Literature DB >> 35783877

Efficacy and Safety of Aspirin, Promethazine, and Micronutrients for Rapid Clinical Recovery in Mild to Moderate COVID-19 Patients: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

G Sunil Kumar1, Atul Vadgaonkar2, Srilata Purunaik3, Rohit Shelatkar4, Vidyadhar G Vaidya5, Gayatri Ganu6, Aditya Vadgaonkar7, Shashank Joshi8.   

Abstract

Introduction In the present study, the combination of two tablets, one with Aspirin and Promethazine and the other with vitamin D3, C, and B3 along with zinc and selenium supplementation was proposed as an intervention (APMV2020). The ingredients in the formulation represent a precise, tailored therapy for the symptoms of COVID-19, combined with natural constituents to help the body itself build immunity to recover from infection. The present study was conducted to clinically validate the safety and efficacy of the APMV2020 tablets. Trial design The present trial is a randomized, multicentric, controlled clinical trial involving 260 mild to moderate COVID-19 patients. The treatment duration was of 10 days. Methodology The subjects were randomized to receive either the control intervention (clinical management protocol for COVID-19 advocated by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) or the test intervention (treatment with APMV2020 tablets along with the standard control treatment. The assessment days were baseline, days five and 10. Results APMV2020 significantly (<0.05) improved symptoms of COVID-19 like cough, myalgia, headache, and anosmia as compared to the control group. APMV2020 treatment also reduced inflammatory markers like lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, and C-reactive protein (CRP). Conclusion APMV2020 can prove as a good candidate to be integrated into the COVID-19 management protocol. As it can offer speedy clinical recovery to reduce the burden on healthcare infrastructure, second, the combination shows significant anti-inflammatory potential to improve prognosis, and lastly, the immunomodulatory properties offer long-term protection that can help in combating long COVID symptoms and complications.
Copyright © 2022, Kumar et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aspirin; covid-19; promethazine; selenium; vitamin c; vitamin d; zinc

Year:  2022        PMID: 35783877      PMCID: PMC9240808          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25467

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection presents itself clinically from asymptomatic, to mild to moderate respiratory and non-respiratory symptoms, to severe COVID-19 pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) with multiorgan failure. There is worldwide emergence of various long-lasting complications after SARS-CoV-2 infection (the post-COVID syndrome or long COVID). The SARS-Cov-2 infection leads to a host response that triggers wide-ranging immuno-inflammatory, thrombotic, and parenchymal derangements in COVID 19 [1]. The virus mutations led to several phases or waves of COVID 19. The cross-reactivity on one hand and the viral mutations, on the other hand, explain the evolution of the pandemic until the summer of 2020 [2]. The primary mutations observed during the summer of 2021 appeared in the spike protein [3], which has noticeably increased its transmissibility. The strain with D614G is associated with validated previous studies showing that patients infected have higher viral loads in the upper respiratory tract [4]. With time, the virus can get mutated in various ways, and there should be some interventions that will, in general, improve the prognosis of the disease. The first line of treatment used in COVID-19 treatment is antiviral drugs with antipyretics etc. As measures to fight the novel COVID-19 are researched, emphasis is being placed on reducing the cytokine storm and immunity-building benefits of COVID-19 treatment. In the present study, the combination of two tablets (dosage mentioned in the intervention and dosage section), one with Aspirin and Promethazine and the other with vitamin D3, C, and B3 along with zinc and selenium supplementation was proposed as an intervention (APMV2020) (CTRI/2021/06/034254). The ingredients in the formulation represent a precise, tailored therapy for the symptoms of COVID, combined with natural constituents to help the body to build immunity on its own to recover from infection. Treatment with APMV2020 in mild to moderate COVID 19 management holds the potential for providing faster recovery from associated symptoms and reducing the risk of disease progression [5,6,7]. The present clinical trial involves the evaluation of the safety and efficacy of APMV2020 along with the standard of care in mild to moderate COVID 19 patients. Objectives of the study The objectives of the study were to assess the effectiveness of the APMV2020 combination in reducing symptoms that is more subjects getting relieved of symptoms, reducing inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), ferritin, and faster clinical recovery in mild to moderate COVID 19 patients along with the assessment of safety and tolerability of the intervention.

