Literature DB >> 35776178

Impact of the hip joint mobility on whole-body sagittal alignment: prospective analysis in case with hip arthroplasty.

Jun Ouchida1, Hiroaki Nakashima2, Tokumi Kanemura3, Kotaro Satake3, Kei Ando1, Kenyu Ito3, Mikito Tsushima3, Masaaki Machino1, Sadayuki Ito1, Hidetoshi Yamaguchi1, Naoki Segi1, Hiroyuki Koshimizu1, Hiroyuki Tomita1, Shiro Imagama1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To clarify the impact of restriction of hip extension on radiographic whole-body sagittal alignment with using postoperative changes of radiographical parameters for hip osteoarthritis.
METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 68 patients with hip osteoarthritis scheduled for arthroplasty. Variables included manual examination of hip range of motion (H-ROM) and radiographic whole-body sagittal alignment parameters including sagittal vertical axis (SVA), center of acoustic meatus and femoral head offset (CAM-HA), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis, sacral slope (SS), and knee flexion angle (KF). We divided patients with preoperative hip extension angle < 0 into the extension restriction (ER) + group and ≥ 0 into the ER- group. Differences in H-ROM, radiographic parameters between groups and postoperative changes were comparatively analyzed.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven patients (The ER + group included 28 patients and the ER- group included 29 patients.) were available for the analysis. Pre-/postoperative H-ROM were 99.7 ± 24.9/118.1 ± 16.0 degrees (p < .01). Greater increases in SVA (5.4 ± 3.4 vs 3.4 ± 2.8 cm, p = .02) and in CAM-HA (3.9 ± 3.9 vs 2.8 ± 3.4 cm, p =  013) were found in the ER + group versus ER- group. Postoperatively, the ER + group showed an increase in TK (pre-/postoperative: 35.2 ± 9.7/37.4 ± 8.8 degrees, p = .04) and decreases in SS (36.5 ± 9.6/33.7 ± 9.9 degrees, p < .01) and KF (9.5 ± 7.0/6.9 ± 6.0 degrees, p = .02). Postoperative changes in radiographic parameters in the ER- group were not significant.
CONCLUSION: Patients with restriction of hip extension showed global spine imbalance, and significant changes in TK, SS, and KF were observed after arthroplasty. The presence of hip joint disorder and H-ROM restriction must be considered when evaluating spinopelvic alignment and whole-body sagittal alignment.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Compensatory mechanism; EOS; Hip spine syndrome; Lordosis; Sagittal alignment; Spinal alignment

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35776178     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-022-07251-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   2.721


  4 in total

1.  Normative values of spino-pelvic sagittal alignment, balance, age, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of healthy adult subjects.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Hasegawa; Masashi Okamoto; Shun Hatsushikano; Haruka Shimoda; Masatoshi Ono; Kei Watanabe
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-07-18       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Change in spinal alignment after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kristen E Radcliff; Fabio Orozco; Nicholas Molby; Lawrence Delasotta; Eric Chen; Zachary Post; Alvin Ong
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.071

3.  Invariance of head-pelvis alignment and compensatory mechanisms for asymptomatic adults older than 49 years.

Authors:  Celia Amabile; Jean-Charles Le Huec; Wafa Skalli
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 4.  Spinopelvic Compensatory Mechanisms for Reduced Hip Motion (ROM) in the Setting of Hip Osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Aaron J Buckland; Leah Steinmetz; Peter Zhou; Dennis Vasquez-Montes; Matthew Kingery; Nicholas D Stekas; Ethan W Ayres; Christopher G Varlotta; Virginie Lafage; Renaud Lafage; Thomas Errico; Peter G Passias; Themistocles S Protopsaltis; Jonathan Vigdorchik
Journal:  Spine Deform       Date:  2019-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.