| Literature DB >> 35782913 |
Xia Liu1,2, Bin Qiu2, Wei Liu2,3, Yuhan Zhang3, Xianshu Wang2, Xingang Li3,4, Lingfei Li5, Di Zhang1,3,4.
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is an important complication of diabetes. The prevention of DKD can effectively reduce the mortality rate of diabetic patients and improve their quality of life. The present study examined the effects of fermented and germinated foxtail millet whole grain (FG-FM) on kidney lesions in a diabetic mouse model (Db/Db mice). The results proved that the FG-FM consumption significantly alleviated the kidney tissue damage in the diabetic mouse model. The transcriptome analysis of kidney tissues demonstrated that the overactivation of signaling pathways related to inflammation and immunity in the diabetic mouse model was significantly inhibited with the FG-FM intake. Moreover, the consumption of the FG-FM diet effectively elevated the bacterial diversity, increased the relative abundance of probiotics and decreased the relative abundance of previously reported DKD-related bacteria in the gut microbiota of diabetic mice. Our study confirmed foxtail millet as a potential source of functional food for the non-pharmacological intervention of DKD.Entities:
Keywords: diabetic kidney disease; fermentation; foxtail millet; germination; gut microbiota
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782913 PMCID: PMC9243661 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2022.940404
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1Physiological parameters. (A) Body weight changes during 8 weeks on diets, asterisks indicate significant differences between the Db-93M group and the Db-FM group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01). (B) Epididymal fat weights comparison. (C) Kidney weights comparison. (D) Liver weights comparison. (E) Spleen weights comparison. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 2Histopathological analysis. (A) The appearance and morphology of the kidneys from CTRL group; (B) the appearance and morphology of the kidneys, the left one is the kidney from the Db-FM group, the right one is the kidney from the Db-93M group; (C) the kidney of mice from the Db-93M group; (D) histopathological examination of kidney tissues (top: 40 ×; bottom: 200 ×); (E) histopathological examination of liver tissues (top: 40 ×; bottom: 200 ×).
Figure 3The gene expression analysis performed by RNA-sequencing (RNA-Seq, n = 6). (A) Numbers of differential expressed genes (DEGs) in kidney tissue of different groups; the volcanic maps for DEGs in (B) CTRL vs. Db-93M group; the red dots were up-regulated, and the green dots were down-regulated in Db-93M group when compared to CTRL group. (C) CTRL vs. Db-FM groups; the red dots were up-regulated, and the green dots were down-regulated in the Db-FM group when compared to the CTRL group. (D) Db-93M vs. Db-FM group; the red dots were up-regulated, and the green dots were down-regulated in the Db-FM group when compared to the Db-93M group.
Figure 4The KEGG enrichment results (kidney tissues) based on the identified DEGs from. (A) Comparison of CTRL group and Db-93M group. (B) Comparison of CTRL group and Db-FM group. (C) Comparison of Db-93M group and Db-FM group.
Figure 5The gut microbiota composition analysis. (A) The microbial richness index of Chao. (B) The microbial diversity index of Shannon. (C) Venn diagrams that illustrated observed overlap of OTUs from different groups. (D) The composition of gut microbiota in mice at phylum level. (E) The composition of gut microbiota in mice at the genus level. “Others” represent the sum of all the phyla/genera, which abundances were under 1%. Data are expressed as the mean ± SEM.
Figure 6LEfSe analysis of gut microbiota. (A) Effect size of significantly enriched taxa in each group when performing a comparison between Db-93M group and Db-FM group. (B) Taxonomic cladogram obtained using LEfSe analysis result from the comparison between Db-93Mgroup and Db-FM group. (C) Relative abundance of representative bacterial taxa in the gut microbiota of Db-93M group and Db-FM group identified by LEfSe analysis.