Literature DB >> 35776123

Repurposing CRISPR RNA-guided integrases system for one-step, efficient genomic integration of ultra-long DNA sequences.

Zhou-Hua Cheng1, Jie Wu2, Jia-Qi Liu2, Di Min2, Dong-Feng Liu1,2, Wen-Wei Li2, Han-Qing Yu2.   

Abstract

Genomic integration techniques offer opportunities for generation of engineered microorganisms with improved or even entirely new functions but are currently limited by inability for efficient insertion of long genetic payloads due to multiplexing. Herein, using Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as a model, we developed an optimized CRISPR-associated transposase from cyanobacteria Scytonema hofmanni (ShCAST system), which enables programmable, RNA-guided transposition of ultra-long DNA sequences (30 kb) onto bacterial chromosomes at ∼100% efficiency in a single orientation. In this system, a crRNA (CRISPR RNA) was used to target multicopy loci like insertion-sequence elements or combining I-SceI endonuclease, thereby allowing efficient single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA insertions. The engineered strain exhibited drastically improved substrate diversity and extracellular electron transfer ability, verifying the success of this system. Our work greatly expands the application range and flexibility of genetic engineering techniques and may be readily extended to other bacteria for better controlling various microbial processes.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Nucleic Acids Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35776123      PMCID: PMC9303307          DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkac554

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   19.160


INTRODUCTION

Genetic engineering techniques have greatly advanced our understanding and manipulation of living organisms. Especially, the recent development of in vitro recombination and gene editing techniques allow us to customize a living organism’s genetic sequence (1,2), thereby endowing it with entirely new physiology and functions. To realize the expression of foreign genes in host microbes, plasmid-based system or chromosomal integration strategy is commonly employed (3,4). Plasmids can be conveniently used for metabolic engineering of cells and expression of recombinant proteins. However, antibiotics have to be added in such processes in order to prevent plasmid loss, which not only cause secondary environmental pollution but also complicate the final product separation (5,6). Furthermore, this technique may lead to microbial metabolic unbalance and suffer from plasmid instability, making it difficult for expressing natural metabolic gene cluster up to tens of kilobases (kb) (7). These drawbacks of conventional plasmid-based system have motivated the search for antibiotic-free genetic engineering techniques (8). One possible strategy is to raise the importance of plasmids to host microbes by means such as expressing anti-toxin genes for detoxification of toxins from a toxin–antitoxin operon (9) or the origin of replication-encoded plasmid replication inhibitor in growing cells (10), so that plasmid can be introduced without dosing antibiotics (11). However, this approach is still time-consuming, labor-intensive, and is challenged by cell-to-cell variation and inability for expression of long natural metabolic genes (12,13). Compared with gene expression from plasmids, chromosomal integration allows more efficient genomic insertion of the metabolic genes and pathways due to its high stability in gene expression and minimized cell-to-cell variation (4,13). Multiple genomic integration approaches have been developed to date (4). By adopting these genomic integration methods, the pace to obtain excellent traits of important functional microbes can be accelerated. For example, recombinase-assisted genome engineering enables the integration of alginate metabolic pathway into the genome of Escherichia coli, thereby realizing the integration of long DNA constructs (14). In addition, serine recombinase-mediated site-specific integration has been adopted to successfully integrate natural product synthesis genes (up to 10–100 kb) into the genome of actinomycetes (15,16). Nevertheless, these methods for long DNA constructs integration still involve complicated operations and have been mainly used for model microbes (4,14,17). Effective and convenient approaches for integration of ultra-long DNA constructs into the microbial genome are still on urgent demand. The recent advances of clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-based technologies (1,18) are bringing new dawn to solve this problem. In particular, the combination of CRISPR technology and homologous recombination allows for efficient gene deletion, integration and single nucleotide modification (19). However, this technology can only be utilized for integration of a limited cargo size of about 10 kb (20,21). A transposon-encoded CRISPR-Cas system (INTEGRATE), consisting of DNA-targeting complex Cascade and the transposition protein TniQ, was designed to achieve RNA-mediated insertion of donor DNA with variable lengths at a fixed distance downstream of target DNA sequences (22). Although a marker-free and highly accurate DNA integration of about 10 kb at ∼100% efficiency can be achieved by the optimized single-plasmid INTEGRATE system (23), it is difficult for genomic integration of oversized DNA cassettes due to the huge size of such a system. Recently, another CRISPR-associated transposase from cyanobacteria Scytonema hofmanni (ShCAST) has emerged and exhibit efficiently for DNA insertion in E. coli (24). ShCAST consists of the type V-K CRISPR effector (Cas12k) and Tn7-like transposase subunits (TnsB, TnsC and TniQ) and catalyzes the RNA-guided DNA transposition by insertion of DNA 60 to 66 bp downstream of the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) sequences (24,25). This system contains two plasmids (pHelper and pDonor) and directs targeted DNA integration with a lower fidelity than the INTEGRATE system. Although the feasibility and reliability of this system were only verified in restricted species, the ultrasmall-sized pDonor provides a huge space for ShCAST system to integrate oversized DNA cassettes over 10 kb in microbes (24). Therefore, this work aims to develop an optimized ShCAST system for high-efficient integration of ultra-long DNA sequences onto bacterial chromosomes in a single orientation by using Shewanella oneidensis MR-1 as a model. To enable site-specific integration of kilobase-sized DNA sequences in Shewanella species and other microbes, we first developed an optimized ShCAST system for highly efficient large-scale gene insertion in S. oneidensis MR-1. Next, the feasibility of single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA integration into the same cells and the potential for integrating up to 30 kilobases in bacteria using the optimized ShCAST system was explored. Lastly, we examined whether this system could function as an effective genetic tool to successfully break the two important bottlenecks in S. oneidensis MR-1 for practical applications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Plasmid construction

