| Literature DB >> 35774744 |
Yared Andargie1, Woretaw Sisay1, Mulugeta Molla1, Getaye Tessema1.
Abstract
Background: Conventional antidiabetic drugs are linked with a number of contraindications and untoward effects. The root decoction of Solanum incanum L. has traditionally been used to treat diabetes. However, its safety and efficacy have not been scientifically authenticated yet. Hence, the study was conducted in mice to corroborate its antidiabetic potential and safety profile.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35774744 PMCID: PMC9239786 DOI: 10.1155/2022/4454881
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Preliminary phytochemical screening of hydro-methanolic extract of S. incanum L. root extract.
| Phytochemical constituents | Methods used for screening | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Flavonoids | Lead acetate test | Positive |
| Terpenoids | Salkowski's test | Positive |
| Alkaloids | Wagner's test | Positive |
| Phenols | NaOH test | Positive |
| Tannins | Ferric chloride test | Positive |
| Saponins | Foam test | Positive |
| Steroids | Salkowski's test | Positive |
| Glycosides | Glycoside test | Negative |
| Anthraquinones | Borntrager's test | Positive |
Positive: present, Negative: absent.
Total flavonoid, phenolic, and alkaloid contents of Solanum incanum L. root extract.
| Test extract | Flavonoid content (g) | Phenolic content (mg/g) | Alkaloid content (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 0.21 (8.4%) | 74.51 (7.5%) | 0.03 (1.2%) |
Figure 1α-Amylase inhibition (%) as a function of Solanum incanum L. extract and acarbose concentration.
Figure 2Effect of S. incanum L. crude extract on the blood glucose level of oral glucose-loaded mice.
Hypoglycemic activity of hydro-methanolic root extract of Solanum incanum L. in normoglycemic mice.
| Group | Blood glucose level (mg/dl) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | 6 h | |
| DW10 | 123.70 ± 1.18 | 121.88 ± 1.37 | 122.43 ± 0.86 | 123.43 ± 0.69d3 | 122.77 ± 1.00c3d3 |
| SIRE100 | 124.53 ± 1.10 | 122.04 ± 0.91 | 123.65 ± 0.80 | 123.66 ± 0.85d3 | 122.80 ± 0.78c3d3 |
| SIRE200 | 125.12 ± 0.74 | 123.99 ± 0.88 | 123.32 ± 0.66 | 123.64 ± 0.66d3 | 112.16 ± 0.86a3b3d1 |
| SIRE 400 | 124.70 ± 0.65 | 123.50 ± 0.72 | 123.40 ± 0.60 | 112.28 ± 1.04a3b3c3 | 108.24 ± 0.60a3b3c1 |
| GLC5 | 124.66 ± 0.64 | 119.99 ± 0.78 | 108.40 ± 1.00a3b2c2d1 | 100.16 ± 0.99a3b3c3d1 | 95.05 ± 0.87a3b3c3d2 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. a Compared with the negative control,b compared with SIRE 100 mg/kg,c compared with SIRE 200 mg/kg, and d compared with SIRE 400 mg/kg.1P < 0.05,2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001. SIRE = Solanum incanum root extract, DW = distilled water, and GLC = glibenclamide.
Effect of hydro-methanolic extract of the root of Solanum incanum L. in oral glucose-loaded mice.
| Group | Blood glucose level (mg/dl) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 30 min | 60 min | 120 min | |
| DW10 | 126.35 ± 0.74 | 185.17 ± 2.10 | 185.15 ± 2.16c1d3 | 182.53 ± 1.58c2d3 |
| SIRE100 | 127.26 ± 1.24 | 183.00 ± 1.90 | 178.21 ± 2.40d3 | 177.13 ± 1.53d3 |
| SIRE200 | 127.28 ± 1.05 | 184.78 ± 1.46 | 176.34 ± 1.84a1 | 174.77 ± 1.36a2d2 |
| SIRE 400 | 126.13 ± 1.31 | 185.83 ± 0.82 | 172.14 ± 0.80a3 | 165.14 ± 1.39a3b3c2 |
| GLC5 | 127.08 ± 0.80 | 183.72 ± 1.17 | 147.62 ± 1.50a3b3c3d2 | 144.65 ± 1.32a3b3c2d1 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. a Compared with negative control, b compared with SIRE 100 mg/kg, c compared with SIRE 200 mg/kg, and d compared with SIRE 400 mg/kg. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001. SIRE = Solanum incanum root extract, DW = distilled water, and GLC = glibenclamide.
