| Literature DB >> 35772194 |
Henning H Rise1, Synne Brune2, Claudia Chien3, Tone Berge4, Steffan D Bos2, Magí Andorrà5, Irene Pulido Valdeolivas5, Mona K Beyer6, Piotr Sowa7, Michael Scheel8, Alexander U Brandt9, Susanna Asseyer10, Kaj Blennow11, Mads L Pedersen1, Henrik Zetterberg12, Michel Thiebaut de Schotten13, Maria Cellerino14, Antonio Uccelli15, Friedemann Paul16, Pablo Villoslada5, Hanne F Harbo2, Lars T Westlye17, Einar A Høgestøl18.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Connectivity-based approaches incorporating the distribution and magnitude of the extended brain network aberrations caused by lesions may offer higher sensitivity for axonal damage in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) than conventional lesion characteristics. Using individual brain disconnectome mapping, we tested the longitudinal associations between putative imaging-based brain network aberrations and levels of serum neurofilament light chain (NfL) as a neuroaxonal injury biomarker.Entities:
Keywords: Disconnectome mapping; Longitudinal; Magnetic resonance imaging; Multiple sclerosis; Neurofilament
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35772194 PMCID: PMC9253471 DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.103099
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neuroimage Clin ISSN: 2213-1582 Impact factor: 4.891
Demographic, clinical and biomarker information of the MS cohort.
| Female % | 70.5 | 69.4 |
| Age, mean years ( | 42.9 (9.9, 19–68) | 45.1 (9.8, 21–70) |
| Disease duration, mean years ( | 11.0 (8.2, 0–43) | 13.5 (8.5, 2–46) |
| Follow-up time, mean years ( | 1.97 (0.34, 0.7–3.3) | |
| Age at first symptom, mean years ( | 31.4 (8.9, 7–56) | |
| Barcelona % ( | 18 (59) | 18 (44) |
| Oslo % ( | 30 (95) | 33 (78) |
| Berlin % ( | 22 (70) | 18 (44) |
| Genova % ( | 28 (88) | 31 (76) |
| No treatment % ( | 30 (94) | 26 (61) |
| Effective treatment % ( | 44 (138) | 37 (87) |
| Highly-effective treatment % ( | 26 (79) | 37 (87) |
| CIS % ( | 1.6 (5) | 1.7 (4) |
| RRMS % ( | 81.4 (254) | 78.5 (190) |
| SPMS % ( | 8.0 (25) | 10.3 (25) |
| PPMS % ( | 9.0 (28) | 9.5 (23) |
| EDSS, median ( | 2.0 (1.5–3.5, 0.0–8.0) | 2.0 (1.0–3.5, 0.0–8.0) |
| Δ EDSS improving, % ( | 19 (51) | |
| Δ EDSS stable, % ( | 65 (181) | |
| Δ EDSS worsening, % ( | 16 (43) | |
| T2 lesion volume ml, mean ( | 8.5 (10.9, 0.1–64.5) | 9.6 (11.1, 0.1–57) |
| Δ T2 lesion volume ml, mean (SD, range) | −0.4 (6.5, −52.2–53.7) | |
| Normalized brain volume ml, mean ( | 1507 (90, 1263–1724) | 1453 (70, 1244–1666) |
| Serum neurofilament light levels, mean pg/ml ( | 8.9 (7.0, 2.2–93.2) | 8.7 (5.5, 2.3–45.5) |
CIS = clinically isolated syndrome; EDSS = Expanded Disability Status Scale; IQR = interquartile range; PPMS = primary-progressive multiple sclerosis; RRMS = relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis; SD = standard deviation; SPMS = secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis.
Fig. 1Association between global disconnectome and T2 lesion volume. Global disconnectome is shown as a factor between 0 and 1 for each individual disconnectome map averaged across all white matter voxels represented in the mask. The fit line represents the quadratic regression model based on the association between the global disconnectome factor and corresponding T2 lesion volume across all MS subjects.
