Literature DB >> 35781622

Forensic odontology and dental age estimation research: a scoping review a decade after the NAS report on strengthening forensic science.

Paula Valentina Espinoza-Silva1,2, Sandra López-Lázaro1,2,3, Gabriel M Fonseca4,5.   

Abstract

Dental age estimation (DAE) is one of the most reliable and useful scientific methods employed by forensic odontology (FO) for human identification. In 2009, the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS) report highlighted the need to deepen research in many disciplines, among which FO received strong criticism for specific expertise. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview in order to systematically map the latest original research done in FO, as well as identify DAE within this field. A systematic search was performed from 2014 to 2019. In total, 644 studies were identified for qualitative analysis: DAE was the most studied topic (41.30%). Asia was the most productive continent with 58.27% of the global production on DAE; India was the most productive Asian country, with 32.33% and 55.48% of global and Asian production, respectively. The University of Macerata (Italy), KU Leuven (Belgium), University of Split (Croatia), and University of São Paulo (Brazil) led DAE research. Authors from leading countries on DAE research demonstrated great individual productivity, which is evidence of their scientific efforts, but also possible risks if the continuity of this line of research depends on them. Although FO has significantly focused its research on DAE, the absence of publications on controversial topics but necessary for research according to the NAS report shows the possible lack of interest of authors or journals to address them.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bite mark evidence; Dental age estimation; Forensic odontology; NAS report; Publications; Research

Year:  2022        PMID: 35781622     DOI: 10.1007/s12024-022-00499-w

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Med Pathol        ISSN: 1547-769X            Impact factor:   2.007


  23 in total

1.  The good, the bad, the ugly: the NAS report on strengthening forensic science in America.

Authors:  David H Kaye
Journal:  Sci Justice       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 2.  The distribution of forensic journals, reflections on authorship practices, peer-review and role of the impact factor.

Authors:  Alan Wayne Jones
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2006-06-19       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Teaching forensic odontology: an opinion on its content and format*.

Authors:  A B Acharya
Journal:  Eur J Dent Educ       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 2.355

4.  Forensic odontology in the 21st century - Identifying the opinions of those behind the teaching.

Authors:  Scheila Mânica; Ludovica Gorza
Journal:  J Forensic Leg Med       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 1.614

5.  The NAS Report: Ten Years of Response.

Authors:  Susan M Ballou
Journal:  J Forensic Sci       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.832

Review 6.  Analysis of 100 most cited articles on forensic odontology.

Authors:  Namrata Sengupta; Sachin C Sarode; Gargi S Sarode; Amol R Gadbail; Shailesh Gondivkar; Sneha Patil; Shankargouda Patil
Journal:  Saudi Dent J       Date:  2020-04-18

7.  Accuracy of the Demirjian, Willems and Nolla methods for dental age estimation in a northern Chinese population.

Authors:  Meng-Qi Han; Si-Xuan Jia; Chen-Xu Wang; Guang Chu; Teng Chen; Hong Zhou; Yu-Cheng Guo
Journal:  Arch Oral Biol       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 2.633

Review 8.  Teeth in forensics: A review.

Authors:  Preetam Shah; Priyam R Velani; Laxmi Lakade; Siya Dukle
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2019 Mar-Apr

9.  Analysis of PubMed User Sessions Using a Full-Day PubMed Query Log: A Comparison of Experienced and Nonexperienced PubMed Users.

Authors:  Illhoi Yoo; Abu Saleh Mohammad Mosa
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2015-07-02

Review 10.  Interpol review of forensic science management literature 2016-2019.

Authors:  William P McAndrew; Max M Houck
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.395

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.