| Literature DB >> 35784311 |
Yuanfeng Zhang1,2, Xin Chen1, Lin Li3,4, Yun Li3, Li Lin3, Yang Cao3, Na Wang3, Donglin Yang1, Aiming Pang1, Rongli Zhang1, Qiaoling Ma1, Weihua Zhai1, Yi He1, Jialin Wei1, Erlie Jiang1, MingZhe Han1, Yicheng Zhang3, Sizhou Feng1.
Abstract
We compared the efficacy and safety of porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin (pALG) (n=140) and rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG) (n=86) in patients with acquired aplastic anemia (AA) receiving hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) from matched sibling donors (MSD) in two transplantation centers in China ranging from 2005 to 2020. The groups had similar baseline characteristics except for a higher number of infused mononuclear cells (P<0.001) and a higher proportion of peripheral blood stem cells as graft sources (P=0.003) in the pALG group. The rates of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 (P=1), platelet engraftment at day 28 (P=0.228), bloodstream infection before engraftment (P=0.867), invasive fungal diseases (P=0.362), cytomegalovirus viremia (P=0.667), and graft rejection (P=0.147) were similar in the two groups. A higher cumulative incidence of grades II-IV acute graft versus host disease (aGvHD) at 100 days occurred in the pALG group (19% vs. 8%, P=0.035) while no significant differences in grades III-IV aGvHD (P=0.572), mild to severe chronic GvHD (cGvHD) (P=0.181), and moderate to severe cGvHD (P=0.586) were observed. The actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS), failure-free survival (FFS), and GvHD-free, FFS rates of the pALG group were 87% (95% confidence interval [CI], 82-93), 85% (95% CI, 80-92), and 78% (95% CI, 72-92) versus 91% (95% CI, 86-99) (P=0.33), 88% (95% CI, 82-97) (P=0.428), and 79% (95% CI, 72-90) (P=0.824) in the rATG group, respectively. A busulfan-containing conditioning regimen was the only adverse risk factor for OS and FFS in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, pALG is an alternative to rATG in patients with severe AA receiving MSD-HSCT. A prospective, large-sample study is needed to explore this therapy further.Entities:
Keywords: aplastic anemia; matched sibling donors; porcine; rabbit; stem cell transplantation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35784311 PMCID: PMC9241985 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.889784
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 8.786
Characteristics and outcomes of patients with acquired aplastic anemia.
| Variables | pALG group (140) | rATG group (86) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Patient age, years, median (range) | 26 (7-66) | 24 (4-54) | 0.15 |
| Patient gender (male), no. (%) | 80 (57.14) | 51 (59.30) | 0.857 |
| Donor gender (male), no. (%) | 64 (45.71) | 37 (43.02) | 0.797 |
| Diagnosis, no. (%) | 0.396 | ||
| severe aplastic anemia | 90 (64.29) | 49 (56.98) | |
| very severe aplastic anemia | 40 (28.57) | 32 (37.21) | |
| non-severe aplastic anemia | 10 (7.14) | 5 (5.81) | |
| Interval from diagnosis to transplant, moths, median (range) | 2 (0.4-204) | 2 (0.5-231) | 0.375 |
| Conditioning regimen | 0.415 | ||
| ATG+CTX ± FLU | 115 (82.14) | 66 (76.74) | |
| BU+FLU+ATG ± CTX | 25 (17.86) | 20 (23.26) | |
| Graft source, no. (%) | 0.003 | ||
| Peripheral blood | 119 (85.00) | 58 (67.44) | |
| Bone marrow ± peripheral blood | 21 (15.00) | 28 (32.56) | |
| Mononuclear cells, ×108/kg, median (range) | 10 (2.8-47) | 8 (2.8-38) | <0.001 |
| CD3+ cells, ×106/kg, median (range) | 127.3 (13.7-384.1) | 115.8 (6.7-292.5) | 0.377 |
| CD34+ cells, ×106/kg, median (range) | 3 (1.5-17) | 3 (0.75-10) | 0.161 |
| Neutrophil engraftment, days, median (range) | 12 (7-22) | 12 (9-23) | 0.004 |
| Platelet engraftment, days, median (range) | 12 (7-30) | 14 (8-34) | 0.001 |
| 28-day neutrophil engraftment, no. (%) | 138 (100) | 86 (100) | 1 |
| 28-day platelet engraftment, no. (%) | 132 (95.65) | 78 (90.70) | 0.228 |
| Graft rejection | 0.147 | ||
| Primary graft rejection, no. (%) | 1 (0.71) | 0 (0) | |
| Secondary graft rejection, no. (%) | 3 (2.14) | 6 (6.98) | |
| Bloodstream infection before engraftment, no. (%) | 22 (15.71) | 12 (13.95) | 0.867 |
| Invasive fungal diseases, no. (%) | 10 (7.14) | 10 (11.63) | 0.362 |
| Cytomegalovirus viremia, no. (%) | 31 (22.14) | 22 (25.58) | 0.667 |
| 100-day aGvHD grades I-IV, no. (%) | 33 (24.26)* | 20 (23.26)* | 0.992 |
| 100-day aGvHD grades II-IV, no. (%) | 26 (19.12)* | 7 (8.14)* | 0.041 |
| 100-day aGvHD grades III-IV, no. (%) | 11 (8.09)* | 5 (5.81)* | 0.71 |
| Mild to severe cGvHD, no. (%) | 29 (22.31)# | 9 (11.11)# | 0.061 |
| Moderate to severe cGvHD, no. (%) | 6 (4.76)# | 6 (7.69)# | 0.577 |
| Overall deaths, no. (%) | 19 (13.57) | 8 (9.30) | 0.454 |
| Follow-up of alive patients, moths, median (range) | 62 (7-190) | 79 (3-169) | 0.087 |
*Among enrolled patients, 136 and 86 patients were evaluable; #among enrolled patients, 130 and 81 patients were evaluable; among enrolled patients, 74 and 33 patients were evaluable.
