Metasurfaces, artificially engineered surfaces comprised of subwavelength resonators, show promise for realizing a new generation of optical materials and devices. However, current metasurface architectures suffer from environmental degradation, a limited spectral range, and a lack of scalability. Here, we demonstrate a novel large-area embedded metasurface architecture that is environmentally robust and capable of a spectrally selective absorption of greater than 80% spanning from 330 to 2740 nm. These fully encapsulated metasurfaces leverage the capabilities of colloidal plasmonic nanoparticles with various crystallinities, materials, shapes, and sizes to access a larger spectral range and allow for control of nanoscale spatial losses and subsequent heat generation within the constituent elements of the metasurface. Through the selection of material, particle size, and shape, these metasurfaces can be designed across the ultraviolet (UV) to short-wave infrared (SWIR) region for various hot-electron, photodetection, photocatalysis, and photothermal processes.
Metasurfaces, artificially engineered surfaces comprised of subwavelength resonators, show promise for realizing a new generation of optical materials and devices. However, current metasurface architectures suffer from environmental degradation, a limited spectral range, and a lack of scalability. Here, we demonstrate a novel large-area embedded metasurface architecture that is environmentally robust and capable of a spectrally selective absorption of greater than 80% spanning from 330 to 2740 nm. These fully encapsulated metasurfaces leverage the capabilities of colloidal plasmonic nanoparticles with various crystallinities, materials, shapes, and sizes to access a larger spectral range and allow for control of nanoscale spatial losses and subsequent heat generation within the constituent elements of the metasurface. Through the selection of material, particle size, and shape, these metasurfaces can be designed across the ultraviolet (UV) to short-wave infrared (SWIR) region for various hot-electron, photodetection, photocatalysis, and photothermal processes.
Metasurfaces are artificial
materials or surfaces comprised of an ensemble of subwavelength elements,
allowing for unparalleled control of electromagnetic waves that circumvent
the limitations of naturally occurring optical materials. For specific
applications, light absorption and subsequent energy conversion is
essential, but naturally occurring materials in the UV to SWIR region
have limited absorption ranges corresponding to inherent electron
and phonon excitations. Metamaterials, on the other hand, can be designed
to realize high-efficiency absorption for nearly any wavelength by
taking advantage of metallic nanostructures.[1−5] Light incident upon the metallic nanostructures excites
localized surface plasmons: i.e., coherent oscillations of free electrons
confined to the surface of a highly conductive material. These plasmons
are resonant oscillations that are dependent on the geometry and materials
of the metallic nanostructures and as such are well-suited for designable
metamaterials. When they are packed to a specific surface density,
the collective electric and magnetic response can destructively interfere
with incident radiation, resulting in near-perfect absorption at the
plasmon resonance.[6,7] Typically, these large electric
and magnetic modes are achieved through coupling two planar plasmonic
surfaces to create a plasmonic cavity[8,9] and are realized
by separating nanoscale disks or cubes from a smooth metallic film
with a dielectric spacer. Achieving resonances in the UV to SWIR region
with these plasmonic nanocavities requires a specialized fabrication
to achieve relevant feature sizes that are less than 300 nm.[10,11] Top-down approaches, such as deep-UV or electron-beam lithography,
are capable of achieving sub 10 nm feature sizes but are either prohibitively
expensive or not capable of patterning over wafer-scale areas. Bottom-up
synthesis approaches are capable of growing large quantities of metallic
nanoparticles with planar facets and monodisperse sizes but necessitate
a crystalline growth process that can limit the size and material
selection.[2] Lithography-free approaches
such as planar metasurfaces have shown spectrally selective absorbing
surfaces from the visible to midwave infrared region[12−17] but lack full spatial control over the absorbed power and heat generation.
As such, no current metasurface platform has been capable of producing
strongly absorbing filters that span the UV to SWIR region over large
areas, while allowing for the spatial losses, heat, or hot-electron
generation to be fully designed for a chosen application.Here
we demonstrate a new metasurface architecture that can realize
absorbing metasurfaces ranging from 330 to 2740 nm over wafer-scale
areas through the utilization of standard colloidal synthesis, material
growth, and deposition techniques. Due to the stochastic self-assembly
process of the colloidal deposition, the metasurfaces are comprised
of randomly oriented plasmonic nanocavites. These nanocavies support
a localized surface plasmon resonance (LSPR) between two closely spaced
plasmonic surfaces.[2,4] In this work, the plasmon resonance
is passively controlled by varying the size, material, and geometry
of the nanostructures. In order to fabricate plasmonic resonators
with variously shaped nanoparticles (NPs), a new fabrication technique
is developed in order to create two closely spaced metallic surfaces
separated by a dielectric gap, as shown in Figure a. This fabrication approach incorporates
NPs of different shapes that arise during colloidal synthesis and
creates highly absorbing metasurfaces from NPs previously incapable
of doing so.
