| Literature DB >> 35780177 |
Mahin Saberi1,2, Hamid Ghomi3, Christian Andreasen4.
Abstract
This study aims to improve the quality and quantity of winter wheat by using the potential of combining the use of cold plasma and waste biorefinery products for improving wheat yield. Plasma was applied by a radio frequency (RF) plasma reactor operated with air for 180 s and 50 W. The waste biorefinery products, including pyroligneous acid, biochar, and azolla compost, were used as plant nutrition. The effects of cold plasma treatment and waste biorefinery products were determined by measuring plant photosynthesis, grain yield, and content of chlorophyll, carotenoids, anthocyanin, protein, and starch. The experiment was conducted during the cropping seasons 2016-18 in a randomized complete block design with four replications. The combination of cold plasma and pyroligneous acid increased the grain yield up to 40.0%. The photosynthesis rate was improved up to 39.3%, and total chlorophyll content up to 48.3% in both years. Seed plasma treatment combined with biochar application increased the starch content by 36.8%. Adding azolla compost increased the protein content by 35.4%. Using seed plasma treatment with biochar increased the microbial biomass carbon by 16.0%. The application of plasma and azolla compost increased the microbial biomass nitrogen by 29.0%.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35780177 PMCID: PMC9250529 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-15286-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Figure 1Process of treating wheat seeds by the RF plasma device.
Figure 2Optical spectra emitted from RF plasma for powers 50 W.
Figure 3Atomic force microscope (AFM) images of seed surface at 10 µm. (A) control (without plasma treatment). (B) seed surface after receiving 180 s, 50 W plasma treatment. The images was
taken from identical locations on the dorsal side of the wheat kernels.
Figure 4Scanning electron microscope (SEM) images of seed surface at 10 µm. (A) control (without plasma treatment). (B) seed surface after receiving 180 s, 50 W plasma treatment. The images were
taken from identical locations on the dorsal side of the wheat kernels.
Analysis of variance showing the effect of year (Y), treatments (T) (application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar) and interactions (T*Y) of on the biochemical responses of wheat.
| Source | df | Mean square | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthocyanin | Carotenoid | Total chlorophyll | Net photosynthesis rate | ||
| Y | 1 | 19.90** | 12.25** | 43.85** | 231.14** |
| R(Y) | 4 | 0.02 ns | 0.37 ns | 0.43 ns | 1.20 ns |
| T | 7 | 5.07** | 3.67** | 1.88** | 10.20** |
| T*Y | 7 | 1.25* | 0.53 ns | 0.54 ns | 5.82** |
| Error | 27 | 0.81 | 0.52 | 0.36 | 1.33 |
| CV (%) | 15.28 | 14.88 | 15.24 | 14.76 | |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Y, year; R(Y), replication year; T, treatments; T*Y, interaction between treatments and years; df, degree of freedom; CV, coefficient of variation.
Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on biochemical responses of wheat.
| Traits | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Anthocyanin | Carotenoid | Total chlorophyll | Net photosynthesis rate | ||||
| 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| Plasma | 5.59 ± 0.25d-e | 6.39 ± 0.69bc | 5.38 ± 0.21 cd | 5.44 ± 0.20bc | 3.31 ± 0.41bc | 4.56 ± 0.21 cd | 6.02 ± 0.67 cd | 7.23 ± bc |
| Pyroligneous acid | 5.68 ± 0.37c-e | 5.94 ± 0.47cde | 5.27 ± 0.29d | 4.66 ± 0.88c | 3.22 ± 0.24bc | 4.56 ± 0.51 cd | 5.31 ± 0.33d | 7.04 ± 0.51d |
| Plasma + Pyroligneous acid | 6.13 ± 0.16ab | 6.44 ± 0.78b | 5.67 ± 0.30bc | 6.60 ± 0.96a | 3.60 ± 0.48a | 5.15 ± 0.05a | 7.87 ± 0.57a | 7.03 ± 0.08a |
| Azolla compost | 5.13 ± 0.76de | 5.93 ± 0.81de | 4.97 ± 0.21e | 4.41 ± 0.83d | 3.21 ± 0.51cde | 4.21 ± 0.13e | 5.11 ± 0.73de | 6.97 ± 0.87de |
| Plasma + Azolla compost | 6.23 ± 0.17a | 6.56 ± 0.76a | 6.01 ± 0.42a | 5.72 ± 0.41a | 3.38 ± 0.07bc | 4.71 ± 0.38bc | 6.13 ± 0.35c | 7.34 ± 0.21bc |
| Biochar | 4.29 ± 0.51e-f | 5.68 ± 0.78e | 4.63 ± 0.29ef | 4.25 ± 0.18de | 2.80 ± 0.27e | 4.07 ± 0.21ef | 4.54 ± 0.75e | 6.94 ± 0.14de |
| Plasma + Biochar | 5.97 ± 0.58bc | 5.72 ± 0.46b | 5.74 ± 0.22b | 5.68 ± 0.16ab | 3.48 ± 0.91b | 4.91 ± 0.26b | 7.66 ± 0.42b | 7.33 ± 0.33ab |
| Control | 4.12 ± 0.88f. | 5.02 ± 0.35f. | 4.23f. ± 0.57 g | 4.05 ± 0.25e | 2.68 ± 0.18ef | 3.23 ± 0.28f. | 4.07 ± 0.41f. | 6.64 ± 0.12e |
Means in each column followed by similar letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% probability level using LSD Range Test.
Figure 5Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on grain protein of wheat.
