| Literature DB >> 35783839 |
Romy de Laat-Kremers1, Augusto Di Castelnuovo2, Lisa van der Vorm3, Simona Costanzo4, Marisa Ninivaggi3, Chiara Cerletti4, Dana Huskens3,5, Amalia De Curtis4, Alessandro Gialluisi4,6, Cuicui Bai3,7, Giovanni de Gaetano4, Dongmei Yin3, Maria Benedetta Donati4, Bas de Laat1,3,7, Licia Iacoviello4,6.
Abstract
The coagulation system can be assessed by the thrombin generation (TG) assay, and increased TG peak height, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP), and velocity index are associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Obesity had been reported to increase TG and is associated with dyslipidemia, which also predisposes to atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the effect of the blood lipid profile on TG has not been studied extensively. To gain more insight into the associations of TG, body mass index (BMI) and lipid profile, we studied TG in relation to these parameters in a large Italian population cohort, the Moli-sani study (N = 22,546; age ≥ 35 years; 48% men). TG was measured in plasma samples collected at the enrollment of subjects in the Moli-sani study. TG was triggered with 1 or 5 pM tissue factor, and TG parameters lag time, peak, ETP, time-to-peak (TTP) and velocity index (VI). Additionally, thrombomodulin was added to assess the function of the activated protein C system during TG. In both women and men, overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m2) and obesity (BMI > 30 kg/m2) were significantly associated with higher ETP, peak and VI (all p < 0.001). High total cholesterol, triglycerides and LDL-cholesterol levels were significantly associated with increased ETP and peak (all p < 0.001). Linear regression analysis revealed that the ETP is positively associated with both plasma LDL and HDL cholesterol levels, whereas the velocity index is positively associated with HDL cholesterol. Additionally, ETP, peak and VI were significantly associated with the plasma triglycerides content. In conclusion, our study shows significant associations of high BMI and blood lipid levels with increased TG parameters, and this hypercoagulability may partly explain the increased risk of CVD in individuals with obesity and/or dyslipidemia.Entities:
Keywords: BMI; Moli-sani; lipids; thrombin; thrombin generation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783839 PMCID: PMC9243635 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.897733
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med ISSN: 2297-055X
Figure 1Flowchart of selection of the studied population among Moli-sani participants. The groups of eliminated participants (of the 24 325 recruited at baseline) overlap and the scheme shows sequential exclusion criteria. Therefore, the patients in each eliminated group do not fulfill the previous elimination criteria, but it is possible that patients on VKAs were previously eliminated because of e.g., insufficient plasma volume for thrombin generation.
General characteristics of the Moli-sani cohort, stratified by sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, | 55.1 ± 11.7 | 56.1 ± 11.9 | <0.001 |
| Current smoker, % | 20.4 | 26.1 | <0.001 |
| BMI, | 27.9 ± 5.3 | 28.2 ± 4.0 | <0.001 |
| Waist:hip ratio | 0.89 ± 0.09 | 0.95 ± 0.06 | <0.001 |
| Total cholesterol, | 216.5 ± 41.6 | 210.1 ± 41.8 | <0.001 |
| LDL-C, | 131.4 ± 35.4 | 129.1 ± 34.9 | <0.001 |
| HDL-C, | 62.8 ± 14.7 | 51.9 ± 12.9 | <0.001 |
| Triglycerides, | 97 (63) | 124 (88) | <0.001 |
| Blood glucose, | 93 (16) | 100 (19) | <0.001 |
| CRP, | 1.56 (2.36) | 1.47 (2.00) | 0.002 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD or median (IQR) for normally distributed and skewed continuous variables, respectively, and as a percentage for categorical variables. Statistical differences between men and women were analyzed using a Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U test for normally distributed and skewed continuous variables, respectively, and a Pearson's χ.
Thrombin generation (TG) parameters in the Moli-sani cohort, stratified by sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| ETP, | 1754.7 ± 419.3 | 1685.4 ± 400.2 | <0.001 |
| Peak, | 370.6 ± 89.9 | 356.8 ± 86.4 | <0.001 |
| Lag time, | 3.94 (1) | 4 (1) | <0.001 |
| Time-to-peak, | 6.00 (1) | 6.33 (2) | <0.001 |
| VI, | 166.2 ± 64.8 | 160.4 ± 61.6 | <0.001 |
|
| |||
| ETP, | 1766.9 ± 433.5 | 1698.4 ± 412.3 | <0.001 |
| Peak, | 374.8 ± 83.4 | 355.7 ± 79.8 | <0.001 |
| Lag time, | 2.67 (1) | 2.67 (1) | <0.001 |
| Time-to-peak, | 5.00 (1) | 5.00 (1) | <0.001 |
| VI, | 167.8 ± 57.3 | 156.9 ± 54.7 | <0.001 |
| ETP inhibition, % | 12.24 (9) | 12.63 (11) | <0.001 |
| Peak inhibition, % | 0.84 (4) | 1.83 (5) | <0.001 |
Data are presented as the mean ± SD or median (IQR) for normally distributed and skewed continuous variables, respectively. PPP, platelet poor plasma; ETP, endogenous thrombin potential; TTP, time to peak; VI, velocity index.