The J23119 promoter-driving crRNA cassette, lac promoter-driving tnsB-tnsC-tniQ-Cas12k-tracrRNA expression cassette, the I-SceI recognition site and the I-SceI Endonuclease expression cassette were synthesized by General Biosystems Co., China. These expression cassettes were assembled into the pYYDT plasmid (26) to form the pHelper. The original pDonor plasmid (contains chloramphenicol resistance gene flanked by the transposon left end and right end) was synthesized by General Biosystems Co., China according to the sequences reported (24). The glucokinase (glk; ZMO0369), fructokinase (frk; ZMO1719), glucose facilitator (glf; ZMO0366) genes and 30 kb DNA fragment were amplified from the Zymomonas mobilis ZM4. The sucrose metabolism gene clusters (cscY-cscB-cscA), the flavin synthesis gene clusters, the violacein synthesis gene clusters, extracellular amylase-encoding gene (amyE), and 20 kb DNA fragment were amplified from Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5, Bacillus subtilis strain 168, Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris NZ9000, Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12742 and Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, respectively. These DNA fragments were integrated into pDonor plasmid via Gibson assembly method (27). The plasmids used in this work are listed in Supplementary Table S2. The complete sequence of the optimized ShCAST system is provided in the supporting information.

General transposition assays

Plasmids pHelper and pDonor could be co-transformed into S. oneidensis MR-1 by conjugation. In brief, E. coli WM3064 containing pHelper or pDonor was cultured in LB medium supplemented with 50 μg/ml diaminopimelic acid and appropriate antibiotics at 37°C. The wild-type and engineered strains of S. oneidensis MR-1 were cultured in LB medium at 30°C. After overnight incubation, the pure cultures of E. coli and S. oneidensis were mixed in equal proportion. The cells (500 μl mixture) were then pelleted by centrifugation, re-suspended with 100 μl LB and dropped on the LB agar plates containing 50 μg/ml diaminopimelic acid. After 12-h cultivation at 30°C, the formed bacterial plaque was scraped, re-suspended with 1 ml LB and spread on LB plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics. When required, 50 μg/ml kanamycin, 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol or 15 μg/ml gentamycin was added into the LB plates. All plates were placed 24 h in a 30 °C incubator to allow transposition to take place. The transposon events could be readily identified by PCR (Supplementary Table S3) and Sanger sequencing.

Single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA integration assays in the same cells

Single-step multiplexed DNA integration in MR-1 was conducted through constructing the pHelper with two crRNAs targeting sites S3 and S7 or a crRNA targeting ISSod10. The goal strains were obtained according to the general transposition assays described above. For iterative DNA integration in S. oneidensis MR-1, chloramphenicol resistance gene was initially inserted into site S3, the positive clones were cultured overnight in LB medium supplemented with 10 mM arabinose (I-SceI counter-selection) and the resulting plasmid-free strain was annonated as MR-1/Cm. Next, both pHelper with a crRNA targeting S7 and pDonor with gentamycin resistance cargo gene were introduced into MR-1 and MR-1/Cm to generate MR-1/Gm and MR-1/Cm-Gm, respectively. The growth of the MR-1, MR-1/Cm, MR-1/Gm and MR-1/Cm-Gm in LB medium supplemented with or without 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol and 15 μg/ml gentamycin was monitored by measuring the optical density at 600 nm (OD600) using a BioTek microplate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek Ins., U.S.A.).

Carbon source utilization assays, flavins determination, and flow cytometric analysis

S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/Sucrose were cultured in LB medium for 12 h, and then transferred at a ratio of 1:100 into 96-well plate containing 200 μl mineral salt medium (28) with lactate, glucose, fructose, or sucrose as the sole carbon source (20 mM). The growth curves of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/Sucrose were obtained by measuring the OD600 using a BioTek microplate reader (Synergy HT, BioTek Ins., U.S.A.). The growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/Starch in mineral salt medium containing 20 g/l starch was estimated by CFU counting. The production of α-amylase in S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/starch was further assessed by visualization of starch degradation halos on 2% starch-containing LB plates after staining with iodine solution (29). The flavin synthesis in S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/sucrose-Rib and MR-1/starch-Rib was determined as follows: all the strains were cultured overnight in LB medium with 10 mM IPTG (Isopropyl β-D-Thiogalactopyranoside) at 30°C. The culture supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 12 000 g for 2 min and its fluorescence intensity was recorded by fluorescence spectroscopy with an excitation wavelength of 440 nm and an emission wavelength of 525 nm. The fluorescence intensity of GFP in S. oneidensis MR-1 was measured by a Flow Cytometer (CytExpert, Beckman Coulter Inc., U.S.A.), and the collected data were analyzed by CytExpert 2.0 software (Beckman Coulter Inc., U.S.A.).

Electrochemical tests

A MFC system was used to detect the EET abilities of Shewanella (Table 1). The two chambers, each with a working volume of 150 ml, were separated by a cation exchange membrane. The treated carbon felt was used as the anode and cathode materials (the anode was 1 × 1 cm, and the cathode was 2 × 2 cm). The two electrodes were connected by a 1 kΩ resistance wire. The cathodic electrolyte was composed of solution of 50 mM potassium ferricyanide in 50 mM phosphate buffer solution. The mineral medium with 20 mM lactate, glucose, frutose, sucrose or 20 g/l starch as the sole electron donor was used as the anodic electrolyte. High-purity nitrogen gas was flushed into the anode and cathode chambers to keep the anaerobic atmosphere.
Table 1.

