Literature DB >> 35780474

mRNA vaccines: a transformative technology with applications beyond COVID-19.

Isabella Overmars1, George Au-Yeung2,3, Terence M Nolan3,4, Andrew C Steer1,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Microbiology; Preventive medicine; Vaccination; Vaccine preventable disease; Vaccines; Virus diseases

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35780474      PMCID: PMC9350149          DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   12.776


× No keyword cloud information.
mRNA vaccines can be used for broader infectious diseases prevention and cancer therapy Messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccine technology, decades in development as a therapy for cancer and for prevention of infectious diseases but not yet realising a licensed product, was rapidly implemented to accelerate the creation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) vaccines. Yet their spectacular success against SARS‐CoV‐2 provides just a glimpse of their full potential. This article describes how mRNA vaccines are made and how they work, and their potential for further infectious disease prevention and cancer therapy.

How mRNA vaccines are made and how they work

mRNA is a single‐stranded molecule comprised of nucleic acid bases which function to provide a genetic code for a specific protein. During normal cellular processes, the parts of DNA‐containing genes are transcribed into mRNA molecules in the cell nucleus, and the mRNA moves into the cytoplasm to facilitate protein assembly. The mRNA vaccine, however, is designed in silico (on a computer) using genomic sequences of the antigen of interest to initiate an immune response. Synthetic nucleic acid bases (adenine, uracil, guanine and cytosine) are used to make mRNA. The mRNA of interest is created by using DNA, and mRNA is transcribed from that DNA, in vitro (not in a cell) and capped with a poly‐adenine tail to prevent degradation. The output is purified and put into the delivery mechanism before it is tested for quality, potency and other characteristics. There are several delivery methods that can be used to get the mRNA into cells, but lipid nanoparticles are favoured. These particles themselves have a complex design and manufacturing process. Adjuvants may also be used. With the right facilities, large‐scale manufacturing of the final mRNA vaccine can occur rapidly. mRNA vaccines deliver into the host an mRNA that contains a code for a specific antigen. mRNA enters host cell ribosomes where it is translated into the coded protein. This typically leads to the host cell displaying the protein on its surface to promote cell‐mediated immunity, and the host cell releases proteins outside of the cell which are taken up and presented by other antigen‐presenting cells to promote antibody‐mediated immunity (Box 1). MHC = major histocompatibility complex; vax = vaccine. The figure shows how conventional mRNA vaccines, with lipid nanoparticle coats, stimulate multiple pathways of the immune response due to involvement of normal cellular processes. (1) mRNA is delivered to into the body through a conventional mRNA vaccine, made up of mRNA coding for an antigen of interest surrounded by a lipid nanoparticle. (2) mRNA is delivered to, and enters, the cell by fusion of the lipid nanoparticle with the cell membrane. (3 and 4) mRNA enters the host cell ribosome where it is translated into the coded antigen. mRNA is then degraded through normal cellular processes. (5) The antigen can then stimulate the immune system in different ways. The antigen can be released outside of the cell, where it is taken up by a different antigen‐presenting cell (represented as the same cell in this figure, for simplicity), and presents the antigen on the cell surface via an MHC class II molecule, stimulating CD4+ T cells. (6) The antigen can be presented on the cell surface in an MHC class I molecule, stimulating CD8+ T cells. (7) The antigen can also present itself on the cell surface, where it can be recognised by antibodies and directly stimulate B cells.

Advantages and limitations of mRNA vaccines

mRNA has low toxicity because it is quickly degraded by normal cellular processes, and because design developments have allowed stimulation of cellular and humoral immune responses without excessive immunogenicity. A potential advantage of mRNA over DNA vaccines is the obviation of risk of integration into the host genome, albeit theoretical and likely rare. In addition, mRNA vaccines are a non‐infectious alternative to other vaccine types such as attenuated or inactivated vaccines, which means there is no possibility for an infection to occur from the vaccine itself. Furthermore, mRNA vaccines do not rely on non or mildly pathogenic viral vectors as a delivery method, which in some cases can cause issues of immune‐based clotting disorders, such as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), and antivector immunity. TTS has been rarely observed following administration of the adenoviral vector coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccines, including those from AstraZeneca and Johnson and Johnson/Janssen. Antivector immunity is when the immune system responds to the viral vector and not the target antigen, as has been reported when using adenovirus vectors. The manufacturing process also has several benefits, including in vitro development and use of synthetic materials, meaning there are minimal contaminants compared with some other methods. Moreover, mRNA vaccines can be rapidly synthesised after the required sequence is known, and modifications can be expedited, which is advantageous in responding to emerging immune‐evasive variants. Although the advantages of mRNA vaccines compared with other vaccine types have been explored, existing vaccine approaches remain incredibly successful in averting millions of deaths from vaccine‐preventable diseases each year. As mRNA can be degraded by cellular processes, it can be easily destroyed. Furthermore, mRNA and lipid nanoparticles are thermodynamically unstable, and need to be kept at cold temperatures for storage and transport, some at ‐20°C and as low as ‐80°C, often requiring specialised ultrarefrigeration equipment and thawing before use. This presents serious limitations for settings unable to meet these cold chain logistics, especially in low and middle‐income countries. Safety concerns have emerged with mild‐to‐moderate myocarditis and pericarditis rarely following SARS‐CoV‐2 mRNA vaccination, mainly in young male adults, albeit without fatal consequences. While the mechanism of action is yet to be elucidated, it may be specific to the antigen target used, or general to all mRNA vaccines if the immune response reacts to the presence of mRNA itself. Close monitoring of this safety signal and investigation into its occurrence will be a crucial focus in the development of future mRNA vaccines.

