| Literature DB >> 35783711 |
Pei Yin1, Jun Zhang1, Han Yan1, Jun Zhao1, Jing Wang1, Chunmei Liang1.
Abstract
This paper studies the privacy risk perception of online medical community users based on deep neural network. Firstly, this paper introduces privacy protection based on deep neural network and users' privacy risk perception in online medical community. Then, using the fuzzy neural network to deal with highly complex and nonlinear data, we can better obtain the accurate evaluation value, and use the improved gravity search optimization algorithm to optimize the fuzzy neural network evaluation model and improve the convergence puzzle of the model. Finally, using the experimental method of questionnaire survey, and the questionnaire is composed of three parts. The first part investigates the basic personal information of the subjects, including gender, age, educational background, physical condition, physical examination frequency, Internet use experience, long-term residence, etc.; The second part is the measurement items of each variable in the theoretical model, including nine variables: service quality, personalized service, reciprocal norms, result expectation, material reward, perceived risk, trust in doctors, trust in websites, and willingness to disclose health privacy information. The experimental results show that the correlation coefficient between the interaction items of personalized service and reciprocal norms on material reward is positive (β = 0.072, P < 0.01), and the correlation coefficient between sexual service and material reward was positive (β = 0.202, P < 0.01), then reciprocal norms positively regulate the relationship between personalized service and material reward.Entities:
Keywords: deep neural network; evaluation model; highly complex and nonlinear data; online medical community; risk perception
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783711 PMCID: PMC9240421 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.914164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
FIGURE 1Online community medical service.
FIGURE 2Perceptron.
FIGURE 3Convolution operation.
FIGURE 4RELU function.
FIGURE 5Pool operation.
FIGURE 6Full connection operation.
FIGURE 7Data distribution. (A) IRIS data set and (B) LOWBWT data set.
Time taken to update parameters once (s).
| Batch size | 5 | 15 | 25 |
| IRIS | 1.117207 | 3.004752 | 5.016047 |
| LOWBWT | 1.402311 | 3.529103 | 5.713865 |
Non standardized coefficient of adjustment effect test.
| Variable | Perceived risk | Result expectation | ||||||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | |||||
| Predictor | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE | Estimate | SE |
| Gender | 0.148 | 0.123 | 0.099 | 0.122 | 0.008 | 0.089 | 0.024 | 0.091 |
| Age | 0.067 | 0.068 | 0.057 | 0.066 | –0.049 | 0.049 | –0.030 | 0.050 |
| education | 0.208 | 0.067 | 0.214 | 0.066 | 0.078 | 0.049 | 0.031 | 0.035 |
| Physical condition | –0.008 | 0.042 | –0.148 | 0.0365 | 0.049 | 0.033 | 0.031 | –0.193 |
| Physical examination frequency | –0.051 | 0.067 | 0.035 | –0.012 | 0.068 | 0.049 | 0.035 | –0.056 |
| Internet use experience | –0.068 | 0.067 | –0.102 | 0.066 | –0.021 | 0.049 | –0.001 | 0.049 |
| Long term residence | 0.046 | 0.099 | 0.043 | 0.097 | 0.063 | 0.072 | 0.052 | 0.073 |
FIGURE 8Non standardized path coefficient diagram.