| Literature DB >> 35775047 |
Beida Ren1,2,3, Ling Tan4, Yuebo Song1, Danxi Li2,3, Bingjie Xue2,3, Xinxing Lai2, Ying Gao1,2.
Abstract
Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) is the most common chronic vascular disease involving the whole brain. Great progress has been made in clinical imaging, pathological mechanism, and treatment of CSVD, but many problems remain. Clarifying the current research dilemmas and future development direction of CSVD can provide new ideas for both basic and clinical research. In this review, the risk factors, biological markers, pathological mechanisms, and the treatment of CSVD will be systematically illustrated to provide the current research status of CSVD. The future development direction of CSVD will be elucidated by summarizing the research difficulties.Entities:
Keywords: biological markers; cerebral small vessel disease; future development direction; neuroimaging; pathological mechanism; research difficulties; treatment
Year: 2022 PMID: 35775047 PMCID: PMC9237477 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.843953
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neurol ISSN: 1664-2295 Impact factor: 4.086
Classification of imaging diagnosis of CSVD.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Traditional imaging | CT/CTA | (1) Differential diagnosis of basal ganglia and cerebral vascular wall calcification; |
| DSA | (1) Showing small arteries including perforating arteries; (2) Blood vessels with a diameter less than 850μm cannot be clearly displayed; (3) Invasive examination; (4) Lonizing radiation. | |
| Currently using | MRI-T1/T2/FLAIR/DWI/GRE/SWI | CSVD is considered when the total score is≥2: (1) Number of vascular-derived lacunas≥1; (2) The number of CMB in the deep or under the tentorium≥1; (3) EPVS (Level 2-4); WMH around the ventricle: Fazekas scale score≥3 points or deep≥2 points. |
| Further development | UHF | (1) Visualization; (2) No contrast agent; |
| rs-fMRI | (1) Judging the network connection between various functionally related brain areas, which is helpful for the early differential diagnosis of CSVD. | |
| TA | (1) Suitable for white matter and brain volume; (2) Predicting onset of dementia; (3) Potential ofmarker | |
| DTI/PSMD/DSEG | (1) DTI: White matter microstructure changes; (2) PSMD: A hopeful surrogate indicator for observing the progress of CSVD; (3) DSEG-θ: An accurate method to assess brain microstructure damage; identifying the risk of dementia inpatients with CSVD; indicating clinical severity; Preclinical markers. | |
| ASL | (1) ASL is highly consistent with the contrast-enhanced MRI display; | |
| PET | (1) Distinguish between vascular and degenerative cognitive impairment. |
Classification of CSVD-related influencing factors.
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|
| Biological markers | Markers of Vascular Endothelial Injury | • CAM1 |
| • VEGF | ||
| • ET-1/NO | ||
| • HH | ||
| Nerve damage markers | • NfL | |
| Inflammatory markers | • CRP | |
| • IL6 | ||
| • LP-PLA2 | ||
| • TNFα | ||
| • FIB | ||
| Oxidative stress markers | • PPAR | |
| • PON | ||
| Blood-brain barrier injury markers | • MMP | |
| Cerebrospinal fluid markers | • CSF albumin-to-serum albumin ratio | |
| Risk factors | Independent risk factors | • CysC |
| • TM | ||
| • C-P | ||
| Important risk factors | • SUA | |
| • LDL | ||
| • TFPI | ||
| • D-D | ||
| • Lp(a) | ||
| • F1+2 | ||
| Other risk factors | • age | |
| • hypertension | ||
| • atherosclerosis | ||
| • diabetes | ||
| Indicators | Important indicator | • alkaline phospholipase |
| • ferritin | ||
| Predicators | • PAI-1 | |
| • 25-dihydroxyvitamin D | ||
| • urinary microprotein creatinine ratio | ||
| Genes | Predisposing genes | • APOEε4 |
Figure 1Synthetic diagram of the mechanism of CSVD.