| Literature DB >> 35769984 |
Zhulan Nie1,2,3,4, Yongli Ren1,2,3, Lirong Zhang2,3,4, Rui Ge2,3,4, Jie Wei1,2,3,4.
Abstract
To protect the germplasm resources of Schizothorax biddulphi, we developed and used 20 pairs of polymorphic microsatellite primers to analyze the genetic diversity and structure of populations. A total of 126 samples were collected from the Qarqan River (CEC), Kizil River (KZL), and Aksu River (AKS) in Xinjiang, China. The results showed that 380 alleles were detected in 20 pairs of primers and the average number of alleles was 19.0. The effective allele numbers and Nei's gene diversity ranged from 1.1499 to 1.1630 and 0.0962 to 0.1136, respectively. The Shannon index range suggested low levels of genetic diversity in all populations. The genetic distance between the CEC and AKS populations was the largest, and the genetic similarity was the smallest. There was a significant genetic differentiation between CEC and the other two populations. The UPGMA clustering tree was constructed based on population genetic distance, and the clustering tree constructed by individuals showed that the AKS population and KZL population were clustered together, and the CEC population was clustered separately. Also, the group structure analysis also got the same result. It can be seen that although the three populations of S. biddulphi do not have high genetic diversity, the differentiation between the populations was high and the gene flow was limited, especially the differentiation between the CEC population and the other two populations. This study not only provided genetic markers for the research of S. biddulphi but the results of this study also suggested the need for enhanced management of S. biddulphi populations.Entities:
Keywords: Schizothorax biddulphi; genetic diversity; genetic structure; genome survey; microsatellite
Year: 2022 PMID: 35769984 PMCID: PMC9234283 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2022.908367
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Genet ISSN: 1664-8021 Impact factor: 4.772
FIGURE 1Population sampling sites of Schizothorax biddulphi. ★: each sampling point.
20 microsatellite locus characteristics of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| Locus | Primer sequence (5′-3′) | Repeat motif | Tm (°C) | Product size (bp) | Accession |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T43 | F:TGTATGAAAGCACAATGGG | (TG)5(TA)6 | 48.0 | 164–191 | MT211579 |
| R:GTGTAGTTTTTAGCGGCA | |||||
| T90 | F:TTATGATTTTCTTTCGTC | (TA)12 | 49.0 | 339–349 | MT211580 |
| R:TCAACATTCTCTCTTTTT | |||||
| T136 | F:GCTCTTGCTTTCTCTGGG | (AC)11 | 50.8 | 316–358 | MT211581 |
| R:GATTTCTCGTGCTGTCATT | |||||
| T144 | F:TGAGGTTTGGTGTCTGTG | (ATGG)7 | 56.6 | 91–154 | MT211582 |
| R:ATCCATCTGTCCGTCTGT | |||||
| T166 | F:GGTGTCATCTGTTTTGTGG | (GT)5 | 50.8 | 217–262 | MT211583 |
| R:CTGTATCCCTGGTTAGCG | |||||
| T175 | F:GTATTCCTGTATCTCACCTG | (TG)6 | 48.0 | 239–322 | MT211584 |
| R:TCTCATCCTCTTTCGTTC | |||||
| T218 | F:TGCTGGCAGAGAATGAATGT | (ACT)11 | 53.5 | 341–405 | MT211585 |
| R:TTGGTTGATGTCAGAGGTTG | |||||
| T227 | F:CTTTTTGTTGCTGAGGTGTT | (CTA)16 | 49.0 | 272–372 | MT211586 |
| R:TACTGTGAGGGATTTGTCGT | |||||
| T229 | F:GTAAAACCAACAGCACAGCC | (CA)22 | 48.0 | 220–314 | MT211587 |
| R:GGGACAAGGGGAAAAAACTA | |||||
| T230 | F:TTTCATCCTTCTGCCACCAC | (AC)16 | 48.0 | 276–318 | MT211588 |
| R:ATCCGCTAATCATAAACACC | |||||
| T231 | F:TATTACAAAACGAATGGAGG | (AC)25 | 56.6 | 311–392 | MT211589 |
| R:AAGAAACAAAGGTAGATCAA | |||||
| T239 | F:AAAGAAGGAAGAAAAGCAGC | (TC)20 | 49.0 | 197–254 | MT211590 |
| R:GGGGAAGGAAAAAAAGTGAC | |||||
| T246 | F:GTATCTGGTCCATCTGCTCC | (GA)15 | 56.6 | 220–240 | MT211591 |
| R:TCTGTCATGTTCTTTTGCTTT | |||||
| T255 | F:CCTGAACAAATAAAACACCA | (TG)20 | 48.0 | 257–285 | MT211592 |
| R:ACTCAAGGATAGACAAAACAT | |||||
| T259 | F:TGGGTTTTAGTATTTTTGTC | (TA)20 | 48.0 | 351–372 | MT211593 |
| R:ACTTTTTCTGTCTCGTTTCA | |||||
| T260 | F:CTTTCAAACAGACAAGAGGA | (GA)22 | 48.0 | 218–258 | MT211594 |
| R:AAACAGTTCAAGATGTAAATAAT | |||||
| T269 | F:CAAACAAACCTCTACCCTCC | (CT)19 | 53.5 | 160–341 | MT211595 |
| R:AAACAGTTCAAGATGTAAATAAT | |||||
| T272 | F:TATGTTATTGATGTGTTGATT | (AATG)14 | 56.6 | 253–301 | MT211596 |
| R:GTGCACCCTTTAGTTGTTAG | |||||
| T277 | F:AATGCTTTCCTTTCTCAGCT | (ATCT)15 | 48.0 | 281–380 | MT211597 |
| R:GTCCCTATTTTTTGTGGTTC | |||||
| T278 | F:AGCATCTTCTCATACATTTT | (ATCT)23 | 48.0 | 188–285 | MT211598 |
| R:GTGTCTTTATTTCTTGTCATT |
FIGURE 219 K-mer analysis for estimating the genome size of Schizothorax biddulphi.