Strains used in this work

StrainsRelevant genotype or phenotypeSource or reference
MR-1Wild-typeLab stock
MR-1/S1Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_0261 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S2Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_0314 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S3Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_0986 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S4Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_1396 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S5Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_1779 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S6Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_2727 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S7Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_2917 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S8Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_3715 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S9Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_3980 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S10Insertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at SO_4591 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/11.4 kbInsertion of violacein synthesis gene cluster (11.4 kb) cloned from Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 at SO_0986 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S3-22.6 kbInsertion of 22.6 kb gene fragment cloned from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 at SO_0986 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/S3-31.7 kbInsertion of 31.7 kb gene fragment cloned from Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 at SO_0986 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/ISInsertion of chloramphenicol resistance gene at four IS repeats in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/SucroseInsertion of glf, glk, frk and csc gene cluster at SO_2917 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/StarchInsertion of glf, glk, frk and aymE at SO_2917 in S. oneidensis MR-1This work
MR-1/Sucrose-RibInsertion of flavin synthesis gene cluster at SO_0986 in MR-1/SucroseThis work
MR-1/Starch-RibInsertion of flavin synthesis gene cluster at SO_0986 in MR-1/StarchThis work
E. coli WM3064 thrB1004 pro thi rpsL hsdS lacZΔM15 RP4-1360Δ(araBAD)567ΔdapA1341::[erm pir(wt)]Lab stock
Strains used in this work S. oneidensis MR-1 and the engineered strains were cultured in LB medium for 16 h at 30 °C. The centrifuged cell pellets were washed twice with 10 ml PBS (phosphate buffered saline, pH 7.3–7.5) and re-suspended with 2 ml mineral salt medium (without carbon source). The bacterial suspension (50 ml) was subsequently added into the anode chamber at an initial optical density (OD600) of 0.3. The voltage output of the MFCs inoculated with Shewanella strains was recorded every 10 min using a data acquisition system (USB2801, ATD Co., China). Linear sweep voltammetry (LSV), CV, and EIS analysis were conducted as described previously (26). The three-electrode MECs (carbon felt as anode material with a specific surface area of 8 cm2) were also adopted to evlaute the EET ability of Shewanella by applying a constant potential of 0.2 V (26). An electrochemical workstation (CHI1030B, Chenhua Instrument Co., China) served as the potentiostat. S. oneidensis MR-1 and the engineered strains were cultured in mineral medium with different carbon sources under aerobic conditions until an OD600 reached 0.5. Subsequently, the cultures were directly transferred into MECs.

RESULTS

Optimization of ShCAST system for high-efficiency, RNA-guided DNA integration

ShCAST system relies on the cooperation of dual plasmids (pHelper and pDonor) to precisely insert cargo gene into the host cells. The pHelper contains J23119 promoter-driving crRNA (CRISPR RNAs) cassette and lac promoter-driving tnsB-tnsC-tniQ-Cas12k-tracrRNA (trans-activating crRNA) expression cassette. The R6K replicon-based pDonor contains a genetic cargo flanked by the transposon left end (LE) and right end (RE) (24). Cryogenic electron microscopic studies reveal that TnsC polymerization and TniQ interacting with TnsC define downstream transposition insertion polarity and the target-site, respectively (30). After cotransformation of pHelper and pDonor into S. oneidensis MR-1, the ShCAST complex made up of Cas12k, TnsB, TnsC and TniQ and guided by crRNA mediated the integration of cargo genes downstream of the PAM (Figure 1A).
Figure 1.

RNA-guided DNA integration by ShCAST system. (A) Model for RNA-guided DNA transposition by ShCAST system. (B) A two-plasmid ShCAST system encodes protein-RNA components on pHelper and the cargo gene flanked by the transposon left end (LE) and right end (RE) on pDonor. (C) Schematic of experiment to test for genome insertions in MR-1. Plasmids pHelper and pDonor could be co-transformed into S. oneidensis MR-1 by conjugation. The transposon events could be readily identified by PCR and Sanger sequencing. A I-SceI recognition site and the I-SceI Endonuclease expression cassette under the control of the arabinose-inducible araBAD promoter were integrated into the pHelper to cure the plasmids after editing. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif sequences; L: the transposon left end; R: the transposon right end.

RNA-guided DNA integration by ShCAST system. (A) Model for RNA-guided DNA transposition by ShCAST system. (B) A two-plasmid ShCAST system encodes protein-RNA components on pHelper and the cargo gene flanked by the transposon left end (LE) and right end (RE) on pDonor. (C) Schematic of experiment to test for genome insertions in MR-1. Plasmids pHelper and pDonor could be co-transformed into S. oneidensis MR-1 by conjugation. The transposon events could be readily identified by PCR and Sanger sequencing. A I-SceI recognition site and the I-SceI Endonuclease expression cassette under the control of the arabinose-inducible araBAD promoter were integrated into the pHelper to cure the plasmids after editing. PAM: protospacer adjacent motif sequences; L: the transposon left end; R: the transposon right end. We randomly selected 10 different non-essential gene sites (S1-S10) on the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1 and designed the corresponding crRNAs (Figure 2A, C, D, and Supplementary Figures S1 and S2, Table S1). The efficiency of the same cargo gene (chloramphenicol resistance gene) being integrated into the different target sites was evaluated through two pairs of primers. Each pair of primers contained a primer located within the transposon donor DNA and a primer adjacent to the target genomic site. We found that the integration efficiencies were above 95% in seven sites and between 50% and 80% in the other three sites (Figure 2B and Supplementary Figure S1). The lower integration efficiencies in these three sites might be originated from the poor activity of lac promoter in S. oneidensis MR-1. Moreover, integration events occurred, favoring 59 and 63 base pairs (bp) downstream of the target site in a single orientation (Figure 2C, D and Supplementary Figure S2).
Figure 2.

