Here, we describe the neutral cyclometalated tert-butylisocyanide PtII complexes, [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBut)] 1, the double salts [Pt(C∧N)(CNBut)2][Pt(C∧N)Cl2] 2, and the cationic complexes [Pt(C∧N)(CNBut)2]ClO4 3 [C∧N = difluorophenylpyridine (dfppy, a), 4-(2-pyridyl)benzaldehyde (ppy-CHO, b)]. A comparative study of the pseudopolymorphs 1a, 1a·CHCl3, 1b, 1b·0.5Toluene, 1b·0.5PhF, and 3a·0.25CH2Cl2 reveals strong aggregation through Pt···Pt and/or π···π stacking interactions to give a variety of distinctive one-dimensional (1D) infinite chains, which modulate the photoluminescent properties. This intermolecular long-range aggregate formation is the main origin of the photoluminescent behavior of 1a and 1b complexes, which exhibit highly sensitive and reversible responses to multiple external stimuli including different volatile organic compounds (VOCs), solvents, temperatures, and pressures, with distinct color and phosphorescent color switching from green to red. Furthermore, complex 1b undergoes supramolecular self-assembly via Pt···Pt and/or π···π interactions into a polymer thin polystyrene (PS) film 10 wt % in response to toluene vapors, and 3a exhibits vapochromic and vapoluminescent behavior. Theoretical simulations on the dimer, trimer, and tetramer models of 1a and 1b have been carried out to get insight into the photophysical properties in the aggregated solid state.
Here, we describe the neutral cyclometalated tert-butylisocyanide PtII complexes, [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBut)] 1, the double salts [Pt(C∧N)(CNBut)2][Pt(C∧N)Cl2] 2, and the cationic complexes [Pt(C∧N)(CNBut)2]ClO4 3 [C∧N = difluorophenylpyridine (dfppy, a), 4-(2-pyridyl)benzaldehyde (ppy-CHO, b)]. A comparative study of the pseudopolymorphs 1a, 1a·CHCl3, 1b, 1b·0.5Toluene, 1b·0.5PhF, and 3a·0.25CH2Cl2 reveals strong aggregation through Pt···Pt and/or π···π stacking interactions to give a variety of distinctive one-dimensional (1D) infinite chains, which modulate the photoluminescent properties. This intermolecular long-range aggregate formation is the main origin of the photoluminescent behavior of 1a and 1b complexes, which exhibit highly sensitive and reversible responses to multiple external stimuli including different volatile organic compounds (VOCs), solvents, temperatures, and pressures, with distinct color and phosphorescent color switching from green to red. Furthermore, complex 1b undergoes supramolecular self-assembly via Pt···Pt and/or π···π interactions into a polymer thin polystyrene (PS) film 10 wt % in response to toluene vapors, and 3a exhibits vapochromic and vapoluminescent behavior. Theoretical simulations on the dimer, trimer, and tetramer models of 1a and 1b have been carried out to get insight into the photophysical properties in the aggregated solid state.
Currently,
there is a great deal of interest in producing chromic
PtII complexes, with changes in the color or luminescence
upon the application of external stimuli.[1] Most of the studies focus on changes in luminescence using as external
stimuli liquids,[2] vapors,[3] temperature,[3d,4] or mechanical grinding[5] of interest in memory, sensors, and optoelectronics.[6] Some excellent reviews about these topics have
been published.[7] Many complexes only respond
to a single external stimulus, with the systems that respond to multiple
external stimuli being rare.[3d,4b,8]The versatile chromic behavior of the PtII complexes
is a consequence of their rigid square planar geometry, which enables
noncovalent π···π stacking and intra- or
intermolecular Pt···Pt interactions via open axial positions. These interactions endow supramolecular structures
generating 3ππ excimeric and metal–metal-to-ligand
charge-transfer (3MMLCT) transitions, respectively, remarkably
red-shifted in comparison to the intraligand (3IL), ligand–ligand
charge-transfer (3LLCT) or metal-to-ligand charge-transfer
(3MCLT) transitions present in the monomer.[7a,7g,9] The interplanar and metallophilic
interactions, with Pt···Pt separations shorter than
the sum of van der Waals radii, can allow the formation of dimers,
trimers, oligomers, or one-dimensional (1D)-stacked structures,[3a,7g,10] and some of these systems have
been successfully utilized to develop white light, deep-red to near-infrared
organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs) or data storage devices.[11] However, intermolecular interactions can also
cause nonradiative deactivation.[12] Considering
that the metallophilic Pt···Pt interactions show a
bond strength comparable to that of the hydrogen bonding,[13] these relatively weak interactions can be affected
by steric effects or other noncovalent intra-/intermolecular interactions
such as solvation, hydrogen/halogen interactions, etc.[7b,14] In consequence, noncovalent interactions play key roles in the assembly
of platinum systems that respond to external stimuli and in the modulation
of the photoluminescence properties of the resulting materials.[7a,15]Among chromic PtII systems, a number of cyclometalated
PtII complexes have been developed as a means to achieve
bright, colorful luminescent materials.[1,2,7c,7e,7i,16] On the other hand, isocyanides
are versatile synthons for photoluminescent platinum complexes, which
show stimuli response properties,[17] and
on some occasions, the luminescence can be modulated by noncovalent
interactions.[18] In this field, some chromic
cycloplatinated complexes containing the strong field ligand isocyanides
have been documented,[14a,19] and it has been demonstrated
that their photophysical properties can be modulated effectively by
adjusting steric effects, the strength of the intermolecular interactions,
or the medium. In this line, our group has reported two families of
chloro-cyclometalated complexes, the benzoquinolinyl [Pt(bzq)Cl(CNR)],[14a] in which isocyanide was varied, [R = tert-butylisocyanide (Bu);
2,6-dimethylphenyl (Xyl); 2-naphthyl (2-Np)], and the xylylisocyanide
compounds, [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNXyl)], in which the cyclometalated
backbone was modified [HC∧N = 2-phenylpyridine (ppy);
2,4-difluorophenylpyridine (dfppy); and phenylquinoline (pq)],[19a] aiming to examine the role of the intermolecular
π···π and short- or long-range Pt···Pt
stacking interactions on their structural arrays and photophysical
properties. The higher self-assembly behavior in the ground and excited
state was found for the bzq/CNBu, 2-Np
and ppy-based complexes.In this work, we report the preparation,
characterization, and
optical study of cyclometalated isocyanide PtII complexes,
[Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBu)] 1, the double salts [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2][Pt(C∧N)Cl2] 2, and the cationic complexes [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]ClO43 with difluorophenylpyridine (dfppy, a) or formyl-functionalized phenylpyridine (ppy-CHO, b) cyclometalated ligands. Among them, we discuss in depth the relationship
between the structure–optical properties of complexes that
display chromism upon the application of one or several stimuli. In
particular, we present the differences in the crystal packing and
luminescent properties of several pseudopolymorphs of 1a and 1b and the effect of solvents (vapochromism and
solvatochromism), temperature (thermochromism), and mechanical force
(mechanochromism), together with the vapochromism of 3a.
Synthesis and Characterization of Complexes
The synthesis
of the cycloplatinated chloride–isocyanide
complexes [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBu)] (1) and bis-isocyanide [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]ClO4 (3) complexes was carried out using the corresponding complexes containing
HC∧N as an auxiliary ligand as precursors, [Pt(C∧N)(HC∧N)Cl] (C∧N = dfppy Ia,[20] ppy-CHO Ib).
Precursor Ib was prepared in this work following a conventional
protocol, which involves the reaction of K2PtCl4 with an excess of HC∧N in an ethoxyethanol/water
mixture at 80 °C.The reaction of the corresponding precursor Ia or Ib with 1 equiv of CNBu in CH2Cl2 at room temperature and
further treatment of
the dry residue with toluene gave a minority solid, insoluble in toluene,
and a major product soluble in toluene (Scheme i). The main product, identified as [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBu)], was obtained
from the toluene solution in high yields (85–88%) as a yellow-orange
(C∧N = dfppy 1a) or a red solvated
solid (C∧N = ppy-CHO 1b·0.5Toluene). Interestingly, 1b·0.5Toluene keeps its color
in solid for more than 1 month, finally changing to a yellow solid
on standing, suggesting that a structural transformation takes place.