Materials and methods

Study design We conducted a randomized controlled trial with superiority consideration compared to control involving COVID-19 patients recruited from the outpatient department of SK Clinic & Scans, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala (site one); Swasthi Orthopedic and Respiratory Health Care, Bangalore, Karnataka (site two); Vijay Nursing Home, Nashik Maharashtra (site three). The study was approved by Royal Pune Independent Ethics Committee and was registered with the Clinical Trial Registry of India (CTRI/2021/06/034254). The trial involved parallel design, two groups i.e. APMV2020 and control allocated as 1:1. The consolidated standards of reporting trials (CONSORT) flow of the entire study is depicted as follows (Figure 1).
Figure 1

CONSORT diagram.

Inclusion criteria Mild to moderate symptomatic patients [having National Early Warning Score (NEWS) score ≤ 6] aged 18 to 60 years, males and females, confirmed as COVID-19 positive (maximum of 48 hrs before randomization) based on the everse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) report were screened for the study. Subjects willing to provide consent and follow-up were included in the study. There were no changes in the inclusion criteria throughout the study. Exclusion criteria Patients with autoimmune disease and compromised immunity were not included in the study. Pregnant or lactating women, patients requiring hospital admission at the time of screening, and those with aspirin contraindicated were excluded. Subjects with comorbidity at the critical stage at screening were also excluded. Study groups We have taken the patient's consent as per the GCP guidelines. We screened 60 subjects on sites one and two and 140 subjects on site three i.e. Two hundred and sixty subjects based on the inclusion-exclusion criteria, all of which were found suitable and were randomized using a computer-generated randomization sheet to receive either the standard treatment i.e. antiviral and antipyretic agents (control group) or APMV2020 tablets (treatment group). All the subjects were provided with conventional care advocated by the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India. Figure 1 presents the flow of events for the subjects considered in the analysis for this manuscript. The mechanism used to implement the random allocation sequence was sequentially numbered containers, as the trial is open-label there is no blinding. We received a randomization schedule from a qualified statistician and the investigator enrolled the participants in respective study groups. Sample size Considering 40% of subjects getting relieved of cough in the APMV2020 group is on day five compared to 20% in the control group, a qualified statistician evaluated the sample size of a total of 240 (120 cases in each arm) completed cases needed to assess the study objective at 90% power and 5% level of significance. A total of 260 subjects were screened and equally divided in both groups, we represented data of 192 completer subjects in this manuscript. There were 31 subjects from the APMV2020 group and 37 from the control group were lost to follow-up and hence dropped out of the study. Intervention and dosage The dose of APMV2020 was tablet A and tablet B one tablet twice a day with water for 10 days (Table 1). The treatment was provided for 10 days.
Table 1

APMV2020 details

Component A tablet
Aspirin IP150 mg
Promethazine Hydrochloride IP5 mg
Component B tablet
Vitamin D32000 IU
Vitamin C750 mg
Niacinamide80 mg
Zinc Sulphate Monohydrate15 mg
Potassium Iodide100 mcg
Sodium Selenate 82.5 mcg
To assure a standard of care treatment antiviral, antipyretic, and antibiotics were used as per the discretion of the investigator to both groups, and additionally, antihistaminic or antiinflammatory agents were prescribed as a rescue to the control group discretion of the investigator wherever needed. Outcome measures As APMV2020 contains ingredients such as aspirin and promethazine thought to be reducing symptoms and inflammation in COVID 19 and multivitamin composition aiding early recovery, the primary study outcomes were improvement in clinical symptoms on four points ordinal scale (0- no symptoms, one - mild symptoms, two - moderate symptoms, three - severe symptoms) including fever, headache, diarrhea, breathlessness, cough, anosmia, fatigue, and myalgia, a reduction in elevated levels of inflammatory markers and changes in SpO2 levels. The symptom scoring was performed using WHO eight score ordinal scale. The secondary outcomes were the requirement of hospitalization and admission to ICU, and the adverse events occurring from baseline to the end of the study. There were no changes in the outcome assessment or amendments to the protocol. Methodology After attaining ethical approval, the study was registered on the Clinical Trials Registry- India (CTRI) website (CTRI/2021/06/034254). The subjects with positive RT-PCR reports within 48 hrs from the outpatient department of study sites were recruited. The subjects were considered for further evaluation as per the inclusion and exclusion criteria. On the screening visit, written informed consent was obtained from subjects. Demographic details, medical, surgical, and treatment history, and current medication, were noted in the case record form (CRF), along with the vital signs, followed by detailed clinical examination and lab investigations. The record of concomitant medication was properly maintained. The eligible subjects were randomized in respective groups. The treatment was followed till day 10. Assessment of treatment compliance, SpO2, symptom grading was done using the patient’s diary. All subjects were advised to follow their diet routine. The presence of any adverse events was strictly monitored and reported. On day 10, all lab investigations were repeated. The period of the study was from December 2021 to February 2022. There were 95% of subjects fully vaccinated at the time of COVID 19 infection and study enrollment in both groups. Data analysis Patients without any major protocol violation like in inclusion criteria and compliance, who consumed at least one dose of intervention, and those who did not take any prohibited medications like any traditional medicine during the study period were considered for analysis. Variables, such as age and gender, were summarized by frequency, mean, and standard deviation. Number of subjects presenting score of 0 on days five and 10 were analyzed and compared between groups using the Fisher’s exact test. Levels of inflammatory markers were analyzed by Wilcoxon signed rank test and Mann Whitney test whereas the hematological parameters were assessed by student t-test. Parameters like the requirement of hospitalization and ICU, and days of oxygen supplementation, were represented as percentages.

