| Literature DB >> 35783204 |
Kasper Hobin1, Marta Costas-Rodríguez1, Elien Van Wonterghem2,3, Roosmarijn E Vandenbroucke2,3, Frank Vanhaecke1.
Abstract
The concentration and the isotopic composition of the redox-active essential elements Cu and Fe were investigated in blood plasma and specific brain regions (hippocampus, cortex, brain stem and cerebellum) of mice to assess potential alterations associated with sepsis-associated encephalopathy induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) administration. Samples were collected from young (16-22 weeks) and aged (44-65 weeks) mice after intraperitoneal injection of the LPS, an endotoxin inducing neuroinflammation, and from age- and sex-matched controls, injected with phosphate-buffered saline solution. Sector-field single-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry was relied upon for elemental analysis and multi-collector inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry for isotopic analysis. Significant variations were observed for the Cu concentration and for the Cu and Fe isotope ratios in the blood plasma. Concentrations and isotope ratios of Cu and Fe also varied across the brain tissues. An age- and an inflammatory-related effect was found affecting the isotopic compositions of blood plasma Cu and cerebellum Fe, whereas a regional Cu isotopic redistribution was found within the brain tissues. These findings demonstrate that isotopic analysis of essential mineral elements picks up metabolic changes not revealed by element quantification, making the two approaches complementary.Entities:
Keywords: Cu; Fe; LPS-infected mice; MC-ICP-MS; blood plasma; brain; inflammation; isotopic analysis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35783204 PMCID: PMC9241339 DOI: 10.3389/fchem.2022.896279
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Chem ISSN: 2296-2646 Impact factor: 5.545
Instrument settings and data acquisition parameters for SF-ICP-MS and for MC-ICP-MS.
| Instrument Settings | Element XR | Neptune |
|---|---|---|
| Sample uptake rate (µL min−1) | 200 | 100 |
| Plasma gas flow rate (L min−1) | 15 | 15 |
| Auxiliary gas flow rate (L min−1) | 0.80 | 0.7–0.8 |
| Nebulizer gas flow rate (L min−1) | 1.050 | 1.0–1.1 |
| Rf Power (W) | 1,250 | 1,200 |
| Guard electrode | Connected | Connected |
| Sampling cone | Ni, 1.1 mm orifice diameter | Ni, Jet cone, 1.1 mm orifice diameter |
| Skimmer | Ni, 0.8 mm orifice diameter | Ni, X-type, 0.8 mm orifice diameter |
| Resolution mode | Medium | Pseudo-medium |
|
|
| — |
| Acquisition mode | E-scan | — |
| Number of runs and passes | 5 × 5 | — |
| Dwell time per point (ms) | 10 | — |
| Points per peak | 20 | — |
| Nuclides monitored | 63Cu,65Cu,54Fe,56Fe,69Ga | — |
|
| — |
|
| Scan type | — | Static, multicollection |
| Number of blocks and cycles | — | 9 × 5 |
| Integration time (s) | — | 4.194 |
| Cup configuration—Cu (Ga as IS) | — | L4:63Cu, L2:65Cu, C:67Zn |
| Cup configuration—Fe (Ni as IS) | — | L4:54Fe, L2:56Fe, L1:57Fe |
Blood plasma concentrations and isotope ratios of Cu and Fe in young and aged LPS-injected mice and matched controls. Y LPS, O LPS, Y Controls and O Controls correspond to the young and aged infected mice and young and aged controls, respectively. N is the number of individuals.
| Sample Type | Cu Concentration (102 μg.L−1) | δ65Cu NIST SRM 976 (‰) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | N | Median | IQR | N | |
| Y Controls | 3.3 | 0.5 | 10 | −1.19 | 0.21 | 10 |
| Y LPS | 4.6 | 1.2 | 10 | −1.00 | 0.08 | 10 |
| O Controls | 3.7 | 0.8 | 15 | −1.16 | 0.30 | 14 |
| O LPS | 4.9 | 1.2 | 10 | −0.74 | 0.20 | 10 |
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Y Controls | 7.7 | 7.9 | 10 | −2.16 | 0.14 | 8 |
| Y LPS | 7.4 | 4.9 | 10 | −2.08 | 0.36 | 9 |
| O Controls | 6.5 | 4.5 | 15 | −2.13 | 0.40 | 15 |
| O LPS | 10.3 | 9.4 | 10 | −1.88 | 0.23 | 10 |
FIGURE 1Plasma Cu concentration (A), δ65Cu value (B) and δ56Fe value (C) for young and aged LPS-injected mice and matched controls. Y LPS, O LPS, Y Controls and O Controls correspond to the young and aged infected mice and young and aged controls, respectively. Outliers were indicated by a star. Only p-values that indicate a significant difference between populations (p ≤ 0.05) are shown.
