| Literature DB >> 35782777 |
Xin Li1,2, Zhengzhen Wang2, Yan Wang2, Xiaotong Li3, Dongfeng Li4.
Abstract
Adolescence is an important stage for brain maturation. To investigate the effect of different exercise doses on inhibitory control in adolescents aged 12 to 14-year old, an after-school exercise program was offered 5 days per week for 12 weeks during a school semester. Thirsty-four adolescents (17 boys) from the first six classes were randomly divided into low-dose exercise group (LE group, one 30-min aerobic exercise bout per day, n = 16) and high-dose exercise group (HE group, two 30-min aerobic exercise bouts per day, n = 18), while 23 adolescents (10 boys) in the control group (CON, zero 30-min exercise bout, n = 23) were from the last two classes. All the participants in different classes received the same physical education with the same contents, duration, and intensity at class. All the participants completed flanker tests and cardiorespiratory tests before and after exercise intervention. The HE group showed more significant improvements on inhibitory control and V ˙ O 2 peak than CON (p < 0.05). Changes in physical activity (PA) were significantly correlated with changes in interference scores (Spearman rho = -0.30, p < 0.05), V ˙ O 2 peak (Spearman rho = 0.31, p < 0.05), and BF percentage (Spearman rho = -0.32, p < 0.05). This study demonstrated that effect of exercise on inhibitory control in adolescents is dose-dependent, which highlights the need to focus on the exercise dose in daily life for improving cognition among adolescents.Entities:
Keywords: Adolescents; Cardiorespiratory fitness; Cognition; Dose-response; Inhibitory control; Long-term exercise interventions; Physical activity
Year: 2021 PMID: 35782777 PMCID: PMC9219311 DOI: 10.1016/j.smhs.2021.10.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sports Med Health Sci ISSN: 2666-3376
Fig. 1Experimental flow diagram.
Participant characteristics.
| Variables | CON ( | LE ( | HE ( | Statistics | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 12.70±0.56 | 12.50±0.52 | 12.94±0.73 | 0.11 | |
| Gender (F/M) | 13/10 | 8/8 | 9/9 | 0.89 | |
| ANTHROPOMETRICS | |||||
| Height (cm) | 162.03±5.72 | 162.11±8.41 | 161.87±6.99 | 0.99 | |
| Weight (kg) | 51.54±9.10 | 51.69±8.01 | 56.02±8.65 | 0.21 | |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 19.62±3.26 | 19.61±2.28 | 21.36±2.89 | 0.12 | |
| BF (%) | 21.23±8.18 | 21.64±7.52 | 24.86±9.39 | 0.36 | |
| FFM (kg) | 40.22±5.73 | 40.35±6.39 | 41.83±6.91 | 0.69 | |
| FITNESS | |||||
| PA score | 2.63±0.65 | 2.50±0.97 | 2.56±0.78 | 0.92 | |
| V̇O2peak (ml/kg/min) | 34.58±8.57 | 32.60±7.64 | 31.61±5.60 | 0.44 | |
| FLANKER TEST | |||||
| Accuracy, congruent (%) | 100.0 (88.0,100) | 98.0 (92.0,100) | 100.0(94.0,100) | 0.27 | |
| RT, congruent (ms) | 443.02±63.30 | 387.20±60.67 | 404.79±43.70 | 0.011∗ | |
| Accuracy, incongruent (%) | 92.0 (74.0,100.0) | 82.0 (52.0,96.0) | 90.0(60.0,100.0) | 0.019∗ | |
| RT, incongruent (ms) | 499.35±51.12 | 459.96±60.49 | 497.58±73.76 | 0.11 | |
| interference score (ms) | 56.33±33.82 | 72.75±24.96 | 92.79±36.12 | 0.003∗∗ | |
| attendance (%) | / | 57.2±22.7 | 53.5±20.1 | 0.61 | |
| change in PA (min per day) | 0 | 12.53 (5.26,18.60) | 23.05(10.51,41.24) | <0.001∗∗ | |
∗∗p < 0.01.