Indeed, it is also isolated as unsolvated yellow solid (1b) by dissolution in CH2Cl2 and evaporation
to dryness. These complexes 1 are rather soluble in common
organic solvents. Spectroscopic analysis and X-ray diffraction (XRD)
of crystals of 1a and 1b from different
solvents (see below) reveal that complexes 1 display
the stereochemistry shown in Scheme with CNBu occupying the
trans position to the nitrogen of the C∧N ligand,
similarly to other chloride–isocyanides published[14a,19a,21] and consistent with the lower
trans influence of Cl– compared to the CNBu ligand. They exhibit one ν(Pt–Cl)
absorption at 289 cm–1, consistent with a terminal
Pt–Cl bond trans to C, and one absorption at 2207 1a and 2205 cm–11b, assignable to ν(C≡N)
of terminal CNBu, which is shifted to
higher frequencies with respect to the free ligand (2125 cm–1). Spectroscopically, the microcrystals obtained from different solvents
exhibit almost identical ν(C≡N) bands to the pristine
solids (2207–2211 1a, 2202–2205 cm–11b). Their electrospray ionization (ESI)(+)-mass
spectrometry (MS) spectra show the peak corresponding to the loss
of chloride ([M – Cl]+) and that corresponding to
the dimer [2M – Cl]+, suggesting a strong tendency
to form aggregates. 1H and 13C{1H}
NMR spectra of complexes 1 display the expected signals
for C∧N and CNBu in
a 1:1 intensity ratio, which were assigned on the basis of 1H–1H and 13C–1H correlations
(see the Experimental Section and Figures S1 and S2). The minority solids were proposed as the double salts
[Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2][Pt(C∧N)Cl2] (red solid, C∧N = dfppy, 2a; yellow, C∧N = ppy-CHO 2b) in agreement with their matrix-assisted
laser desorption ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) spectra, which
show peaks due to the corresponding anion [Pt(C∧N)Cl2]− and cation [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]+ operating
in a negative and positive mode, respectively (Figures S3 and S4), and two characteristic ν(C≡N)
absorptions due to the two terminal CNBu ligands. To corroborate this proposal, red complex 2a was obtained alternatively by a reaction of (NBu4)[Pt(dffpy)Cl2] (generated in situ from [Pt(dfppy)(μ-Cl)]2 with 2 equiv of NBu4Cl in refluxing MeOH) and
complex 3a, [Pt(dffpy)(CNBu)2]ClO4. Its insolubility in common organic
solvents prevents the characterization by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray
spectroscopy. 2a does not show solid-state evolution
by thermal treatment in an oven (100 °C) for 24 h into the corresponding
neutral complex [Pt(dfppy)Cl(CNBu)],
a common feature in double salts.[14a,22] A similar
reaction between (NBu4)[Pt(ppy-CHO)Cl2] and 3b also evolves with the formation of the expected salt 2b but mixed with 1b due to a relatively fast
rearrangement of the salt. This type of behavior is not unusual. Indeed,
the salt [Pt(bzq)(CN-2-Np)2][Pt(bzq)Cl2] was
also formed as a subproduct together with [Pt(bzq)Cl(CN-2-Np)] by
reacting [Pt(bzq)(μ-Cl)]2 and CN-2-Np in a 1:2 molar
ratio.[14a]
Scheme 1
Synthesis of 1–3 (a, b),
(i) 1 equiv of CNBu, CH2Cl2; Dryness and Treatment with Toluene,
(ii) Excess of KClO4 and 2 equiv of CNBu, Acetone/CH2Cl2 (1/1), and 298 K
Cationic complexes [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]ClO4 (C∧N = dfppy 3a, ppy-CHO 3b) were prepared
by treatment of a suspension of the corresponding [Pt(C∧N)(HC∧N)Cl] (Ia, Ib)
precursor with an excess of KClO4 and the subsequent addition
of 2 equiv of CNBu in a mixture of acetone/CH2Cl2 (1/1) (Scheme ii). These complexes were isolated as pale-yellow air-stable
solids in good yields (84–88%). They exhibit two terminal ν(C≡N)
absorptions at 2236, 2215 3a, 2248, and 2223 cm–13b, shifted to higher energies than in 1, and peaks at 1085 and 622–624 cm–1, assigned
to the ionic ClO4–. The ESI(+) mass spectra
show the corresponding [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]+ peaks and the NMR spectra
(1H and 13C{1H}) show the expected
signals of C∧N/CNBu in a 1:2 intensity ratio. It is worth noting that in 3, the most deshielded H2 proton appears high-field shifted
in relation to complexes 1 (δ H2 8.90 3avs 9.47 1a; 8.78 3bvs 9.80 1b) (Figures S5 and S6), as a consequence of the substitution of Cl– by CNBu.
Crystallographic
Studies
For 1a, crystals suitable for X-ray
diffraction were
obtained by slow diffusion of n-hexane into a CH2Cl2 solution (1a) or by evaporation
from a concentrated CHCl3 solution (1a·CHCl), and for 1b, by slow diffusion
at 298 K of n-hexane into tetrahydrofuran (THF),
toluene, or fluorobenzene solutions, respectively (1b, 1b·0.5Toluene, 1b·0.5PhF),
and they were subjected to single-crystal X-ray analysis. The basic
crystallographic data and selected bond distances and angles are summarized
in Tables and S1–S3. Their structural analyses reveal
the expected distorted square planar geometry with the isocyanide
ligand in the trans position with respect to the nitrogen of the cyclometalated
groups (Figures and 2). All distances and angles are comparable to those
observed in related complexes.[14a,19a,21]
Table 1
Color, Color Emission, and Selected
Distances (Å) and Angles (deg) of Crystals 1a, 1a·CHCl, 1b, 1b·0.5Toluene, and 1b·0.5PhF
1aa
1a·CHCl3
1b
1b·0.5Toluenea
1b·0.5PhFa
color
yellow
pale-yellow
yellow
orange-red
orange-red
emission
orange
green-yellow
yellow
red
red
Pt(1)–Cl(1) (Å)
2.385(2)
2.399(12)
2.3952(8)
2.4054(9)
2.4001(9)
Pt(1)–N(1) (Å)
2.054(5)
2.054(3)
2.057(3)
2.057(3)
2.061(3)
Pt(1)–Cort (Å)
1.986(3)
1.986(4)
1.992(3)
1.992(3)
1.988(4)
Pt(1)–CCNBut (Å)
1.921(7)
1.898(4)
1.894(3)
1.913(4)
1.908(4)
Pt···Pt (Å)
3.818(dimer)/3.688
5.305/6.541
5.337
3.362(dimer)/3.896
3.370(dimer)/3.864
dinterplanar (Å)b
3.448(dimer)/3.531
3.467/3.523
3.434
3.329(dimer)/3.306
3.298(dimer)/3.331
Pt···Pt···Pt
(deg)
∼145
73.33
79.70
∼147
∼146
Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα (deg)
75.93/72.84
180.0
180.0
64.79/58.51
63.80/57.78
Pair of molecules
with similar distances
and angles were found in the crystals of 1a, 1b·0.5Toluene, and 1b·0.5 PhF. Data are given for molecule A.
Shortest interplanar distance.
Figure 1
(a)
Single infinite crystal stacking along the a-axis
of molecules AB showing the π···π
interplanar and Pt···Pt distances. Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity. (b) Pictures of crystals of 1a under
daylight or UV irradiation. (c) Top view from the a-axis of four stackings showing also C–H···F
contacts between columns. (d) Packing structure of 1a·CHCl along the a-axis showing
the π···π interplanar and Pt···Pt
distances. (e) Pictures of crystals of 1a·CHCl under daylight or UV irradiation. (f) Axial
visualization of solvent interactions along the stacking direction.
(g) View of the packing structure with the solvent channels marked
in yellow along the a-axis. This picture was illustrated
using the Mercury computer program.[24]
Figure 2
(a) Single infinite crystal packing of 1b along the a-axis showing the π···π
interplanar
and Pt···Pt distances. (b) Pictures of crystals of 1b under daylight or UV irradiation. (c) Top view from the b-axis of four columns, showing also H(ppy–CHO)···O(ppy–CHO) interactions. (d)
Columnar stacking along the a-axis of 1b·0.5Toluene showing the π···π interplanar and Pt···Pt
distances. (e) Pictures of crystals of 1b·0.5Toluene under daylight or UV irradiation. (f) Top view from the a-axis of five stackings showing the toluene solvent localization
and secondary contacts. (g) View of the packing structure with the
solvent channels marked in red along the a-axis.
(a)
Single infinite crystal stacking along the a-axis
of molecules AB showing the π···π
interplanar and Pt···Pt distances. Hydrogen atoms are
omitted for clarity. (b) Pictures of crystals of 1a under
daylight or UV irradiation. (c) Top view from the a-axis of four stackings showing also C–H···F
contacts between columns. (d) Packing structure of 1a·CHCl along the a-axis showing
the π···π interplanar and Pt···Pt
distances. (e) Pictures of crystals of 1a·CHCl under daylight or UV irradiation. (f) Axial
visualization of solvent interactions along the stacking direction.
