J J Aziz1, K F Reid1, J A Batsis2, R A Fielding1. 1. Nutrition, Exercise Physiology and Sarcopenia Laboratory, Jean Mayer USDA Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging at Tufts University, Boston, MA, USA. 2. Associate Professor, Division of Geriatric Medicine and Gillings School of Global Public Health.
Abstract
Background: Older adults living in rural areas suffer from health inequities compared to their urban counterparts. These include comorbidity burden, poor diet, and physical inactivity, which are also risk factors for sarcopenia, for which muscle weakness and slow gait speed are domains. To date, no study has examined urban-rural differences in the prevalence of muscle weakness and slow gait speed in older adults living in the United States. Objective: To compare the prevalence of grip strength weakness and slow gait speed between urban and rural older adults living in the United States. Design: A cross-sectional, secondary data analysis of two cohorts from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), using gait speed or grip strength data, and urban-rural residency, dietary, examination, questionnaire and demographic data. Participants: 2,923 adults (≥ 60 yrs.). Measures: Grip weakness was defined as either, an absolute grip strength of <35 kg. and <20 kg. or grip strength divided by body mass index (GripBMI) of <1.05 and <0.79 for men and women, respectively. Slow gait speed was defined as a usual gait speed of ≤0.8m/s. Results: The prevalence of GripBMI weakness was significantly higher in urban compared to rural participants (27.4% vs. 19.2%; p=0.001), whereas their absolute grip strength was lower (31.75(±0.45) vs. 33.73(±0.48)). No urban-rural differences in gait speed were observed. Conclusions: Older adults residing in urban regions of the United States were weaker compared to their rural counterparts. This report is the first to describe urban-rural differences in handgrip strength and slow gait speed in older adults living in the United States.
Background: Older adults living in rural areas suffer from health inequities compared to their urban counterparts. These include comorbidity burden, poor diet, and physical inactivity, which are also risk factors for sarcopenia, for which muscle weakness and slow gait speed are domains. To date, no study has examined urban-rural differences in the prevalence of muscle weakness and slow gait speed in older adults living in the United States. Objective: To compare the prevalence of grip strength weakness and slow gait speed between urban and rural older adults living in the United States. Design: A cross-sectional, secondary data analysis of two cohorts from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), using gait speed or grip strength data, and urban-rural residency, dietary, examination, questionnaire and demographic data. Participants: 2,923 adults (≥ 60 yrs.). Measures: Grip weakness was defined as either, an absolute grip strength of <35 kg. and <20 kg. or grip strength divided by body mass index (GripBMI) of <1.05 and <0.79 for men and women, respectively. Slow gait speed was defined as a usual gait speed of ≤0.8m/s. Results: The prevalence of GripBMI weakness was significantly higher in urban compared to rural participants (27.4% vs. 19.2%; p=0.001), whereas their absolute grip strength was lower (31.75(±0.45) vs. 33.73(±0.48)). No urban-rural differences in gait speed were observed. Conclusions: Older adults residing in urban regions of the United States were weaker compared to their rural counterparts. This report is the first to describe urban-rural differences in handgrip strength and slow gait speed in older adults living in the United States.
Authors: Jinnie J Rhee; Laura Sampson; Eunyoung Cho; Michael D Hughes; Frank B Hu; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2015-02-05 Impact factor: 4.897
Authors: Peggy M Cawthon; Thomas G Travison; Todd M Manini; Sheena Patel; Karol M Pencina; Roger A Fielding; Jay M Magaziner; Anne B Newman; Todd Brown; Douglas P Kiel; Steve R Cummings; Michelle Shardell; Jack M Guralnik; Linda J Woodhouse; Marco Pahor; Ellen Binder; Ralph B D'Agostino; Xue Quian-Li; Eric Orwoll; Francesco Landi; Denise Orwig; Laura Schaap; Nancy K Latham; Vasant Hirani; Timothy Kwok; Suzette L Pereira; Daniel Rooks; Makoto Kashiwa; Moises Torres-Gonzalez; Joseph P Menetski; Rosaly Correa-De-Araujo; Shalender Bhasin Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Jean Pierre Baeyens; Jürgen M Bauer; Yves Boirie; Tommy Cederholm; Francesco Landi; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Yves Rolland; Stéphane M Schneider; Eva Topinková; Maurits Vandewoude; Mauro Zamboni Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2010-04-13 Impact factor: 10.668
Authors: Kathryn E Weaver; Nynikka Palmer; Lingyi Lu; L Douglas Case; Ann M Geiger Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Shalender Bhasin; Thomas G Travison; Todd M Manini; Sheena Patel; Karol M Pencina; Roger A Fielding; Jay M Magaziner; Anne B Newman; Douglas P Kiel; Cyrus Cooper; Jack M Guralnik; Jane A Cauley; Hidenori Arai; Brian C Clark; Francesco Landi; Laura A Schaap; Suzette L Pereira; Daniel Rooks; Jean Woo; Linda J Woodhouse; Ellen Binder; Todd Brown; Michelle Shardell; Quian-Li Xue; Ralph B DʼAgostino; Denise Orwig; Greg Gorsicki; Rosaly Correa-De-Araujo; Peggy M Cawthon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Alanna J Moshfegh; Donna G Rhodes; David J Baer; Theophile Murayi; John C Clemens; William V Rumpler; David R Paul; Rhonda S Sebastian; Kevin J Kuczynski; Linda A Ingwersen; Robert C Staples; Linda E Cleveland Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2008-08 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Alfonso J Cruz-Jentoft; Francesco Landi; Stéphane M Schneider; Clemente Zúñiga; Hidenori Arai; Yves Boirie; Liang-Kung Chen; Roger A Fielding; Finbarr C Martin; Jean-Pierre Michel; Cornel Sieber; Jeffrey R Stout; Stephanie A Studenski; Bruno Vellas; Jean Woo; Mauro Zamboni; Tommy Cederholm Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2014-09-21 Impact factor: 10.668