Analysis of variance of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on physiological responses of wheat.
| Source | df | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intercellular CO2 concentration | Mesophyll conductance | Stomatal conductance | ||
| Y | 1 | 130,656.94** | 1117.97 | 0.00443** |
| R(Y) | 4 | 2836.81* | 3299.07 | 0.00009** |
| T | 7 | 2388.97* | 8869.49** | 0.0002** |
| T*Y | 7 | 1626.19 | 4547.52** | 0.0001** |
| Error | 27 | 1369.21 | 1667.37 | 0.0001 |
| C.V. (%) | 16.38 | 18.09 | 12.10 | |
*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, Y, year; R(Y), replication year; T, treatments; T*Y, interaction between treatments and years; df, degree of freedom; C.V., coefficient of variation.
Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on physiological responses of wheat.
| Traits | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatments | Intercellular CO2 concentration | Mesophyll conductance | Stomatal conductance | |||
| 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | 2016 | 2017 | |
| Plasma | 0.029 ± 0.09c | 0.041 ± 0.05a-c | 294 ± 1.21a | 225.33 ± 1.21bcd | 196.13 ± 4.25abc | 260.44 ± 1.69 cd |
| Pyroligneous acid | 0.035 ± 0.02a | 0.052 ± 0.07a | 206.67 ± 0.28e | 254 ± 0.88ab | 189.1 ± 6.37c | 263.2 ± 2.47ab |
| Plasma + Pyroligneous acid | 0.031 ± 0.05b | 0.045 ± 0.06ab | 291 ± 1.31ab | 244 ± 1.96b | 205.06 ± 4.06a | 305.33 ± 1.78a |
| Azolla compost | 0.026 ± 0.08de | 0.036 ± 0.06 cd | 198 ± 0.21ef | 182.33 ± 0.88f. | 164.28 ± 5.76ef | 231.68 ± 4.81d |
| Plasma + Azolla compost | 0.028 ± 0.05 cd | 0.045 ± 0.07ab | 213.67 ± 0.42 cd | 198.33 ± 1.41d | 198.05 ± 4.07ab | 262.37 ± 4.76bc |
| Biochar | 0.025 ± 0.06e | 0.037 ± 0.05 cd | 233 ± 0.29c | 257 ± 0.12a | 173.97 ± 4.51d | 209.97 ± 4.78e |
| Plasma + Biochar | 0.027 ± 0.08d | 0.039 ± 0.08c | 163.67 ± 1.22 g | 221.67 ± 2.18bcd | 183.84 ± 4.58 cd | 232.53 ± 4.46d |
| Control | 0.025 ± 0.06ef | 0.038 ± 0.07 cd | 147.46 ± 0.57 h | 195 ± 2.16de | 169.55 ± 5.88e | 209.09 ± 3.35e |
Means in each column followed by similar letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% probability level using LSD Rang Test.
Analysis of variance of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on yield, protein and starch content of wheat in the field.
| Source | df | Mean square | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grain yield | Grain starch | Grain protein | ||
| Y | 1 | 497,297.05** | 10,364.44** | 40.08** |
| R(Y) | 4 | 62,637.13* | 1481.12* | 1.57 |
| T | 7 | 521,938 | 2183.41** | 2.17** |
| T*Y | 7 | 341,475.58** | 770.88 | 2.81** |
| Error | 27 | 6483.66 | 564.01 | 0.81 |
| C.V. (%) | 13.95 | 14.81 | 7.98 | |
* and ** Significant at 5% and 1% probability levels, respectively. Y, year; R(Y), replication year; T, treatments; T*Y, interaction between treatments and years; df, degree of freedom; C.V., coefficient of variation.
Figure 6Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on grain yield of wheat.
Figure 7Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on starch content of wheat.
Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on chemical changes of soil in the field average 2016–17.
| Treatments | Organic carbon | N | Available P | Available K | Available Zn | Available Fe | Available Ca |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OC% | (%) | (ppm) | (ppm) | (ppm) | (ppm) | (ppm) | |
| Plasma | 0.896f. | 0.133e | 32e | 276 fg | 1.92d | 3.12c | 2386 fg |
| Pyroligneous acid | 0.903e | 0.139de | 40a | 349a | 3.03ab | 3.74ab | 2688a |
| Plasma + Pyroligneous acid | 0.919d | 0.140d | 39ab | 347ab | 3.08a | 3.76a | 2686ab |
| Azolla compost | 0.980cd | 0.171ab | 35c | 316c | 2.84b | 3.18d | 2348ef |
| Plasma + Azolla compost | 0.984c | 0.176a | 34cd | 314cd | 2.81bc | 3.24e | 2368e |
| Biochar | 1.030ab | 0.151c | 35c | 316c | 2.31cd | 3.58b | 2448c |
| Plasma + Biochar | 1.035a | 0.151c | 37b | 313cde | 2.32c | 3.51ab | 2432cd |
| Control | 0.890 g | 0.132ef | 32e | 277f. | 1.91de | 3.13ef | 2390f. |
Means in each column followed by similar letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% probability level using LSD Range Test.
Mean comparison of effect of application of plasma, pyroligneous acid, azolla compost and biochar on microbial changes of soil in the field average 2016–17.
| Treatments | Microbial Biomass Carbon | Microbial Biomass Nitrogen |
|---|---|---|
| Plasma | 132e | 9.91e |
| Pyroligneous acid | 141c | 10.12d |
| Plasma + Pyroligneous acid | 143cd | 10.21d |
| Azolla compost | 141c | 12.78a |
| Plasma + Azolla compost | 140d | 12.76a |
| Biochar | 150ab | 11.56bc |
| Plasma + Biochar | 152a | 11.67b |
| Control | 131ef | 9.88ef |
Means in each column followed by similar letter(s) are not significantly different at 5% probability level using LSD Range Test.