(g) View of the packing structure with the solvent channels marked
in yellow along the a-axis. This picture was illustrated
using the Mercury computer program.[24](a) Single infinite crystal packing of 1b along the a-axis showing the π···π
interplanar
and Pt···Pt distances. (b) Pictures of crystals of 1b under daylight or UV irradiation. (c) Top view from the b-axis of four columns, showing also H(ppy–CHO)···O(ppy–CHO) interactions. (d)
Columnar stacking along the a-axis of 1b·0.5Toluene showing the π···π interplanar and Pt···Pt
distances. (e) Pictures of crystals of 1b·0.5Toluene under daylight or UV irradiation. (f) Top view from the a-axis of five stackings showing the toluene solvent localization
and secondary contacts. (g) View of the packing structure with the
solvent channels marked in red along the a-axis.Pair of molecules
with similar distances
and angles were found in the crystals of 1a, 1b·0.5Toluene, and 1b·0.5 PhF. Data are given for molecule A.Shortest interplanar distance.Yellow needles of 1a show orange emission similar
to 1a powder, whereas the pale-yellow crystals of 1a·CHCl display a green-yellow
emission due to their different molecular stacking (Figure ). 1a presents
two nearly identical molecules (A and B) in the asymmetric unit (data
given for A in Table ) that form head-to-head slightly twisted parallel dimers (AB), which
stack along the a-axis (Figure a), with alternating Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα(CNBu angles of 75.93/72.84°,
interplanar dfppy π···π interactions of
3.448 (dimer)/3.531 Å and Pt···Pt distances of
3.818 (dimer)/3.688 Å, close to the van der Waals limit, which
is around 3.5 Å.[23] The Pt atoms in
the columns are rather aligned with a Pt–Pt–Pt angle
of ∼145°. Inside the columns, there are also secondary
C–H(Bu···Cl
interactions (2.770 Å) and the columns interact through C–H···F
contacts (2.554 Å) (Figure c).The 1a·CHCl crystals
also show a staggered columnar packing. The molecules stack along
the a-axis in a head-to-tail manner with an antiparallel
arrangement, which minimizes the repulsion between the tert-butyl moieties (Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα angle of 180°, Figure f), and alternating π···π
interactions, similar to those found in 1a (3.467 and
3.523 Å, Figure d and Table ). The
Pt–Pt distances are longer than in 1a (5.305 and
6.541 Å) with a zigzag Pt–Pt–Pt angle of 73.33°.
Interestingly, the molecules of the solvent are occluded in continuous
channels along the a-axis, with two rows of CHCl3 per cavity interacting with the complex [Cl···Cl/H(solvent) 2.663 Å, F···Cl(solvent) 3.160 Å, and H(Bu···Cl(solvent) 2.822 Å] (Figures f,g and S7). The
channels have an aperture size of 11.1 Å × 10.3 Å,
and the total void volume occupies 26.3% of the unit cell. The green-yellow
emission of these crystals changes to orange on standing in the air
(4 h), suggesting that the CHCl3 molecules are lost, reversing
to 1a. The shorter Pt–Pt distances in 1a could account for the lower-energy emissions of the crystals of 1a in relation to 1a·CHCl. The vapochromic behavior of the powder 1a (see
below) could be related to the occurrence of a structural transformation
from the initial framework of 1a, in which the molecules
present a head-to-head disposition to the porous channel structure
of 1a·CHCl, with the molecules
adopting a head-to-tail arrangement. The solvent channels appear to
be more accessible to absorb vapors of solvent molecules, thereby
resulting in a rapid vapochromic response (see below).Yellow
needles of 1b display a staggered columnar
packing, which resembles 1a·CHCl (Figure ),
with a regular antiparallel head-to-tail arrangement of neighboring
molecules with π···π (ppy-CHO) interactions
of 3.434 Å and a long Pt···Pt distance (5.337
Å), indicative of negligible metallophilic interactions. The
Pt–Pt–Pt and torsional Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα angles are 79.70 and 180.0°, respectively (Figure a,c).The red
needles crystals of 1b·0.5Toluene and 1b·0.5PhF display very similar crystallographic data
and structural arrangement, with small variations that fit within
the experimental error (Figures and S8). Therefore, only
the structure of 1b·0.5Toluene will be discussed.
In 1b·0.5Toluene, the two nearly identical molecules
(A and B) found in the asymmetric unit form a head-to-head dimer with
a short Pt···Pt distance of 3.362 Å and a π···π
(ppy-CHO) interplanar distance of 3.329 Å (Figure d,f). The short distances[23] imply a strong Pt–Pt interaction within the dimeric
unit, which could account for the lower-energy emissions of crystals 1b·0.5Toluene at 298 K, intensified by cooling. The dimers
stack along the a-axis to form a columnar structure
with a Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα torsion angle of 64.79/58.51° and a slight zigzag Pt–Pt–Pt
arrangement (angle ∼147°), thus increasing the Pt···Pt
distance (3.896 Å) between dimers. These columns are mainly supported
by interplanar ppy-CHO π···π (3.306 Å)
and secondary Cl···H(Bu (2.893 Å) interactions. A notable structural feature
is the presence of a channel with an approximately 6 Å pore diameter
along the a-axis, running parallel with the Pt···Pt
stacks, partly occupied by toluene molecules in this red crystalline
form, supported by weak contacts such as O(ppy-CHO)···HPh/Me(Tol) (2.500 Å), H(ppy-CHO/Bu)···CMe(Tol) (2.739 Å), and H(ppy-CHO)···HMe(Tol) (2.172 Å) (Figures g and S9). The solvent-accessible volume occupies 22.7% of the total
volume of the unit cell for 1b·0.5Toluene and 18.1%
for 1b·0.5PhF. Different solvents were studied (THF,
xylene, acetone, CHCl3, and MeCN), and only red crystals
were obtained from toluene and fluorobenzene. This fact suggests that
the formation of channels seems to be driven by the required solvent
space and the interactions between solvent molecules and the platinum
moieties. These structures are stable with time, as solvent molecules
are “trapped”, as evidenced by the fact that the red
crystal lasted more than 1 month to lose the solvent and its color
into the air. Structural analysis of 1b·0.5Toluene and 1b·0.5PhF provides insight into the solvent
exchange mechanism, enabling rationalization of the vapochromic response
that will be detailed in the corresponding section (see below).Microcrystals of 3a·0.25CHCl and pale-yellow blocks
of 3b were obtained by slow diffusion of n-hexane into a solution of the corresponding compound in CH2Cl2 at 298 K (Figures and S10 and Table S4).
For 3b, the quality of the data collection was not good
enough, and only the connectivity and the packing were established
(Figure S11). Crystals of 3a·0.25CHCl contain four nearly identical molecules in the asymmetric unit,
and only selected parameters for molecule A are given in Table S5. The cation exhibits the expected distorted
square planar geometry formed by the dfppy and two tert-butylisocyanide ligands. In the crystal lattice, the cations form
columnar structures along the a- and b-axis via partial π-stacking between two dfppy
units from neighboring molecules, which have an antiparallel arrangement
with short π···π interactions (3.391 Å)
and a long Pt···Pt separation (5.160 Å). As shown
in the Supporting Information (Figure S10), the dimers packed with other twisted
units through a longer π···π (3.499, 3.538
Å) and a shorter Pt···Pt distance (4.558, 4.707
Å) and also show secondary C–H(Bu···F(dfppy) (2.472 Å)
and H(dfppy/Bu)···O(ClO4) (2.494–2.525 Å) contacts.
Figure 3
(a) Single infinite crystal
packing of 3a·0.25CHCl along the b-axis
showing the π···π
interplanar and Pt···Pt distances. (b) Pictures of
crystals of 3a·0.25CHCl under daylight or UV irradiation.
(a) Single infinite crystal
packing of 3a·0.25CHCl along the b-axis
showing the π···π
interplanar and Pt···Pt distances. (b) Pictures of
crystals of 3a·0.25CHCl under daylight or UV irradiation.
