| Literature DB >> 35783803 |
Abstract
The ideological and political education (IPE) situation is constantly developing and changing. In modern globalization, the ideological education of college students has received great attention. The purpose is to strengthen morality and cultivate people as the basic point of a college education. The principles of educational psychology are adopted to integrate IPE into the whole process of college teaching and help students develop healthily for a long time. First, IPE psychology's concept and subject attribute under educational psychology are expounded. Next, the concept and development of cognitive structure theory are introduced. Moreover, educational constructivist measures are analyzed. Furthermore, the cognitive structure of college students' self-cognition and IPE is interpreted and analyzed using cognitive psychology. Then, a questionnaire is designed to study the influencing factors of political education strategies in colleges. Finally, the questionnaire is collected to summarize the influencing factors and put forward optimization strategies. The results show that using the principles of educational psychology and cognitive psychology to investigate can accurately understand modern college students' self-cognitive structure and ideological and political cognitive structure. The opportunity factor greatly impacts the IPE strategy of college students. More than 97% think that it has an impact, of which more than 51% think that it has a great impact and more than 21% think that it is the decisive factor. Challenge factors greatly impact college students' IPE strategies. More than 97% think they have an impact, of which more than 55% think they have a great impact, and more than 24% think they are decisive factors. It shows that educational psychology is conducive to the progress of political education in colleges and the improvement of college students' ideological and political levels. This exploration provides a new direction for educational psychology research in ideological and political work.Entities:
Keywords: cognitive structure; educational psychology; educational strategy; higher education; ideological and political
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783803 PMCID: PMC9240215 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.892110
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Difference between moral education and IPE.
| Moral education | IPE | |
| Concept | Studying the formation and development process of people’s morality and the law of IPE | Revealing the mechanisms, laws, and nature of psychological phenomena in moral education. |
| Research subjects | Human psychology | Moral characters |
| Elements | Psychological mechanism, psychological laws, psychological phenomena, the psychological laws of the formation and development of people’s political ideas, and the performance, acceptance, and operation mechanism of psychological phenomena | Ideology, politics, legal system, and moral education |
FIGURE 1Cognitive process of human beings (A) physiological process (B) thinking process.
FIGURE 2Information processing model.
Elements of cognitive structures.
| Name | Meanings | Sources | Effects |
| Knowledge | Practical experience and the laws of natural science and human science | Objective things, nature, and human society | It reflects people’s understandings of the content of the objective world |
| Structure | Knowledge structure | Knowledge | It provides background knowledge for the subject and views it as a reference for selecting, filtering, processing, and storing information, restricting the subject’s cognitive ways. |
| Cognitive styles | The cognitive way of the subjects in information processing | Self | It shows the differences between cognitive subjects and the influence of education. |
| Cognitive strategy | A collection of procedures, rules, methods, and techniques for indicating and detecting cognitive processes | Self | Cognition tools |
| Metacognition | Cognition about cognition | Self | Tools for understanding “cognition.” |
| Thinking modes | The way the human brain processes the information obtained | Self and human society | It shows how thinking activities are carried out, how human beings understand things and explore the angle, way, and method humans deal with things. |
| Irrational elements | The irrational elements are also needed, such as needs, emotions and will | Self | As a spiritual force, it penetrates into individual cognitive and practical activities |
FIGURE 3Overview of cognitive structure.
Constructivists’ views on education.
| View of knowledge | Learning view | Students view | Teaching view |
| A. Knowledge is not a purely objective reflection of reality, but an explanation, hypothesis or hypothesis of the objective world. In specific problem solving, original knowledge needs to be reprocessed and recreated according to the situation of specific problems. | A. Students need to adopt a new learning style, adopt a new cognitive processing strategy, and form a psychological model that they are the constructors of knowledge and understanding. | A. Since the meaning of things does not exist completely independently of us, but comes from our construction, and each person understands certain aspects of things in his own way, teaching should promote cooperation between students and enable students to see the basis of views that are different from his own. | A. The role of teachers should be changed from the traditional authority role of transferring knowledge to students to the mentor of students’ learning and become the senior collaborator of students’ learning. |
| B. Knowledge cannot exist as an entity outside the individual. Real understanding can only be constructed by learners themselves based on their own experience background and depends on the learning process in a specific context. | B. In constructivism teaching, teachers should always pay attention to keep learning tasks in the “zone of recent development” of students, and provide certain “supports” and guidance. | B. Teaching should make understanding richer and more comprehensive through the cooperation of learners. | B. Teachers are helpers and promoters of meaning construction, rather than providers and indoctrinators of knowledge. Students are the main body of learning information processing and the initiative of meaning construction, rather than the passive receiver of knowledge and the object of inculcation. |
| C. Textbook knowledge is only a reliable explanation or hypothesis about a phenomenon, rather than an “absolute reference” to explain the real world. | C. Students should realize the importance of becoming a self-control learner and try to learn some self-control skills and habits. | C. Teaching is not the transmission of knowledge, but the processing and conversion of knowledge. | C. Teachers should organize collaborative learning (discussion and communication) whenever possible, and guide the process of collaborative learning in a direction conducive to meaning construction. |
| D. Students’ reception of knowledge can only be constructed by themselves. They should analyze and judge the rationality of knowledge against the background of their own experience. In the learning process, students not only understand new knowledge, but also analyze, examine and criticize it. | D. In the teaching process, the learning content should be authentic and should not be oversimplified to make it far away from the realistic problem situation. |
FIGURE 4Cognitive construction process.
The SWOT analysis.
| Strengths | Weaknesses | |
| Opportunities | Opportunities- Strengths | Opportunities- Weaknesses |
| Threats | Threats- Strengths | Threats- Weaknesses |
Evaluation indexes.
| Categories | Number | Indexes |
| Advantage | a | Technical equipment and facilities |
| b | Excellent traditions and qualities | |
| c | Campus cultural activities | |
| Disadvantage | a | Educational and teaching environments |
| b | Controllability of the network environment | |
| c | Learning atmospheres | |
| d | The system of IPE | |
| Opportunities | a | Teaching materials of IPE |
| b | Reform of IPE | |
| c | Perfection of the socialist theory | |
| d | Attaching importance to IPE | |
| Challenge | a | Employment environments |
| b | Multiculturalism | |
| c | Market economy | |
| d | Family spiritual environments |
Basic information of the respondents.
| Gender | Age | |||||
| Male | Female | Under 22 | 22–25 | 25–28 | Over 28 | |
| Number | 96 | 72 | 64 | 45 | 35 | 24 |
| Proportion of valid questionnaires | 57.14% | 42.86% | 38.10% | 26.79% | 20.83% | 14.28% |
Educational backgrounds and occupations of the respondents.
| Education | Occupation | |||||
| Undergraduates | Post-graduates | Doctors | Others | Students | Teachers | |
| Number | 97 | 43 | 12 | 16 | 118 | 50 |
| Proportion of valid questionnaires | 57.74% | 25.60% | 7.14% | 9.61% | 70.15% | 29.85% |
The SWOT analysis.
FIGURE 5Influencing factors (A) positive factors (B) negative factors (C) opportunities (D) challenges.