Gene integration at ten sites on the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1 by the original ShCAST system. (A) Schematic of 10 sites (S1, S2, S3…S10) on the genome. (B) Gene integration efficiencies at different sites. (C) PCR products with two primers pairs probing for the insertion of the cargo gene at the target site, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. (D) Sanger sequencing chromatograms for the upstream and downstream junctions of genomically integrated transposons from the experiments with crRNA-S1, crRNA-S2 and crRNA-S3. LE and RE elements are highlighted and the duplicated insertion sites denoted. Data in (B) are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Gene integration at ten sites on the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1 by the original ShCAST system. (A) Schematic of 10 sites (S1, S2, S3…S10) on the genome. (B) Gene integration efficiencies at different sites. (C) PCR products with two primers pairs probing for the insertion of the cargo gene at the target site, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. (D) Sanger sequencing chromatograms for the upstream and downstream junctions of genomically integrated transposons from the experiments with crRNA-S1, crRNA-S2 and crRNA-S3. LE and RE elements are highlighted and the duplicated insertion sites denoted. Data in (B) are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples. We further optimize the pHelper to enable more efficient expression of the necessary protein-RNA components. To promote the expression of gfp in S. oneidensis MR-1, a panel of constitutive promoters (five endogenous promoters: P0139, P3285, P2277, P0406, P3988; five exogenous promoters: Ppcn, Plac, Ptrc, PrpsL, PJ23119) was used. Flow cytometry analysis reveals that all these constitutive promoters could work but with varied expression strengths (Figure 3A, B). We then modified lac promoter-driving protein–RNA expression cassette at different intensities with the three constitutive promoters (Figure 3C, low; 0139; medium; 0406; high: 3988). Higher expression led to 100% integration efficiency at the S4, S6 and S7 sites (Figure 3D). The elimination of pHelper after gene integration is essential for the multi-round genome editing. To cure the plasmids after transposition, an I-SceI recognition site and the I-SecI Endonuclease (31) expression cassette under the control of the arabinose-inducible araBAD promoter were also integrated into the optimized pHelper (Supplementary Figure S3a), which enabled the complete elimination of the pHelper after arabinose induction (Supplementary Figure S3b). All these results demonstrate that the optimized ShCAST system can achieve efficient, large-scale gene insertion in S. oneidensis MR-1. This optimized system was used for the subsequent tests.
Figure 3.

Optimization of ShCAST system. Characterizations of the expression intensities of the (A) five endogenous and (B) exogenous promoters by using GFP as the reporter gene. Schematics of three pHelper plasmids. (C) Three promoters with varying intensities (low; 0139; medium; 0406; high: 3988) were selected to drive the expression of tnsB-tnsC-tniQ-Cas12k-tracrRNA cassette. The J23119 promoter was selected to drive the expression of crRNA. (D) Gene integration efficiencies at sites S4, S6 and S7 with the three ShCAST systems. Data in A, B and D are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Optimization of ShCAST system. Characterizations of the expression intensities of the (A) five endogenous and (B) exogenous promoters by using GFP as the reporter gene. Schematics of three pHelper plasmids. (C) Three promoters with varying intensities (low; 0139; medium; 0406; high: 3988) were selected to drive the expression of tnsB-tnsC-tniQ-Cas12k-tracrRNA cassette. The J23119 promoter was selected to drive the expression of crRNA. (D) Gene integration efficiencies at sites S4, S6 and S7 with the three ShCAST systems. Data in A, B and D are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA integration into the same cell using the optimized ShCAST system

Multiple insertions with a high specificity in distinct genomic regions are highly desired for metabolic engineering (32,33). However, traditional approaches like integrating of multiple FLP recombinase target sites beforehand into the genomes of microbes are cumbersome (34). To resolve this problem, we firstly evaluated the amenability of the optimized ShCAST system for single-step multiplexed DNA integration. Two crRNAs were employed to target the S3 and S7 sites simultaneously, but only a single insertion in S3 site was obtained. Insertion-sequence (IS) elements, typically <3 kb in length, contain transposase-encoding genes for their independent transposition (35). A large and diverse population of IS elements have been identified in the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1 and are considered to play critical roles in modulating its genome plasticity (36). Thus, we designed crRNA targeting IS elements for single-step multiplexed DNA integration in the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1. The ISSod10 with four identical copies in S. oneidensis MR-1 was chosen as the IS element. A 2 kb cargo gene (chloramphenicol resistance gene) was inserted into four IS repeats simultaneously at ∼100% efficiency (Figure 4A, B, Supplementary Figure S4). Given the high copy numbers of some IS elements in S. oneidensis MR-1 (ISSo1 and ISSo4 with 49 and 53 copies, respectively) and other microbes (36), our results imply a great application potential of the optimized ShCAST system for single-step multiplexed DNA integration in various microbes. Briefly, the ShCAST system could achieve multiple insertions at a high efficiency when the target sites harbor repeated sequences.
Figure 4.

