoned that this could be the cause of sudden death that occurs with several psychotropic drugs. In contrast, Labau et al., elucidated the mechanism by which lacosamide, an anti-epileptic drug that has been used recently to treat pain, interact with pain sodium channel Nav1.7. They suggested a hybrid mechanism of inhibition of NaV1.7 by therapeutically achievable concentrations of lacosamide where the drug must interact with a specific residue on the VSD4, W1538, before binding in the pore.Long QT syndrome is a life-threatening genetic disease. Most of the mutations that occurs in the cardiac sodium channel Nav1.5 lead to LQT3 or Brugada syndrome (Zimmer et al., 2014). Cano et al. investigated the potential use of ranolazine in treating specific LQT3 disease caused by a specific mutation, V411M, instead of using flecainide. Using Markovian sodium channel model, they compared the efficacy of using ranolazine and flecainide in affecting V411M mutation model. They concluded that patients with LQT3 caused by the heterozygous V411M mutation could benefit from a treatment with ranolazine rather than flecainide.Despite that structure-based drug design became an essential and invaluable tool for faster and more cost-efficient development way of new medications compared to traditional methods, it is still in its infancy and needs more work to get different structures of the same ion channel at more than one physiological state.
Authors: Alexander Cloake; Daniel T Infield; José P Llongueras; Christopher P Arthur; Thomas Clairfeuille; Zhong Rong Li; Yuwen Jian; Marie-France Martin-Eauclaire; Pierre E Bougis; Claudio Ciferri; Christopher A Ahern; Frank Bosmans; David H Hackos; Alexis Rohou; Jian Payandeh Journal: Science Date: 2019-02-07 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Tamer M Gamal El-Din; Michael J Lenaeus; Ning Zheng; William A Catterall Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2018-12-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Hui Xu; Tianbo Li; Alexis Rohou; Christopher P Arthur; Foteini Tzakoniati; Evera Wong; Alberto Estevez; Christine Kugel; Yvonne Franke; Jun Chen; Claudio Ciferri; David H Hackos; Christopher M Koth; Jian Payandeh Journal: Cell Date: 2019-01-17 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Goragot Wisedchaisri; Lige Tonggu; Tamer M Gamal El-Din; Eedann McCord; Ning Zheng; William A Catterall Journal: Mol Cell Date: 2020-11-23 Impact factor: 17.970
Authors: Daohua Jiang; Lige Tonggu; Tamer M Gamal El-Din; Richard Banh; Régis Pomès; Ning Zheng; William A Catterall Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2021-01-04 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Lin Tang; Tamer M Gamal El-Din; Teresa M Swanson; David C Pryde; Todd Scheuer; Ning Zheng; William A Catterall Journal: Nature Date: 2016-08-24 Impact factor: 49.962