, peak oxygen consumption evaluated by the maximal exercise test.
Normally distributed data: mean ± standard deviation (SD), one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA).
Non-normally distributed data: median (min, max), KruskalWallis test. BMI, body mass index; BF, body fat; FFM, fat free mass; PA, physical activity; RT, reaction time.
Fig. 2Effects of group on primary outcome measures and reaction times (RTs) in (A) congruent and (B) incongruent trials, and the (C) interference score. Error bars represent standard deviations of the mean. ∗∗p < 0.01 (refers to paired -t tests). CON, control group; LE, low-dose exercise group; HE, high-dose exercise group.
Change from baseline to 12 weeks in the flanker task (mean ± SD).
| variables | CON ( | LE ( | HE ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| change in interference score (ms) | -5.14±23.83 | -5.99±17.17 | -23.70±31.26∗# | 3.29 | 0.045 |
| change in RT, congruent (ms) | −0.59±49.09 | 11.55±46.27 | −2.80±40.68 | 0.48 | 0.620 |
| change in RT, incongruent (ms) | −5.73±48.90 | 5.56±46.26 | −26.50±44.99 | 2.07 | 0.136 |
| change in BMI (kg/m2) | −0.26±0.49 | −0.61±0.39 | −0.38±0.69 | 2.05 | 0.14 |
| change in BF (%) | −0.87±2.84 | −2.19±3.42 | −2.58±2.30 | 2.02 | 0.14 |
| change in FFM (kg) | 0.33±1.76 | 0.38±1.72 | 1.40±1.69 | 2.26 | 0.11 |
| change in | 2.05±4.39 | 6.08±5.07@ | 5.18±5.45& | 3.70 | 0.03 |
RT, reaction time; SD, standard deviations of the mean; BMI, body mass index; BF, body fat; FFM, fat free mass.
p values are for group differences assessed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For a given outcome measure, when ANOVA showed statistically significant findings (p < 0.05), all pairwise comparisons among groups were tested for statistical significance using the least significant difference test. The pairwise comparison that was significantly different is indicated in the following footnote.
∗ CON vs HE, p = 0.022.
# LE vs HE, p = 0.043.
@ CON vs LE, p =0.015.
& CON vs HE, p =0.049.
Bivariate correlations between changes (Δ) in the outcome variables from baseline to 12 weeks.
| ΔPA | Δ interference score | ΔRT, incongruent | ΔRT, congruent | Δ | ΔBMI | ΔBF% | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ΔPA | 1 | -0.30∗ | −0.16 | 0.02 | 0.31∗ | −0.17 | −0.32∗ |
| Δ interference score | -0.30∗ | 1 | 0.36∗∗ | -0.19 | -0.14 | 0.03 | 0.03 |
| ΔRT, incongruent | −0.16 | 0.36∗∗ | 1 | 0.85∗∗ | −0.05 | −0.01 | −0.12 |
| ΔRT, congruent | 0.02 | -0.19 | 0.85∗∗ | 1 | 0.03 | −0.02 | −0.14 |
| Δ | 0.31∗ | -0.14 | −0.05 | 0.03 | 1 | −0.35∗∗ | −0.45∗∗ |
| ΔBMI | −0.17 | 0.03 | −0.01 | −0.02 | −0.35∗∗ | 1 | 0.36∗∗ |
| ΔBF% | −0.32∗ | 0.03 | −0.12 | −0.14 | −0.45∗∗ | 0.36∗∗ | 1 |
∗p< 0.05.
∗∗p < 0.01.
ΔPA: spearman correlation; PA, physical activity.
Δ interference score; ΔRT, incongruent; ΔRT, congruent; Δ; ΔBMI; ΔBF%: Pearson correlation; RT, reaction time; BMI, body mass index; BF, body fat.