| Literature DB >> 35775759 |
Pellegrino Crafa1, Francesco Di Mario2, Simone Grillo3, Stefano Landi4, Marilisa Franceschi5, Kryssia Rodriguez-Castro6, Antonio Tursi7, Giovanni Brandimarte8, Lorella Franzoni9.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Chronic Atrophic Gastritis (CAG) is a precancerous condition for gastric cancer (GC) as single risk factor, being a consequence of a previous Helicobacter pylori (Hp) infection or based on autoimmune mechanisms. Achlorhydria plays an important role towards the formation of a class I carcinogen, acetaldehyde, after food intake. L-cysteine has been claimed to be able to bind in a covalent way acetaldehyde when administered at means.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35775759 PMCID: PMC9335434 DOI: 10.23750/abm.v93i3.12812
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Biomed ISSN: 0392-4203
Demographics
| Group 1 | Group 2 | p | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Patients N° | 77 | 50 | ns |
| Male | 24 (31.16%) | 14 (28.00%) | ns |
| Female | 53 (68.83%) | 36 (72.00%) | ns |
| Mean age | 52.7±11.2 ys | 50 ± 11.9 ys | ns |
| Age range | 37-74 ys | 43-79 ys | ns |
| Smoking habit | 14 (18,18%) | 9 (18,00%) | ns |
| Alcohol intake | 19 (24,68%) | 11 (22,00%) | ns |
| Previous H.p. | 47 (61.03%) | 20 (40.00%) | <0.001 |
| Autoimmune gastritits | 30 (38.96%) | 30 (60.00%) | <0.001 |
Group 1 CAG treated by L-cysteine (study group)
Group 2 untreated CAG (control group)
PGI and G17 values in Group 1 and Group 2, lasting one year of follow-up
| Baseline | 3 months* | 6 months** | 12 months*** | p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 | 7.88 μg/L | 11.51 μg/L | 13.73 μg/L | 15.92 μg/L | * <0.05 |
| Group 2 | 6.90 μg/L | 7.20μg/L | 6.80μg/L | 7.10 μg/L | n* ns |
| Group 1 | 30.31 pg/L | 25.46 pg/L | 21.84 pg/L | 19.23 pg/L | * <0.01 |
| Group 2 | 34.52 pg/L | 35.48 pg/L | 35.8 pg/L | 32.15 pg/L | * ns |
*3 months vs baseline values; **6 months vs baseline values; *** 12 months vs baseline values; Group 1 CAG treated by L-cysteine (study group); Group 2 untreated CAG (control group)
Figure 1.Comparison of PGI values between Group 1 and Group 2
Figure 2.Comparison of G17 values between Group 1 and Group 2
Figure 3.PGI values according with OLGA grading
Figure 4.G17 values according with OLGA grading