Single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA integration into the same cell using the optimized ShCAST system. (A) Schematic of single-step multiplexed DNA integration. ISSod10 with four identical copies was found in S. oneidensis MR-1. We designed a crRNA targeting ISSod10 for single-step integration of chloramphenicol resistance gene into four IS repeats simultaneously. (B) Gene integration efficiencies at four IS repeats. (C) Schematic of iterative integration of chloramphenicol and gentamicin resistance gene in sites 3 and 4. (D) The growth of S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/Cm and MR-1/Cm-Gm in LB medium in the presence of the different antibiotics. LB: LB medium only; LB + Cm: LB medium containing 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol; LB + Gm: LB medium containing 15 μg/ml gentamycin; LB + Cm + Gm: LB medium containing 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol and 15 μg/ml gentamycin. Data in b and d are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Single-step multiplexed or iterative DNA integration into the same cell using the optimized ShCAST system. (A) Schematic of single-step multiplexed DNA integration. ISSod10 with four identical copies was found in S. oneidensis MR-1. We designed a crRNA targeting ISSod10 for single-step integration of chloramphenicol resistance gene into four IS repeats simultaneously. (B) Gene integration efficiencies at four IS repeats. (C) Schematic of iterative integration of chloramphenicol and gentamicin resistance gene in sites 3 and 4. (D) The growth of S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/Cm and MR-1/Cm-Gm in LB medium in the presence of the different antibiotics. LB: LB medium only; LB + Cm: LB medium containing 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol; LB + Gm: LB medium containing 15 μg/ml gentamycin; LB + Cm + Gm: LB medium containing 10 μg/ml chloramphenicol and 15 μg/ml gentamycin. Data in b and d are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples. The amenability of the optimized ShCAST system for iterative integration events was also evaluated. After isolating a clonal strain (MR-1/Cm) containing the S3 site-specific insertion (chloramphenicol resistance gene), we cured the plasmid and reintroduced the ShCAST system into the strain MR-1/Cm to generate another insertion (gentamicin resistance gene) at S4 site (Figure 4C). The growth of the resulting strain (named as MR-1/Cm-Gm) in the Luria–Bertani (LB) medium in the presence of chloramphenicol or/and gentamicin was monitored. It exhibited a slightly lower OD600 than the wild-type and the strain MR-1/Cm after 24-h cultivation. Chloramphenicol inhibited the growth of the wild-type but did not affect the MR-1/Cm-Gm and MR-1/Cm. However, only the strain MR-1/Cm-Gm could grow in the LB medium containing gentamicin or gentamicin plus chloramphenicol (Figure 4D). These results confirm that the optimized ShCAST system enabled the single-step multiplexed and efficient iterative DNA insertions into S. oneidensis MR-1.

Targeted insertion of ultra-long fragments of DNA

The ShCAST system has been used for targeted insertion of a 10 kb DNA fragment in E. coli (24). In order to show more intuitively that the optimized ShCAST system can change bacterial traits by introducing large segments of exogenous DNA, we inserted the violacein biosynthesis gene cluster from Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472 into the S3 site of MR-1 (Figure 5C). The obvious color change of the strain from red to purple, with the patterns of panda and letters drawn on the plates, suggests that the insertion was successful (Figure 5A,B).
Figure 5.

Targeted insertion of large fragments of DNA. (A) Schematic of the integration of 11.4 kb (CV_3274-CV_3270 from Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472, the violacein biosynthesis gene cluster), 22.6 kb (PA_4202-PA_4218 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1) or 31.7 kb (RS_08140-RS_08270 from Zymomonas mobilis ZM4) DNA fragment into site S3. (B) The patterns of panda and letters drawn on the plates using the strain MR-1 and MR-1/10.4 kb. PCR products with multiple primers pairs probing for integration of (C) 11.4 kb, (D) 22.6 kb and (E) 31.7 kb into site S3, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. Control: the genome DNA from MR-1 was used as RCR template. (F) Integration efficiencies of 11.4, 22.6 and 31.7 kb DNA fragment at site S3. Data in (E) are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Targeted insertion of large fragments of DNA. (A) Schematic of the integration of 11.4 kb (CV_3274-CV_3270 from Chromobacterium violaceum ATCC 12472, the violacein biosynthesis gene cluster), 22.6 kb (PA_4202-PA_4218 from Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1) or 31.7 kb (RS_08140-RS_08270 from Zymomonas mobilis ZM4) DNA fragment into site S3. (B) The patterns of panda and letters drawn on the plates using the strain MR-1 and MR-1/10.4 kb. PCR products with multiple primers pairs probing for integration of (C) 11.4 kb, (D) 22.6 kb and (E) 31.7 kb into site S3, resolved by agarose gel electrophoresis. Control: the genome DNA from MR-1 was used as RCR template. (F) Integration efficiencies of 11.4, 22.6 and 31.7 kb DNA fragment at site S3. Data in (E) are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples. This system also enabled more efficient integration of larger fragments of DNA than the previously reported methods (24). After modification of the pDonor to mobilize payloads of 22.6 or 31.7 kb DNA fragment, we used a total of seven pairs of primers located inside the cargo gene or at the junction between the target site and cargo gene for integration verification (Figure 5D, E). Results show that the 20 or 30 kb DNA fragment was integrated into the S3 site of S. oneidensis MR-1 at ∼100% efficiency by using the optimized ShCAST system (Figure 5F).