Photophysical Properties and Theoretical
Calculations
Absorption Spectra in Solution and Density
Functional Theory
(DFT) Calculations
The absorption spectra of the complexes 1a, 1b, 3a, and 3b were
recorded in a CH2Cl2 solution (5 × 10–5 M, Figure ), and also in THF for compounds 1 (Figure S12), and the data are listed in Table S6. All complexes display intense high-energy
absorption bands till ∼340 nm, assigned to a mixed intraligand 1IL(π–π*), located on the metalated C∧N ligand and charge-transfer (1MLCT/1L′LCT/1LL′CT) transitions. They also
show a characteristic low-energy (LE) broad feature, red-shifted for
the ppy-CHO compounds (b) in relation to that of dffpy
(a) (389, 408 1bvs 362,
379 1a; 360, 375 3bvs 351,
368 nm 3a) and for the neutral Cl/CNBu (1) in relation to the cationic (CNBu)2 (3), as expected
on the basis of the lower energy of the corresponding lowest unoccupied
molecular orbital (LUMO) and the highest occupied molecular orbital
(HOMO), respectively (ppy-CHO vs dfpy on the LUMOs
and cationic vs neutral on the HOMOs). The absorption
spectra in CH2Cl2 and THF display similar patterns,
with a slight negative solvatochromism for the LE band with a red
shift on decreasing the polarity of the solvent (362, 379 1a, 389, 408 1b nm in CH2Cl2; 382 1a, 392, 412 nm 1b THF), evidencing a certain
charge-transfer (CT) nature (Figure S12).
Figure 4
(a) Normalized absorption spectra of complexes 1a, 1b, 3a, and 3b in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. (b) Low-energy region of the UV–vis
absorption spectra of 1b in CH2Cl2 at different concentrations. (c) Representation of the absorbance
at the 427 nm band vs concentration. Green box: the
expansion of the low concentration range (<0.01 M).
(a) Normalized absorption spectra of complexes 1a, 1b, 3a, and 3b in CH2Cl2 at 298 K. (b) Low-energy region of the UV–vis
absorption spectra of 1b in CH2Cl2 at different concentrations. (c) Representation of the absorbance
at the 427 nm band vs concentration. Green box: the
expansion of the low concentration range (<0.01 M).DFT/time-dependent (TD)-DFT calculations were carried out
for monomeric
species of 1a, 1b, and 3a in
CH2Cl2 (Tables S7–S9 and Figures S13–S16). In complexes 1, the
low-energy feature is mainly assigned to a 1IL/1MLCT admixture with some 1XLCT (X = Cl) character, whereas
bis-isocyanide complex 3a has an important 1IL character, with some ligand-to-ligand (1LL′CT,
C∧N → C≡N) and ligand-to-metal 1LMCT character. The red shift observed for the ppy-CHO complexes
(b) in relation to the dfppy (a) can be
related to the stabilization of the LUMO induced by the presence of
the aldehyde moiety (−1.98 1avs −2.43 eV 1b), whereas the HOMO remains similar
(−6.16 1avs −6.14 eV 1b), which reduces the HOMO–LUMO gap. As is shown in Figure , the substitution
of the chloride by other isocyanide ligand displays a blue shift in
the LE absorption maxima (362, 379 1avs 351, 368 nm 3a), which can be ascribed to the major
C∧N contribution in 3a (94%) with respect
to 1a (55%) in the HOMO and to the π-acidity of
the isocyanide that stabilizes the HOMO, leading to a larger HOMO–LUMO
gap.
Figure 5
Schematic representation of selected frontier orbitals and excitations
of 1a, 1b, and 3a.
Schematic representation of selected frontier orbitals and excitations
of 1a, 1b, and 3a.A concentration dependence study in CH2Cl2 was carried out for 1a and 1b.
In both
complexes (Figure b,c for 1b, and Figure S17 for 1a), the lowest absorption band follows Beer’s
law in the concentration range from 5 × 10–6 to 5 × 10–3 M, suggesting that no obvious
ground-state aggregation occurs within these concentrations range.
However, at higher concentrations (>5 × 10–3 M), a clear deviation from Beer’s law is observed for 1b (monitored at 427 nm). Weaker absorptions are also discernible
at lower energy (∼475 and 510 nm), indicating the formation
of aggregates. This agrees with color and emission changes from pale-yellow
to dark orange on increasing the concentration from 5 ×10–3 to 0.4 M. This aggregation is also reflected in the
clear upfield shift of all aromatic proton signals upon increasing
the concentration (Figure S18). However,
complex 1a exhibited lower solubility at concentrations
>5 × 10–3 M, and the study is less conclusive.
Emission Spectra in the Film, Solution, and TD-DFT Calculations
Photophysical properties of complexes 1a, 1b, 3a, and 3b were studied in doped polystyrene
(PS) films (1–10 wt %) and CH2Cl2 and
THF solutions (298, 77 K) and in the solid state; the relevant data
are listed in Tables S10 and 2. Calculations on the lowest-lying (S0–T1, SI) and spin density distribution
of the triplet excited states (T1) based on their corresponding
optimized S0 and T1 geometries of the monomers
are detailed in the SI.
Table 2
Photophysical Data for 1–3 (a, b) in the Solid
State at 298 and 77 K
298 K
77 K
compound
λem/nm (λex/nm)
τ/μs
ϕ
λem/nm (λex/nm)
τ/μs
1a
625 (420)
1.1 (63%), 0.5 (37%)
0.51
650 (420)
7.5
1a-CHCl3-R
662 (550)
0.24 (80%), 1.05 (20%)
0.21
660, 720max (470)
9.5 (660)
730 (580)
3.7 (717)
4.2 (730)
1a-CHCl3-G
474sh, 534a (420)
0.26 (51%), 1.68
(49%) (474); 22.7 (534)
0.11
474a (440)
12.4
1a-CHCl3-G-ground
632 (460)
0.31 (35%), 1.35 (65%)
0.38
677 (468)
5.5
1a(THF)
627 (470)
0.3 (31%), 1.0 (69%)
0.43
654 (470)
8.9
1a(MeOH)
650 (525)
0.3 (70%), 0.9 (30%)
0.14
722 (530)
3.9
1a(EtOH)
651 (550)
0.4 (50%), 1.3 (50%)
0.26
718, 748sh (500)
4.3 (718)
2.5 (748)
1a(CHCl3)
660 (570)
0.3 (67%), 0.7 (33%)
0.22
724 (570)
3.2
1a(CH2Cl2)
689 (570)
0.2 (54%), 0.9 (46%)
0.21
739 (570)
2.3
1b
545a (420)
0.3 (53%), 2.8 (48%)
0.06
550 (420)
22.6
1b·0.5Toluene
658
<1%
0.20
550sh, 596, 706 (420)
14.8 (550)
706 (550)
12.6 (596)
9.8 (706)
1b-ground
550a (420)
0.32 (64%), 1.96
(36%)
0.03 (420)
557, 598, 660 (420)
17.2 (557)
660 (500)
(585)
0.05(500)
10.2 (660)
2a
640 (550)
0.22
0.05
717 (550)
2.1
2b
650 (515)
2.0
3a
474,a 595max (385)
1.4 (595)
0.57
478a, 585max (385)
40.7 (478)
478a, 617max (420)
8.9 (617)
3a·0.25CH2Cl2
490, 509max (420)
24.8 (509)
0.15
488 (420)
47.4 (488)
3a-CHCl3
627 (430)
1.09
0.26
482a, 624max, 638sh, 721sh (430)
32.5 (482)
10.8 (624)
650 (475)
9.3 (650)
725 (590)
1.4 (700)
3a-Acetone
612
(430)
0.4
0.15
480a, 514, 613max, 645sh, 704sh (430)
67.3 (476)
640, 659, 696sh (475)
10.7 (613)
630, 690max (550)
9.5 (650)
1.5 (690)
3a-THF
623 (430)
0.6
0.16
476, 510, 616max, 705sh (430)
54.6 (476)
12.5 (616)
645 (470)
6.8 (645)
630, 700 (540)
2.4 (700)
3b
530 (440)
0.1 (58%),
0.8 (43%)
0.10
560, 628 (480)
15.8
ν0→0 transition
of the structured emission.
ν0→0 transition
of the structured emission.Both chloride–isocyanide derivatives 1a and 1b display in a diluted PS film (1 wt %) structured phosphorescence
bands (λem = 467 1a, 524 nm 1b, Figures and S19), attributed to monomer emission (3IL/3MLCT) involving the cyclometalated ligand and the
Pt atom, with a predominant 3IL character (see calculations
below). At higher concentrations, only 1a forms aggregates.
Thus, at a doped concentration of 10 wt %, a broad unstructured red-shifted
emission band appears at ∼580 nm, increasing in intensity relative
to the peak at 467 nm by excitation from 365 to 410 nm and only a
broad red-shifted band at 635 nm with λexc > 460
nm. These bands are characteristic of the formation of partial ground-state
aggregates formed by π···π stacking and/or
Pt···Pt interactions, which are supported by the different
excitation spectra obtained by monitoring the distinct emission maxima.
Because of these contributions, the emission color shifts gradually
from green to yellow-orange with increasing concentration (Figure ), and the quantum
yields increase from ϕ = 5% (PS 1 wt %, monomer) to 19% (PS
10 wt %), although without a significant effect in the lifetimes,
which fit to two components (τaverage = 0.6–0.9
μs).