Figure 1
(a) Depiction of various colloidal nanoparticle (NP) shapes
self-assembled
onto a transparent substrate. (b) Process of fabricating a plasmonic
metasurface shown with a single metasurface unit cell. First the NPs
are self-assembled onto a transparent substrate, then a dielectric
spacer such as SiO2 is grown around the NPs, and finally
a metal film is sputtered around the dielectric-coated NPs to form
a conformal plasmonic cavity around the NP. (c) Simulated reflection
spectra for three metasurfaces comprised of the three NP shapes shown
in (a), depicting that the wavelength of resonant absorption depends
upon the geometry of the plasmonic cavity. (d) Simulated electric-field
enhancement for the three metasurface elements at their resonant wavelengths,
demonstrating the plasmonic coupling between the Ag NPs and the Al
film.
(a) Depiction of various colloidal nanoparticle (NP) shapes
self-assembled
onto a transparent substrate. (b) Process of fabricating a plasmonic
metasurface shown with a single metasurface unit cell. First the NPs
are self-assembled onto a transparent substrate, then a dielectric
spacer such as SiO2 is grown around the NPs, and finally
a metal film is sputtered around the dielectric-coated NPs to form
a conformal plasmonic cavity around the NP. (c) Simulated reflection
spectra for three metasurfaces comprised of the three NP shapes shown
in (a), depicting that the wavelength of resonant absorption depends
upon the geometry of the plasmonic cavity. (d) Simulated electric-field
enhancement for the three metasurface elements at their resonant wavelengths,
demonstrating the plasmonic coupling between the Ag NPs and the Al
film.This fabrication is initiated
by conformally depositing the plasmonic
NPs onto a substrate by coating the substrate in alternating PAH/PSS
(cationic/anionic) polymer layers. The top cationic layer polymer
facilitates an electrostatic self-assembly of the NPs coated with
an anionic coating from their host solution, resulting in the first
diagram of Figure b. Next, a dielectric coating is grown around the nanoparticles with
plasma-enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) and then a metal
film is physically sputtered around the dielectric-coated NP. By using
a transparent substrate within the desired wavelength range, the light
incident through the substrate will excite the plasmonic resonances
between the NP and sputtered metal films, as shown in the last panel
of Figure b. Finite-element
simulations were used to model the optical response of the three different
geometries with 50 nm NPs, a 24 nm SiO2 spacer, and a 150
nm Al film. A fill fraction of 12% was used for the 50 nm Ag spheres
and 4% for the 50 nm Ag cubes and 50 nm cuboctahedra. The simulated
reflectance spectra in Figure c show that the peak absorptivity at the fundamental plasmon
resonance occurs at 575 nm for the cubic NPs, 560 nm for the cuboctahedral
NPs, and 490 nm for the spherical NPs, as indicated by the gray dashed
lines. The electric field enhancement at the fundamental plasmon resonance
for each of these geometries is included in Figure d. The electric field enhancement shows that
the majority of the electric field is contained in and near the surfaces
of the NP. This plasmon oscillation confined to the NP is coupled
to an oscillation of the opposite phase in the sputtered metal film.
This coupled mode between the NP and the film reduces or cancels the
electric field in the far field, preventing reradiation of the incident
energy, which results in the significant absorption of metasurfaces
comprised of these elements.Experimentally, the metasurfaces
were realized following the procedure
laid out in Figure b, and more details of the fabrication process are described in the experimental section in the Supporting Information.
First, the NP shape dependence was tested experimentally with 45 ±
4 nm Ag spheres and 48 ± 5 nm Ag cubes, where the size distributions
were calculated from SEM images. These NPs were self-assembled onto
coverslips, and SEM images of both NPs assembled onto coverslips are
shown in Figure a.