Broadening the carbon source utilization spectra and enhancing the extracellular electron transfer ability of S. oneidensis MR-1

The genus of Shewanella hold a great potential for enhanced environmental remediation and bioenergy production applications due to their unique extracellular electron transfer abilities (26,37) but are currently restricted by their narrow spectrum of feedstocks and limited extracellular electron transfer (EET) efficiency (38). S. oneidensis MR-1 could utilize some three-carbon substrates only like lactate and pyruvate for anaerobic respiration, which severely limits their application niches (28). In break this limitation, we introduced the glucose- and fructose-utilization pathway into S. oneidensis MR-1 by using the optimized ShCAST system (Figure 6A). Two key genes encoding glucokinase and 6-phosphofructokinase in glycolytic pathway were missing in the genome of S. oneidensis MR-1 (39). Therefore, the glucokinase (glk; ZMO0369), fructokinase (frk; ZMO1719) and glucose facilitator (glf; ZMO0366) genes from Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 under the control of the pcn promoter were introduced into the pDonor plasmid. The glucose facilitator could uptake glucose or fructose into the cytoplasm without requiring energy (40). Then, glucokinase and fructokinase conversed glucose and fructose into glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate, respectively, in the initial process of the glycolytic pathway (Figure 6A) (41). Previous studies show that, after introducing a gene cluster (csc) for sucrose metabolism from Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5, the Pseudomonas putida gained the ability to utilize sucrose as the sole carbon source for growth (40). This cluster consisted of four genes: cscR encoding the repressor protein, cscY and cscB facilitating sucrose transport across the cell membranes, cscA encoding sucrose hydrolase. Sucrose could be converted into glucose and fructose via sucrose hydrolase CscA (Figure 6A). The cscY-cscB-cscA cluster was also introduced into the pDonor plasmid. Therefore, utilizing the optimized ShCAST system, we successfully integrated the glf, glk, frk and the cscY-cscB-cscA cluster into the S3 site of the S. oneidensis MR-1 genome (Figure 6B). The resulting strain MR-1/sucrose showed a similar growth rate to the wild-type in the presence of lactate as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions (Figure 6C). However, the wild-type could not naturally utilize sucrose, glucose and fructose, while the strain MR-1/sucrose grew well with these substrates as the sole carbon source (Figure 6D).
Figure 6.

Broadening the carbon source utilization spectra of MR-1. (A) Schematic of the carbohydrate metabolism in S. oneidensis MR-1. The introduction of cscY-cscB-cscA cluster from (B, top) Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 enabled MR-1 to grow on sucrose as the sole carbon and energy source. cscY and cscB facilitated sucrose transport across the cell membranes, while cscA encoded sucrose hydrolase. The introduction of extracellular amylase-encoding gene (amyE) from (B, bottom) Bacillus subtilis strain 168 enabled MR-1 to grow on starch as the sole carbon and energy source. The glucokinase (glk; ZMO0369), fructokinase (frk; ZMO1719) and glucose facilitator (glf; ZMO0366) genes from (B) Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 under the control of the pcn promoter were also introduced into S. oneidensis MR-1. The glucose facilitator could uptake glucose or fructose into the cytoplasm without requiring energy. Glucokinase and fructokinase converted glucose and fructose into glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate, respectively, in the initial process of the glycolytic pathway. (C) The growth curves of S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/sucrose, and MR-1/starch in mineral salt medium with lactate as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions. (D) The growth curves of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/sucrose in mineral salt medium with sucrose, glucose, or fructose as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions. (E) Evaluation of the growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/Starch in mineral salt medium with starch as the sole carbon source through the CFU method. Inset: the cultures into 96-well plates were stained with iodine solution at 0 and 48 h. Top: MR-1/Starch. Bottom: MR-1. (F) Observation of starch degradation halo when MR-1/starch and MR-1 were inoculated on 2% starch-containing LB plates after staining with iodine solution. Data in C, D, E and F are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Broadening the carbon source utilization spectra of MR-1. (A) Schematic of the carbohydrate metabolism in S. oneidensis MR-1. The introduction of cscY-cscB-cscA cluster from (B, top) Pseudomonas protegens Pf-5 enabled MR-1 to grow on sucrose as the sole carbon and energy source. cscY and cscB facilitated sucrose transport across the cell membranes, while cscA encoded sucrose hydrolase. The introduction of extracellular amylase-encoding gene (amyE) from (B, bottom) Bacillus subtilis strain 168 enabled MR-1 to grow on starch as the sole carbon and energy source. The glucokinase (glk; ZMO0369), fructokinase (frk; ZMO1719) and glucose facilitator (glf; ZMO0366) genes from (B) Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 under the control of the pcn promoter were also introduced into S. oneidensis MR-1. The glucose facilitator could uptake glucose or fructose into the cytoplasm without requiring energy. Glucokinase and fructokinase converted glucose and fructose into glucose-6-phosphate and fructose-6-phosphate, respectively, in the initial process of the glycolytic pathway. (C) The growth curves of S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/sucrose, and MR-1/starch in mineral salt medium with lactate as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions. (D) The growth curves of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/sucrose in mineral salt medium with sucrose, glucose, or fructose as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions. (E) Evaluation of the growth of S. oneidensis MR-1 and MR-1/Starch in mineral salt medium with starch as the sole carbon source through the CFU method. Inset: the cultures into 96-well plates were stained with iodine solution at 0 and 48 h. Top: MR-1/Starch. Bottom: MR-1. (F) Observation of starch degradation halo when MR-1/starch and MR-1 were inoculated on 2% starch-containing LB plates after staining with iodine solution. Data in C, D, E and F are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples. Starch is the most common carbohydrate in nature and can be hydrolyzed into glucose by α-amylase of bacteria (42). To further extend the substrate utilization range of S. oneidensis MR-1, we introduced the extracellular amylase-encoding gene (amyE) from Bacillus subtilis strain 168 controlled by the J23119 promoter (Figure 6A) into S. oneidensis MR-1. The optimized ShCAST system was employed to integrate glf, glk, frk and amyE into the S3 site of the S. oneidensis MR-1 genome (Figure 6B). The engineered strain MR-1/Starch showed a similar growth rate to the wide type when lactate was used as the sole carbon source under aerobic conditions (Figure 6C). However, when shifting to starch carbon source, the number of MR-1/starch cells (counted by colony forming units (CFU) method) increased gradually from 2.7 × 106 to 6.1 × 108 CFU/ml after 48-h cultivation (Figure 6E), while that of MR-1 cells increased from 1.9 × 106 to only 1.0 × 108 CFU/ml (the growth was possibly caused by impurities in starch). The starch utilization by the MR-1/starch was also supported by the obvious starch degradation halo appeared after inoculation on 2% starch-containing LB plates and iodine staining (Figure 6F). S. oneidensis MR-1 is capable of both direct electron transport via c-type cytochromes and indirect electron transfer using flavin as electron shuttles (26). The latter pathway accounts for about 75% of microbial extracellular electron flux to electrode (43). Therefore, we further integrated the flavin synthesis gene clusters cloning from lactic acid bacteria into the S7 site of the genome of MR-1/sucrose or MR-1/starch to enhance their EET ability (Figure 7A–C). Evaluation of the microbial EET ability in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) at a constant anodic potential (Figure 7D–G, Supplementary Figure S7) shows a significantly higher current intensity for the MEC with the strain MR-1/Sucrose over the wide type when fed with sucrose, glucose or fructose. Similarly, the strain MR-1/starch could generate a stable and much larger current in the MECs than the wide type when starch was used as the sole carbon source. Moreover, the EET capabilities of the MR-1/sucrose-Rib and MR-1/starch-Rib were further improved than without flavin overexpression. The corresponding current densities of the MECs were: 3.1 A/m2 for the MR-1/sucrose-Rib versus 1.0 A/m2 for the MR-1/sucrose when fed with sucrose; 1.8 A/m2 for the MR-1/starch-Rib versus 0.5 mA/m2 for the MR-1/starch when fed with starch. Similarly, when glucose or fructose was used as the sole carbon source, the MR-1/sucrose-Rib group achieved 3.9 or 5.3 times higher current densities than the MR-1/sucrose (Figure 7D–G). Similar effects of EET enhancement by the overexpression of flavin were also demonstrated by the other engineered microbes in dual-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) (Supplementary Figure S5). Cyclic voltammetry (CV) experiments (Supplementary Figure S6) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) analyses (Supplementary Figure S5c, f, i, l) confirm that the enhanced EET capacities of the strain MR-1/sucrose-Rib and MR-1/starch-Rib were attributed to the overproduction of flavins and lowered resistance of the electrochemical reactions on the electrodes. Together, these results validate that the optimized ShCAST system can be used as a robust tool to broaden the substrate utilization spectra and enhance the EET efficiency of S. oneidensis MR-1.
Figure 7.

