| Literature DB >> 35782923 |
Lin Liu1, Jie Chen1, Chang Liu1, Yuxuan Luo1, Jiayun Chen1, Yuanyuan Fu1, Yajie Xu1, Haili Wu1,2, Xue Li1, Hui Wang1.
Abstract
Introduction: Heavy metals were classified as essential, probably essential, and potentially toxic in the general population. Until now, it has been reported inconsistently on the association between heavy metals and BC. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the association between heavy metals and BC and review the potential mechanisms systematically.Entities:
Keywords: breast cancer; cadmium; copper; lead; manganese
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782923 PMCID: PMC9245072 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.838762
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Working flowchart for the systematic selection of studies for this meta-analysis.
Figure 2Forest plot of studies of essential trace elements in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (A) Forest plot of studies of Cu levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (B) Forest plot of studies of Zn levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (C) Forest plot of studies of Cr levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (D) Forest plot of studies of Co levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (E) Forest plot of studies of Fe levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. The standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Cu, copper; Zn, zinc; Cr, chromium; Co, cobalt; Fe, iron.
Figure 3The world map for the associations between heavy metals and breast cancer. (A) The world map for the association between Cu and breast cancer in plasma/serum. (B) The world map for the association between Zn and breast cancer in plasma/serum. (C) The world map for the association between Zn and breast cancer in hair. (D) The world map for the association between Mn and breast cancer in plasma/serum. (E) The world map for the association between Mn and breast cancer in hair. (F) The world map for the association between Cd and breast cancer in plasma/serum. The standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and remarked in the maps by regions. Cu, copper; Zn, zinc; Mn, manganese; Cd, cadmium.
Figure 4Forest plot of studies of possible essential trace elements in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (A) Forest plot of studies of Ni levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (B) Forest plot of studies of Mn levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. The standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Ni, nickel; Mn, manganese.
Figure 5Forest plot of studies of potential toxic trace elements in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (A) Forest plot of studies of Cd levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. (B) Forest plot of studies of Pb levels in subjects with breast cancer vs. non-breast cancer controls. The standard mean differences (SMD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Cd, cadmium; Pb, lead.
Figure 6Signaling pathways involved in the associations between heavy metals and breast cancer.