Next, a SiO2 spacer layer was grown around the NPs, where
the optimal absorption was achieved with a thickness of 30 nm or ∼60%
of the NP size. Finally, a 150 nm thick Al film was sputtered and
the reflection spectra were measured through the coverslip. Reflection
spectra of the samples were collected with a Shimadzu UV-3600 commercial
spectrometer at normal incidence and were integrated over an area
with a 5 mm diameter. The reflection spectra from the 50 nm Ag sphere
and cube metasurfaces are shown in Figure b along with a dimensionally labeled diagram.
The Ag sphere metasurface has a peak absorption at 485 nm and possesses
a 115 nm full width at half-maximum (fwhm), and the Ag cube metasurface
possesses a peak absorption at 575 nm with a 195 nm fwhm. Finite-element
simulations were used to estimate the reflection spectra of these
metasurfaces, as shown in Figure c, and the optimal SiO2 thickness from simulations
was found to be ∼48% of the NP size, in contrast with the ∼60%
found experimentally. In comparison with the simulations of uniformly
sized NPs, the experimental results possess increased fwhms due to
the nonuniform size distribution of the colloidal NP solutions and
a small number of NPs aggregating during deposition. The polycrystalline
50 nm Ag spheres have an ±8.9% size deviation, and 90% of the
NPs were unaggregated spheres after self-assembly, as determined from
SEM images. The colloidal 50 nm Ag cubes possess a ± 10.4% size
deviation where 91% of the NPs were unaggregated cubes after deposition.
The fwhms can be improved through filtering the NP solutions for tighter
size distributions. However, this metasurface platform is capable
of producing highly absorbing metasurfaces with colloidal NPs of varying
shapes and crystallinities with commercially obtained NP solutions.
Figure 2
(a) SEM
images of 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes assembled onto coverslips
before growth of the SiO2 spacer. (b) Experimental reflectance
spectra for metasurfaces from the 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes shown
in (a) along with labeled metasurface cross sections. (c) Simulated
spectra for the metasurfaces created with 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes.
(d) Three SWIR metasurface cross sections comprised of a 180 nm Au
cuboctahedron, a 50 nm Au shell around a 200 nm silica core, and a
250 nm Ag cube. (e) Experimental reflectance spectra for these metasurfaces
showing fundamental resonances in the SWIR and second-order resonances
in the near-IR. (f) Simulated spectra of the three SWIR metasurfaces,
closely following the spectral features of the experimental results.
(a) SEM
images of 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes assembled onto coverslips
before growth of the SiO2 spacer. (b) Experimental reflectance
spectra for metasurfaces from the 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes shown
in (a) along with labeled metasurface cross sections. (c) Simulated
spectra for the metasurfaces created with 50 nm Ag spheres and cubes.
(d) Three SWIR metasurface cross sections comprised of a 180 nm Au
cuboctahedron, a 50 nm Au shell around a 200 nm silica core, and a
250 nm Ag cube. (e) Experimental reflectance spectra for these metasurfaces
showing fundamental resonances in the SWIR and second-order resonances
in the near-IR. (f) Simulated spectra of the three SWIR metasurfaces,
closely following the spectral features of the experimental results.To further establish the spectral flexibility of
these metasurfaces,
larger colloidal NPs were developed and synthesized (Nanocomposix
Inc.) to realize resonances into the SWIR. Figure d shows three such metasurfaces with 180
nm Ag cuboctahedra, 45 nm Au shells around a 200 nm silica core, and
260 nm Ag cubes. The three metasurfaces consist of 108, 170, and 150
nm Si3N4 spacers with a 250 nm sputtered Au
film, and their experimental reflection spectra are shown in Figure e. Each spectrum
shows a primary absorption peak in the SWIR at 1740, 2260, and 2740
nm corresponding to the fundamental plasmonic modes of the cuboctahedra,
shell, and cube, respectively, whereas secondary absorption peaks
exist in the near-IR at 780, 1030, and 1320 nm, respectively. Simulated
reflection spectra from Figure f show fundamental modes at 1830, 2350, and 2540 nm with secondary
modes at 900, 1080, and 1260 nm, which closely follow the experimental
modes. Experimentally, the 290 nm Au shells show the narrowest fwhm
of 260 nm due to the smaller 2.7% size distribution of the 288 nm
shell NPs in comparison to the 6.6% and 6.5% distributions of the
180 nm cuboctahedra and the 260 nm cubes, respectively. These results
demonstrate that this versatile fabrication approach is clearly capable
of achieving strongly absorbing surfaces from varying NP shapes, crystallinities,
and materials while covering wavelengths from the visible to the SWIR
region.To further demonstrate the versatility
of this
approach, various metasurfaces were fabricated with resonances in
the visible and UV regimes through utilization of smaller NPs and
various plasmonic materials. These metasurfaces are comprised of 50
nm cubic or spherical NPs and plasmonic materials ranging from Al
to Pt, Ag, and Au. Photographs of select metasurfaces were captured
to show the large-area uniformity and color of these metasurfaces,
which are shown in Figure a. For example, the top three metasurfaces Figure a-i–iii are 50 nm spherical
NPs with a 30 nm SiO2 layer and a 150 nm Al film where
the NP material is (i) Pt, (ii) Ag, and (iii) Au. The reflectance
spectra for these three metasurfaces are shown in Figure b along with their simulated
spectra and a labeled schematic. The Pt metasurface shows a peak absorption
at 330 nm, the Ag metasurface at 490 nm, and the Au metasurface at
575 nm. The peak absorptions for all possible combinations of Al,
Pt, Ag, and Au films and 50 nm spherical NPs are shown in Figure c, which were obtained
by finite-element simulations. With a fixed geometry, a variation
of the constituent metasurface materials allows for a range of resonant
wavelengths to be achieved. As such, the use of NPs with different
materials, sizes, and shapes allow for the absorption spectra to be
passively tuned across the ultraviolet to SWIR region with a single
fabrication approach.
