| Literature DB >> 35782834 |
Assem Mohamed Noureldin Zein1, Alaa Zenhom Mahmoud Hassan1, Ahmed Nady Saleh Elsaid1.
Abstract
Genu recurvatum (GR) is defined as knee hyperextension greater than 5°, with the normal physiological accepted limits of up to 10 to 15° of extension. Physiological GR is commonly bilateral, symmetrical, and mostly asymptomatic. Pathologic GR is usually asymmetric, symptomatic, and can be congenital or acquired. Acquired GR can be classified according to the origin of the deformity into pure osseous, soft tissue, and combined types. Symptomatic GR can present with anterior knee pain and/or instability. Surgery is generally indicated in symptomatic (pain, instability), pathologic GR with an associated causative correctible deformity (bony, soft tissue, or a combination of both). Tibial slope-reversing osteotomy is indicated for the osseous or mixed types where there is inverted tibial slope. Varu-correcting osteotomy is indicated in the posttraumatic soft-tissue type (posterior and lateral soft-tissue injury as in knee dislocation), the aim of osteotomy is to protect the reconstructed ligaments. No role for osteotomy in the nontraumatic soft tissue type (gradual stretching of the posterior structures). In this article, we describe a technique to correct a unilateral genu recurvatum deformity with inverted tibial slope, mostly due to Osgood-Schlatter disease. Correction is done by performing an anterior open-wedge osteotomy of the proximal tibia and impaction of 2 wedges of autogenous iliac bone grafts within the osteotomy. The proximal portion of the tibia is cut in the coronal plan and is used as a biologic plate for fixation with no need for additional hardware (e.g., plate or staples) for fixation of the osteotomy.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782834 PMCID: PMC9244464 DOI: 10.1016/j.eats.2022.02.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arthrosc Tech ISSN: 2212-6287
Surgical Steps, Pearls, and Pitfalls of the Technique
| Surgical steps | Pearls | Pitfalls |
|---|---|---|
| Skin incision | Make it just lateral to the tibial crest. | Direct incision on the tibial shin may jeopardize wound healing. |
| Proximal tibial exposure | Ensure subperiosteal exposure. | Nonmeticulous subperiosteal exposure or using sharp Hohmann retractors will damage the muscles of the anterior compartment or the neurovascular structures. |
| Osteotomy of the proximal tibia. | Localize the site of cutting with an electrocautery. | If not well localized, this will result in a superficial cut that may easily breaks or an undesired deep cut. |
| Insertion of K-wires for the anterior opening osteotomy | Under image control. | If not done under image control, it will be inserted inappropriately with liability of posterior knee structures injury. |
| Making the anterior open wedge osteotomy | Do not violate the posterior cortex and leave a posterior hinge for opening the osteotomy. | If not done under image control, posterior knee structures can be damaged. |
| Anterior opening of the osteotomy | Under image control to precisely control the amount of anterior opening and the degree of tibial slope correction. | Without using these tools (image and ruler), the degree of correction will be inappropriate. |
| Insertion of the iliac graft. | Precisely size the graft according to the desired amount of opening. | Wrongly sized graft wedges will result in an undesired change of the tibial slope. |
| Repositioning of the anterior tibial fragment | Chamfer any bony prominences with a saw blade before reduction. | If not done, anatomic reduction will be hindered. |
| Fixation of the anterior fragment | Use proximal and distal screws in a lag manner. | Avoid overpenetration of the posterior cortex with the drill bit or long screws to avoid any injuries of the posterior structures. |
PCL, posterior cruciate ligament.
Advantages and Disadvantages of the Technique
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Bone of the anterior part of the proximal tibia is used as a biological plate. Decreasing the amount of hardware has the advantage of lowering the cost, decreasing the incidence of infection, and reducing the need for future hardware removal. | |
| Using autogenous iliac bone graft has the advantage of decreasing disease transmission associated with allograft. It also is cost-effective compared with artificial bone substitutes. | Increased operative time. |
Fig 1Preoperative planning. Lateral plain radiograph of the left knee. The yellow line is tangent with the tibial plateau. The red line is perpendicular to the yellow line. The blue line is tangent with the posterior tibial cortex and intersects with the yellow line making the tibial slope angle, which in this case was 79°, denoting a reversed tibial slope, Osgood-Schlatter disease of the tibial apophysis (yellow arrow).
