Sebastian Rademacher1, Timm Denecke2, Thomas Berg3, Daniel Seehofer4. 1. Klinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. 2. Klinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland. 3. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland. 4. Klinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. daniel.seehofer@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In addition to conditioning measures in liver surgery, perioperative anti-tumor therapy is becoming increasingly more important in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature review on the status of multimodal and in particular neoadjuvant therapy for CCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature overview of the current scientific original and review articles. RESULTS: Resection and rarely also liver transplantation are still the only curative treatment approaches for CCA in the non-distant metastatic stage; however, long-term results, e.g. in node positive tumors, are still unsatisfactory. Adjuvant chemotherapy is now standard but cannot be used in many patients. Neoadjuvant concepts include chemotherapy and local and locoregional procedures, such as radioembolization. Both are increasingly used in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) but rarely in perihilar CCA. Initial data show that this is very effective in iCCA to achieve secondary operability in primarily inoperable cases. In addition, based on the current literature, neoadjuvant therapy also seems justified in operable intrahepatic CCA with a high risk of recurrence (e.g. lymph node metastases). CONCLUSION: There is a high potential for the use of multimodal therapy in CCA, which could further increase in the near future as a result of new therapeutic agents. Due to the lack of evidence clear recommendations cannot be given; however, it is becoming apparent that neoadjuvant therapy is gaining importance in iCCA and is already increasingly used as part of individual concepts in patients with a high risk of recurrence.
BACKGROUND: In addition to conditioning measures in liver surgery, perioperative anti-tumor therapy is becoming increasingly more important in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA). OBJECTIVE: Systematic literature review on the status of multimodal and in particular neoadjuvant therapy for CCA. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Literature overview of the current scientific original and review articles. RESULTS: Resection and rarely also liver transplantation are still the only curative treatment approaches for CCA in the non-distant metastatic stage; however, long-term results, e.g. in node positive tumors, are still unsatisfactory. Adjuvant chemotherapy is now standard but cannot be used in many patients. Neoadjuvant concepts include chemotherapy and local and locoregional procedures, such as radioembolization. Both are increasingly used in intrahepatic CCA (iCCA) but rarely in perihilar CCA. Initial data show that this is very effective in iCCA to achieve secondary operability in primarily inoperable cases. In addition, based on the current literature, neoadjuvant therapy also seems justified in operable intrahepatic CCA with a high risk of recurrence (e.g. lymph node metastases). CONCLUSION: There is a high potential for the use of multimodal therapy in CCA, which could further increase in the near future as a result of new therapeutic agents. Due to the lack of evidence clear recommendations cannot be given; however, it is becoming apparent that neoadjuvant therapy is gaining importance in iCCA and is already increasingly used as part of individual concepts in patients with a high risk of recurrence.
Authors: Meredith C Mason; Nader N Massarweh; Ching-Wei D Tzeng; Yi-Ju Chiang; Yun Shin Chun; Thomas A Aloia; Milind Javle; Jean-Nicolas Vauthey; Hop S Tran Cao Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2021-02-14 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: M Bitzer; S Voesch; J Albert; P Bartenstein; W Bechstein; S Blödt; T Brunner; F Dombrowski; M Evert; M Follmann; C La Fougère; P Freudenberger; A Geier; E Gkika; M Götz; E Hammes; T Helmberger; R T Hoffmann; W P Hofmann; P Huppert; A Kautz; G Knötgen; J Körber; D Krug; F Lammert; H Lang; T Langer; P Lenz; A Mahnken; A Meining; O Micke; S Nadalin; H P Nguyen; J Ockenga; K Oldhafer; P Paprottka; K Paradies; P Pereira; T Persigehl; M Plauth; R Plentz; J Pohl; J Riemer; P Reimer; J Ringwald; U Ritterbusch; E Roeb; B Schellhaas; P Schirmacher; I Schmid; A Schuler; D von Schweinitz; D Seehofer; M Sinn; A Stein; A Stengel; N Steubesand; C Stoll; A Tannapfel; A Taubert; J Trojan; I van Thiel; R Tholen; A Vogel; T Vogl; H Vorwerk; F Wacker; O Waidmann; H Wedemeyer; H Wege; D Wildner; C Wittekind; M A Wörns; P Galle; N Malek Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2022-02-11 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Ammar Sarwar; Aamir Ali; Damir Ljuboja; Jeffrey L Weinstein; Anuradha S Shenoy-Bhangle; Imad A Nasser; Matthew K Morrow; Salomao Faintuch; Michael P Curry; Andrea J Bullock; Muneeb Ahmed Journal: J Vasc Interv Radiol Date: 2021-08-25 Impact factor: 3.464
Authors: B Le Roy; M Gelli; G Pittau; M-A Allard; B Pereira; B Serji; E Vibert; D Castaing; R Adam; D Cherqui; A Sa Cunha Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2017-08-31 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: Adam C Sheka; Ariella Altman; Schelomo Marmor; Jane Y C Hui; Jason W Denbo; Jacob S Ankeny; Eric H Jensen Journal: Surg Oncol Date: 2020-06-30 Impact factor: 3.279
Authors: Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Kota Sahara; Lu Wu; Dimitrios Moris; Fabio Bagante; Alfredo Guglielmi; Luca Aldrighetti; Matthew Weiss; Todd W Bauer; Sorin Alexandrescu; George A Poultsides; Shishir K Maithel; Hugo P Marques; Guillaume Martel; Carlo Pulitano; Feng Shen; Olivier Soubrane; B Groot Koerkamp; Amika Moro; Kazunari Sasaki; Federico Aucejo; Xu-Feng Zhang; Ryusei Matsuyama; Itaru Endo; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 14.766