Fig. 2Probability distribution heterogeneity of lesions and disconnectome in the MS sample. An overview with representative example slices of the probability distribution of (A) lesion and (B) disconnectome maps, as seen in a large axial slice to the left and smaller coronal and sagittal slices on the top right and lower right, respectively. Masked out in both (A) and (B) are the borders of the resulting global masks and the colour-filled probability maps corresponding to the percentage of subjects with a lesion or disconnectome maps in the depict voxels. The corresponding colour bar is shown at the bottom of the figure. In (C) we depicted five subjects with different levels of GD, with blue colour highlighting the underlying lesion masks, while the red to yellow colour indicates the probability of disconnectivity. The GD value listed states the proportion and severity of white matter voxels affected, where 0.50 equals 50 %.
Robust linear mixed models testing for associations of GD and T2LV with serum NfL, including center as fixed effect term.
| Std. β | Std. β | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (Intercept) | −0.60 | 0.51 | −1.60 – 0.41 | −1.16 | 0.246 | −0.53 | 0.32 | −1.16 – 0.10 | −1.64 | 0.101 |
| Serum NfL | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.01 – 0.05 | 2.84 | 0.005 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 – 0.01 | −0.82 | 0.414 |
| Timepoint | −0.04 | 0.01 | −0.06 – -0.01 | −2.49 | 0.013 | −0.00 | 0.01 | −0.02 – 0.01 | −0.53 | 0.596 |
| Disease duration | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.02 – 0.25 | 2.35 | 0.019 | 0.10 | 0.03 | 0.03 – 0.16 | 2.81 | 0.005 |
| Age | 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.06 – 0.31 | 2.82 | 0.005 | 0.15 | 0.04 | 0.07 – 0.23 | 3.82 | 1.3 |
| Sex [Female] | 0.08 | 0.12 | −0.16 – 0.32 | 0.63 | 0.528 | 0.09 | 0.08 | −0.07 – 0.24 | 1.11 | 0.265 |
| Phenotype [PMS] | 0.62 | 0.49 | −0.34 – 1.59 | 1.26 | 0.208 | 0.16 | 0.31 | −0.44 – 0.77 | 0.53 | 0.600 |
| Phenotype [RRMS] | 0.58 | 0.49 | −0.38 – 1.54 | 1.18 | 0.238 | 0.18 | 0.31 | −0.42 – 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.554 |
| Treatment [Effective] | 0.01 | 0.02 | −0.02 – 0.04 | 0.71 | 0.476 | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.03 – 0.00 | −1.47 | 0.141 |
| Treatment [Highly | 0.01 | 0.01 | −0.02 – 0.04 | 0.61 | 0.539 | 0.00 | 0.01 | −0.01 – 0.02 | 0.10 | 0.922 |
| Center [Oslo] | −0.29 | 0.16 | −0.60 – 0.02 | −1.82 | 0.068 | −0.03 | 0.10 | −0.23 – 0.16 | −0.35 | 0.726 |
| Center [Berlin] | −0.41 | 0.19 | −0.77 – -0.04 | −2.19 | 0.029 | −0.04 | 0.12 | −0.27 – 0.18 | −0.38 | 0.703 |
| Center [Genoa] | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.13 – 0.75 | 2.79 | 0.005 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.28 – 0.67 | 4.80 | 1.6 |
| Serum NfL * Timepoint | −0.01 | 0.01 | −0.03 to −0.00 | −2.21 | 0.027 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 – 0.02 | 1.97 | 0.049 |
| σ2 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||||||
| τ00 | 0.84 ID | 0.33 ID | ||||||||
| ICC | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||||||||
| N | 297 ID | 297 ID | ||||||||
| Observations | 506 | 505 | ||||||||
| Marginal R2 / Conditional R2 | 0.236 / 0.998 | 0.267 / 0.999 | ||||||||
Fig. 3An overview of the distribution of global disconnectome (GD) at baseline across the four centers. As depicted for each individual, patients from Berlin had significantly lower GD (mean = 0.21, SD = 0.17), while patients from Genoa had significantly higher GD (mean = 0.39, SD = 0.16) relative to patients from Barcelona (mean = 0.31, SD = 0.17). GD in patients from Oslo (mean = 0.25, SD = 0.16) did not significantly differ from patients in Barcelona.
Fig. 4Voxel-wise associations between disconnectome maps and serum NfL. Regional effects of serum NfL on brain disconnectome was found in cerebellum and brainstem using FSL randomise with TFCE. Age, sex, disease duration, diagnosis and treatment were included in the model. FWER-corrected t-stat map with threshold at p = 0.05 showing significant voxels in cerebellum and brainstem associated with increased serum NfL.