Literature DB >> 35782272

Combining and analyzing novel multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging metrics for predicting Gleason score.

Rulon Mayer1,2, Baris Turkbey3, Peter Choyke3, Charles B Simone4.   

Abstract

Background: Radiologists currently subjectively examine multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI) to determine prostate tumor aggressiveness using the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System scoring system (PI-RADS). Recent studies showed that modified signal to clutter ratio (SCR), tumor volume, and eccentricity (elongation or roundness) of prostate tumors correlated with Gleason score (GS). No previous studies have combined the prostate tumor's shape, SCR, tumor volume, in order to predict potential tumor aggressiveness and GS.
Methods: MP-MRI (T1, T2, diffusion, dynamic contrast-enhanced images) were obtained, resized, translated, and stitched to form spatially registered multi-parametric cubes. Multi-parametric signatures that characterize prostate tumors were inserted into a target detection algorithm [adaptive cosine estimator (ACE)]. Pixel-based blobbing, and labeling were applied to the threshold ACE images. Eccentricity calculation used moments of inertia from the blobs. Tumor volume was computed by counting pixels within multi parametric MRI blobs and tumor outlines based on pathologist assessment of whole mount histology. Pathology assessment of GS was performed on whole mount prostatectomy. The covariance matrix and mean of normal tissue background was computed from normal prostate. Using signatures and normal tissue statistics, the z-score, noise corrected SCR [principal component (PC), modified regularization] from each patient was computed. Eccentricity, tumor volume, and SCR were fitted to GS. Analysis of variance assesses the relationship among the variables.
Results: A multivariate analysis generated correlation coefficient (0.60 to 0.784) and P value (0.00741 to <0.0001) from fitting two sets of independent variates, namely, tumor eccentricity (the eccentricity for the largest blob, weighted average for the eccentricity) and SCR (removing 3 PCs, removing 4 PCs, modified regularization, and z-score) to GS. The eccentricity t-statistic exceeded the SCR t-statistic. The three-variable fit to GS using tumor volume (histology, MRI) yielded correlation coefficients ranging from 0.724 to 0.819 (P value <<0.05). Tumor volumes generated from histology yielded higher correlation coefficients than MRI volumes. Adding volume to eccentricity and SCR adds little improvement for fitting GS due to higher correlation coefficients among independent variables and little additional, independent information. Conclusions: Combining prostate tumors eccentricity with SCR relatively highly correlates with GS. 2022 Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gleason score (GS); Tumor morphology; histology of whole mount prostatectomy; multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (MP-MRI); prostate cancer; regularization; signal to clutter ratio (SCR)

Year:  2022        PMID: 35782272      PMCID: PMC9246760          DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-1092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg        ISSN: 2223-4306


  23 in total

1.  Visual estimation of the tumor volume in prostate cancer: a useful means for predicting biochemical-free survival after radical prostatectomy?

Authors:  M May; M Siegsmund; F Hammermann; V Loy; S Gunia
Journal:  Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis       Date:  2006-12-26       Impact factor: 5.554

2.  Intra- and interreader reproducibility of PI-RADSv2: A multireader study.

Authors:  Clayton P Smith; Stephanie A Harmon; Tristan Barrett; Leonardo K Bittencourt; Yan Mee Law; Haytham Shebel; Julie Y An; Marcin Czarniecki; Sherif Mehralivand; Mehmet Coskun; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto; Joanna H Shih; Peter L Choyke; Baris Turkbey
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Gleason Score within Prostate Abnormal Areas Defined by Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Did Not Vary According to the PIRADS Score.

Authors:  Hakim Slaoui; Yann Neuzillet; Tarek Ghoneim; Mathieu Rouanne; Abdelali Abdou; Pierre Marie Lugagne-Delpon; Antoine Scherrer; Camelia Radulescu; Christian Delancourt; Vincent Molinié; Thierry Lebret
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2017-04-08       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  Preoperative neural network using combined magnetic resonance imaging variables, prostate-specific antigen, and gleason score for predicting prostate cancer biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Vassilis Poulakis; Ulrich Witzsch; Rachelle de Vries; Volker Emmerlich; Michael Meves; Hans-Michael Altmannsberger; Eduard Becht
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.649

5.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository.

Authors:  Kenneth Clark; Bruce Vendt; Kirk Smith; John Freymann; Justin Kirby; Paul Koppel; Stephen Moore; Stanley Phillips; David Maffitt; Michael Pringle; Lawrence Tarbox; Fred Prior
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 6.  Prognostic determinants in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Neil E Martin; Lorelei A Mucci; Massimo Loda; Ronald A Depinho
Journal:  Cancer J       Date:  2011 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.360

7.  Correlation of prostate tumor eccentricity and Gleason scoring from prostatectomy and multi-parametric-magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rulon Mayer; Charles B Simone; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-10

8.  Prostate tumor eccentricity predicts Gleason score better than prostate tumor volume.

Authors:  Rulon Mayer; Charles B Simone; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2022-02

9.  Correlation of Prostate-Imaging Reporting and Data Scoring System scoring on multiparametric prostate magnetic resonance imaging with histopathological factors in radical prostatectomy material in Turkish prostate cancer patients: a multicenter study of the Urooncology Association.

Authors:  Fuat Kızılay; Serdar Çelik; Sinan Sözen; Bora Özveren; Saadettin Eskiçorapçı; Mahir Özgen; Haluk Özen; Bülent Akdoğan; Güven Aslan; Fehmi Narter; Çağ Çal; Levent Türkeri
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2020-02-08

10.  Preoperative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Predicts Biochemical Recurrence in Prostate Cancer after Radical Prostatectomy.

Authors:  Richard Ho; Mohummad M Siddiqui; Arvin K George; Thomas Frye; Amichai Kilchevsky; Michele Fascelli; Nabeel A Shakir; Raju Chelluri; Steven F Abboud; Annerleim Walton-Diaz; Sandeep Sankineni; Maria J Merino; Baris Turkbey; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood; Peter A Pinto
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.