Literature DB >> 35781757

Determination of antibiotic susceptibility of bacteria by flow cytometric method.

Huseyin Hatipoglu1, Gulay Erman2, Hande Toptan3, Mehmet Koroglu1, Mustafa Altindis1.   

Abstract

In this study, it was aimed to determine the antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial strains by using flow cytometry method by comparing them with current standardized methods. Eleven clinical isolates and 6 standard bacterial strains were included in the study. MIC values were determined by broth microdilution method (BMD), VITEK 2® automated system and flow cytometric method (FCM). FCM was performed with the Accuri C6 flow cytometer. For all strains except P. aeuruginosa ATCC 27853 [BMD-FCM:r = 0.557(p = 0.048); VITEK 2-FCM:r = 0.529(p = 0.063)], E. faecalis ATCC 29212 [BMD-FCM:r = 0.393(p = 0.295); BMD-VITEK 2:r = 0.393(p = 0.295)], and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium clinical isolate [BMD-FCM:r = 0.452(p = 0.063)] r values were in the range of 0.802-0.969 for BMD-FCM (p < 0.001), 0.655-0.941 for BMD-VITEK 2 (p < 0.005) and 0.667-0.953 for FCM-VITEK 2 (p < 0.005). Correlation values of antibiotic susceptibility test results between three methods for Gram-negative bacteria were found as follows; r = 0.927(p < 0.001) for BMD-FCM, r = 0.851(p < 0.001) for BMD-VITEK 2, r = 0.807(p < 0.001) for VITEK 2-FCM. Correlation values were found as follows for Gram positive bacteria; r = 0.848(p < 0.001) for BMD-FCM, r = 0.877(p < 0.001) for BMD-VITEK 2, r = 0.800(p < 0.001) for VITEK 2-FCM. When all bacteria included in the study were evaluated as a total; it was r = 0.911(p < 0.001) for BMD-FCM, r = 0.888(p < 0.001) for BMD-VITEK 2, r = 0.835(p < 0.001) for VITEK 2-FCM. The methicillin resistance of the clinical methicillin resistant S. aureus isolate could not be detected by FCM. It was determined that there was a high level of correlation between methods. FCM shortens the duration of antibiotic susceptibility tests by 12-14 h and gives results within the same day. However, it has not been standardized to be widely used in microbiology laboratories and experienced personnel are needed for its implementation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antibiotic; Antibiotic resistance; Antibiotic susceptibility; Antibiotic susceptibility test methods; Bacteria; Flow cytometric method

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35781757     DOI: 10.1007/s11274-022-03332-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol        ISSN: 0959-3993            Impact factor:   3.312


  14 in total

Review 1.  Colistin: the revival of polymyxins for the management of multidrug-resistant gram-negative bacterial infections.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Sofia K Kasiakou
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2005-03-22       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions.

Authors:  Ramanan Laxminarayan; Adriano Duse; Chand Wattal; Anita K M Zaidi; Heiman F L Wertheim; Nithima Sumpradit; Erika Vlieghe; Gabriel Levy Hara; Ian M Gould; Herman Goossens; Christina Greko; Anthony D So; Maryam Bigdeli; Göran Tomson; Will Woodhouse; Eva Ombaka; Arturo Quizhpe Peralta; Farah Naz Qamar; Fatima Mir; Sam Kariuki; Zulfiqar A Bhutta; Anthony Coates; Richard Bergstrom; Gerard D Wright; Eric D Brown; Otto Cars
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2013-11-17       Impact factor: 25.071

3.  Very rapid flow cytometric assessment of antimicrobial susceptibility during the apparent lag phase of microbial (re)growth.

Authors:  Srijan Jindal; Harish Thampy; Philip J R Day; Douglas B Kell
Journal:  Microbiology (Reading)       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.777

4.  A novel flow cytometric assay for rapid detection of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases.

Authors:  I Faria-Ramos; M J Espinar; R Rocha; J Santos-Antunes; A G Rodrigues; R Cantón; C Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 8.067

5.  Flow cytometry approach study of Enterococcus faecalis vancomycin resistance by detection of Vancomycin@FL binding to the bacterial cells.

Authors:  Tomasz Jarzembowski; Agnieszka Jóźwik; Katarzyna Wiśniewska; Jacek Witkowski
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 2.188

6.  Rapid Identification of Klebsiella pneumoniae by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry and Detection of Meropenem Resistance by Flow Cytometric Assay.

Authors:  Abdullah Kilic; Eyup Dogan; Sinem Kaya; Sema Oren; Duran Tok; Nurittin Ardic; Mehmet Baysallar
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2016-05-30       Impact factor: 2.352

7.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing in 90 min by bacterial cell count monitoring.

Authors:  M A C Broeren; Y Maas; E Retera; N L A Arents
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2012-03-05       Impact factor: 8.067

Review 8.  Global spread of Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Patrice Nordmann; Thierry Naas; Laurent Poirel
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.883

9.  Potential Impact of Flow Cytometry Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing on the Clinical Management of Gram-Negative Bacteremia Using the FASTinov® Kit.

Authors:  Sofia Costa-de-Oliveira; Rita Teixeira-Santos; Ana P Silva; Elika Pinho; Paulo Mergulhão; Ana Silva-Dias; Nádia Marques; Inês Martins-Oliveira; Acácio G Rodrigues; José A Paiva; Rafael Cantón; Cidália Pina-Vaz
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Rapid susceptibility profiling of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Authors:  K T Mulroney; J M Hall; X Huang; E Turnbull; N M Bzdyl; A Chakera; U Naseer; E M Corea; M J Ellington; K L Hopkins; A L Wester; O Ekelund; N Woodford; T J J Inglis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.