Application to infectious diseases

mRNA vaccines can be used prophylactically where they are administered to prevent infection or disease, or therapeutically where they are delivered after infection to support the immune response. Viruses are an ideal target group of pathogens for prophylactic mRNA vaccines, as they are structurally smaller and less complex than bacteria, parasites or fungi. A broad portfolio of candidate prophylactic mRNA vaccines targeting viruses is under development (Box 2). , , , Bacteria and parasites have a multiplicity of antigens, and thus choosing a target can be challenging. Furthermore, parasites have complex reproduction cycles, so that antigens are not always present on the pathogen. Despite these barriers, some bacterial and parasite mRNA vaccine candidates have shown success in mouse models, including for group A and B streptococci and for malaria. In addition, mRNA vaccines for infectious diseases can be applied therapeutically, as opposed to prophylactically, with some in development for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The vaccines being tested for HIV involve using mRNA that codes for antigens and activation signals, delivered using dendritic cells, to support the immune response in patients already infected with HIV. HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; hMPV = human metapneumovirus; na = not applicable; mRNA = messenger RNA; PIV3 = human parainfluenza virus type 3; RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

Applications in cancer

The therapeutic role of vaccines in cancer control has been extensively investigated over the past two decades, with limited success in advanced disease. More recently, research in tumour‐specific vaccines has been reignited, spurred on by dramatic and durable responses seen with immune checkpoint inhibitors in certain malignancies, coupled with improvements in technology facilitating better design and delivery systems. The explosion of the genomic era has also enabled the identification of tumour‐specific antigens that are not subject to immune tolerance. These tumour “neoantigens”, unique to individual tumours, may represent a personalised patient‐specific vaccine strategy that has already shown some promise in the clinic. Understanding which of the tumour neoantigens are important immunologically and refining the algorithms used to define them remain a critical aspect of therapeutic vaccine development in cancer. mRNA vaccines are ideal for therapeutic use because they can be rapidly designed and manufactured, especially to improve the immune response to neoantigens. Those in development are listed in Box 3. mRNA = messenger RNA. If available. Clinically, it remains unclear which setting is likely to benefit most from the use of therapeutic tumour vaccines. Immunogenically “hot” tumours, which have high levels of immune cell infiltration, typically respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors, and the addition of a therapeutic vaccine may not be required to induce an immune response. In contrast, the use of a vaccine in “cold” tumours, with limited infiltration, may not be sufficient to overcome the various mechanisms of immune exclusion in these tumour types. The disease setting is also likely to be influential — advanced, metastatic disease is typically considered immune‐suppressive, with tumours surrounded by an immunosuppressive micro‐environment. Therefore, therapeutic tumour vaccines are now being tested with different adjuvants or in “minimal residual disease” environments to avoid these challenges. The degree of uncertainty but also the distinct opportunity of therapeutic tumour vaccines is reflected in the vast number of active clinical trials across different tumour types and settings.

Future of mRNA vaccines

mRNA vaccine development will continue to accelerate, spurred on by the success of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccines, and further improvements to the technology may mitigate some of the current limitations and facilitate broader reach. For example, strategies to make the mRNA vaccines self‐amplify, meaning the mRNA delivered in the vaccine encodes not only the antigen of interest but also the replication machinery that amplifies the mRNA, will reduce the amount of mRNA needed in each vaccine. This could also facilitate the creation of multivalent vaccines, one of the most powerful opportunities for this technology, allowing multiple antigen targets, for the same or different pathogens, to be delivered in one vaccine lipid nanoparticle. Moderna is already in phase 1 with a seasonal influenza quadrivalent product, and is developing other combination vaccines, including one for human metapneumovirus and parainfluenza virus. To progress mRNA vaccine development, existing challenges need to be addressed to ensure equitable access and expansion. To do this, manufacturing facilities with advanced mRNA technology may be required in multiple locations globally. Testing of different additives, adjuvants and delivery mechanisms will be important to increase the stability of mRNA vaccines at higher temperatures and to therefore facilitate equitable access. mRNA technology has progressed rapidly over the past 2 years in response to the global COVID‐19 pandemic, revealing new and exciting avenues for prophylactic and therapeutic vaccine development.

