| Literature DB >> 35771331 |
Zhenping Tang1,2, Yu Zhang3, Shasha Xiao3, Yuanyuan Gao2, Yi Duan1,3, Boyang Liu3, Cong Xiong3, Zhengqing Yang3, Yueyue Wu4, Shuai Zhou5,6,7.
Abstract
Accumulation of toxic organic has posed a substantial pressure on the proliferation of bacterial resistance. While aromatic organics have been demonstrated to enhance the antibiotic resistance in bacteria, no information is yet available on the effects of non-aromatic organics on the variations of bacterial resistance. Here, we investigated the effects of a typical ketone (i.e., methylisobutanone (MIBK)) on the variations of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli (E. coli). The results showed that the growth of resistant E. coli under environmental concentration of 50 μg/L MIBK was firstly inhibited as explained by the transient disruption in the cell membrane and then recovered possibly due to the reactive oxygen species. Exposure to 50 μg/L MIBK gradually raised the abundance of representative resistance gene (ampR) in E. coli. In contrast, the high concentration of 50 mg/L MIBK continuously inhibited the growth of resistant E. coli by disrupting cell membrane and notably promoted the proliferation of ampR through enhancing the horizontal transformation and up-regulating the expression of efflux pump gene. These findings provided the first evidence for the evolution of bacterial resistance in response to ketone organics.Entities:
Keywords: Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs); Escherichia coli; Ketone; Methylisobutanone (MIBK); Transformation
Year: 2022 PMID: 35771331 PMCID: PMC9245865 DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21600-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Sci Pollut Res Int ISSN: 0944-1344 Impact factor: 5.190
Fig. 1.Effects of MIBK on the variations of resistance phenotype (a), living cells ratio (b), and ROS concentration (c) in E. coli. The column and line diagram in section (a) indicate the resistant E. coli concentration and fold change, respectively. The fold change (log10) lower than 0 denotes inhibition, and the value higher than 0 means promotion.
Fig. 2.TEM of E. coli under MIBK stress at 24 h. a Control group, b 50 μg/L MIBK, and c 50 mg/L MIBK.
Fig. 3.Changes in abundance of ampR exposed to different concentrations of MIBK. The column and line diagram indicate the abundance of ampR and its fold change, respectively.
Fig. 4.Effects of MIBK on the expression profiles of acrA.
Fig. 5.Transformation frequency of pUC118 in E. coli under MIBK exposure.
Fig. 6.Effects of 100 mg/L MIBK on the resistant E. coli (a) and ampR (b).
Fig. 7.Schematic of underlying mechanisms involved in MIBK affecting the antibiotic resistance in E. coli. (i) Inducing ROS generation, (ii) causing damage to cell structure, (iii) stimulating the expression of acrA, and (iv) promoting transformation.