Literature DB >> 35778521

Mapping Research Domain Criteria using a transdiagnostic mini-RDoC assessment in mental disorders: a confirmatory factor analysis.

Bernd R Förstner1, Mira Tschorn1, Nicolas Reinoso-Schiller1, Lea Mascarell Maričić2, Erik Röcher3, Janos L Kalman4,5, Sanna Stroth6, Annalina V Mayer7, Kristina Schwarz8, Anna Kaiser9, Andrea Pfennig10, André Manook11, Marcus Ising12, Ingmar Heinig13, Andre Pittig13,14, Andreas Heinz2, Klaus Mathiak3,15, Thomas G Schulze4, Frank Schneider3,16, Inge Kamp-Becker6, Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg8, Frank Padberg5, Tobias Banaschewski9, Michael Bauer10, Rainer Rupprecht11, Hans-Ulrich Wittchen5,13, Michael A Rapp17.   

Abstract

This study aimed to build on the relationship of well-established self-report and behavioral assessments to the latent constructs positive (PVS) and negative valence systems (NVS), cognitive systems (CS), and social processes (SP) of the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework in a large transnosological population which cuts across DSM/ICD-10 disorder criteria categories. One thousand four hundred and thirty one participants (42.1% suffering from anxiety/fear-related, 18.2% from depressive, 7.9% from schizophrenia spectrum, 7.5% from bipolar, 3.4% from autism spectrum, 2.2% from other disorders, 18.4% healthy controls, and 0.2% with no diagnosis specified) recruited in studies within the German research network for mental disorders for the Phenotypic, Diagnostic and Clinical Domain Assessment Network Germany (PD-CAN) were examined with a Mini-RDoC-Assessment including behavioral and self-report measures. The respective data was analyzed with confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to delineate the underlying latent RDoC-structure. A revised four-factor model reflecting the core domains positive and negative valence systems as well as cognitive systems and social processes showed a good fit across this sample and showed significantly better fit compared to a one factor solution. The connections between the domains PVS, NVS and SP could be substantiated, indicating a universal latent structure spanning across known nosological entities. This study is the first to give an impression on the latent structure and intercorrelations between four core Research Domain Criteria in a transnosological sample. We emphasize the possibility of using already existing and well validated self-report and behavioral measurements to capture aspects of the latent structure informed by the RDoC matrix.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Confirmatory factor analysis CFA; Diagnosis and classification; PD-CAN; RDoC; Research Domain Criteria; Transdiagnostic

Year:  2022        PMID: 35778521     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-022-01440-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  29 in total

1.  Research domain criteria (RDoC): toward a new classification framework for research on mental disorders.

Authors:  Thomas Insel; Bruce Cuthbert; Marjorie Garvey; Robert Heinssen; Daniel S Pine; Kevin Quinn; Charles Sanislow; Philip Wang
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 18.112

Review 2.  Diagnostic Issues and Controversies in DSM-5: Return of the False Positives Problem.

Authors:  Jerome C Wakefield
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 18.561

3.  Translating intermediate phenotypes to psychopathology: the NIMH Research Domain Criteria.

Authors:  Bruce N Cuthbert
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Toward an Empirical Multidimensional Structure of Anhedonia, Reward Sensitivity, and Positive Emotionality: An Exploratory Factor Analytic Study.

Authors:  Thomas M Olino; Dana L McMakin; Erika E Forbes
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2016-11-20

5.  The RDoC framework: continuing commentary.

Authors:  Bruce N Cuthbert
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 49.548

6.  Latent variable analysis of positive and negative valence processing focused on symptom and behavioral units of analysis in mood and anxiety disorders.

Authors:  Martin P Paulus; Murray B Stein; Michelle G Craske; Susan Bookheimer; Charles T Taylor; Alan N Simmons; Natasha Sidhu; Katherine S Young; Boyang Fan
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 4.839

7.  The Positive Valence Systems Scale: Development and Validation.

Authors:  Gabriela Kattan Khazanov; Ayelet Meron Ruscio; Courtney N Forbes
Journal:  Assessment       Date:  2019-08-16

Review 8.  Challenges and opportunities for drug discovery in psychiatric disorders: the drug hunters' perspective.

Authors:  Erik H F Wong; Frank Yocca; Mark A Smith; Chi-Ming Lee
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 5.176

9.  Clinical Insight Into Latent Variables of Psychiatric Questionnaires for Mood Symptom Self-Assessment.

Authors:  Athanasios Tsanas; Kate Saunders; Amy Bilderbeck; Niclas Palmius; Guy Goodwin; Maarten De Vos
Journal:  JMIR Ment Health       Date:  2017-05-25

10.  The Measurement of Positive Valence Forms of Empathy and Their Relation to Anhedonia and Other Depressive Symptomatology.

Authors:  Sharee N Light; Zachary D Moran; Carolyn Zahn-Waxler; Richard J Davidson
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-04-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.