Figure 6
Normalized excitation (dashed line) and emission (solid line) spectra
in PS at 1–10 wt % at 298 K in air of 1a.
Normalized excitation (dashed line) and emission (solid line) spectra
in PS at 1–10 wt % at 298 K in air of 1a.Only 1b is emissive in fluid CH2Cl2 (5 × 10–4 M) at 298
K (Figure S20), displaying a typical structured
phosphorescent emission, indicative of an emissive state of mixed 3IL/3MLCT nature with a dominant 3IL
character, which was further supported by calculations (see below).
No significant changes neither in emission maxima nor the quantum
yield were observed in a THF solution at 298 K (Table S10). Complex 1b shows an aggregation of
the PtII monomer in glasses of CH2Cl2 even in a diluted solution (5 × 10–5 M, λem 640 nm), whereas in THF glasses, the presence of the monomer
(λem 517 nm, Figure S20) is dominant. The effect of the concentration on the emissive behavior
was examined in CH2Cl2 at 298 and 77 K. The
distinct emission profiles and color change can be visualized in Figure S21. At 298 K, increasing the concentration
(5 × 10–5 to 0.4 M) affects the emission color.
With concentrations of 5 × 10–5 to 0.01 M,
only the monomer is observed. From 0.01 to 0.4 M, an aggregation broad
peak (λem ∼ 710 nm), attributed to metal–metal-to-ligand
charge transfer (3MMLCT), gradually gains intensity, and
the emission changes from green to red (Figure S21a). Upon cooling to 77 K, the monomer emission dominates
in diluted solutions (5 × 10–5 to 10–3 M), whereas that aggregated emission peak is observable from 0.01
to 0.4 M, together with the monomer (Figure S21b).Complex 1a is nonemissive in solution probably
due
to deactivation through molecular motions in fluid or the ease of
the thermal activation of the 3MC excited states. In a
glassy solution at 77 K, it exhibits intense emission profiles, which
depend on the solvent, the concentration, and the wavelength excitation.
Upon cooling, diluted CH2Cl2 solutions (5 ×
10–5 M) show three different emission bands depending
on the excitation wavelengths (Figure ). By excitation to low wavelengths (λexc 365 nm), a minority band of the monomer (λem 465
nm), a broad band at 552 nm, and a shoulder at 645 nm are observed,
whereas with λexc > 440 nm, the band at 645 nm
dominates.
The excitation spectra monitored at the three peaks differ, also suggesting
the aggregation processes. At higher concentrations (5 × 10–4 M), only two broad emission bands (λem 570 and 650 nm) are observed by excitation at λexc < 400 nm, the LE emission band being selectively obtained using
LE excitation wavelengths (λexc 450 nm) (Figure S22). Considering the unstructured emission
profiles and their crystal packing, we tentatively ascribe the origin
of these LE bands to ligand-centered 3ππ* and 3MMLCT transitions, respectively. Similar behavior was observed
in THF at 77 K (Figure S23). In the glasses,
the aggregate lifetimes [τ = 9.7 μs (552), 6.4 μs
(645 nm) 1a, CH2Cl2 5 × 10–5 M; 10.1 μs (640 nm) (5 × 10–5 M), 9.7 μs CH2Cl2 0.01 M, 1b] are shorter than the corresponding monomer decay [τ = 14.9
μs (465), 1a, CH2Cl2; 14.8
μs (540) CH2Cl21b], in agreement
with 3MMLCT contribution for the lowest-energy band (645 1a, 710 nm 1b) or some triplet–triplet
annihilation (TTA)[25] in the 3ππ* excimeric-like feature (552 1a, 640
nm 1b).
Figure 7
Normalized excitation and emission spectra of 1a in
CH2Cl2 5 × 10–5 M at
77 K. Photographs taken under lamps of the ∼λexc indicated and the N2 atmosphere.
Normalized excitation and emission spectra of 1a in
CH2Cl2 5 × 10–5 M at
77 K. Photographs taken under lamps of the ∼λexc indicated and the N2 atmosphere.For the bis-isocyanide compounds in PS films (1 wt %), 3b displays a typical 3IL-structured emission (524 nm),
similar to 1b, while in the dfppy derivative (3a) dominates an unstructured emission peak [600 nm, τ = 1.8
(61%), 3.0 (39%) μs], characteristic of aggregate emission,
in relation to the small intensity of the monomer (474 nm) (Figure ). In a fluid CH2Cl2 solution (5 × 10–4 M)
(Figures S24a and S25a) both compounds
show monomer emission (471 3a, 511 nm 3b) with lower quantum yields (ϕ 1% 3a, 2% 3b) than in PS films (ϕ 27% 3a, 9% 3b). In agreement with its behavior in PS films, compound 3a shows a higher tendency to aggregate in glasses at 77 K
(Figure S24b), whereas 3b displays
essentially monomeric emission with an increase in the LE shoulder
(Figure S25b). As in complexes 1, the aggregate lifetimes [τ = 6.6 (580) 3a, 14.5
(618) μs 3b, CH2Cl2 77 K]
are shorter than the corresponding monomer [τ = 39.1 (475) 3a, 24.5 (524) μs 3b, CH2Cl2 77 K].
Figure 8
Normalized emission spectra of 3a (λex 365 nm) and 3b (λex 420 nm)
in PS
(1 wt %) at 298 K in air.
Normalized emission spectra of 3a (λex 365 nm) and 3b (λex 420 nm)
in PS
(1 wt %) at 298 K in air.The analysis of the monomer emission of these compounds indicates
that the variation of the cyclometalated ligand has a notable effect
on the emission maximum, with the ppy-CHO complexes (b) red-shifted with respect to the dfppy (a) derivatives,
consistent with the higher energy gap for the π–π*
orbitals of the dfppy complexes. The nature of the emissions was studied
in 1a, 1b, and 3a through calculations
of the lowest-lying T1 (S0 → T1) (Table S9) and spin density distribution
for the triplet excited states (T1) (Figure ), based on their corresponding optimized
S0 and T1 geometries, respectively. The calculated
lowest-lying T1 state involves mainly the HOMO →
LUMO transition (66% 1a, 77% 1b, 83% 3a), resulting in a 3IL transition with a minor
contribution of 3MLCT and 3XLCT for complexes 1 and 3LL′CT (C∧N →
CNBu) and 3LMCT (C∧N → Pt) for 3a. However, the calculated spin
density distribution in the optimized T1 state (Figure ) is located mainly
on the cyclometalated ligand and to a lesser extent in platinum (Pt,
0.1377 1a, 0.1912 1b, 0.0850 3a), with a negligible contribution of the other coligands, thus supporting
a predominant 3IL state with 3MLCT contribution
higher in the neutral complexes 1 than in 3. This result is in coherence with numerous works on cyclometalated
isocyanide metal complexes, in which the large separation between
the 3MLCT and 3IL states lead to a weak configuration
interaction and a predominant 3IL character in T1.[26] In agreement with this, the calculated
contribution of the Pt center in the SOMO-1 (Figure S26 and Table S11) decreases (Pt 9% 1a, 16% 1b, 3% 3a) in the optimized T1 state
in relation to the optimized S0 geometry, especially for 1 (HOMO, 30% 1a, 34% 1b, 5% 3a), suggesting distortion upon excitation. The calculated
emission wavelengths [1a (521), 1b (619), 3a (531 nm)] are consistent with the monomer emission observed
[1a (467), 1b (524), 3a (474
nm), PS 1 wt %], although with expected overestimated values.
Figure 9
Spin density
distribution for the lowest triplet excited state
in 1a, 1b, and 3a.
Spin density
distribution for the lowest triplet excited state
in 1a, 1b, and 3a.
Emission Spectra in the Solid State
The photophysical
characteristics in the solid state are compiled in Tables (emission) and S12 (absorption spectra calculated from their
reflectance spectra). Interestingly, complexes 1a and 1b exhibit multistimuli behavior, and 3a shows
vapochromic behavior. As is seen in the structural section, the different
possibility of packing of the complexes seems to be decisive in the
observed vapochromic (1a, 1b, 3a), solvatochormic, and mechanochromic (1a, 1b) behavior.Powdered as-obtained yellow-orange samples or crystals
of 1a show a bright orange structureless emission band
(625 nm), narrower and red-shifted (650 nm) to 77 K (Figures and S27), which is associated with a mixed 3MMLCT/3ππ* manifold due to the formation of dimers in
the ground-state stacking in columns with relatively close Pt···Pt
and π···π contacts. However, crystals of 1a·CHCl display a yellow-green
monomer 3IL/3MLCT emission (534 nm) with a minor
structured 3IL band at 474 nm, which dominates at 77 K
(Figure S28), in accordance with their
staggered columnar packing with longer Pt···Pt separations.
