| Literature DB >> 35783955 |
Lingyun Liu1, Lupeng Wang1, Xuefei Li1, Shurui Zhu1, Niangang Pan1, Xin Wang1, Changtian Li1,2, Yu Li1,2.
Abstract
The cultivation of Pleurotus eryngii was studied by different methods, such as puncturing and fixed-point mushroom production, shading treatment at the top of the bag, and pulling the top of the bag. The agronomic characters, yield, nutritional components, and antioxidant activities in vitro of fruiting bodies of P. eryngii were determined. The results showed that the number of buds in the perforated treatment was less than that in the production method of traditional fruiting bodies to a certain extent. When a circular hole with a diameter of 1.5 cm was drilled in the perforated treatment, the number of buds was 5, which was less than that in the control group. The efficiency of artificial removal of buds was significantly higher than that of the control group, but the harvesting date was longer than that of other methods. The number of buds in shading treatment and bag opening treatment was significantly less than that in the control group, which could effectively control the number of buds and reduce the cost of manpower and material resources. In terms of nutritional components, the A3 treatment group with a hole diameter of 1.0 cm and a quantity of one had the highest crude protein content of 151.34 g, and a significant difference was observed in crude fiber content compared with other treatments. The extraction rate of B5 crude polysaccharide was the highest, and the extraction rate was 12.90%. The antioxidant activities in vitro increased with the increase of crude polysaccharide concentration. Using A3 treatment to cultivate fruiting bodies is conducive to meeting people's requirements for improving quality of life.Entities:
Keywords: Pleurotus eryngii; agronomic characters; antioxidant activities; buds; nutritional components
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783955 PMCID: PMC9244624 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.917010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 6.627
Punch round holes and triangular holes in the fixed position of the bag.
| Round hole | Diameters (cm) | Number | Triangular hole | Side length (cm) | Number |
| A1 | 0.5 | 1 | B1 | 0.5 | 1 |
| A2 | 0.5 | 2 | B2 | 0.5 | 2 |
| A3 | 1.0 | 1 | B3 | 1.0 | 1 |
| A4 | 1.0 | 2 | B4 | 1.0 | 2 |
| A5 | 1.5 | 1 | B5 | 1.5 | 1 |
| A6 | 1.5 | 2 | B6 | 1.5 | 2 |
Comparison of emergence time of primordia and number of buds under different treatments.
| Treatment | Date of complete mycelia running | Date of primordia occurrence | Number of buds | Harvest date |
| A1 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 7.6 ± 2.40 | 10.30 |
| A2 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 9.8 ± 2.28 | 10.30 |
| A3 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 5.4 ± 1.67 | 10.30 |
| A4 | 10.13 | 10.18 | 11.8 ± 2.38g | 10.30 |
| A5 | 10.13 | 10.18 | 5.4 ± 1.57b | 10.30 |
| A6 | 10.13 | 10.18 | 8.0 ± 1.41 | 10.30 |
| B1 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 8.4 ± 2.07 | 10.30 |
| B2 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 8.4 ± 1.81 | 10.30 |
| B3 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 6.4 ± 1.51 | 10.30 |
| B4 | 10.13 | 10.19 | 9.2 ± 2.58 | 10.30 |
| B5 | 10.13 | 10.18 | 6.8 ± 1.30 | 10.30 |
| B6 | 10.13 | 10.18 | 11.0 ± 1.58 | 10.30 |
| C | 10.13 | 10.20 | 3.2 ± 1.48a | 10.29 |
| D | 10.13 | 10.20 | 3.0 ± 0.70a | 10.29 |
| CK | 10.13 | 10.20 | 6.2 ± 1.48 | 10.29 |
The data are mean ± standard deviation, and different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
Effects of different treatments on agronomic characters of fruiting bodies.
| Treatment | Cap diameter (mm) | Stipe diameter (mm) | Stipe length (mm) |
| A1 | 51.17 ± 5.36 | 41.17 ± 2.68 | 113.73 ± 3.82 |
| A2 | 46.63 ± 0.67 | 39.44 ± 1.25 | 123.53 ± 4.34b |
| A3 | 59.22 ± 5.57b | 43.25 ± 5.50 | 113.33 ± 21.68 |
| A4 | 47.54 ± 3.02 | 36.10 ± 3.31 | 108.86 ± 13.32 |
| A5 | 50.47 ± 1.03 | 40.17 ± 3.70 | 117.33 ± 7.04 |
| A6 | 49.84 ± 2.08 | 39.46 ± 1.81 | 90.23 ± 4.93h |
| B1 | 42.67 ± 1.16g | 33.12 ± 2.09f | 104.16 ± 10.19 |
| B2 | 48.01 ± 1.91 | 36.50 ± 3.12 | 94.03 ± 10.12 |
| B3 | 45.66 ± 5.11 | 34.52 ± 4.44 | 101.10 ± 3.68 |
| B4 | 45.26 ± 1.17 | 37.23 ± 1.64 | 95.96 ± 4.79 |
| B5 | 51.86 ± 1.58 | 40.64 ± 4.55 | 116.60 ± 6.35 |
| B6 | 49.51 ± 1.54 | 40.66 ± 1.03 | 105.67 ± 2.89 |
| C | 57.64 ± 4.65 | 42.15 ± 2.40 | 127.23 ± 9.88b |
| D | 65.71 ± 3.82a | 51.17 ± 3.31a | 139.60 ± 7.68a |
| CK | 55.65 ± 2.54 | 47.97 ± 3.91 | 112.50 ± 6.22 |
The data are mean ± standard deviation, and different letters in the same column indicate significant difference (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 1Effects of different treatments on the weight of single fruiting bodies. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 2Effects of different treatments on the weight of single bag. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 3Crude protein content of fruiting bodies of each treatment. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 4Crude fiber content of fruiting bodies of each treatment. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 5Crude fat content of fruiting bodies of each treatment. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
FIGURE 6Total sugar content of fruiting bodies of each treatment. Different letters in the figure indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).
Extraction rate of crude polysaccharide from fruiting bodies of different treatments.
| Treatment | A3 | B5 | C | D | CK |
| Crude polysaccharide(%) | 9.20 | 12.90 | 12.23 | 10.78 | 9.06 |
FIGURE 7Total antioxidant capacity of crude polysaccharides from fruiting bodies at different concentrations in vitro.
FIGURE 8DPPH radical scavenging ability of crude polysaccharides from fruiting bodies with different concentrations in vitro.
FIGURE 9Hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of crude polysaccharides from fruiting bodies with different concentrations in vitro.
FIGURE 10Superoxide anion radical scavenging ability of crude polysaccharides from fruiting bodies with different concentrations in vitro.