Yrina Oelen1, Sven Revenberg2, Judith de Vos-Geelen2, Robin van Geel3,4, Janna Schoenmaekers4,5, Marieke van den Beuken-Everdingen5, Liselot Valkenburg-van Iersel2. 1. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. yrina.oelen@mumc.nl. 2. Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 4. CARIM School for Cardiovascular Disease, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. 5. Centre of Expertise for Palliative Care, Maastricht University Medical Centre (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Despite the inconclusiveness regarding health effects of cannabinoids among cancer patients, studies from non-European countries suggest that the medical-intended consumption of such products by this patient group is significant. The current study analyses cannabinoid usage among oncology patients receiving systemic treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS: The current study included adult patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy at Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, for a solid malignancy. Participants were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire including questions on demographic variables, clinical variables and cannabinoid consumption. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients with solid cancer were included in this study. Almost 25% reported usage of cannabinoids for medical purposes, with 15% of the patients currently using the substance. Additionally, 18% of non-users considered future medical usage. In 48% of the cases, consumption was reported by the oncologist. The proposed anti-cancer effect was reported by 46% of the users as motivation for consumption. Current users were mainly palliative patients and 54% of the users were undergoing immunotherapy. Intention of treatment and type of therapy were predictive factors for consumption. Cannabinoid-oil was the most frequently used way of consumption. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the high number of cannabinoid users among oncology patients in the Netherlands in presumed absence of clinical guidance. It highlights the essence of a pro-active role of the clinician, assessing cannabinoid usage and educating the patients on the most recent evidence regarding its potential benefits and risks. Further studies on clinical decision making and efficacy of cannabinoids are recommended, to improve clinical guidance.
PURPOSE: Despite the inconclusiveness regarding health effects of cannabinoids among cancer patients, studies from non-European countries suggest that the medical-intended consumption of such products by this patient group is significant. The current study analyses cannabinoid usage among oncology patients receiving systemic treatment in the Netherlands. METHODS: The current study included adult patients receiving intravenous systemic therapy at Maastricht Comprehensive Cancer Centre, for a solid malignancy. Participants were asked to complete an anonymous questionnaire including questions on demographic variables, clinical variables and cannabinoid consumption. RESULTS: A total of 153 patients with solid cancer were included in this study. Almost 25% reported usage of cannabinoids for medical purposes, with 15% of the patients currently using the substance. Additionally, 18% of non-users considered future medical usage. In 48% of the cases, consumption was reported by the oncologist. The proposed anti-cancer effect was reported by 46% of the users as motivation for consumption. Current users were mainly palliative patients and 54% of the users were undergoing immunotherapy. Intention of treatment and type of therapy were predictive factors for consumption. Cannabinoid-oil was the most frequently used way of consumption. CONCLUSION: This study underlines the high number of cannabinoid users among oncology patients in the Netherlands in presumed absence of clinical guidance. It highlights the essence of a pro-active role of the clinician, assessing cannabinoid usage and educating the patients on the most recent evidence regarding its potential benefits and risks. Further studies on clinical decision making and efficacy of cannabinoids are recommended, to improve clinical guidance.
Authors: Maria Fernanda Arboleda; Erin Prosk; Claude Cyr; Rihab Gamaoun; Antonio Vigano Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2020-03-14 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Kristine A Donovan; Ritika Oberoi-Jassal; Young D Chang; Sahana Rajasekhara; Meghan F Haas; Anthony L Randich; Diane G Portman Journal: J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol Date: 2019-08-22 Impact factor: 2.223
Authors: Alexia Blake; Bo Angela Wan; Leila Malek; Carlo DeAngelis; Patrick Diaz; Nicholas Lao; Edward Chow; Shannon O'Hearn Journal: Ann Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-23
Authors: K Martell; A Fairchild; B LeGerrier; R Sinha; S Baker; H Liu; A Ghose; I A Olivotto; M Kerba Journal: Curr Oncol Date: 2018-06-28 Impact factor: 3.677
Authors: Antony J Mersiades; Annette Tognela; Paul S Haber; Martin Stockler; Nicholas Lintzeris; John Simes; Iain McGregor; Ian Olver; David J Allsop; Craig Gedye; Adrienne C Kirby; Rachael L Morton; Peter Fox; Stephen Clarke; Karen Briscoe; Morteza Aghmesheh; Nicole Wong; Anna Walsh; Carmel Hahn; Peter Grimison Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2018-09-12 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ilana M Braun; Manan M Nayak; Anna Revette; Alexi A Wright; Peter R Chai; Miryam Yusufov; William F Pirl; James A Tulsky Journal: Cancer Date: 2020-09-28 Impact factor: 6.860