Linear regression and quartile analysis of lipid levels as determinants for TG parametersdetermined using PPP reagent.
|
|
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lag time | β-coef. UVR | 0.002*** | 0.001*** | 0.003*** | −0.005*** |
| β-coef. MR | COL | 0.001*** | 0.003*** | −0.005*** | |
| Q1 | 203 (52) | 97 (67) | 121 (43) | 58 (20) | |
| Q2 | 211 (54)*** | 107 (73)*** | 128 (44)*** | 57 (20)*** | |
| Q3 | 216 (56)*** | 115 (79)*** | 134 (45)*** | 55 (19)*** | |
| Q4 | 221 (59)*** | 127 (90)*** | 137 (49)*** | 52 (18)*** | |
| ETP | β-coef. UVR | 1.97*** | 0.50*** | 2.17*** | |
| β-coef. MR | 1.13*** | 0.51*** | 0.80** | ||
| Q1 | 200 (52) | 98 (68) | 120 (44) | 56 (19) | |
| Q2 | 209 (54)*** | 107 (73)*** | 126 (43)*** | 56 (20) | |
| Q3 | 215 (53)*** | 112 (79)*** | 132 (45)*** | 56 (19) | |
| Q4 | 220 (58)*** | 117 (82)*** | 136 (48)*** | 56 (19) | |
| Peak | β-coef. UVR | 0.29*** | 0.10*** | 0.27*** | 0.15*** |
| β-coef. MR | COL | 0.20*** | 0.22*** | 0.38*** | |
| Q1 | 204 (56) | 99 (70) | 124 (47) | 55 (20) | |
| Q2 | 208 (53)*** | 105 (74)** | 126 (44)*** | 56 (19) | |
| Q3 | 212 (54)*** | 111 (74)*** | 129 (44)*** | 56 (20) | |
| Q4 | 219 (56)*** | 119 (84)*** | 134 (47)*** | 56 (19) | |
| Time-to-peak | β-coef. UVR | 0.003*** | 0.001*** | 0.004*** | −0.006*** |
| β-coef. MR | COL | 0.001*** | 0.005*** | −0.006*** | |
| Q1 | 202 (50) | 101 (70) | 119 (42) | 57 (20) | |
| Q2 | 211 (54)*** | 107 (74)*** | 128 (45)*** | 57 (19)* | |
| Q3 | 214 (55)*** | 111 (77)*** | 132 (46)*** | 55 (20)*** | |
| Q4 | 220 (59)*** | 120 (88)*** | 137 (49)*** | 54 (19)*** | |
| Velocity index | β-coef. UVR | 0.05*** | 0.04*** | 0.06* | |
| β-coef. MR | 0.01 | 0.06*** | 0.15** | ||
| Q1 | 211 (57) | 128 (47) | 105 (74) | 55 (19) | |
| Q2 | 210 (55) | 128 (45) | 104 (73) | 56 (20)** | |
| Q3 | 209 (54) | 127 (45) | 108 (75)** | 56 (20)* | |
| Q4 | 214 (54)*** | 130 (45)*** | 117 (82) | 56 (19) |
Linear regression results are presented as β-coefficients and their associated p-values. Lipid levels were quantified as the median and IQR for the quartiles of each TG parameter. (Bonferroni corrected) p-values were indicated as *p <0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Sex was coded as ‘'0” for men and ‘'1” for women, hence a negative β-coefficient indicates a decrease in outcome (TG) variable in women compared to men. Smoking was coded as ‘'0” for non-smokers and ‘'1” for current smokers, hence a negative β-coefficient indicates a decrease in outcome (TG) variable in smokers compared to non-smokers. Significant variables shown in the table were included in the final model. β-coef., β-coefficient; ETP, Endogenous thrombin potential; UVR, univariate regression analysis; MR, multiple regression analysis; COL, variable excluded from the model because of collinearity (VIF ≥ 10), Q, quartile.