Competing interests

No relevant disclosures.

Provenance

Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
PathogenCompany (code)Clinical trial numberVaccine development phase
PreclinicalPhase 1Phase 2Phase 3
Chikungunya virusModerna (mRNA‐1388)NCT03325075CompletedCompleted
CytomegalovirusModerna (mRNA‐1647)NCT05085366CompletedCompletedCompletedPlanned
Moderna (mRNA‐1647 and mRNA‐1443)NCT03382405CompletedCompleted
Epstein–Barr virusModerna (mRNA‐1189)UnavailableOngoing
HIVModerna (mRNA‐1644)naOngoing
Moderna (mRNA‐1574)naOngoing
BioNTech (na)naOngoing
hMPV + PIV3Moderna (mRNA‐1653)NCT04144348CompletedCompleted
Influenza virusModerna (mRNA‐1440–H10N8)NCT03076385CompletedCompleted
Moderna (mRNA‐1851–H7N9)NCT03345043CompletedCompleted
Moderna (mRNA‐10‐10,20,30)NCT04956575CompletedOngoing
CureVac (CV7301)naOngoing
BioNTech (BNT161)naOngoing
Sanofi and Translate Bio (MRT540‐0,1)UnavailableCompletedOngoing
Lassa virusCureVac (na)naOngoing
Nipah virusModerna (mRNA‐1215)naOngoing
Rabies virusCureVac (CV7202)NCT03713086CompletedOngoing
RSVModerna (mRNA‐1345)NCT04528719CompletedOngoing
Moderna (mRNA‐1777)UnavailableCompletedCompleted
Moderna (mRNA‐1172)UnavailableCompletedOngoing
CureVac (na)naOngoing
Varicella‐zoster virusModerna (mRNA‐1278)naCeased
Zika virusModerna (mRNA‐1893)NCT04917861CompletedCompletedPlanned
Moderna (mRNA‐1325)NCT03014089CompletedCompleted

HIV = human immunodeficiency virus; hMPV = human metapneumovirus; na = not applicable; mRNA = messenger RNA; PIV3 = human parainfluenza virus type 3; RSV = respiratory syncytial virus.

Targeted cancerSponsorTrial numberVaccine type (vaccine name*)Vaccine development phase
Phase 1Phase 2Phase 3
BrainGuangdong 999 Brain HospitalNCT02808416Personalised mRNA cellular vaccine (PerCellVac3)Ongoing
Breast or melanomaInge Marie SvaneNCT00978913mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccineOngoing
GeneralNational Cancer InstituteNCT03480152Personalised mRNA vaccine (NCI‐4650)OngoingOngoing
MelanomaModernaTXNCT03897881Personalised mRNA vaccine (mRNA‐4157)CompletedOngoing
Oesophageal and/or non‐small cell lungStemirna TherapeuticsNCT03908671Personalised mRNA vaccineOngoing
Ludwig Institute for Cancer ResearchNCT03164772mRNA vaccine (BI 1361849)OngoingOngoing
OvarianUniversity Medical Center GroningenNCT04163094mRNA vaccine (W_ova1)Ongoing
Oslo University HospitalEUCTR2010‐020233‐56‐NOmRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccineOngoingOngoing
Steinar AamdalNCT01334047Personalised mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccine (DC‐006)OngoingOngoing
ProstateCenter for Cancer Immunotherapy and Department of Oncology, Herlev HospitalEUCTR2011‐001602‐10‐DKmRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccine (Taxotere)CompletedOngoing
Oslo University HospitalNCT01278914mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccineOngoingOngoing
Oslo University HospitalNCT01197625mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccine (DC‐005)OngoingOngoing
Oslo University HospitalEUCTR2010‐018770‐20‐NOPersonalised mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccineOngoingOngoing
University of FloridaNCT01153113Personalised mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccine (hTERT mRNA DC)CompletedOngoing
Solid tumoursStemirna TherapeuticsChiCTR1900023000Personalised mRNA vaccineOngoing
University Hospital, AntwerpNCT01291420Personalised mRNA transfected dendritic cell vaccineOngoingOngoing

mRNA = messenger RNA.

