Literature DB >> 35771631

Genetic variance in human disease - modelling the future of genomic medicine.

Monkol Lek1, Julija Hmeljak2, Kirsty M Hooper2.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35771631      PMCID: PMC9254226          DOI: 10.1242/dmm.049700

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Model Mech        ISSN: 1754-8403            Impact factor:   5.732


× No keyword cloud information.
2021 marked the 20th anniversary of the publication of the draft human reference genome. Since then, many technological advances have been made, and the wealth of human genomic and transcriptomic data has been expanded, deepened and diversified (Lek and Mardis, 2021). 2022 was another landmark year for the genetic research community, with the completion of the entire telomere-to-telomere reference human genome assembly (Church, 2022; Nurk et al., 2022). These developments strive towards a deeper understanding of variation in the human genome that impacts both health and disease, but genomics cannot achieve this alone. We must be conscious of how we interpret these data and integrate them with phenotypes to develop a holistic view of human disease, its causes and consequences, across the global human population. With this in mind, researchers continue to develop advanced analytical tools to assess human genetic variation and a spectrum of model systems to understand its phenotypic consequences in human disease. In this issue of Disease Models & Mechanisms, we launch a new Subject Focus ‘Genetic variance in human disease: decoding diversity to advance modern medicine’, spearheaded by Associate Editor Monkol Lek and Editor-in-Chief Liz Patton. This ongoing series of invited articles reflects on the latest advances in our understanding of genetic variance and genotype–phenotype complexities in disease. New Interview, Perspective and Review articles will discuss model systems and tools, as well as striking examples of how combining human genomic data with experimental systems helps us understand the broad spectrum of disease presentation, assess risk and identify treatment opportunities. As in-depth human genome data expanded, we increased the pool of variants of uncertain (clinical) significance (Richards et al., 2015), which poses an immense challenge for translating genotype to phenotype in the context of human disease. When a novel variant is associated with a disease, it is important to examine the associated phenotype in suitable model systems, whether it be in silico, in vitro or in vivo. Advances in multi-omics and imaging alongside improved integration across model systems allows thorough examination of disease phenotypes and the degree to which genetic variance affects them. Furthermore, rapid screening and in-depth phenotyping of potential disease-causing variants in organisms such as Drosophila (Wall et al., 2021), zebrafish (Isiaku et al., 2021), Caenorhabditis elegans (Lange et al., 2021) and yeast (Young et al., 2020) facilitate mechanistic discovery and translation. For instance, humanised yeast can be used to rapidly assess vast numbers of variants within a single gene to predict pathogenicity (Kachroo et al., 2022). Similar screens can also be achieved in cell lines or in silico to support computational variant effect predictors (Livesey and Marsh, 2022). Furthermore, expansive biobanks and improved access to electronic health records can augment phenotyping efforts with valuable human data (Schalkamp et al., 2022; Lek, 2022). To effectively translate this wide range of genotypic and phenotypic data, investigators need the support of sophisticated analysis tools, integrated databases and centralised reagent-sharing networks (Bellen, 2022). In rare and ultra-rare disease, low numbers of patients can make it difficult to pinpoint a genetic diagnosis and even harder to develop effective treatments. A solution to this urgent issue is enhancing global collaboration and data sharing, enabled via platforms such as the Matchmaker Exchange (Philippakis et al., 2015), helping both to solve the diagnostic odyssey for rare disease patients and to advance treatments (Kropp et al., 2021; Lek, 2022). By contrast, some disease-associated variants can be very common, such as the alcohol flushing syndrome-associated ALDH2 variant. This single variant has been linked to a multitude of phenotypes, yet there is still more to explore beyond its alcohol-related effects (Chen et al., 2022). Whether a variant is rare or common, accurately and thoroughly assessing the phenotype remains a challenge, but with collaborative efforts, researchers can begin to connect the dots. Another area of difficulty is the exploration of diseases with complex genetic aetiology. Advances in computational models that assess polygenic risk scores are necessary to carefully evaluate disease susceptibility (Lewis et al., 2021). Hand in hand with genetic variation analyses, heterogeneity in aetiology and phenotype can be untangled by deep phenotyping in patient cohorts. Computational analysis of rich clinical datasets can improve risk prediction, diagnosis, prognosis and treatment for many complex diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (Schalkamp et al., 2022). This, however, is another aspect of human disease research where expanding data in diverse populations is imperative. We need to understand the effect of both benign and pathogenic variants to truly decipher the genetics of disease, but to address this properly and effectively, this needs to be done across global populations (Lek and Mardis, 2021; Lek, 2022). As modern medicine heavily relies on genetics, we must ensure that these advances will benefit everyone (Olopade, 2021; Raghavan, 2022). DMM's new Subject Focus ‘Genetic variance in human disease: decoding diversity to advance modern medicine’ will continue to highlight how researchers are fine-tuning genotypic and phenotypic data to infer disease biology, risk and therapy. Technological advances have proven vital to build rich datasets, but studies also need to consider genetic variation between populations to mitigate health disparities. As modern medicine embraces genomics, global collaborations and knowledge sharing should be a priority. By curating an ongoing series of invited articles that examine these nuanced and complex issues, we hope to support the community in building an inclusive future for translational genomic medicine.
  19 in total

1.  A next-generation human genome sequence.

Authors:  Deanna M Church
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  How inclusive are cell lines in preclinical engineered cancer models?