Determinants for TG parameters in linear regression analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age, y | 0.003*** | 0.001* | −3.51*** | −4.93*** | −0.005*** | −0.005*** | 0.47*** | 0.24*** | ||
| Sex | 0.17*** | 0.092*** | −69.4*** | −55.5*** | −13.9*** | −15.0*** | 0.168*** | 0.148*** | −5.74*** | −9.88*** |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.025*** | 0.008*** | 14.0*** | 12.4*** | 2.55*** | 1.46*** | 0.017*** | 0.013*** | 2.55*** | 0.47*** |
| Smoking | 0.038*** | −14.6*** | −3.19*** | 0.026* | ||||||
| Waist:hip ratio | 1.191*** | 111** | 68.7*** | 21.3* | 0.334* | −0.645*** | 65.7*** | 29.9*** | ||
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 0.003*** | −0.006*** | 2.02*** | COL | 0.34*** | COL | 0.003*** | COL | 0.10*** | COL |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 0.004*** | 0.009*** | 2.24*** | 1.87*** | 0.33*** | COL | 0.005*** | 0.005*** | 0.07*** | COL |
| HDL-C, mg/dL | −0.009*** | COL | 0.45* | 1.79*** | −0.009*** | −0.007*** | −0.09** | −0.49*** | ||
| TGL, mg/dL | 0.002*** | 0.002*** | 0.49*** | 0.63*** | 0.14*** | 0.08*** | 0.001*** | 0.001** | 0.08*** | |
| Blood glucose, mg/dL | 0.001*** | −0.001*** | −0.32** | −0.93*** | 0.16*** | −0.001** | −0.003*** | 0.18*** | 0.04* | |
| CRP, mg/L | 0.042*** | 0.033*** | 20.0*** | 17.0*** | 4.17*** | 3.33*** | 0.022*** | 0.018*** | 2.90*** | 2.28*** |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Age, y | 0.003*** | 0.001** | −3.41*** | −4.77*** | −0.19*** | −0.47*** | −0.003*** | −0.003*** | 0.27*** | 0.11** |
| Sex | 0.096*** | 0.047*** | −68.5*** | −52.8*** | 19.06*** | −19.6*** | 0.152*** | 0.129*** | −10.9*** | −12.8*** |
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.017*** | 0.005*** | 14.0*** | 12.4*** | 2.05*** | 1.24*** | 0.016*** | 0.01*** | 1.04*** | 0.34*** |
| Smoking | 0.023*** | −0.021* | −16.5*** | −4.53*** | 0.026** | −2.14*** | ||||
| Waist:hip ratio | 0.894*** | 0.132* | 93.4** | 28.86*** | 20.2* | 0.583*** | −0.29** | 28.4*** | 22.6*** | |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 0.002*** | 0.003*** | 1.97*** | 1.67*** | 0.29*** | COL | 0.003*** | 0.004*** | 0.05*** | −0.02* |
| LDL-C, mg/dL | 0.003*** | 2.17*** | COL | 0.27*** | COL | 0.004*** | ||||
| HDL-C, mg/dL | −0.005*** | −0.006*** | 0.15*** | −0.53*** | −0.006*** | −0.008*** | 0.06* | 0.16*** | ||
| TGL, mg/dL | 0.001*** | 0.50*** | 0.30*** | 0.10*** | 0.001*** | 0.04*** | 0.05*** | |||
| Blood glucose, mg/dL | 0.001*** | −0.001*** | −0.34** | −0.96*** | 0.06** | −0.05* | −0.002*** | 0.10*** | 0.04* | |
| CRP, mg/L | 0.031*** | 0.025*** | 20.2*** | 17.1*** | 3.75*** | 3.24*** | 0.019*** | 0.015*** | 2.49*** | 2.13*** |
Linear regression results are presented as β-coefficients and their associated p-values. P-values were indicated as *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Sex was coded as ‘'0” for men and ‘'1” for women, hence a negative β-coefficient indicates a decrease in outcome (TG) variable in women compared to men. Smoking was coded as ‘'0” for non-smokers and ‘'1” for current smokers, hence a negative β-coefficient indicates a decrease in outcome (TG) variable in smokers compared to non-smokers. Abbreviations: β-coef., β-coefficient; ETP, Endogenous thrombin potential; UVR, univariate regression analysis; MR, multiple regression analysis; COL, variable excluded from the model because of collinearity (VIF ≥ 10); BMI, Body Mass Index; LDL-C, low density lipoprotein cholesterol; HDL-C, high density lipoprotein cholesterol; CRP, C-reactive protein.