Enhancing the extracellular electron transfer efficiency of S. oneidensis MR-1. (A) Schematic of the extracellular electron transfer pathway in S. oneidensis MR-1. S. oneidensis MR-1 has two major electron transport mechanisms: the direct electron transport pathway based on c-type cytochromes and the indirect electron transport pathway based on flavin shuttles. Flavin electron shuttling accounts for about 75% of extracellular electron transfer to electrode. Therefore, we further integrated the flavin synthesis gene clusters cloning from lactic acid bacteria into the S7 site of the genome of (B) MR-1/sucrose or MR-1/starch to obtain the engineered strains with stronger extracellular electron transfer ability. (C) Comparison of the fluorescence intensities of flavins synthesized by S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/Sucrose-Rib and MR-1/Starch-Rib in LB medium. Inset: the photos of three cultures supernatant. Left: MR-1. Center: MR-1/sucrose-Rib. Right: MR-1/starch-Rib. The current densities of the MECs inoculated with S. oneidensis MR-1 and engineered strain when (D) glucose, (E) fructose, (F) sucrose or (G) starch was used as the sole carbon source. HMP: hexose monophosphate pathway. Data in C, D, E, F and G are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

Enhancing the extracellular electron transfer efficiency of S. oneidensis MR-1. (A) Schematic of the extracellular electron transfer pathway in S. oneidensis MR-1. S. oneidensis MR-1 has two major electron transport mechanisms: the direct electron transport pathway based on c-type cytochromes and the indirect electron transport pathway based on flavin shuttles. Flavin electron shuttling accounts for about 75% of extracellular electron transfer to electrode. Therefore, we further integrated the flavin synthesis gene clusters cloning from lactic acid bacteria into the S7 site of the genome of (B) MR-1/sucrose or MR-1/starch to obtain the engineered strains with stronger extracellular electron transfer ability. (C) Comparison of the fluorescence intensities of flavins synthesized by S. oneidensis MR-1, MR-1/Sucrose-Rib and MR-1/Starch-Rib in LB medium. Inset: the photos of three cultures supernatant. Left: MR-1. Center: MR-1/sucrose-Rib. Right: MR-1/starch-Rib. The current densities of the MECs inoculated with S. oneidensis MR-1 and engineered strain when (D) glucose, (E) fructose, (F) sucrose or (G) starch was used as the sole carbon source. HMP: hexose monophosphate pathway. Data in C, D, E, F and G are shown as mean ± s.d. for n = 3 biologically independent samples.