Figure 3
(a) Photographs of reflected light from select metasurfaces
with
resonances in the visible and UV region, where each metasurface is
realized with 50 nm NPs, a 30 nm SiO2 layer, and a 150
nm Al film unless otherwise noted. The metasurfaces are as follows:
(i) Pt sphere; (ii) Ag sphere; (iii) Au sphere; (iv) Ag cube with
20 nm SiO2; (v) Ag cube; (vi) Au sphere with an Au film.
(b) Experimental and simulated spectra for metasurfaces comprised
of 50 nm spheres of various compositions along with their corresponding
diagrams. (c) Depiction of various fundamental resonances achievable
for various 50 nm NPs and film compositions as computed from simulations.
(a) Photographs of reflected light from select metasurfaces
with
resonances in the visible and UV region, where each metasurface is
realized with 50 nm NPs, a 30 nm SiO2 layer, and a 150
nm Al film unless otherwise noted. The metasurfaces are as follows:
(i) Pt sphere; (ii) Ag sphere; (iii) Au sphere; (iv) Ag cube with
20 nm SiO2; (v) Ag cube; (vi) Au sphere with an Au film.
(b) Experimental and simulated spectra for metasurfaces comprised
of 50 nm spheres of various compositions along with their corresponding
diagrams. (c) Depiction of various fundamental resonances achievable
for various 50 nm NPs and film compositions as computed from simulations.Beyond the wavelength flexibility of these large-area
metasurfaces,
the versatility of material choice allows for the nanoscale losses
and subsequent heat generation to be spatially engineered. At the
fundamental plasmonic mode, the incident electromagnetic energy is
converted into localized surface plasmons confined to the metasurface
resonators. These localized plasmons decay at femtosecond time scales
and generate heat due to electron–phonon scattering on picosecond
time scales.[18−21] The power loss density in this system in units of W/m3 can be estimated classically via resistive/Ohmic losses due to the
collective movement of charges (i.e., plasmon) in a lossy conductor.[20] The power loss density for the metasurface element, Qh, is calculated from eq where r⃗ is the spatial
location in the metasurface unit cell, c is the speed
of light, λ is the wavelength, ε′′(λ) is the imaginary component of the permittivity, and E⃗(r⃗,λ) is the electric
field vector. Intentional choices for the NP geometry and material
composition allow for control over the spatial electric field distribution.