Results

Total of 260 subjects were screened and randomized in two groups (130 in each group), out of which 31 subjects from the APMV2020 group and 37 from the control group were dropped out as they lost to follow-up. We evaluated 99 subjects from the APMV2020 group and 93 from control group (total of 192) in this manuscript. Demographic characteristics Both groups were comparable in terms of the mean age of the male and female subjects, ranging from 36 to 37.6 years. There were 16 and 18 subjects presenting comorbidity in APMV2020 and control groups respectively. The male to female ratio in both test and control groups was approximately 55.2:44.8 (Table 2).
Table 2

Demographic details of study subjects

*Analyzed by student t test. # analyzed by chi square test. Non-significant p>0.05

Parameter Treatment Control
Group/ Gender# Male (n=54) Female(n=45) Male(n=52) Female(n=41)
*Age (years) 38.20±10.52 36.82±10.26 36.27±11.28 36.49±12.67
Total Age (years) 37.6±10.4 36±12

Demographic details of study subjects

*Analyzed by student t test. # analyzed by chi square test. Non-significant p>0.05 Primary study outcomes Change in the COVID-19 Symptoms Clinical symptoms such as cough, breathlessness, fatigue, myalgia, headache, diarrhea and anosmia were assessed from baseline to day 10. There was significant reduction (p<0.05) in symptoms in both groups from their respective baseline to day 10. However it was evident that the treatment group had a faster relief of symptoms compared to the control as more subjects were relieved of cough, myalgia, headache and anosmia in the treatment group on day five as compared to the control (Table 3). The faster resolution of symptoms is denoted by change of WHO ordinal scale score from two to 0 on day five in the treatment group than the control.
Table 3

Subjects population with symptom score between groups

 Analyzed by Fisher Exact test. p<0.05 indicated as * for within group and # for between group analysis.

Duration/ scoreTreatment (N=99)Control (N=93)
Score 0Score 1Score 2Score 0Score 1Score 2
Cough
Baseline392634461235
556*376493410
1062*37055380
Breathlessness
Baseline97209210
599009012
1099#008922
Fatigue
Baseline95229120
598108814
1099#0085*17
Myalgia
Baseline343530293034
577*#21159*331
1097*2093*00
Headache
Baseline57#261667179
586*13087*42
1098*1093*00
Diarrhea
Baseline91358832
599*0093*00
1099*0093*00
Anosmia
Baseline836108067
597*#2081102
1099*#008391

Subjects population with symptom score between groups

Analyzed by Fisher Exact test. p<0.05 indicated as * for within group and # for between group analysis. Changes in SpO2 Levels The average SpO2 level in both groups were maintained in normal range and thus the difference was not significant (The range of SpO2 was 97-98.5%). Changes in Inflammatory Markers Inflammatory markers, namely CRP, LDH, D-dimer, and ferritin were elevated in both groups at baseline. There was a statistically significant (p<0.05) reduction in the elevated levels of serum LDH and ferritin in the treatment group compared to the control (Table 4). There was a statistically significant reduction (p<0.001) in both groups but more reduction in magnitudes of the treatment group.
Table 4