pALG, porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin; rATG, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin; no., number of patients; CTX, cyclophosphamide; FLU, fludarabine; BU, busulfan; aGvHD, acute graft versus host disease; cGvHD, chronic graft versus host disease.
Figure 1Cumulative incidences (CI) of grades II-IV aGvHD (A), grades III-IV aGvHD (B), mild to severe cGvHD (C), and moderate to severe cGvHD (D) in the pALG and rATG groups.
Primary causes of death (COD) among patients.
| COD | pALG group (n=19) (%) | rATG group (n=8) (%) |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| aGvHD | 7 (5) | 1 (1.2) | 0.16 |
| Infection | 10 (7.1) | 3 (3.5) | 0.379 |
| cGvHD | 1 (0.7) | – | 1 |
| Accident | 1 (0.7) | 1 (1.2) | 1 |
| Intracranial hemorrhage | – | 3 (3.5) | 0.054 |
pALG, porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin; rATG, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin; aGvHD, acute graft versus host disease; cGvHD, chronic graft versus host disease.
Figure 2The actuarial 5-year overall survival (OS) (A), failure-free survival (FFS) (B), and GvHD-free, failure-free survival (GFFS) (C) rates of patients in the pALG and rATG groups.
Figure 3Overall survival (OS) of different age groups.
Univariate and multivariate analysis of survival.
| Variables | Comparison | Overall survival | Failure-free survival | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||||
| HR (95%CI) |
| HR (95%CI) |
| HR (95%CI) |
| HR (95%CI) |
| ||
| Patient gender | Female vs male | 0.44 (0.19-1.05) | 0.065 | 0.47 (0.17-1.29) | 0.144 | 0.53 (0.25-1.1) | 0.088 | 0.96 (0.3-1.32) | 0.221 |
| Donor gender | Female vs male | 1.42 (0.65-3.11) | 0.377 | 1.19 (0.6-2.35) | 0.62 | ||||
| Patient age | Continuous variable | 1.02 (0.99-1.05) | 0.269 | 1.01 (0.98-1.04) | 0.503 | ||||
| Diagnosis (VSAA) | VSAA vs SAA | 1.71 (0.77-3.82) | 0.19 | 2.05 (0.81-5.14) | 0.128 | 1.84 (0.89-3.77) | 0.097 | 1.94 (0.92-4.07) | 0.082 |
| Diagnosis (NSAA) | NSAA vs SAA | 2.13 (0.61-7.47) | 0.238 | 1 (0.21-4.77) | 1 | 2.45 (0.82-7.34) | 0.109 | 1.74 (0.56-5.4) | 0.337 |
| Treatment | ATG vs no ATG | 1.45 (0.2-10.73) | 0.715 | 1.14 (0.16-8.36) | 0.898 | ||||
| ATG source | rATG vs pALG | 0.67 (0.29-1.52) | 0.336 | 0.75 (0.36-1.54) | 0.43 | ||||
| Conditioning regimen | Bu vs non-Bu | 3 (1.39-6.49) | 0.005 | 3.4 (1.35-8.56) | 0.009 | 2.07 (1.01-4.27) | 0.048 | 0.35 (0.1-1.15) | 0.031 |
| Interval from D to T | Continuous variable | 1 (0.99-1.01) | 0.395 | 1 (0.99-1.01) | 0.617 | ||||
| Graft source | BM ± PB vs PB | 0.43 (0.13-1.42) | 0.167 | 0.65 (0.15-2.86) | 0.566 | 0.31 (0.1-1.03) | 0.056 | 2.35 (1.08-5.1) | 0.084 |
| Amount of MNC | Continuous variable | 0.99 (0.93-1.05) | 0.66 | 0.98 (0.93-1.04) | 0.462 | ||||
| Amount of CD34+ cells | Continuous variable | 0.99 (0.84-1.16) | 0.871 | 0.97 (0.83-1.12) | 0.651 | ||||
HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; VSAA, very severe aplastic anemia; NSAA, non-severe aplastic anemia; SAA, severe aplastic anemia; ATG, anti-thymocyte globulin; rATG, rabbit ATG; pALG, porcine anti-lymphocyte globulin; D, diagnosis; T, transplantation; Bu, busulfan; BM, bone marrow; PB, peripheral blood; MNC, mononuclear cells.