With the design of this spatial electric field distribution and its
relative placement in high-loss or low-loss materials, i.e. materials
with high or low imaginary permittivities, the power loss density
can be spatially engineered. For example, the spatial losses and subsequent
heat generation can be controlled for a fixed geometrical design through
the material choice, as seen in Figure a with 50 nm spheres of various compositions. The power
loss density, Qh, is shown for five representative
metasurface elements, where the spatial losses can be tuned between
the 96% occurring in the NP with the Au NP/Ag film geometry to 96%
occurring in the film with the Ag NP/Au film. The fractional absorption
occurring within a specific region, denoted as Aregion(λ), can be calculated from eq where Atotal(λ)
is the total absorption of the metasurface element, where the power
loss density is integrated over the volume of the desired region,
such as the NP, spacer, or film. Figure b demonstrates the fractional spectral absorption
for an Au NP/Au film calculated with eq , where the fractional absorption for the film, NP,
and spacer are shown. For wavelengths shorter than 500 nm, the interband
transition of Au governs the large absorptions occurring in both the
film and NP.[18] Past interband transitions,
the fundamental plasmonic resonance dominates at 590 nm, showing a
significantly enhanced absorption in the Au NP due to the electric
field confinement in and around the NP. At the peak absorption of
99.8%, over 62% is absorbed in the Au NP and 38% in the Au film. Figure c shows the absorption
percentages occurring in the NP and film for simulated metasurfaces
at their resonance wavelengths. All of the simulated metasurfaces
have the same geometry with a 24 nm SiO2 spacer, but the
NP and film material are varied among Au, Ag, Al, and Pt. The highest
fraction of power absorbed in the NP occurs with an Au NP and an Ag
film, showing 96% of all absorption occurring in the NP on resonance.
The lowest fraction of power absorbed in the NP occurs with an Ag
NP and an Au film, where 4% of all absorption occurs in the NP at
its resonance. These two cases are shown pictorially in Figure a on the far left and far right
images, where most of the absorption is either happening in the NP
or film. By utilizing other material combinations, the relative absorption
and subsequent heat generation in the metasurface can be spatially
engineered for resonances spanning the UV to SWIR region.
Figure 4
(a) Simulated
absorbed power density of metasurface unit cells
comprised of 50 nm spheres embedded in films with varied compositions,
where the highest losses are shown in yellow and the lowest losses
are shown in white. The losses can be engineered to occur in either
the NP or film through alteration of their composition. (b) Simulated
absorption spectra of a 50 nm Au sphere with an Au film along with
the absorption spectra localized in each constituent material of the
metasurface calculated according to eq . (c) Absorption percentage occurring in the NP and
the film for metasurfaces comprised of 50 nm spheres, where the dashed
line indicates 100% total absorption. This demonstrates that with
only four plasmonic materials the fractional losses between the NP
and the film can be engineered over nearly the full parameter space.
(a) Simulated
absorbed power density of metasurface unit cells
comprised of 50 nm spheres embedded in films with varied compositions,
where the highest losses are shown in yellow and the lowest losses
are shown in white. The losses can be engineered to occur in either
the NP or film through alteration of their composition. (b) Simulated
absorption spectra of a 50 nm Au sphere with an Au film along with
the absorption spectra localized in each constituent material of the
metasurface calculated according to eq . (c) Absorption percentage occurring in the NP and
the film for metasurfaces comprised of 50 nm spheres, where the dashed
line indicates 100% total absorption. This demonstrates that with
only four plasmonic materials the fractional losses between the NP
and the film can be engineered over nearly the full parameter space.The presented metasurface architecture leverages
the strengths
of colloidal synthesis, self-assembly, and large-area deposition processes
to demonstrate nanometer- to millimeter-scale control of absorption
processes from 330 to 2740 nm. Furthermore, the absorbing metasurfaces
have promising spectral, environmental, and geometrical characteristics
for filling a spectral niche for optical metasurfaces with feature
sizes below the resolution of standard i-line photolithographic systems.
The influence of NP shape and material composition were analyzed both
by experiments and with finite-element simulations to show the flexibility
of this method with various crystallinities, materials, shapes, and
sizes. In particular, this flexibility allows for the heat or hot-electron
generation within these metasurfaces to be consolidated closer to
an active film or material, for a variety of hot-electron or photothermal
processes. For instance, integration of a thermally sensitive film,
such as a pyroelectric material, into the gap of the plasmonic nanocavity
would allow for an optical–thermal–-electrical conversion
device for the creation of photodetectors[22−24] sensitive from
the ultraviolet to short-wave infrared region. Incorporation of actively
tunable materials into these metasurfaces would allow for dynamic
control of their reflection spectra[16,25−28] for spectrally tunable photodetectors or beam-steering surfaces.
The presented metasurfaces could provide a promising platform for
a new generation of optical devices spanning the UV to SWIR region.