Changes in inflammatory markers between groups

Data analyzed by-Within group comparison: Wilcoxon signed-rank test (CRP), student t-test (LDH and ferritin. Between-group comparison: Maan Whitney U test (CRP), student t-test (LDH and ferritin)

(Mean ± SD) LDH IU/L
DurationTreatment (N=99)Control (N=93)P value (Between)
Screening363.77±126.54347.93±136.260.406
Day 10296.61±102.59330.46±122.15 
Mean diff (Screening – Day 10)66.32±111.8517.47±106.040.002
% Reduction18.42%5.02% 
P value (within)<0.0010.115 
(Mean ± SD) Ferritin ug/L
DurationTreatment (N=99)Control (N=93)P value
Screening106.38±88.23105.55±98.730.931
Day 1087.41±77.55104.62±113.42 
Mean diff (Screening – Day 10)18.97±59.740.59±80.960.074
% Reduction17.83%0.88% 
P value (within)0.0020.944 
(Mean ± SD) CRP mg/L
DurationTreatment (N=99)Control (N=93)P value
Screening9.21±13.669.40±7.590.327
Day 103.95±2.834.73±2.59 
Mean diff (Screening – Day 10)5.26±13.624.52±7.480.772
% Reduction57.11%49.63% 
P value (within)<0.001<0.001 

Changes in inflammatory markers between groups

Data analyzed by-Within group comparison: Wilcoxon signed-rank test (CRP), student t-test (LDH and ferritin. Between-group comparison: Maan Whitney U test (CRP), student t-test (LDH and ferritin) Secondary study outcomes Hospitalization, ICU, and Supplemental Oxygen There were no subjects who required hospitalization, ICU, and supplemental oxygen till their clinical recovery in both groups. Safety outcomes Hematological parameters were assessed on baseline and day 10, and there were no significant changes in the parameters between groups (Table 5).
Table 5

Changes in hematological parameters between groups

Analyzed by student t-test. Not significant (p>0.05).

Laboratory Investigation(Mean ± SD)
TestControl
BaselineDay 10BaselineDay 10
Total Leukocyte Count (/mm^3)7743.94±2294.347440.91±1830.717907.10±2664.267281.18±1764.29
Neutrophil %58.34±9.2756.76±7.0358.77±10.4756.14±7.73
Lymphocyte %36.12±9.0436.49±6.4235.17±10.6937.33±7.90
Monocyte %3.25±1.213.74±1.753.43±1.323.68±1.70
Eosinophil %3.45±2.313.57±2.123.26±1.993.43±1.98
Total RBC 10^6/mm^34.76±0.704.82±0.554.67±0.694.76±0.51
Hemoglobin (g/dl)13.14±1.9013.14±1.7412.97±1.7312.97±1.61
Hematocrit (%)41.11±4.7941.42±4.2540.35±5.3140.61±4.40
Platelet Count (Lacs/mm^3)2.72±0.743.02±0.672.57±0.752.76±0.64

Changes in hematological parameters between groups

Analyzed by student t-test. Not significant (p>0.05). Adverse events No adverse events related to study medication or possible engagement of test intervention were reported throughout the study period.