Interestingly, upon fuming the yellow-orange powder 1a with vapors of CHCl3 for only ∼5 min, the sample
changes to a kinetic red form, with a red emission (1a-CHCl-R form) (Figures a and S29). The elemental and thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) of
the 1a-CHCl-R form
revealed a phase transition at 75 °C arising from the desorption
of CHCl3 from the lattice (Figure S30a). When a red sample of 1a-CHCl-R was heated up to 175 °C, the lost weight (ca. ∼19%) corresponds to about one lattice CHCl3 molecule per complex, giving 1a. This 1a-CHCl-R form displays
a red shift structureless band centered at 662 nm, which narrows and
considerably shifts to lower energies (λmax 730 nm,
λexc 580 nm) at 77 K (Figure S29). The emission is attributed to an 3MMLCT transition
from long-range kinetic aggregates (trimers, tetramers, etc.) formed
by fast incorporation of the solvent and likely having shorter Pt···Pt
intermolecular interactions than that found in 1a. Interestingly,
CHCl3 is easily removed in this kinetic red form (1a-CHCl-R), and upon
treatment with acetone or CH2Cl2 vapors, the
unsolvated 1a is recovered. By contrast, if the fuming
time of 1a with vapors of CHCl3 increases
to ∼30 min at 298 K, we observed that the color changes gradually
from red (1a-CHCl-R) to a final thermodynamically more stable yellow form (1a-CHCl-G) (Figure a), with a green-yellow structured emission
identical to that measured for crystals 1a·CHCl. TGA analysis shows a phase transition from 1a-CHCl-G at 75 °C,
corresponding to the transformation to 1a, by the loss
of CHCl3 (Figure S30b). If the
solid 1a-CHCl-G is kept in a close vial, it is stable for weeks, but if it is heated
to 65 °C, it reverts to 1a, although without passing
through the previous kinetic red form. Interestingly, the color of
the phase 1a-CHCl-G changed from pale-yellow to dark yellow by manual grinding in a
mortar (Figure S31). The 1a-CHCl-G-ground form is an amorphous
orange emissive phase, which displays a broad unstructured band at
632 nm, similar to the as-prepared powder 1a, which is
red-shifted at 77 K (677 nm). This indicates that mechanical stress
in the yellow phase favors the ground-state interchromophore interactions.
The emission quantum yields of these forms range from ϕ 11%
in 1a-CHCl-G, 21% 1a-CHCl-R, and 38% 1a-CHCl-G-ground to
51% 1a (Table ). These values are comparable to or higher than those in
polystyrene.
Figure 10
(a) Scheme and photographs of the external stimuli-responsive
color
and emission changes in 1a; left: under ambient light
and right: under UV light irradiation (λex 365 nm).
Emission color changes of 1a after exposure to CHCl3 vapors for 5 min (1a·CHCl-R) or more than 30 min (1a·CHCl-G). (b) Normalized excitation
(red, λem 660 nm; orange λem 625
nm; green λem 535 nm) and emission spectra of 1a powder (λex 420 nm), 1a·CHCl-R (λex 550
nm), 1a·CHCl-G (λex 400 nm), and 1a·CHCl-G-ground (λex 450
nm) in air. (c) Normalized absorption spectra calculated from their
reflectance spectra in the solid state. (d) Powder XRD (PXRD) patterns
of different forms of 1a.
(a) Scheme and photographs of the external stimuli-responsive
color
and emission changes in 1a; left: under ambient light
and right: under UV light irradiation (λex 365 nm).
Emission color changes of 1a after exposure to CHCl3 vapors for 5 min (1a·CHCl-R) or more than 30 min (1a·CHCl-G). (b) Normalized excitation
(red, λem 660 nm; orange λem 625
nm; green λem 535 nm) and emission spectra of 1a powder (λex 420 nm), 1a·CHCl-R (λex 550
nm), 1a·CHCl-G (λex 400 nm), and 1a·CHCl-G-ground (λex 450
nm) in air. (c) Normalized absorption spectra calculated from their
reflectance spectra in the solid state. (d) Powder XRD (PXRD) patterns
of different forms of 1a.The absorption properties of all forms in the solid state are shown
in Figure c and Table S12. The yellow-orange pristine solid 1a shows a broad absorption band up to 550 nm, whereas the 1a-CHCl-G form is characterized
by a blue-shifted absorption band up to 500 nm, attributed to mixed 1LLCT/1MLCT transitions. The 1a-CHCl-R phase shows an absorption
spectrum extending to 600 nm, most likely due to 1MMLCT
transitions based on Pt···Pt interactions, in coherence
with its color. As expected, the absorption spectrum of 1a-CHCl-G-ground and 1a-CHCl-R treated with acetone vapors
are similar to that obtained for pristine 1a. The powder
X-ray diffraction (PXRD) patterns show that pristine 1a is crystalline in nature, the PXRD peaks being consistent with the
major diffraction peaks simulated from the cif files of the structure
of larger single crystals of 1a (Figure d), suggesting that microcrystalline solid
has a molecular packing similar to that of their larger crystalline
samples. After exposing the sample of 1a to CHCl3 fumes for 5 min to obtain the red form 1a-CHCl-R, new peaks appeared (red
line), indicating that the incorporation of a molecule of CHCl3 induces a structural transformation. The peaks of the pristine
sample 1a can be mainly recovered once the red sample 1a-CHCl-R is exposed
to acetone or CH2Cl2 vapors or is heated above
75 °C (yellow line, Figure d), indicating that both phases are dynamically related
and that the positions of CHCl3 are not occupied by the
incoming solvents. This behavior suggests the ease of loss of CHCl3 either by displacement with more volatile vapors or by heating
above the boiling point of CHCl3 (61 °C). The vapochromic
luminescent behavior of 1a in CHCl3 and 1a-CHCl-R in acetone
is reversible for at least five cycles without perceivable performance
degradation (Figure S32). Furthermore,
when the red sample 1a-CHCl-R is exposed to air without stimuli, it gradually changes
its color and emissive behavior from red to yellow-orange (more than
2 weeks), indicating that the desolvated 1a species is
recovered. On the other hand, the PXRD peaks of the pale-yellow solid 1a-CHCl-G, obtained
by treatment of 1a with vapors of CHCl3 for
∼30 min (green line, Figure d), show consistency with the major diffraction peaks
simulated from the cif file of crystals of 1a·CHCl (blue line). Finally, the grinding process
of 1a-CHCl-G induces
a considerable decrease in its crystallinity, transforming it into
an amorphous phase.In addition to responding to vapors and
pressure, complex 1a displays reversible color, color
emission, and quantum
efficiency change depending on the crystallization solvents (Figure a). The colors
of the solids obtained by evaporation after the dissolution of 1a in different solvents vary from yellow to red and the emission
ranges from 627 nm (THF) to 689 nm (CH2Cl2)
(Figure b), red-shifted
at 77 K (654 nm, THF to 739 nm, CH2Cl2) (Figure S33 and Table ). With MeOH or EtOH, the shift observed
is ∼25 nm (298 K)/∼70 nm (77 K) and with CHCl3 or CH2Cl2 it reaches up to ∼64 nm (298
K)/∼90 nm (77 K). This discernible behavior can be also observed
in the UV–vis absorption solid spectra. The solids obtained
from alcohols show, in relation to 1a, a red-shifted
LE band up to 550 nm and from chloride solvents up to 630 nm (Figure c and Table S12). The notable red shift of the red
solvates could be mainly ascribed to 1MMLCT transitions
favored by the presence of different aggregates with distinct π···π/Pt···Pt
interactions, which seems to be stronger in chloride solvents. The
emission color changes are accompanied by a dramatic decrease in the
emission brightness from ϕ = 51%, 1a to 14%, 1a(MeOH), typically attributed to aggregation caused quenching.
Interestingly, the formed phases in these solvents are not stable
with time and the initial form 1a (emission and quantum
efficiencies) can be restored on standing ca. 72
h or by stirring the solids in hexane for 1 h. This fact suggests
that crystallization from chloride solvents probably gives rise to
structures with short Pt···Pt distances, which slowly
undergo switching to more stable structures surely with longer Pt···Pt
separations.
Figure 11
(a) Photographs under ambient light, air atmosphere, and
UV light
irradiation (λex = 365 nm) of 1a (solid)
and solids obtained by the evaporation of the appropriate solution
of 1a in different solvents. (b) Normalized emission
spectra. (c) Normalized absorption spectra calculated from their reflectance
spectra in the solid state.