Methods
Sample
Fabrication
First, a transparent substrate,
in this case a VWR no. 2 coverslip, was cleaned in acetone and isopropyl
alcohol. Next, a nanoscale adhesion layer was deposited using layer-by-layer
dip coating of alternating polyelectrolyte (PE) layers composed of
a positively charged poly(allylamine) hydrochloride (PAH) polymer
and a negatively charged polystyrenesulfonate (PSS) polymer with layers
of ∼1 nm thickness. The PE polymers were deposited by dip coating
the substrate in a 1 M NaCl solution with 3 mM of PAH or PSS. After
dip coating the samples were rinsed in a 1 M NaCl solution to remove
residual polymer. The samples were rinsed with DI water and dried.
The top layer, a positively charged PAH layer, was utilized to promote
the adhesion of the colloidal nanoparticles to the surface due to
the negatively charged PVP stabilizer coating. Next, the nanoparticles
were deposited on the PE layers. For the initial experiments a variety
of nanoparticles, including Ag nanocubes, Ag cuboctahedra, Au/Ag/Pt
nanospheres, and silica–Au core–shell nanospheres, were
self-assembled onto the PE layers. All nanoparticles used in this
experiment were commercially synthesized (nanoComposix, Inc., San
Diego). The solutions were prepared by concentrating a 1 mg/mL solution
of nanoparticles and resuspending them in 18 MΩ DI water with
a final concentration of 4 mg/mL. A coverslip with the final nanoparticle
solution was inverted on the PE layers, often referred to as drop
casting, and the cubes were allowed 1 h to settle and self-assemble
onto the surface. During the nanoparticle deposition, the sample was
placed in a refrigerator to reduce evaporation. Next, the samples
were washed with DI water, removing excess nanoparticle solution,
and were dried with nitrogen gas. Following the nanoparticle deposition,
the SiO2 and Si3N4 dielectric spacer
layers were grown conformally around the nanoparticles with plasma-enhanced
chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) at 200 °C. Other thin-film
deposition techniques such as atomic layer deposition (ALD) or sputtering
could also be utilized to form the spacer layer around the nanoparticles.
After deposition of the dielectric layer, the nanoparticle/dielectric
structure was surrounded in an optically thick metallic film of 150–250
nm thickness depending on the particle size. In this work, the metallic
film consisted of Au or Al and was physically deposited with a DC
sputtering machine.
Reflection Measurements
Reflection
spectra of the samples
were collected with a Shimadzu UV-3600 commercial spectrometer in
normal reflectance mode. The spectra correspond to an integrated area
of 5 mm in diameter and were normalized relative to coverslips with
the same metallic film as the measured sample.
Finite-Element Simulations
The simulations were conducted
in COMSOL Multiphysics utilizing the Wave Optics module for the absorptive
characteristics and calculation of the power loss density. The electromagnetic
(EM) simulation was conducted in the frequency domain with the boundary
conditions shown in Figure S1, where periodic
boundary conditions and perfectly matched layers were used to simulate
an infinitely periodic array of the plasmonic resonators. The electric
field enhancement and spatial loss density were calculated with the
frequency domain simulation results. In the simulations, a range of
fill fractions between 4 and 25% were used to ensure that the lattice
mode was far removed from the plasmonic mode.
Authors: Gleb M Akselrod; Jiani Huang; Thang B Hoang; Patrick T Bowen; Logan Su; David R Smith; Maiken H Mikkelsen Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2015-11-09 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Andreas Tittl; Ann-Katrin U Michel; Martin Schäferling; Xinghui Yin; Behrad Gholipour; Long Cui; Matthias Wuttig; Thomas Taubner; Frank Neubrech; Harald Giessen Journal: Adv Mater Date: 2015-07-14 Impact factor: 30.849
Authors: Xiaolong Zhu; Christoph Vannahme; Emil Højlund-Nielsen; N Asger Mortensen; Anders Kristensen Journal: Nat Nanotechnol Date: 2015-12-14 Impact factor: 39.213
Authors: Antoine Moreau; Cristian Ciracì; Jack J Mock; Ryan T Hill; Qiang Wang; Benjamin J Wiley; Ashutosh Chilkoti; David R Smith Journal: Nature Date: 2012-12-06 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Matthew E Sykes; Jon W Stewart; Gleb M Akselrod; Xiang-Tian Kong; Zhiming Wang; David J Gosztola; Alex B F Martinson; Daniel Rosenmann; Maiken H Mikkelsen; Alexander O Govorov; Gary P Wiederrecht Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2017-10-17 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: Jialong Peng; Hyeon-Ho Jeong; Qianqi Lin; Sean Cormier; Hsin-Ling Liang; Michael F L De Volder; Silvia Vignolini; Jeremy J Baumberg Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-05-10 Impact factor: 14.136