Discussion

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of the APMV2020 tablets on COVID-19. Patients of the APMV2020 group demonstrated faster recovery from symptoms of COVID-19 evident by more and more subjects getting relieved of symptoms in five days, such as cough, myalgia, headache, and anosmia, and reduced serum levels of inflammatory markers like LDH, ferritin, and CRP. Overall, the inclusion of APMV2020 in the treatment protocol for COVID-19 resulted in faster clinical recovery in terms of symptomatic relief with no disease progression. The duration of the study medication was of 10 days. We followed up with all subjects for 28 days telephonically on days 15, 20, and 28 to assess their wellness. It was found that all subjects in both groups were clinically recovered and did not present any major symptoms. Repurposing the use of acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) is a reasonable choice to come up to a sustainable intervention in mild, moderate to severe patients with COVID 19. Aspirin is a researched molecule for its anti-inflammatory, analgesic, and antithrombotic properties. It has antiviral potential of its effect against DNA and RNA viruses. Aspirin was reported to be reducing RNA synthesis and replication of human coronavirus-299E (CoV-229E) and Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS)-CoV in an in vitro study [5]. Remarkably, the use of aspirin in COVID-19 is explored for its possible causal effect in reducing mortality, hospital stay, and supplemental oxygen requirement. As per research by Chow et al. the use of aspirin was associated with improved outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19 [6]. Patients with COVID-19 have positively correlated with systemic elevation of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α [6]. The over-activation of mast cells and release of cytokines might also have a role in the development of pulmonary fibrosis in COVID-19. An anti-histaminic agent like Promethazine can act in COVID-19 patients as a cough suppressant as well as a strong anti-inflammatory agent to reduce histamine and mast cell activity [7]. The multivitamin combination of APMV2020 can be beneficial in supporting the immune system as well as it’s a unique blend of Vitamin D3, C, and B3 along with zinc, thereby having the potential to modulate immunity to achieve faster viral clearance as well as the reduction in extrapulmonary effects of the infection to lead to speedy clinical recovery. It is well documented through previous research that zinc has the potential to inhibit viral replication. A wide range of viruses is reported to be inhibited in vitro using zinc including SARS coronavirus (SARS-CoV). In the later stages of infection, zinc could be beneficial by mitigating the impact of deregulation of the immune system, inflammation, and hypoxia‐induced oxidative stress by modulating the immune response, and inflammatory pathway it improves recovery of patients in viral infection. Zinc can target multiple pathways driving the complex pathogenesis of COVID-19 and thus would be beneficial in COVID-19 management [8]. In the present research, there was no need of hospital admission, nor supplemental oxygen in both groups. Assessment of hematological parameters suggested no significant change post-treatment and no adverse events throughout the 10-day protocol, indicating the safety of the intervention. All patients were compliant with the APMV2020 regimen for 10 days. Symptom regressions and recovery are strongly correlated in COVID 19 [9]. Our results demonstrated that APMV2020 significantly relieved symptoms such as cough, myalgia, headache and anosmia for more subjects faster than the control group. Triggered inflammatory responses result from rapid viral replication of SARS-CoV-2 or other inflammatory conditions, resulting in cellular destruction that can stimulate the release of cytokines and chemokine through macrophages and monocytes leading to cytokine storms in COVID-19. Inflammatory markers, such as serum LDH, ferritin and CRP have been positively allied to the high risks of severity and fatality in COVID-19 [10]. In the present study, treatment with APMV2020 demonstrated excellent anti-inflammatory activity by significantly reducing serum levels of LDH, ferritin, and CRP than control. APMV2020 is a potential interventional candidate with balanced immunomodulatory and anti-inflammatory activities. Aspirin from APMV2020 inhibits platelet aggregation and cyclooxygenase activity causing inhibition of Thromboxane-A2, which is responsible for inflammation and thrombosis which accounts for pulmonary and cardio-protective benefits of Aspirin. Aspirin can help in the prevention of thrombo-inflammation, pulmonary embolism, and thrombosis found commonly in COVID-19 patients [11]. There are many studies that provide data regarding the usefulness of vitamin D3, B3 and C in COVID 19 management by virtue of their powerful antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory activities [12]. Selenoproteins have a crucial role in maintaining redox balance virtually in all tissues [13]. COVID-19 is characterized by increased oxidative stress; therefore, selenium is thought to be beneficial in the management of COVID-19. A study demonstrated the use of selenium in subjects to achieve rapid clinical recovery in mild to moderate COVID-19 patients to reduce mortality and hospital stay in severe COVID-19 [13]. The unbalance nutrition affects the immune system and can induce inflammatory cascade, which is prevalently seen in severe infection with SARS-CoV-2. The severity in COVID-19 is seen in older people, comorbid, malnourished and obese individuals. There are many studies suggesting a role of vitamins and minerals like vitamin A, D, zinc and selenium in alleviating inflammatory response in COVID-19 [14]. Nutritional supplementation correcting nutritional imbalance is important in promoting a diverse gut microbiota thus supporting the optimum immune response to any infection. There are many advantages of a balanced nutritional therapy like the APMV202 relevant to encounter with SARS-CoV-2 infections [15].At present, there are no elaborative studies to confirm that micronutrient deficiency just like selenium can trigger the mutations in viral RNA like in influenza and coronaviruses [16]. To summarize, APMV2020 can prove a good candidate to be integrated into the COVID-19 management protocol as it aids in faster symptom recovery with significant anti-inflammatory activity and has potential immunomodulatory properties by virtue of the multivitamin combination of the APMV2020. A clinical trial of APMV2020 is warranted in long COVID patients.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that APMV2020 treatment for COVID-19 patients provides advantages over the standard of care treatment alone. There was a faster recovery of subjects from COVID-19 symptoms, along with a significant reduction in inflammatory markers like LDH ferritin, and CRP. This study serves as preliminary evidence for further research using aspirin, promethazine, vitamin D, C, and micronutrient therapy as an intervention in the management of long COVID symptoms.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Topical promethazine side effects: our experience and review of the literature.

