| Literature DB >> 35784247 |
Pravin R Kshirsagar1, Hariprasath Manoharan2, Shitharth Selvarajan3, Hassan A Alterazi4, Dilbag Singh5, Heung-No Lee5.
Abstract
The majority of the current-generation individuals all around the world are dealing with a variety of health-related issues. The most common cause of health problems has been found as depression, which is caused by intellectual difficulties. However, most people are unable to recognize such occurrences in them, and no procedures for discriminating them from normal people have been created so far. Even some advanced technologies do not support distinct classes of individuals as language writing skills vary greatly across numerous places, making the central operations cumbersome. As a result, the primary goal of the proposed research is to create a unique model that can detect a variety of diseases in humans, thereby averting a high level of depression. A machine learning method known as the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) model has been included into this evolutionary process for extracting numerous features in three distinct units. The CNN also detects early-stage problems since it accepts input in the form of writing and sketching, both of which are turned to images. Furthermore, with this sort of image emotion analysis, ordinary reactions may be easily differentiated, resulting in more accurate prediction results. The characteristics such as reference line, tilt, length, edge, constraint, alignment, separation, and sectors are analyzed to test the usefulness of CNN for recognizing abnormalities, and the extracted features provide an enhanced value of around 74%higher than the conventional models.Entities:
Keywords: convolutional neural network (CNN); depression characteristics; emotion recognition; machine learning (ML); perception
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35784247 PMCID: PMC9243559 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.893989
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Model Summary for feature extraction using Handwriting and Drawing sample.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 2D Convolutional (Conv2D)-5 | 0, 222, 222, 32 | 898 |
| 2D Convolutional-6 (Conv2D) | 0, 220, 220, 64 | 18,494 |
| 2D Maximum_pooling-4 | 0, 110, 110, 64 | 0 |
| Dropout-5 (Dropout) | 0, 110,110,64 | 0 |
| 2D Convolutional-7 (Conv2D) | 0, 108,108,64 | 36,926 |
| Dropout-6 (Dropout) | 0,54,54, 64 | 0 |
| 2D Convolutional-8 (Conv2D) | 0, 52,52,128 | 73,858 |
| Dropout- 8 | 0,26, 26, 128 | 0 |
| Flatten- 3 | 0, 86528 | 0 |
| Dense- 4 | 0, 64 | 5,537,858 |
| Dropout-7 | 0, 64 | 0 |
| Dense-5 | 0, 1 | 65 |
Figure 1A sample task to draw a pentagon, a house, a circle and a clock and text in cursive.
Figure 2Network architecture for eight-layered CNN.
Figure 3Feature extraction for drawing and handwriting samples.
Figure 4Feature fusion and depression scale prediction using handwriting and drawing samples
Figure 5Sample set vs. Measurement values (A) Total comparison, (B) accuracy, (C) precision, (D) recall, and (E) F1-Score.
Comparative analysis of different ML algorithms used for predicting depression from samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 82.54 | 84.54 | 83.36 | 8.394 |
| Random forest | 88.97 | 87.46 | 88.77 | 8.811 |
| Naive Bayes | 78.21 | 76.96 | 75.12 | 7.6028 |
| 71.36 | 73.49 | 72.48 | 7.2981 | |
| Logistic regression | 64.52 | 66.16 | 68.83 | 6.744 |
Error values of different ML algorithms used for predicting depression from samples.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| SVM | 8.8548 | 8.8942 | 9.6363 |
| Random forest | 6,541 | 8.4235 | 8.5896 |
| Naive Bayes | 10.2254 | 9.2152 | 10.2203 |
| 4,141 | 8.4458 | 10.9299 | |
| Logistic regression | 12.6656 | 11.5569 | 12.6112 |
Figure 6Error values attained from sample dataset.
Figure 7Confusion matrix for depressed and non-depressed classes of the proposed model.
Figure 8Comparison of convergence characteristics.