Fig 2Patient position and surgical landmarks. Front image of the left knee while the patient supine and the knee are extended, showing the landmarks for performing knee arthroscopy and open correction of the recurvatum deformity. (HALP, high anterolateral portal; PT, patellar tendon and the patella; TT, tibial tuberosity.).
Fig 3Steps of surgical exploration of the proximal tibia of the left knee while the patient is supine. (A) Front image of the left knee while the patient supine and the knee extended. A 10- to 15-cm surgical incision is made on the anterior aspect of the tibia just lateral to the tibial shin and starting just proximal to the tibial tuberosity. (B) Muscles on the anterolateral aspect of the proximal tibia are lifted off subperiosteally to expose the proximal tibia. (C) The site of osteotomy is marked with an electrocautery. (PT, patellar tendon and the patella; TT, tibial tuberosity.).
Fig 4Steps of creating the biological bone plate (10-15 cm long) by performing an osteotomy of the proximal tibia of the left knee in the coronal plan. (A-B) Front image of the left knee while the patient is supine and the knee extended. While Hohmann retractors are placed subperiosteally, the bone of the proximal tibia is cut horizontally with a saw blade. (C) The bone cut is completed with an osteotome to create a bone segment of about 15 cm long (biological bone plate). (D) The bone segment is reflected proximally and wrapped with a wet towel.
Fig 5Insertion of K-wires at the site of osteotomy. (A) Front image of the left knee while the patient is supine. Two parallel K-wires are inserted in the proximal tibia from anterior to posterior at the desired osteotomy site and directed to a point just proximal to the posterior cruciate ligament insertion. (B) Fluoroscopic lateral view of the left knee taken intraoperatively as Image control is mandatory to precisely locate the k-wires.
Fig 6Performing the anterior open-wedge correcting osteotomy. (A) Front image of the left knee while the patient is supine showing a saw blade used to perform the bone cut from anterior to posterior, guided by the previously inserted K-wires. (B) Fluoroscopic lateral view of the left knee taken intraoperatively as image control is mandatory to control the bone cut that is made by a saw blade from anterior to posterior, parallel and inferior to the inserted K-wires to avoid intra-articular propagation while opening the osteotomy. Care is taken not to cut the posterior tibial cortex and leave about 5 mm of bone from the posterior cortex as a hinge for the osteotomy.
Fig 7Opening the correction osteotomy. (A) Front image of the left knee while the patient supine and the knee flexed showing anterior opening of the osteotomy by the sequential insertion of multiple osteotomes. (B) Fluoroscopic lateral view of the left knee taken intraoperatively as to control the amount of osteotomy opening and avoiding posterior cortex violation. (C) Front image of the left knee while the patient supine and the knee flexed, the amount of anterior wedge opening is measured according to the preoperative plan.
Fig 8Impaction of the autogenous iliac graft into the osteotomy site. (A) A saw blade is used to cut the autogenous iliac bone graft into two wedges of bone. (B) Two wedges of autogenous iliac bone graft are shaped according to the desired correction size. (C) Front image of the left knee while the patient supine and the knee flexed showing the impaction of the 2 bone wedges into the osteotomy gap. (D) Fluoroscopic lateral view image of the left knee taken intraoperatively showing the corrected tibial slope after the impaction of the bone wedges.
Fig 9Reduction and fixation of the biological bone plate. (A) Front image of the left knee while the patient is supine and the knee flexed. Any bony prominence is chamfered with the saw. (B) Reduction of the bone plate. (C) Fixation of the bone plate with small fragment lag screws proximal and distal to the osteotomy. (D) Intraoperative lateral image of the left knee showing correction of the deformity and final fixation. (E) Intraoperative anteroposterior image of the left knee showing correction of the deformity and final fixation.