Antihyperglycemic activity of repeated daily doses of Solanum incanum L. root hydro-methanolic extract in STZ-induced diabetic mice.
| Group | Baseline | Fasting blood glucose level (mg/dl) | Percentage (%) reduction | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7th day | 14th day | 7th day | 14th day | ||
| DC | 293.17 ± 1.76n3 | 295.50 ± 0.86n3 | 292.18 ± 1.25n3 | −0.8% | 0.3% |
| SIRE100 | 291.00 ± 0.98n3 | 281.85 ± 0.80n3 | 273.55 ± 1.20a1n3 | 3.1% | 6.0% |
| SIRE200 | 289.12 ± 1.18n3 | 266.82 ± 1.88a2n3 | 253.13 ± 1.10a2n3 | 7.7% | 12.4% |
| SIRE 400 | 290.17 ± 2.80n3 | 251.42 ± 1.20a3n3 | 233.06 ± 1.37a3n3 | 13.3% | 19.7% |
| GLC5 | 287.12 ± 2.02n3 | 201.06 ± 1.34a3n3 | 190.32 ± 1.93a3n3 | 30.0% | 33.7% |
| NC | 123.09 ± 1.74a3 | 121.51 ± 1.92a3 | 124.23 ± 1.41a3 | 1.3% | −0.9% |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. a Compared with negative control, and n compared with normal control. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001. SIRE = Solanum incanum root extract, DC = diabetic control, NC = normal control, and GLC = glibenclamide.
Effect of hydro-methanolic extract of the root of Solanum incanum L. on the body weight of STZ-induced diabetic mice.
| Group | Body weight (g) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Before induction of DM | Baseline | 7th day of treatment | 14th day of treatment | |
| DC | 31.11 ± 0.80 | 27.34 ± 0.93n2 | 26.66 ± 1.03n3 | 25.69 ± 1.10n3 |
| SIRE100 | 30.94 ± 0.85 | 26.78 ± 0.91n2 | 27.79 ± 0.78n2 | 27.91 ± 0.56n2 |
| SIRE200 | 30.84 ± 1.21 | 27.43 ± 1.11n2 | 28.22 ± 0.72n2 | 31.27 ± 0.53a1 |
| SIRE 400 | 33.14 ± 0.83 | 28.14 ± 0.44n2 | 31.62 ± 0.65a2 | 32.59 ± 1.41a2 |
| GLC5 | 33.83 ± 0.63 | 28.45 ± 1.04n2 | 32.34 ± 0.97a3 | 33.23 ± 1.11a3 |
| NC | 31.13 ± 0.58 | 32.21 ± 0.79a2 | 33.50 ± 1.15a3 | 34.37 ± 1.35a3 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. a Compared with the diabetic control, and n compared with the normal control. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001. SIRE = Solanum incanum root extract, DC = diabetic control, NC = normal control, and GLC = glibenclamide.
Effect of hydro-methanolic extract of the root of Solanum incanum L. on serum lipid levels of diabetic mice.
| Group | Serum lipid level (mg/dl) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STC | STG | LDL-c | VLDL-c | HDL-c | |
| DC | 184.74 ± 1.51n3 | 164.32 ± 1.69n3 | 116.99 ± 1.14n3 | 36.59 ± 1.52n3 | 32.90 ± 0.88n3 |
| SIRE100 | 183.16 ± 2.15n3 | 162.12 ± 2.18n3 | 114.20 ± 2.19n3 | 35.03 ± 2.49n3 | 34.11 ± 1.65n3 |
| SIRE200 | 176.10 ± 1.18a1n3 | 154.64 ± 1.46a2n3 | 110.05 ± 0.79a1n3 | 32.14 ± 1.27n3 | 36.14 ± 1.55n3 |
| SIRE 400 | 174.07 ± 0.71a2n3 | 152.92 ± 0.69a3n3 | 107.79 ± 1.01a2n3 | 30.29 ± 1.25n3 | 39.42 ± 0.87a1n3 |
| GLC5 | 172.17 ± 1.12a3n3 | 149.26 ± 1.00a3n3 | 104.27 ± 1.57a3n3 | 27.13 ± 1.52a2n3 | 43.48 ± 1.33a3n3 |
| NC | 100.93 ± 3.01a3 | 99.92 ± 2.34a3 | 57.58 ± 1.86a3 | 12.06 ± 0.79a3 | 57.02 ± 2.26a3 |
Results are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 6) and analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test. a Compared with the diabetic control, and n compared with the normal control. 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, and 3P < 0.001. SIRE = Solanum incanum root extract, DC = diabetic control, NC = normal control, GLC = glibenclamide, STC = serum total cholesterol, STG = serum triglyceride, HDL-c = high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, VLDL-c = very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and LDL-c = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.