(a) Photographs under ambient light, air atmosphere, and
UV light
irradiation (λex = 365 nm) of 1a (solid)
and solids obtained by the evaporation of the appropriate solution
of 1a in different solvents. (b) Normalized emission
spectra. (c) Normalized absorption spectra calculated from their reflectance
spectra in the solid state.Complex 1b also exhibits remarkable luminescence switching
properties as a result of their self-assembly behavior under application
of different external stimuli. The two pseudopolymorphs, 1b and 1b·0.5Toluene, can be exchanged under vapor/solvent
exposure or heating. Furthermore, a new phase (1b-ground), obtained by mechanical grinding of the monomer-emissive form 1b, is described. The related luminescence images and emission
spectra of the three phases are shown in Figure a,b. The yellow powder 1b (and
also microcrystals of 1b) exhibits a yellow structured
emission at 545 nm (ϕ = 6%), only slight red-shifted at 77 K
(550 nm) and, as expected, with more prolonged lifetime (τav = 1.5 μs, 298 K; 22.6 μs, 77 K) (Figures and S34). Red microcrystals of 1b·0.5Toluene show a broad red emission at 658 nm with a ϕ value of 20%
and a short lifetime (<1 μs) at 298 K, which is red-shifted
at 77 K (706 nm; 9.8 μs) (Table and Figure S35). This emission
is ascribed to 3MMLCT in accordance with the short Pt··Pt
distance (3.362 Å) found in the crystals of 1b·0.5Toluene. After 1b was ground, the resulting amorphous orange-yellow
powder (1b-ground) developed a lesser structured band
at 550 nm upon excitation at 420 nm, and a broad LE band at 660 nm
by exciting to 500 nm (Figure S36), which
are red-shifted at 77 K, indicating the formation of an amorphous
solid with closer Pt units. This solid is not stable and 1b is recovered on standing by 2 h.
Figure 12
(a) Scheme and photographs of the external
stimuli-responsive color
and emission changes in 1b; left: under ambient light
and right: under UV light irradiation (λex 365 nm).
The emission color of 1b changes under treatment with
toluene vapors for 2 h or addition of a drop of toluene (1b·0.5Toluene) and by mechanical grinding to afford 1b-ground. (b)
Normalized excitation (yellow, λem 544 nm; orange,
λem 585 nm; red, λem 660 nm) and
emission spectra of 1b (λex 430 nm), 1b·0.5Toluene (λex 480 nm), and 1b-ground (λex 420 nm) in air. (c) Normalized
absorption spectra calculated from their reflectance spectra in the
solid state. (d) Powder XRD patterns of different forms of 1b.
(a) Scheme and photographs of the external
stimuli-responsive color
and emission changes in 1b; left: under ambient light
and right: under UV light irradiation (λex 365 nm).
The emission color of 1b changes under treatment with
toluene vapors for 2 h or addition of a drop of toluene (1b·0.5Toluene) and by mechanical grinding to afford 1b-ground. (b)
Normalized excitation (yellow, λem 544 nm; orange,
λem 585 nm; red, λem 660 nm) and
emission spectra of 1b (λex 430 nm), 1b·0.5Toluene (λex 480 nm), and 1b-ground (λex 420 nm) in air. (c) Normalized
absorption spectra calculated from their reflectance spectra in the
solid state. (d) Powder XRD patterns of different forms of 1b.When samples of 1b or 1b-ground were
exposed to toluene liquid or vapors (around 2 h), the yellow powder
turned vivid red with red luminescence. The emission spectra displayed
an identical pattern to those of the crystals of 1b·0.5Toluene. The diffuse reflectance spectrum showed a broad band reaching 610
nm, clearly red-shifted in relation to those obtained with samples
of 1b or 1b-ground tail to 550 nm) (Figure c). TGA of 1b·0.5Toluene revealed the phase transition arising from
desorption of the lattice toluene molecules because the TGA curve
of up to ∼170 °C represented a weight loss of ca. 7.8% corresponding to a half molecule per complex, as
the crystal structure of 1b·0.5Toluene (Figure S37). However, on standing in the solid,
the toluene molecules are also lost over time, and after 1 month of
exposure to the air, it showed a gradual change to 1b (Figure S38). Moreover, 1b is recovered by exposition to acetone liquid/vapors or heating over
110 °C, as is reflected in its color change and its diffuse reflectance
spectrum (Figure c).The powder X-ray diffraction pattern of 1b coincides
well with the simulated powder pattern of 1bcrystal (Figure d). Mechanical
force destroys or changes the ordered molecular packing and induces
a crystal-to-amorphous transformation in the PXRD pattern of 1b-ground, forming a much looser packing where more active
molecular motions can occur. A direct crystal-to-crystal phase transition
from 1b to 1b·0.5Toluene was observed
for the PXRD of 1b·0.5Toluene, obtained from 1b under saturated toluene vapor or 1b·0.5Toluenecrystal, as shown in Figure d, which coincides with the simulated PXRD
pattern of 1b·0.5Toluenecrystal. Toluene
fuming can facilitate molecular motions and lead to an arrangement
of molecules to form ordered packing again.Aggregation of PtII compounds embedded in polymeric
matrices can lead to sensory properties, which are not present in
the starting compound. This type of process has been studied in depth
for its use as dyes in the fabrication of smart materials.[16a,27] In this sense, we decided to evaluate the self-assembly behavior
of 1b inside the polymer matrix. Two films of polystyrene
(PS) were obtained after doping them with 1 and 10%, respectively,
of 1b in CH2Cl2. As is shown in Figure a, one drop of
each mixture was deposited in a glass holder followed by slow evaporation
at 298 K (∼5 h). To investigate if the compound 1b inside the polymer exhibits vapochromic response, the two polymer
thin PS films were exposed to vapors of toluene for 20 min, and then
their luminescence was measured. For that, the glass with the thin
film was placed on top of a vial containing toluene, allowing the
vapor to come into contact with the polymer. In the case of the film
doped at 1%, it exhibits the typical yellow emission of the monomer
species (λ 524 nm). It seems that the low doping is not enough
to self-assemble and form aggregates. However, for the higher concentrated
film (10%), the change is notable in the presence of toluene vapor
both in the naked eye and in the microscope (Figure b,c). In the beginning, the polymer film
is a yellow-emitting (λmax 566 nm) translucent sheet
with some imperfect points. Within 3 min of being exposed to the solvent,
orange-red crystalline needles grow inside the matrix from a starting
nucleation point. After 15 min, multiple needles with a width of ∼50
μm have grown alongwith the film, showing a remarkable red shift
of the emission with the aggregation band centered at 675 nm. This
indicates that molecules are self-assembled via intermolecular
π···π and/or Pt···Pt interactions.
The emission of these orange-red needles resembles that of the 1b·0.5Toluene crystals and the pristine solid 1b·0.5Toluene, suggesting that the needles are formed by incorporation of toluene
channels, as in the crystal packing. The needles are stable for more
than 2 months inside the polymer matrix, but after that time, presumably,
the toluene gradually is lost (Figure S39), losing its crystallinity and changing its color and emission to
yellow.
Figure 13
(a) Schematic drawings showing the fabrication of the PS film and
the exposition to toluene vapors. Naked eye images of the PS film
of 1b doped at 10% under room light before and after
the toluene vapors. (b) Microscopy images of the PS film while the
crystals grow by exposure to the solvent for more than 20 min. Images
up to 16 min have a magnification of 40× (numerical aperture
0.95), while the image of 20 min has a magnification of 10× (numerical
aperture 0.45). (c) Emission color changes of 1b in a
film of PS at 10% (line yellow, λex 400 nm) and after
exposition to toluene vapors (line red, λex 500 nm)
at 298 K.