If available.

  13 in total

1.  Self-amplifying mRNA vaccines.

Authors:  Luis A Brito; Sushma Kommareddy; Domenico Maione; Yasushi Uematsu; Cinzia Giovani; Francesco Berlanda Scorza; Gillis R Otten; Dong Yu; Christian W Mandl; Peter W Mason; Philip R Dormitzer; Jeffrey B Ulmer; Andrew J Geall
Journal:  Adv Genet       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 1.944

Review 2.  mRNA vaccines - a new era in vaccinology.

Authors:  Norbert Pardi; Michael J Hogan; Frederick W Porter; Drew Weissman
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 84.694

3.  Key Parameters of Tumor Epitope Immunogenicity Revealed Through a Consortium Approach Improve Neoantigen Prediction.

Authors:  Daniel K Wells; Marit M van Buuren; Kristen K Dang; Vanessa M Hubbard-Lucey; Kathleen C F Sheehan; Katie M Campbell; Andrew Lamb; Jeffrey P Ward; John Sidney; Ana B Blazquez; Andrew J Rech; Jesse M Zaretsky; Begonya Comin-Anduix; Alphonsus H C Ng; William Chour; Thomas V Yu; Hira Rizvi; Jia M Chen; Patrice Manning; Gabriela M Steiner; Xengie C Doan; Taha Merghoub; Justin Guinney; Adam Kolom; Cheryl Selinsky; Antoni Ribas; Matthew D Hellmann; Nir Hacohen; Alessandro Sette; James R Heath; Nina Bhardwaj; Fred Ramsdell; Robert D Schreiber; Ton N Schumacher; Pia Kvistborg; Nadine A Defranoux
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 4.  Off the beaten path: Novel mRNA-nanoformulations for therapeutic vaccination against HIV.

Authors:  Sigrid D'haese; Céline Lacroix; Felipe Garcia; Montserrat Plana; Simona Ruta; Guido Vanham; Bernard Verrier; Joeri L Aerts
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2020-11-10       Impact factor: 9.776

5.  Immunogenicity and protective efficacy induced by self-amplifying mRNA vaccines encoding bacterial antigens.

Authors:  Giulietta Maruggi; Emiliano Chiarot; Cinzia Giovani; Scilla Buccato; Stefano Bonacci; Elisabetta Frigimelica; Immaculada Margarit; Andrew Geall; Giuliano Bensi; Domenico Maione
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.641

6.  An immunogenic personal neoantigen vaccine for patients with melanoma.

Authors:  Patrick A Ott; Zhuting Hu; Derin B Keskin; Sachet A Shukla; Jing Sun; David J Bozym; Wandi Zhang; Adrienne Luoma; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Lauren Peter; Christina Chen; Oriol Olive; Todd A Carter; Shuqiang Li; David J Lieb; Thomas Eisenhaure; Evisa Gjini; Jonathan Stevens; William J Lane; Indu Javeri; Kaliappanadar Nellaiappan; Andres M Salazar; Heather Daley; Michael Seaman; Elizabeth I Buchbinder; Charles H Yoon; Maegan Harden; Niall Lennon; Stacey Gabriel; Scott J Rodig; Dan H Barouch; Jon C Aster; Gad Getz; Kai Wucherpfennig; Donna Neuberg; Jerome Ritz; Eric S Lander; Edward F Fritsch; Nir Hacohen; Catherine J Wu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Addressing the Cold Reality of mRNA Vaccine Stability.

Authors:  Daan J A Crommelin; Thomas J Anchordoquy; David B Volkin; Wim Jiskoot; Enrico Mastrobattista
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2020-12-13       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 8.  mRNA therapeutics in cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Jan D Beck; Daniel Reidenbach; Nadja Salomon; Mathias Vormehr; Lena M Kranz; Ugur Sahin; Özlem Türeci
Journal:  Mol Cancer       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 27.401

Review 9.  Adenovirus vector-based vaccine for infectious diseases.

Authors:  Fuminori Sakurai; Masashi Tachibana; Hiroyuki Mizuguchi
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 3.614

10.  Neutralization of the Plasmodium-encoded MIF ortholog confers protective immunity against malaria infection.

Authors:  Alvaro Baeza Garcia; Edwin Siu; Tiffany Sun; Valerie Exler; Luis Brito; Armin Hekele; Gib Otten; Kevin Augustijn; Chris J Janse; Jeffrey B Ulmer; Jürgen Bernhagen; Erol Fikrig; Andrew Geall; Richard Bucala
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.