Literature DB >> 35784501

Paraumbilical Varix Masquerading as a Gastric Submucosal Nodule in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis.

Teresa Varghese1, George M Varghese2, Madhu Mathew Vennikandam3, Meaghan Phipps4, Elizabeth Zheng4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2022        PMID: 35784501      PMCID: PMC9246068          DOI: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  ACG Case Rep J        ISSN: 2326-3253


× No keyword cloud information.

CASE REPORT

A 34-year-old man was admitted with alcoholic cirrhosis complicated by portal hypertension and blood loss anemia secondary to hematemesis. He denied any abdominal pain, and clinical examination showed no signs of abdominal tenderness, distension, ascites, or caput medusae, which would have ordinarily warranted a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen. After the patient was stabilized with no concern for a recurring bleed, an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) revealed grade 1 esophageal varices, moderate portal hypertensive gastropathy, and a 4 cm smooth luminal gastric body mass mimicking a gastrointestinal stromal tumor, a common submucosal lesion (SML) or nodule, as shown in Figure 1. On-site endoscopic biopsy of the gastric body mass was deferred because of concerns of the ambiguous presentation of ectopic varices and the patient's anemic state. This avoided possible iatrogenic rupture of any ectopic varix and life-threatening hemorrhage.
Figure 1.

(A and B) Upper GI endoscopy showing gastric body mass (4 cm, well-circumscribed, luminal projecting, flesh tan-colored, smooth surface) mimicking a submucosal nodule. GI, gastrointestinal.

(A and B) Upper GI endoscopy showing gastric body mass (4 cm, well-circumscribed, luminal projecting, flesh tan-colored, smooth surface) mimicking a submucosal nodule. GI, gastrointestinal. Abdominal CT was alternatively ordered to assess for extrinsic gastric wall compression. The CT revealed a 40 mm aneurysmal dilatation of a periumbilical varix adjacent to the gastric antrum (Figure 2). Informed consent for coil embolization of the varix was obtained, and follow-up revealed regression of the varix (Figure 3).
Figure 2.

(A and B) Axial and coronal abdominal CT scans with contrast showing 40 mm aneurysmal dilatation of a periumbilical varix adjacent to the gastric body. CT, computed tomography.

Figure 3.

Venogram obtained immediately after coil embolization of paraumbilical varix.

(A and B) Axial and coronal abdominal CT scans with contrast showing 40 mm aneurysmal dilatation of a periumbilical varix adjacent to the gastric body. CT, computed tomography. Venogram obtained immediately after coil embolization of paraumbilical varix. Ectopic varices such as paraumbilical varices arise in almost 14% of cirrhotic patients but are often underreported.[1] They can have an ambiguous presentation both clinically (eg, possible venous hum, caput medusae, abdominal pain, distension, anemia, or ascites) and endoscopically (external compression of gastric wall mimicking a gastric SML).[1,2] Gastric SMLs are also often asymptomatic and appear as smooth luminal projecting flesh tan-colored masses on EGD.[3] Most SMLs are gastrointestinal stromal tumors, which have a high malignant potential (especially if >4 cm) and require endoscopic biopsy. However, the likelihood of detecting them on routine EGD is only 0.36%; hence, biopsy of suspected SMLs should be deferred until other etiologies have been ruled out.[4] Ectopic varices should be suspected in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension where endoscopy fails to locate the source of upper gastrointestinal bleed.[2] Many studies suggest that patients with small esophageal varices (grade 1 varix) were associated with a larger ectopic varix (4 cm) to offset the portal venous pressure.[1] Intravenous contrast-enhanced multislice CT is the gold standard for the diagnosis of ectopic varices, which appear as well-defined, rounded, tubular, or serpentine structures with homogeneous attenuation (Figure 2).[5] Coil embolization or sclerotherapy by interventional radiology techniques can achieve successful outcomes in varix regression and patient recovery (Figure 3).[2]

DISCLOSURES

Author contributions: The primary team that cared for this patient and reviewed this manuscript included M. Vennikandam, M. Phipps, and E. Zheng. T. Varghese and G. Varghese reviewed the literature and drafted the manuscript/image submission. T. Varghese is the article guarantor. Financial disclosure: None to report. Previous presentation: This case was presented as an oral presentation at the 2021 (AKMG) All Kerala Medical Graduates Association Annual Conference; August 14, 2021; Atlanta, Georgia. Informed consent was obtained for this case report.
  5 in total

Review 1.  Varices in portal hypertension: evaluation with CT.

Authors:  K C Cho; Y D Patel; R H Wachsberg; J Seeff
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.333

2.  Endoscopic ultrasonography for gastric submucosal lesions.

Authors:  Ioannis S Papanikolaou; Konstantinos Triantafyllou; Anastasia Kourikou; Thomas Rösch
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2011-05-16

3.  Cruveilhier-Baumgarten syndrome: an efficient spontaneous portosystemic collateral preventing oesophageal varices bleeding.

Authors:  E Caturelli; M Pompili; M M Squillante; G Sperandeo; S Carughi; M Sperandeo; F Perri; A Andriulli; C Cellerino; G L Rapaccini
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1994 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.029

4.  Hemorrhagic ascites from spontaneous ectopic mesenteric varices rupture in NASH induced cirrhosis and successful outcome: a case report.

Authors:  Raja G R Edula; Kamran Qureshi; Hicham Khallafi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Classification of submucosal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Laura-Graves Ponsaing; Katalin Kiss; Mark-Berner Hansen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.