DISCUSSION

The optimized ShCAST system could be used for the integration of targeted DNA in microbes without need for homologous recombination and DNA double-strand breaks. In addition, it shows a higher insertion efficiency in bacterial genome than the unoptimized system, and enables one-step insertion of ultra-long DNA fragments >30 kb at ∼100% efficiency. By applying this system for multiplexed chromosomal integration, we successfully broadened the carbon source utilization spectra of S. oneidensis MR-1 to cover multiple carbohydrates and significantly enhanced its EET ability. Integrases (like ICEBs1), transposases (such as Mariner, Tn5 and Tn7) and autocatalytic Group II RNA introns have been used for genomic integration (44–46). However, applications of these systems remain practically challenging because they often require prior presence of specific attachment sites in genome and large-scale screens to isolate desired clones, and generally suffer from limited cargo size (only 3–4 kb) and inconsistent integration efficiencies (from 1% to 80%). These drawbacks can be overcome by the optimized ShCAST system, which combines the programmability of CRISPR-mediated targeting with the high-efficiency, seamless integration ability of CRISPR-associated transposase and the large-cargo capability of pDonor plasmid. In addition to genomic integration, it may also be harnessed to generate programmed genomic deletions. This may be achieved through a combination of site-specific recombinases like Cre-LoxP system (47) or enable synthetic lethality screening (48) at the genome scale in microbes by generating libraries of multiplexed guide RNAs. Considering that transposons often function robustly across a broad range of hosts (49), this system could also be modified by replacing plasmid skeleton or optimizing the protein sequence and the related gene regulatory elements, so as to make the CRISPR-associated transposase systems more adaptable for the new host microbes (Supplementary Figure S8). Nevertheless, this system still has some flaws at the present stage. First, the maximum allowable length of inserted DNA is about 30 kb. We attempted to construct the pDonor plasmid with a larger cargo size (40 or 50 kb), but failed due to the formation of a wrong plasmid with genetic sequence disorder. It seems that the maximum length of mobilize payloads depends on not only the characteristics of the ShCAST system itself but also the size of the pDonor plasmid we can build. Another challenge for the ShCAST system is the difficulty in precise, scarless point mutations or insertion on the bacterial chromosomes because the transposase machinery needs the transposon end sequences for specific recognition. However, other applications such as strain tagging and simple gene knockouts by DNA insertion are not constrained. Third, although the efficiency of single-step multicopy chromosomal integration using the ShCAST system is limited, this issue may be addressed by designing a crRNA to target multicopy loci like IS elements or combining orthogonal integrases. Finally, the lower fidelity of the ShCAST system than the INTEGRATE system has demonstrated an off-target activity and also limits its application. Addressing these challenges would require the adoption of multiple strategies to decrease its off-target editing without sacrificing on-target editing efficiency. These may include engineering the Cas12k and transposase subunits, extending the crRNA length, or using a hairpin secondary structure onto the spacer region (50). With further improvement in fidelity, the ShCAST system may offer an appealing tool for organism- and locus-specific genetic manipulation within microbial communities.

DATA AVAILABILITY

All data are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request. Click here for additional data file.
  48 in total

1.  Implementation of stable and complex biological systems through recombinase-assisted genome engineering.

Authors:  Christine Nicole S Santos; Drew D Regitsky; Yasuo Yoshikuni
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

Review 2.  Mariner and the ITm Superfamily of Transposons.

Authors:  Michael Tellier; Corentin Claeys Bouuaert; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Microbiol Spectr       Date:  2015-04

3.  Cre-loxP-Mediated Recombination: General Principles and Experimental Considerations.

Authors:  Micheal A McLellan; Nadia A Rosenthal; Alexander R Pinto
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mouse Biol       Date:  2017-03-02

4.  Bacterial Genome Editing with CRISPR-Cas9: Deletion, Integration, Single Nucleotide Modification, and Desirable "Clean" Mutant Selection in Clostridium beijerinckii as an Example.

Authors:  Yi Wang; Zhong-Tian Zhang; Seung-Oh Seo; Patrick Lynn; Ting Lu; Yong-Su Jin; Hans P Blaschek
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 5.110

5.  A host/plasmid system that is not dependent on antibiotics and antibiotic resistance genes for stable plasmid maintenance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Peter Hägg; Johanna Wa de Pohl; Farhad Abdulkarim; Leif A Isaksson
Journal:  J Biotechnol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  Exploiting nongenetic cell-to-cell variation for enhanced biosynthesis.

Authors:  Yi Xiao; Christopher H Bowen; Di Liu; Fuzhong Zhang
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 15.040

7.  A Broad-Host-Range CRISPRi Toolkit for Silencing Gene Expression in Burkholderia.

Authors:  Andrew M Hogan; A S M Zisanur Rahman; Tasia J Lightly; Silvia T Cardona
Journal:  ACS Synth Biol       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 5.110

8.  Enabling genetic analysis of diverse bacteria with Mobile-CRISPRi.

Authors:  Jason M Peters; Byoung-Mo Koo; Ramiro Patino; Gary E Heussler; Cameron C Hearne; Jiuxin Qu; Yuki F Inclan; John S Hawkins; Candy H S Lu; Melanie R Silvis; M Michael Harden; Hendrik Osadnik; Joseph E Peters; Joanne N Engel; Rachel J Dutton; Alan D Grossman; Carol A Gross; Oren S Rosenberg
Journal:  Nat Microbiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 17.745

9.  Emergence of plasmid stability under non-selective conditions maintains antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Tanita Wein; Nils F Hülter; Itzhak Mizrahi; Tal Dagan
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Fructose metabolism in Chromohalobacter salexigens: interplay between the Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas and Entner-Doudoroff pathways.

Authors:  José M Pastor; Nuno Borges; Juan P Pagán; Sara Castaño-Cerezo; Laszlo N Csonka; Bradley W Goodner; Kathryn A Reynolds; Luís G Gonçalves; Montserrat Argandoña; Joaquín J Nieto; Carmen Vargas; Vicente Bernal; Manuel Cánovas
Journal:  Microb Cell Fact       Date:  2019-08-13       Impact factor: 5.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.