| Literature DB >> 35782566 |
Danfu Ma1,2, Ahmed S Mandour2,3, Ahmed Elfadadny4,5, Hanan Hendawy2,6, Tomohiko Yoshida2, Hussein M El-Husseiny2,7, Koji Nishifuji4, Ken Takahashi8, Zhenlei Zhou1, Yanbing Zhao1, Ryou Tanaka2.
Abstract
Background: Uremic cardiomyopathy (UC), the main cause of death in progressive chronic kidney disease (CKD), is characterized by diastolic dysfunction. Intraventricular pressure gradients (IVPG) derived from color m-mode echocardiography (CMME) and two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2DSTE) were established as novel echocardiographic approaches for non-invasive and repeatable assessment of cardiac function. Previously, salvianolic acid B (Sal B) showed the potential to alleviate concentric LV hypertrophy in the pressure overload model. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in cardiac function in UC and assess the efficacy of Sal B therapy using IVPG and 2DSTE techniques. Materials andEntities:
Keywords: hypertrophy; intraventricular pressure gradients; salvianolic acid; strain; uremic cardiomyopathy
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782566 PMCID: PMC9244798 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.905759
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Vet Sci ISSN: 2297-1769
Figure 1Novel echocardiography and kidney function in uremic cardiomyopathy, sham operation, and Sal B-treated rats. Novel echocardiographic measurements in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test the differences between groups and time points, Tukey's post-hoc test used group comparisons. * Indicate a significant difference between groups, p < 0.05. (A) Total IVPG, the mix of basal and mid-to-apical intraventricular pressure gradients. (B) Basal IVPG, the basal intraventricular pressure gradients. (C) Mid-to-apical IVPG, the mid plus apex intraventricular pressure gradients. (D) E/E′, ratio of E to E′. (E) creatinine. (F) BUN, blood urea nitrogen.
Cardiac morphology of the investigated groups at 6 and 8 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| IVSd, mm | 1.21 ± 0.17 | 1.57 ± 0.35 | 1.39 ± 0.26 | 1.31 ± 0.16 | 1.67 ± 0.3 | 1.57 ± 0.15 | 0.000 | 0.073 |
| LVIDd, mm | 7.53 ± 0.62 | 7.32 ± 0.27 | 7.93 ± 0.5 | 7.25 ± 0.58 | 7.32 ± 0.54 | 7.87 ± 0.69 | 0.007 | 0.423 |
| LVPWd, mm | 1.32 ± 0.27 | 1.78 ± 0.54 | 1.43 ± 0.36 | 1.64 ± 0.33 | 1.95 ± 0.53 | 1.49 ± 0.46 | 0.004 | 0.087 |
| IVSs, mm | 2.06 ± 0.39 | 2.29 ± 0.55 | 2.16 ± 0.46 | 1.96 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.52 | 2.63 ± 0.19 | 0.000 | 0.042 |
| LVIDs, mm | 4.34 ± 0.5 | 4.25 ± 0.38 | 4.48 ± 0.36 | 4.36 ± 0.46 | 3.93 ± 0.51 | 4.13 ± 0.44 | 0.029 | 0.028 |
| LVPWs, mm | 2.32 ± 0.32 | 2.55 ± 0.72 | 2.39 ± 0.18 | 2.38 ± 0.43 | 2.88 ± 0.68 | 2.95 ± 0.44 | 0.009 | 0.001 |
| FS % | 42.59 ± 4.63 | 41.78 ± 4.99 | 43.58 ± 4.19 | 39.59 ± 7.6 | 46.45 ± 5.41 | 47.67 ± 3.28 | 0.003 | 0.157 |
| LVM (gm) | 0.62 ± 0.11 | 0.91 ± 0.34 | 0.79 ± 0.23 | 0.71 ± 0.11 | 0.99 ± 0.38 | 0.86 ± 0.24 | 0.011 | 0.151 |
| HW(g) | 0.85 ± 0.09 | 1.17 ± 0.12 | 1.09 ± 0.12 | 0.88 ± 0.12 | 1.37 ± 0.12 | 1.19 ± 0.12 | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| HW/BW(mg/g) | 3.62 ± 0.19 | 5.11 ± 0.29 | 4.61 ± 0.27 | 3.62 ± 0.24 | 5.61 ± 0.31 | 4.51 ± 0.34 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| RWT | 0.34 ± 0.07 | 0.46 ± 0.13 | 0.36 ± 0.07 | 0.41 ± 0.07 | 0.49 ± 0.09 | 0.39 ± 0.06 | 0.000 | 0.045 |
Echocardiographic measurements and longitudinal strain rate in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test the difference between groups and time points, and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for group comparisons. Significance marks were fitted to compare data at each time point.