Cu and Fe concentrations and δ65Cu and δ56Fe values obtained for the hippocampus, cortex, brain stem and cerebellum for the young and aged LPS-injected mice and matched controls. Y LPS, O LPS, Y Controls and O Controls correspond to the young and aged infected mice and young and aged controls, respectively. N is the number of individuals.
| Cu (µg g−1) | Fe (µg g−1) | δ65Cu (‰) | δ56Fe (‰) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median | IQR | N | Median | IQR | N | Median | IQR | N | Median | IQR | N | ||
|
| Hippocampus | 3.71 | 0.72 | 5 | 5.83 | 2.37 | 5 | 0.34 | 0.26 | 5 | −2.27 | 2 | |
| Cortex | 2.96 | 0.28 | 5 | 6.59 | 4.90 | 5 | 0.17 | 0.14 | 5 | −2.19 | 0.43 | 4 | |
| Brain stem | 3.44 | 0.91 | 5 | 5.23 | 2.54 | 5 | 0.42 | 0.20 | 5 | −1.93 | 0.35 | 4 | |
| Cerebellum | 5.18 | 0.07 | 5 | 9.54 | 8.02 | 5 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 5 | −2.10 | 0.06 | 3 | |
|
| Hippocampus | 3.44 | 1.19 | 5 | 4.45 | 4.77 | 5 | 0.32 | 0.17 | 5 | −2.16 | 0.23 | 4 |
| Cortex | 3.16 | 0.97 | 5 | 4.91 | 5.08 | 5 | 0.01 | 0.18 | 5 | −2.06 | 0.14 | 5 | |
| Brain stem | 3.35 | 0.89 | 5 | 4.33 | 4.87 | 5 | 0.38 | 0.10 | 5 | −2.14 | 0.11 | 5 | |
| Cerebellum | 4.95 | 0.34 | 5 | 4.16 | 9.66 | 5 | 0.25 | 0.18 | 5 | −2.14 | 0.14 | 5 | |
|
| Hippocampus | 3.07 | 0.31 | 5 | 8.79 | 5.15 | 5 | 0.27 | 0.06 | 3 | −2.29 | 2 | |
| Cortex | 2.79 | 0.99 | 5 | 5.22 | 4.63 | 5 | 0.11 | 0.16 | 5 | −2.34 | 0.10 | 4 | |
| Brain stem | 3.25 | 0.60 | 5 | 4.08 | 0.20 | 5 | 0.33 | 0.24 | 5 | −2.19 | 0.14 | 4 | |
| Cerebellum | 6.13 | 0.29 | 5 | 6.58 | 6.62 | 5 | 0.25 | 0.29 | 5 | −2.50 | 0.05 | 5 | |
|
| Hippocampus | 3.76 | 1.02 | 5 | 5.70 | 15.54 | 5 | 0.32 | 0.08 | 5 | −2.79 | 0.45 | 5 |
| Cortex | 3.35 | 0.32 | 5 | 4.83 | 12.03 | 5 | 0.14 | 0.19 | 5 | −2.20 | 0.47 | 5 | |
| Brain stem | 3.48 | 0.54 | 5 | 3.79 | 0.07 | 5 | 0.33 | 0.19 | 5 | −2.28 | 0.18 | 5 | |
| Cerebellum | 6.09 | 2.09 | 5 | 6.03 | 1.29 | 5 | 0.24 | 0.27 | 5 | −2.35 | 0.08 | 5 | |
FIGURE 2Mean and 95% confidence interval for Δ65Cu values between different regions in the brain (A) Δ65CuHippocampus-Cortex and (B) Δ65CuBrain stem-Hippocampus.
FIGURE 3Three-isotope plot for Fe for the cerebellum combining data for each group of mice. Y LPS, O LPS, Y Controls and O Controls correspond to the young and aged infected mice and young and aged controls, respectively. The measurement precision expressed as two SD was 0.03‰ for δ56Fe and 0.07‰ for δ57Fe.