Authors:  C Cantisani; S Ricci; T Grieco; G Paolino; V Faina; E Silvestri; S Calvieri
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 2.  Zinc, Vitamin D and Vitamin C: Perspectives for COVID-19 With a Focus on Physical Tissue Barrier Integrity.

Authors:  José João Name; Ana Carolina Remondi Souza; Andrea Rodrigues Vasconcelos; Pietra Sacramento Prado; Carolina Parga Martins Pereira
Journal:  Front Nutr       Date:  2020-12-07

3.  Post-COVID-19 syndrome among symptomatic COVID-19 patients: A prospective cohort study in a tertiary care center of Bangladesh.

Authors:  Reaz Mahmud; Md Mujibur Rahman; Mohammad Aftab Rassel; Farhana Binte Monayem; S K Jakaria Been Sayeed; Md Shahidul Islam; Mohammed Monirul Islam
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-04-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  The COVID-19 puzzle: deciphering pathophysiology and phenotypes of a new disease entity.

Authors:  Marcin F Osuchowski; Martin S Winkler; Tomasz Skirecki; Sara Cajander; Manu Shankar-Hari; Gunnar Lachmann; Guillaume Monneret; Fabienne Venet; Michael Bauer; Frank M Brunkhorst; Sebastian Weis; Alberto Garcia-Salido; Matthijs Kox; Jean-Marc Cavaillon; Florian Uhle; Markus A Weigand; Stefanie B Flohé; W Joost Wiersinga; Raquel Almansa; Amanda de la Fuente; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Christian Meisel; Thibaud Spinetti; Joerg C Schefold; Catia Cilloniz; Antoni Torres; Evangelos J Giamarellos-Bourboulis; Ricard Ferrer; Massimo Girardis; Andrea Cossarizza; Mihai G Netea; Tom van der Poll; Jesús F Bermejo-Martín; Ignacio Rubio
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 30.700

Review 5.  Micronutrient therapy and effective immune response: a promising approach for management of COVID-19.

Authors:  Fariba Lotfi; Mostafa Akbarzadeh-Khiavi; Ziba Lotfi; Leila Rahbarnia; Azam Safary; Habib Zarredar; Amir Baghbanzadeh; Behrooz Naghili; Behzad Baradaran
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 7.455

Review 6.  Nutrition and immunity: lessons for COVID-19.

Authors:  Philip C Calder
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2021-06-23       Impact factor: 5.097

Review 7.  The trinity of COVID-19: immunity, inflammation and intervention.

Authors:  Matthew Zirui Tay; Chek Meng Poh; Laurent Rénia; Paul A MacAry; Lisa F P Ng
Journal:  Nat Rev Immunol       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 108.555

Review 8.  Prospects of nutritional interventions in the care of COVID-19 patients.

Authors:  Sabiha Alam; Farhana Rumzum Bhuiyan; Tanvir Hossain Emon; Mahmudul Hasan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  SARS-CoV-2 viral spike G614 mutation exhibits higher case fatality rate.

Authors:  Manuel Becerra-Flores; Timothy Cardozo
Journal:  Int J Clin Pract       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.149

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.