Indicates a significant difference between the sham and UC groups. The
symbol indicates the significant difference of p < 0.01.
Indicates a significant difference between Sham and Sal B-UC groups.
Indicates a significant difference between the UC and UC-Sal B groups. The significance level was p < 0.05. IVSd, interventricular septum diastolic diameter; LVIDd, left ventricular internal diastolic diameter; LVPWd, left ventricular posterior wall diastolic diameter; FS, fraction shorting; LVM, left ventricle mass; RWT, relative wall thickness; IVSs, interventricular septum systolic diameter; LVIDs, left ventricular internal systolic diameter; LVPWs, left ventricular posterior wall systolic diameter; FS, fraction shorting; LVM, left ventricle mass; RWT, relative wall thickness; HW, heart weight (g); HW/BW, heart weight (mg)/body weight (g). In this table, the two-way anova only include the data in 6 and 8 weeks. The full data including 2 and 4 weeks could be seen at .
Blood pressure and Doppler hemodynamic measurements in rats at 6 and 8 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| HR, BPM | 298.74 ± 47.14 | 378 ± 56.29 | 353.03 ± 42.92‡ | 310.23 ± 50.05 | 375.72 ± 45.1 | 364.51 ± 45.82‡ | 0.000 | 0.605 |
| SAP, mmHg | 93.41 ± 15 | 133.58 ± 13.56 | 121.24 ± 9.45 | 100.53 ± 15.25 | 144.12 ± 11.98 | 126.75 ± 11.21 | 0.000 | 0.134 |
| DAP, mmHg | 73.75 ± 6.55 | 104.13 ± 9.8 | 88.59 ± 9.82 | 73.2 ± 5.63 | 123.93 ± 19.57 | 106.18 ± 14.43 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| MAP, mmHg | 80.3 ± 6.17 | 113.94 ± 8.08 | 110.36 ± 7.15 | 82.31 ± 8.05 | 130.66 ± 13.52 | 119.89 ± 8.4 | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| E, cm/s | 105.58 ± 17.51 | 106.49 ± 10.79 | 103.26 ± 14.52 | 97.71 ± 16.91 | 106.47 ± 16.2 | 99.83 ± 19.44 | 0.054 | 0.371 |
| E', cm/s | 5.18 ± 1.06 | 6.32 ± 1.42 | 6.06 ± 1.09 | 5.48 ± 0.6 | 6.16 ± 0.77 | 5.62 ± 0.53 | 0.024 | 0.674 |
The echocardiographic measurements of the sham and UC groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test the difference between groups and time points, and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for group comparisons. Significance marks were fitted to compare data at each time point.
Indicates a significant difference between the sham and UC groups, The
symbol indicates the significant difference of p < 0.01,
Indicates a significant difference between Sham and Sal B-UC groups,
Indicates a significant difference between the UC and Sal B-UC groups. The significance level was p < 0.05. HR, heart rate; SAP, systolic arterial pressure; DAP, diastolic arterial pressure; MAP, mean arterial pressure; E, the velocity of early mitral inflow; E′, Peak velocity of early diastolic mitral annular motion as determined by pulsed-wave Doppler. In this table, the two-way anova only include the data in 6 and 8 weeks. The full data including 2 and 4 weeks could be seen at .