Authors:  Shreya Raghavan
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 5.732

3.  The complete sequence of a human genome.

Authors:  Sergey Nurk; Sergey Koren; Arang Rhie; Mikko Rautiainen; Andrey V Bzikadze; Alla Mikheenko; Mitchell R Vollger; Nicolas Altemose; Lev Uralsky; Ariel Gershman; Sergey Aganezov; Savannah J Hoyt; Mark Diekhans; Glennis A Logsdon; Michael Alonge; Stylianos E Antonarakis; Matthew Borchers; Gerard G Bouffard; Shelise Y Brooks; Gina V Caldas; Nae-Chyun Chen; Haoyu Cheng; Chen-Shan Chin; William Chow; Leonardo G de Lima; Philip C Dishuck; Richard Durbin; Tatiana Dvorkina; Ian T Fiddes; Giulio Formenti; Robert S Fulton; Arkarachai Fungtammasan; Erik Garrison; Patrick G S Grady; Tina A Graves-Lindsay; Ira M Hall; Nancy F Hansen; Gabrielle A Hartley; Marina Haukness; Kerstin Howe; Michael W Hunkapiller; Chirag Jain; Miten Jain; Erich D Jarvis; Peter Kerpedjiev; Melanie Kirsche; Mikhail Kolmogorov; Jonas Korlach; Milinn Kremitzki; Heng Li; Valerie V Maduro; Tobias Marschall; Ann M McCartney; Jennifer McDaniel; Danny E Miller; James C Mullikin; Eugene W Myers; Nathan D Olson; Benedict Paten; Paul Peluso; Pavel A Pevzner; David Porubsky; Tamara Potapova; Evgeny I Rogaev; Jeffrey A Rosenfeld; Steven L Salzberg; Valerie A Schneider; Fritz J Sedlazeck; Kishwar Shafin; Colin J Shew; Alaina Shumate; Ying Sims; Arian F A Smit; Daniela C Soto; Ivan Sović; Jessica M Storer; Aaron Streets; Beth A Sullivan; Françoise Thibaud-Nissen; James Torrance; Justin Wagner; Brian P Walenz; Aaron Wenger; Jonathan M D Wood; Chunlin Xiao; Stephanie M Yan; Alice C Young; Samantha Zarate; Urvashi Surti; Rajiv C McCoy; Megan Y Dennis; Ivan A Alexandrov; Jennifer L Gerton; Rachel J O'Neill; Winston Timp; Justin M Zook; Michael C Schatz; Evan E Eichler; Karen H Miga; Adam M Phillippy
Journal:  Science       Date:  2022-03-31       Impact factor: 63.714

4.  Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.

Authors:  Sue Richards; Nazneen Aziz; Sherri Bale; David Bick; Soma Das; Julie Gastier-Foster; Wayne W Grody; Madhuri Hegde; Elaine Lyon; Elaine Spector; Karl Voelkerding; Heidi L Rehm
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 8.822

5.  Interpreting the pathogenicity of Joubert syndrome missense variants in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Karen I Lange; Sofia Tsiropoulou; Katarzyna Kucharska; Oliver E Blacque
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.758

6.  Envisioning the next human genome reference.

Authors:  Monkol Lek; Elaine R Mardis
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-12-22       Impact factor: 5.758

7.  ALDH2 variance in disease and populations.

Authors:  Che-Hong Chen; Benjamin R Kraemer; Daria Mochly-Rosen
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 5.732

Review 8.  Polygenic risk scores in the clinic: Translating risk into action.

Authors:  Anna C F Lewis; Robert C Green; Jason L Vassy
Journal:  HGG Adv       Date:  2021-07-28

9.  Transient, flexible gene editing in zebrafish neutrophils and macrophages for determination of cell-autonomous functions.

Authors:  Abdulsalam I Isiaku; Zuobing Zhang; Vahid Pazhakh; Harriet R Manley; Ella R Thompson; Lucy C Fox; Satwica Yerneni; Piers Blombery; Graham J Lieschke
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-07-23       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 10.  Caenorhabditis elegans for rare disease modeling and drug discovery: strategies and strengths.

Authors:  Peter A Kropp; Rosemary Bauer; Isabella Zafra; Carina Graham; Andy Golden
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2021-08-09       Impact factor: 5.758

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.