| Literature DB >> 35782490 |
Zhengyu Xu1, Yifei Fang1, Yao Chen1, Yushuang Zhao1, Wei Wei1,2, Chong Teng1.
Abstract
Rotator cuff tears (RCTs) are common in shoulder disease and disability. Despite significant advances in surgical repair techniques, 20-70% of patients still have postoperative rotator cuff dysfunction. These functional defects may be related to retear or rotator cuff quality deterioration due to tendon retraction and scar tissue at the repair site. As an effective delivery system, hydrogel scaffolds may improve the healing of RCTs and be a useful treatment for irreparable rotator cuff injuries. Although many studies have tested this hypothesis, most are limited to laboratory animal experiments. This review summarizes differences in hydrogel scaffold construction, active ingredients, and application methods in recent research. Efforts to determine the indications of hydrogel scaffolds (with different constructions and cargos) for various types of RCTs, as well as the effectiveness and reliability of application methods and devices, are also discussed.Entities:
Keywords: cytokine; hydrogel; regeneration medicine; rotator cuff; tissue engineering
Year: 2022 PMID: 35782490 PMCID: PMC9240348 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.851660
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Bioeng Biotechnol ISSN: 2296-4185
FIGURE 1Diagram of the four zones at the bone-tendon interface.
Hydrogel classification.
| Source | Natural Synthetic | Collagen, Gelatin, Chitosan, Hyaluronic acid, N-isopropyl Acrylamide (PNIPAM), Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), PoloxamerEtc. |
|---|---|---|
| Preparation | Homopolymer | A single species of polymer or copolymer |
| Multipolymer | Two independent crosslinked components | |
| Response | Chemical | pH response, oxidant response, glucose response |
| Physical | Temperature response, pressure response, light response | |
| Biochemical | Enzyme response, ligand response, antigen response |
Overview of hydrogels applied for rotator cuff repair.
| Hydrogel Name (Abbreviation) | Hydrogel Features/Advantages for Rotator Cuff Repair Engineering | Limitations | Refs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gelatin hydrogel | Biodegradable, thermo-responsive, elastic, injectable | Poor mechanical properties faster degradation rate |
|
| Collagen hydrogel | Natural ECM protein, reasonable biomechanical properties, injectable | Limited number of functional groups for crosslinking |
|
| Fibrin hydrogel | Easy to be functionalized impressive stiffness, injectable | Immune response |
|
| Gelatin methacryloyl hydrogel (GelMA) | Self-sterilization, low cost, Photopolymerized, high compatibility, injectable | poor tissue adhesivity |
|
| Hyaluronic acid hydrogel (HA) | Biocompatible, biodegradable, noncytotoxic, nonimmunogenic | Do not support cell attachment |
|
| Alginate hydrogel | Quick cross-linking, mechanically strong | Non-biodegradable and elicit immunological responses |
|
| Chitosan hydrogel | Therapeutic substance delivery capacity, injectable | Low solubility and high viscosity |
|
| Chitosan-4-thiobutylamidine hydrogel (CS-TBA) | Biocompatible, highly absorbent, injectable, structurally similar to natural ECM | Low solubility, high viscosity, difficult for preparation |
|
| Human tendon-derived collagen hydrogel (tHG) | Thermo-responsive, injectable, type I collagen-rich | xenogeneic immune response |
|
| Ion-based hydrogels | Anti-inflammatory | Rapid ion release rate |
|
| Polyethylene glycol diacrylate (PEGDA) | Biocompatible, degradable, Easily manipulated, non-immunogenic, injectable | Limited microenvironment control, Poor toughness |
|
| Polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) | Mechanically strong, MSC chondrogenic differentiation | Biologically inert |
|
| Poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) | Biocompatibility, easy handling, Similar mechanical properties with tendon | potential toxicity from dose dumping, inconsistent drug release and drug-polymer interactions |
|
FIGURE 2Hydrogels load therapeutic cargos such as Anti-inflammatory cargos, cytokines, stem cells and mental ions to facilitate rotator cuff healing.
FIGURE 3(A) Synthesis of Cur&Mg-QCS/PF hydrogels. (B) In vivo application and evaluation of Cur&Mg-QCS/PF hydrogels. (Reprinted from (Lin et al., 2021) with permission from Theranostics).
FIGURE 4(A) The fabrication of gradient bimetallic hydrogels. (B) The application of the gradient bimetallic hydrogel for RCT. (C) The mechanism of gradient bimetallic hydrogel for the regeneration of tendon-bone interface. (Reprinted from (Yang et al., 2021) with permission from Science Advances).
FIGURE 5(A) Scheme of the fabrication of QCS/PF hydrogels and the interaction between Mg2+ and QCS; (B) Application of QCS/PF hydrogels delivering Mg2+ in situ to promote tendon-bone interface regeneration in the rabbit RCT model; (Reprinted from (Chen et al., 2020)with permission from Science Advances).
FIGURE 6Illustration of 3D printing multiphasic scaffold for tendon-bone interface engineering. (Reprinted from (Cao et al., 2020) with permission from Elsevier).