| Literature DB >> 35783486 |
Katherine V Houser1, Martin R Gaudinski1,2, Myra Happe1, Sandeep Narpala1, Raffaello Verardi1, Edward K Sarfo1, Angela R Corrigan1, Richard Wu1,2, Ro Shauna Rothwell1, Laura Novik1, Cynthia S Hendel1, Ingelise J Gordon1, Nina M Berkowitz1, Cora Trelles Cartagena1, Alicia T Widge1, Emily E Coates1, Larisa Strom1, Somia Hickman1, Michelle Conan-Cibotti1, Sandra Vazquez1, Olga Trofymenko1, Sarah Plummer1, Judy Stein1, Christopher L Case3, Martha Nason4, Andrea Biju1, Danealle K Parchment1, Anita Changela1, Cheng Cheng1, Hongying Duan1, Hui Geng1, I-Ting Teng1, Tongqing Zhou1, Sarah O'Connell1, Chris Barry1, Kevin Carlton1, Jason G Gall1, Britta Flach1, Nicole A Doria-Rose1, Barney S Graham1, Richard A Koup1, Adrian B McDermott1, John R Mascola1, Peter D Kwong1, Julie E Ledgerwood1.
Abstract
Background: Advances in therapeutic drugs have increased life-expectancies for HIV-infected individuals, but the need for an effective vaccine remains. We assessed safety and immunogenicity of HIV-1 vaccine, Trimer 4571 (BG505 DS-SOSIP.664) adjuvanted with aluminum hydroxide (alum), in HIV-negative adults.Entities:
Keywords: BG505 DS-SOSIP.664; HIV-1; NIH; Phase 1 clinical trial; Trimer 4571; Vaccine
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783486 PMCID: PMC9249552 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101477
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EClinicalMedicine ISSN: 2589-5370
Baseline demographic characteristics of the participants.
| Category | Group 1 | Group 2 | Group 3 | Group 4 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (N=3) | (N=3) | (N=5) | (N=5) | (N=16) | |
| Male | 1 (33·3%) | 1 (33·3%) | 2 (40·0%) | 2 (40·0%) | 6 (37·5%) |
| Female | 2 (66·7%) | 2 (66·7%) | 3 (60·0%) | 3 (60·0%) | 10 (62·5%) |
| Mean (SD) | 32·3 (12·7) | 35·7 (12·5) | 32·4 (8·1) | 32·4 (10·9) | 33·0 (9·7) |
| Range | [24·0, 47·0] | [23·0, 48·0] | [23·0, 41·0] | [22·0, 44·0] | [22·0, 48·0] |
| Asian | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 2 (40·0%) | 2 (12·5%) |
| Black or African American | 1 (33·3%) | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 1 (20·0%) | 2 (12·5%) |
| White | 1 (33·3%) | 3(100·0%) | 4 (80·0%) | 2 (40·0%) | 10 (62·5%) |
| Multiracial | 1 (33·3%) | 0 (0·0%) | 1 (20·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 2 (12·5%) |
| Non-Hispanic/Latino | 2 (66·7%) | 3 (100·0%) | 5 (100·0%) | 5 (100·0%) | 15 (93·8%) |
| Hispanic/Latino | 1 (33·3%) | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 1 (6·3%) |
| Mean (SD) | 29·4 (5·0) | 27·4 (4·3) | 23·4 (3·7) | 26·0 (5·7) | 26·1 (4·8) |
| Range | [25·2, 35·0] | [22·5, 30·1] | [17·8, 26·9] | [19·1, 32·5] | [17·8, 35·0] |
| High school graduate/GED | 0 (0·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 1 (20·0%) | 0 (0·0%) | 1 (6·3%) |
| College/University | 2 (66·7%) | 1 (33·3%) | 3 (60·0%) | 3 (60·0%) | 9 (56·3%) |
| Advanced degree | 1 (33·3%) | 2 (66·7%) | 1 (20·0%) | 2 (40·0%) | 6 (37·5%) |
Sex, race and ethnic group were reported by the participants. Data are n (%) or mean (SD) unless otherwise specified. Sex was reported based on the sex assigned at birth. Body mass index (BMI) represents BMI at enrollment and is reported as the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.
