| Literature DB >> 35782621 |
Young Bae Sohn1, Curtis Rogers2, Jennifer Stallworth2, Jessica A Cooley Coleman2, Laura Buch2, Erin Jozwiak3, Jo Ann Johnson3, Tim Wood4, Paul Harmatz3, Laura Pollard2, Raymond J Louie2.
Abstract
Morquio syndrome A (Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA, MPS IVA) is an autosomal recessive lysosomal storage disorder caused by deficiency of N-acetyl-galactosamine-6-sulfatase (GALNS) which catabolizes the glycosaminoglycans (GAG), keratan sulfate and chondroitin-6-sulfate. Homozygous or compound heterozygous pathogenic variants in the GALNS result in the deficiency of the enzyme and consequent GAG accumulations. DNA sequence and copy number analysis of the GALNS coding region fails to identify biallelic causative pathogenic variants in up to 15% of patients with Morquio syndrome A. RNA transcript analysis was performed to identify pathogenic alterations in two unrelated families with Morquio syndrome A in whom a single heterozygous or no pathogenic alteration was detected by standard analysis of the GALNS gene. RNA sequencing and quantitative expression analysis identified the overabundance of an aberrant GALNS transcript isoform and a reduction of the clinically relevant isoform (NM_000512.4) in the Morquio syndrome A patients from both families. The aberrant isoform (ENST00000568613.1) was produced by alternative splicing and contained intronic sequence that was likely a cryptic exon predicted to result in a reading frame shift and generation of a premature termination codon. These findings indicated that the aberrant splicing is likely the novel molecular defect in our patients. RNA transcript analysis could be useful to identify pathogenic alterations and increase the yield of molecular diagnosis in patients with Morquio syndrome A whose genetic variants are not found by standard sequencing or gene dosage analysis.Entities:
Keywords: Aberrant splicing; GALNS; GALNS transcript isoform; Morquio syndrome A; Mucopolysaccharidosis IVA
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782621 PMCID: PMC9248232 DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgmr.2022.100875
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Genet Metab Rep ISSN: 2214-4269
Clinical, biochemical and genetic findings of the patients.
| Patient 1–1 | Patient 2–1 | Patient 2–2 | Patient 2–3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phenotype | Non-classic | Classic | Classic | Classic |
| Sex | Male | Female | Male | Male |
| Age (years) | 14 | 12 | 11 | 9 |
| Age at Diagnosis (years) | 14 | 6 | 5 | 6.6 |
| Age of ERT initiation (years) | 14 | 9.3 | 8 | 7.3 |
| Reason for Diagnosis | Hip pain with abnormal skeletal x-ray | Short stature, multiple skeletal deformities | Family history, short stature, multiple skeletal deformities | Family history, short stature, multiple skeletal deformities |
| Total urine GAG (mg/mmol creatinine)* | 7.57 (normal range, 0–6.5) | 21.62 (normal range, 0–12) | 19.8 (normal range, 0–12) | 30.21 (normal range, 0–12) |
| Keratan Sulfate (mcg/mg creatinine)* | 6.55 (normal range, 0–2.14) | 19.18 (normal range, 0–6.2) | 28.6 (normal range, 0–6.2) | 35.97 (normal range, 0–6.2) |
| Chondroitin-6-Sulfate (g/mol creatinine)* | Not available | 16.7 (normal range, 0–8.54) | 23.19 (normal range, 0–8.54) | 33.75 (normal range, 0–8.54) |
| GALNS activity in leukocytes (normal range, 49–255 nmol/17 h/mg prot)* | 0 | 0.99 | 1.12 | 0 |
| DNA alteration | None | c.139G > A Heterozygous (NM_000512.4) | c.139G > A Heterozygous (NM_000512.4) | c.139G > A Heterozygous (NM_000512.4) |
| Protein alteration | None | p.Gly47Arg Heterozygous | p.Gly47Arg Heterozygous | p.Gly47Arg Heterozygous |
| RNA alteration | <1% expression of GALNS normal transcript | ~50% expression of GALNS normal transcript | ~50% expression of GALNS normal transcript | No data |
| Height at diagnosis (cm) [Z score] | 162 [−0.23] | 104 [−2.21] | 98 [−2.32] | 102.7 [−3.23] |
| Weight at diagnosis (kg) [Z score] | 50 [−0.10] | 20.0 [−0.08] | 15.9 [−1.21] | 17.6 [−1.87] |
| Facial features | Slightly coarse | Broad forehead, depressed nasal bridge | Mild midfacial hypoplasia, | Midfacial hypoplasia |
| Pectus carinatum | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Odontoid hypoplasia | No | Yes | Yes | No |
| Spine | Kyphosis, | Scoliosis Lordosis | Mild Lordosis | Mild Lordosis |
| Hip | Coxa vara | Coxa vara | Dysplastic femoral heads | Coxa vara |
| Knee | Genu valgum | Genu valgum | Genu valgum | Genu valgum |
| Upper and lower extremities | Irregularity of multiple epiphyses and metaphyses | Shortened in all segments | Shortened in all segments | Mild meosmelic shortening, |
| Joint hypermobility | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Bone or joint pain | Yes | No | No | No |
| Spinal cord compression | No | No | No | No |
| Corneal clouding | Yes | None at initial visit, later mild | None at initial visit, later mild | Mild |
| Hearing loss | No | No | No | No |
| Obstructive sleep apnea (age at diagnosis) | No | Yes (12.2 years) | Yes (10.9 years) | Yes (8.4 years) |
| Cardiac complications | No | No | No | No |
| Surgery (age at done) | None | Bilateral femoral and tibial hemiepiphysiodesis and medial malleolar screws (9 years) | Tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy (11 years) | None |
ERT, enzyme replacement therapy; GAG, glycosaminoglycan; GALNS, N-acetyl-galactosamine-6-sulfatase; *, pre-ERT values.
Fig. 1mRNA sequence analysis of Patient 1–1 identifies imbalanced expression of a GALNS transcript containing a retained intron. mRNA was reverse transcribed to cDNA, PCR amplified with exon-spanning primers, and separated by capillary electrophoresis. Three different PCR products are present in the control sample, whereas only two products are present in the patient (A). To ensure that genomic DNA was not contaminating the assay, samples that lacked reverse transcriptase (No RT) were analyzed as a negative control. The same PCR products were then separated by agarose gel electrophoresis (data note shown) and Sanger sequencing of gel excised bands indicates that the larger product contains a retained exon, whereas the smaller product is a result of skipping of exon 2 (B).
Fig. 2Transcript specific oligos and quantitative PCR of cDNA confirms reduced expression of the normal GALNS transcript and increased expression of the larger, aberrant transcript. (A) Patient 1–1 in family 1 expresses approximately 1% of the normal transcript compared to a normal control and first degree relatives. (B) The aberrant transcript is approximately 16 fold higher in patient 1–1 compared to a normal control and two-fold higher than in first degree relatives. (C) Patient 2–1, Patient 2–2, and mother (obligate carrier) in family 2 expresses approximately half of the normal transcript compared to a normal control. (D) The aberrant transcript is approximately 10 fold higher in Patient 2–1, Patient 2–2, and mother (obligate carrier) compared to a normal control.