(a) Schematic drawings showing the fabrication of the PS film and
the exposition to toluene vapors. Naked eye images of the PS film
of 1b doped at 10% under room light before and after
the toluene vapors. (b) Microscopy images of the PS film while the
crystals grow by exposure to the solvent for more than 20 min. Images
up to 16 min have a magnification of 40× (numerical aperture
0.95), while the image of 20 min has a magnification of 10× (numerical
aperture 0.45). (c) Emission color changes of 1b in a
film of PS at 10% (line yellow, λex 400 nm) and after
exposition to toluene vapors (line red, λex 500 nm)
at 298 K.The double salt 2a is emissive in the solid state
at 298 and 77 K and 2b only at low temperature. 2a shows a broad band centered at 640 nm (τ = 0.22 μs,
ϕ = 5%), red-shifted to 77 K (717 nm, Δ = 77 nm; τ
= 2.1 μs) and in relation to 2b at 77 K (649 nm)
that can be ascribed to a 3MMLCT in the salt (Figure S40). Crystals of the cationic bis-isocyanide
complex 3a·0.25CHCl displays a monomer green phosphorescence
(λem = 490 nm, ϕ = 15%, τ = 24.8 μs)
at 298 K, more structured at 77 K (Table and Figure S41a). However, 3a-pristine solid shows a bright orange
phosphorescence, with very high efficiency (ϕ = 57%) at 298
K, formed by a minor structured band corresponding to the monomer,
together with a structureless band at 595 nm, red-shifted at 77 K
(617 nm), ascribed to an 3MMLCT emission. 3b-pristine exhibits a broad feature, blue-shifted (λem = 530
nm) in relation to that observed in 3a-pristine and with
a lower quantum yield (ϕ = 10%), which might be attributed to
excimer-like 3ππ* emission (Figure S41b). At 77 K, it exhibits a dual emission with maxima
at 560 and 628 nm, which is tentatively assigned to excimer-like 3ππ* and 3MMLCT, respectively. The solid 3a-pristine showed reversible changes in its color and emission
response to vapors of THF, acetone, and CHCl3 at room temperature
for 6 h. In all cases, there is a change in its color from pale-yellow
to pinkish-orange, reflected in the diffuse reflectance spectra, which
show new bands extending to ∼600 nm in relation to the 3a-pristine (480 nm). In addition, the emission
band is slightly red-shifted from 595 (3a-pristine) to
612 (3a-acetone), 623 (3a-THF), and 627
nm (3a-CHCl) (Figure S42). At 77 K, the solvate species exhibit a different
pattern depending on the excitation wavelength (from 615 to 725 nm),
suggesting the formation of different aggregates at low temperatures
(Figure S43).With the aim of understanding
the observed red shift in the UV–vis
absorption and emission spectra of the aggregated species, the geometries
in the ground (S0) and the first triplet excited (T1) states of the dimer, trimer, and tetramer models were optimized
in the gas phase based on 1a and 1b crystal
structures. Two main intermolecular forces drive the dimer and tetramer
assembly, the π···π and Pt···Pt
intermolecular interactions. The geometries of calculated structures
of [1a], [1a], and [1b] with their Pt···Pt distances and Cα–Pt–Pt–Cα angles and the orbitals
involved in the electronic transitions (HOMO/LUMO) as well as the
spin density plots are plotted in Figures and S44. For 1a, the computed Pt···Pt distance of the lowest-energy
dimer [1a] and trimer [1a] in the S0 is 3.34
and 3.31 Å, respectively, which is in agreement with the data
of X-ray structural analyses. The metallophilic interactions are more
evident in the T1-optimized geometries ([1a] 2.83, [1a] 2.95 Å), being shorter than in the X-ray structure. The
S1 transitions of simulated [1a] and [1a] were
mainly derived of the HOMO → LUMO transitions (>97%, Table S13). The HOMO is located at the Pt atoms
(84% [1a], 86% [1a]), whereas the LUMO is mainly localized
in the dffpy cyclometalated ligand (84% [1a], 82% [1a]),
highlighting the prominent 1MMLCT of the low-energy band,
red-shifted in relation to the monomer (S1 417 [1a], 488 [1a]vs 383 nm 1a, Table ). However, in the tetramer
model [1a], although the Pt···Pt
distances are coherent with the X-ray structure, the energy of the
low-energy transition with stronger oscillator strength (S2 391 nm) does not fit, and thus this tetramer model is not considered.
With respect to the emission, the character of the lowest triplet
excited state changes from 3IL/3MLCT character
in the monomer to a mixed 3MMLCT/3IL in the
dimer and trimer, with a higher 3MMLCT character for these
systems, as is seen in their spin density plots (Figure ). In agreement with the experimental
evidence, the predicted emission maxima are red-shifted in the trimer
in relation to the dimer and the monomer, respectively (762 [1a], 624 [1a]vs 519 nm 1a). The value
of the trimer, 762 nm, can be compared to the emission of the kinetic
red form 1a-CHCl-R (662 nm), whereas the value of the dimer fits better to the orange
emission of unsolvated crystals 1a (625 nm, also pristine
solid).
Figure 14
Optimized geometries of [1a]and [1a] models at the S0 and T1 states. Contour plots of HOMO and LUMO
at the S0 and spin density at the T1-optimized
geometries [B3LYP/6–31G(d,p)].
Table 3
Calculated S1 Vertical
Excitation Energies and Emission Energy Computed in the Gas Phase
(SI)
complex
state
λ (nm)
assignment
ΔE emission (T1–S0 opt) (nm)
1a
S1
383
HOMO → LUMO (98%)
519
[1a]2
S1
417
HOMO → LUMO (98%)
624
[1a]3
S1
488
HOMO → LUMO (98%)
762
1b
S1
430
HOMO → LUMO
(97%)
621
[1b]4
S1
527
HOMO → LUMO (95%)
943
Optimized geometries of [1a]and [1a] models at the S0 and T1 states. Contour plots of HOMO and LUMO
at the S0 and spin density at the T1-optimized
geometries [B3LYP/6–31G(d,p)].For 1b, the optimized geometries of [1b] and [1b] models do not
fit with the experimental X-ray diffraction
structure of 1b·0.5Toluene. [1b] and [1b] show Pt···Pt distances in their S0 of
3.73 and 3.81 Å, respectively, longer than in the 1D chain 1b·0.5Toluene, although shorter in the T1 (2.87 [1b], 2.97 Å [1b]). However, the computed Pt···Pt
distances of the lowest-energy tetramer [1b] are 3.26 and 3.78 Å, with an orientation of the
monomers in perfect agreement with the data of X-ray structural analyses
of 1b·0.5Toluene. As expected, the metallophilic
Pt···Pt distances turn significantly shorter in the
T1-optimized geometry (2.94, 3.03, 3.60 Å). The S1 transition of [1b] is
derived from the HOMO → LUMO transition (95%), the HOMO being
composed mainly of Pt (81%) and the LUMO of the ppy-CHO ligand (88%).
This evidences the red-shifted low-energy absorptions in [1b] (527 nm) with significant MMLCT in relation
to the monomer (S1 430 nm). In relation to the emission,
the predicted emission maxima of 943 nm, arising from the lowest-energy
tetramer [1b]vs 621 nm, obtained for the monomer evidence a high 3MMLCT
contribution for the lowest triplet excites state, as is reflected
in its spin density (Figure S44). These
results confirm that the calculated red-shifted absorption and emission
are induced by a packing arrangement better in dimers and trimers
in 1a and tetramers in 1b, which improves
the intermolecular interactions, leading to an increased MMLCT character.
Conclusions
In summary, we report the synthesis, characterization,
and photophysical
investigations of new phosphorescent tert-butylisoyanide
PtII complexes with difluorophenylpyridine or formyl-functionalized
phenylpyridine cyclometalated (C∧N = dfppy a, ppy-CHO b) ligands: neutral, [Pt(C∧N)Cl(CNBu)] (1), double
salts [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2][Pt(C∧N)Cl2] (2), and cationic [Pt(C∧N)(CNBu)2]ClO4 (3). A comparative
study of the crystal packing of the pseudopolymorphs of 1a (1a, 1a·CHCl), 1b (1b, 1b·0.5Toluene, 1b·0.5PhF), and 3a·0.25 CHCl shows
a great ability to be assembled by intermolecular Pt···Pt
and/or π···π interactions in the solid
state, so generating 1D columnar stackings. The structures with head-to-tail
packing exhibit larger Pt···Pt distances (4.556–6.541
Å) than the structures with a head-to-head disposition (3.362–3.896
Å), which is reflected in a change of the emission from greenish
or yellow to orange/red or red. We discovered that complexes 1a and 1b exhibit multistimuli-responsive properties,
displaying vapochromism, vapoluminescence, solvatochromism, thermochromism,
and mechanochromism in the solid state, which can be attributed to
modulation of Pt···Pt and/or π···π
interactions with distinct color switching from green to red. The
solvates 1a·CHCl, 1b·0.5Toluene, and 1b·0.5PhF contain
channels running parallel to the 1D columns, occupied by the corresponding
solvent, thus rationalizing the vapochromic/vapoluminescent/solvatochromic
response of solvent-free 1a and 1b materials.
The interactions can be established even in a polymer matrix. Thus, 1b undergoes also supramolecular self-assembly via Pt···Pt and/or π···π interactions
into a polystyrene film (PS, 10 wt %) in response to toluene vapors.
Grinding the pristine solids 1a and 1b affects
their molecular packing in the solid state, producing a color emission
change to orange with the loss of crystallinity (PXRD). Theoretical
simulations confirm that Pt···Pt contacts are relevant
in dimer and trimer geometries in 1a and tetramers in 1b, especially in their T1 states, leading to an
increased MMLCT character in the solid-state aggregates.