Figure 1Trial CONSORT diagram. Participants were enrolled according to dose-escalation protocol and randomized to receive three doses of adjuvanted Trimer 4571 at weeks 0, 8, and 20. All participants completed the protocol. IM denotes intramuscular, and SC subcutaneous route of vaccine administration. Participants who withdrew during enrollment did so because: time commitment for study procedures (10 participants, 19%), concern of potential risks of study procedures (28 participants, 52%), number of procedures/blood draws (2 participants, 4%), lost contact (5 participants, 9%), study closed to enrollment (7 participants, 13%), participants chose another study (1 participants, 2%) and other (29, 54%). Of the twenty-eight (28) participants that withdrew due to concern of potential risks, 23 (82%) had concerns with vaccine induced seropositivity (VISP). Participants could choose more than one withdrawal reason/category.
* 500 mcg of alum was field mixed with Trimer 4571 for all study groups.
Figure 2Maximum local and systemic reactogenicity reported within 7 days after receipt of each Trimer 4571 vaccination according to dose and route of administration. Percent of participants who reported a local or systemic symptom (y-axis) in the seven days following each vaccination. The severity of solicited adverse events was graded mild, moderate, and severe. Data are n (%). IM denotes intramuscular, and SC subcutaneous.
Figure 3Vaccination with Trimer 4571 induces trimer-specific antibody responses by ELISA. Trimer 4571-specific antibody titers in serum were measured by ELISA at baseline and two weeks after each vaccination. HIV+ samples were used as positive controls. ELISA endpoint titer was defined as the reciprocal of the greatest dilution with an optical density value above 0·1. Geometric mean titers (GMTs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are indicated by error bars. Horizontal dotted line indicates the assay negative cut off. IM denotes intramuscular, and SC subcutaneous. Significant differences from baseline to two weeks after regimen completion were observed for 100 mcg SC (p=0·029), 500 mcg IM (p=0·0052), and 500 mcg SC (p=0·0002) groups.
Figure 4Vaccination with Trimer 4571 induces antibodies against trimer immunogen but not against other Env regions. Anti-Trimer 4571, V3 peptide, fusion peptide (FP), gp120, and gp41 responses at baseline and two weeks after regimen completion were assessed serologically by ELISA. HIV+ human sera were used as assay controls. Horizontal dotted lines indicate the assay negative cut offs. ELISA endpoint titer was defined as the reciprocal of the greatest dilution with an optical density value above 0·1. Significant increase in Trimer 4571 ELISA Endpoint titer was observed from baseline to two weeks after regimen completion across all study groups combined (p<0·0001). IM denotes intramuscular, and SC subcutaneous
Figure 5Vaccination with Trimer 4571 elicits antibodies directed against glycan-free trimer base. A) ELISA base-binding endpoint antibody titers in serum were measured with or without trimer base-directed antibodies (RM19R) at two weeks after regimen completion. ELISA endpoint titer was defined as the reciprocal of the greatest dilution with an optical density value above 0·1. B) Ratios of responses directed to base epitopes were calculated as 1 - (endpoint titer with blocking/endpoint titer without blocking), so that the value is 1·00 when all responses are specific to the glycan-free base. IM denotes intramuscular, and SC subcutaneous
Figure 6Electron Microscopy Polyclonal Epitope Mapping (EMPEM) of the antibody responses to Trimer 4571 distinguished three different antibody classes. A) Representative micrograph of negatively stained Trimer 4571 and Fab complexes (bar size: 100nm). B) Representative reference-free 2D classes of Fab bound to Trimer 4571 (bar size: 10 nm) C) 3D reconstruction of antibody classes detected at two weeks after regimen completion.