2D-speckle tracking echocardiography measurements in rats at 6 and 8 weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
| APS | 4.19 ± 0.41 | 2.97 ± 0.41 | 3.12 ± 0.51 | 4.08 ± 0.48 | 3.04 ± 0.4 | 2.68 ± 0.3 | 0.000 | 0.348 |
| MS | 11.35 ± 1.12 | 7.81 ± 1.09 | 8.3 ± 1.36 | 13.51 ± 1.6 | 8.9 ± 1.17 | 8.64 ± 0.96 | 0.000 | 0.030 |
| BS | 11.97 ± 1.19 | 7.5 ± 1.05 | 9.29 ± 1.52 | 11.5 ± 1.36 | 7.08 ± 0.93 | 7.5 ± 0.84 | 0.000 | 0.098 |
| APL | 6.81 ± 0.67 | 6.55 ± 0.91 | 6.79 ± 1.11 | 7.45 ± 0.88 | 5.12 ± 0.67 | 7.05 ± 0.79 | 0.000 | 0.503 |
| ML | 8.65 ± 0.86 | 6.55 ± 0.91 | 6.23 ± 1.02 | 9.23 ± 1.09 | 6.19 ± 0.81 | 6.05 ± 0.67 | 0.000 | 0.971 |
| BL | 10.68 ± 1.06 | 5.86 ± 0.82 | 7.48 ± 1.23 | 7.72 ± 0.92 | 7.23 ± 0.95 | 7.05 ± 0.79 | 0.000 | 0.101 |
Longitudinal strain rate in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups. Two-way ANOVA was performed to test the difference between groups and time points, and Tukey's post-hoc tests were used for group comparisons. Significance marks were fitted to compare data at each time point.
Indicates a significant difference between the sham and UC groups. The
symbol indicates the significant difference of p < 0.01.
Indicates a significant difference between Sham and UC-Sal B groups.
indicates a significant difference between the UC and UC-Sal B groups. The significance level was p < 0.05. APS, strain rate of the apical segment of the septum; MS, strain rate of the middle segment of the septum; BS, strain rate of the basal segment of the septum; APL, strain rate of the apical segment of the lateral free wall; ML, strain rate of the middle segment of the lateral free wall; BL, strain rate of the basal segment of the lateral free wall.
In this table, the two-way anova only include the data in 6 and 8 weeks. The full data including 2 and 4 weeks could be seen at .
Figure 2Pathology score evaluation. (A) The histological score in the UC group was significantly higher than in the other groups. (B) Fibrosis intensity in the UC group was more than in the Sham and Sal B-UC groups as indicated by the blue staining of Masson's trichrome score. (C) Fibrosis in the perivascular area in the UC group was also high. (D) CD3+ T-lymphocyte frequency in the UC group was the highest among the three groups. The * symbol indicates the significant difference of p < 0.05. The ** symbol indicates the significant difference of p < 0.01.
Figure 3Histological analysis. The histopathological images (10× and 40×) in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups. (A,B) Myocytes are arrayed in parallel, with no inflammatory cell infiltration in the sham group. (C,D) Distorted cardiomyocytes, mononuclear cell infiltration (green arrow), and interstitial edema with necrosis (black arrow) in the UC group. (E,F) Mild edema with little inflammatory cell infiltration in the Sal B-UC group.
Figure 4Masson's trichrome staining. The Masson's trichrome images of the interstitial and perivascular area in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups (50 μm). The light blue staining indicates the severity of cardiac fibrosis. In the sham group, fibrosis was not observed at either the interstitial level (A) or the perivascular area (B). In the UC group, severe fibrosis was observed at both interstitial levels (C) and the perivascular area (D). In the Sal B-UC group, moderate light blue staining was present at the two levels (E,F).
Figure 5Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining of CD3. The IHC staining of CD3 in the sham, UC, and Sal B-UC groups. CD3-T-lymphocytes were not recognized in the sham group (A). The number of CD3 infiltrations (brown color) was significantly increased in the UC group (B). A limited number of CD3+ was observed in the Sal B-UC group (C).