Distribution characteristics of SSR motifs in the genome of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| Repeat type | SSR count | Percent | Base type | Main repeat motif | Density of SSR (per/Mb) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mono-nucleotide | 290,331 | 39.07 | 4 | A/T,C/G | 204.99 |
| Di-nucleotide | 317,627 | 42.74 | 12 | AC/TG,CA/GT,TA/AT,TC/AG,GA/CT | 133.01 |
| Tri-nucleotide | 67,536 | 9.09 | 59 | AAT/TTA,ATT/TA, ATA/TAT,AAC/TTG | 39.37 |
| Tetra-nucleotide | 59,001 | 7.94 | 7.94 | TCTA/AGAT, GATA/CTAT, AGAC/TCTG | 18.36 |
| Penta-nucleotide | 6,862 | 0.92 | 582 | TATTA/ATAAT, AAAAT/TTTTA | 3.64 |
| Hexa-nucleotide | 1,761 | 0.24 | 418 | GTGTGA/CACACT, ATATAC/TATATG | 0.51 |
| Total | 743,118 | 100 | 1290 | — | 399.88 |
20 microsatellite locus genetic variation of S. biddulphi.
| Locus |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T43 | 7 | 1.5802 | 0.3425 | 0.5137 |
| T90 | 7 | 1.3942 | 0.2281 | 0.3508 |
| T136 | 11 | 1.2636 | 0.1788 | 0.2994 |
| T144 | 17 | 1.1913 | 0.1324 | 0.2322 |
| T166 | 5 | 1.5804 | 0.3449 | 0.5188 |
| T175 | 8 | 1.5004 | 0.2901 | 0.4441 |
| T218 | 11 | 1.1471 | 0.117 | 0.2181 |
| T227 | 25 | 1.1217 | 0.0925 | 0.1754 |
| T229 | 21 | 1.1549 | 0.1155 | 0.2111 |
| T230 | 8 | 1.2647 | 0.1646 | 0.2685 |
| T231 | 39 | 1.0946 | 0.0789 | 0.1593 |
| T239 | 26 | 1.1727 | 0.1246 | 0.2243 |
| T246 | 11 | 1.3715 | 0.2221 | 0.3488 |
| T255 | 12 | 1.1983 | 0.1428 | 0.2522 |
| T259 | 17 | 1.1857 | 0.1356 | 0.2437 |
| T260 | 24 | 1.2362 | 0.1641 | 0.2801 |
| T269 | 56 | 1.0595 | 0.054 | 0.1206 |
| T272 | 17 | 1.2659 | 0.1784 | 0.2966 |
| T277 | 34 | 1.1066 | 0.0919 | 0.1838 |
| T278 | 24 | 1.1449 | 0.1081 | 0.2046 |
Genetic diversity parameters of the six populations of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| Population | Polymorphic |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Percentage | ||||
| CEC | 61.32 | 1.1615 | 0.1136 | 0.1936 |
| KZL | 66.84 | 1.1630 | 0.1084 | 0.1841 |
| AKS | 35.53 | 1.1499 | 0.0962 | 0.1529 |
Gene flow N m (above diagonal) and F st values for pairwise comparison (blow diagonal) among the three populations of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| CEC | KZL | AKS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEC | — | 0.897 | 0.866 |
| KZL | 0.218** | — | 2.086 |
| AKS | 0.224** | 0.107 | — |
** p< 0.001.
Nei’s genetic distance D (above diagonal) and genetic identity (blow diagonal) among the three populations of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| CEC | KZL | AKS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| CEC | — | 0.038 | 0.044 |
| KZL | 0.962 | — | 0.021 |
| AKS | 0.957 | 0.980 | — |
FIGURE 3UPGMA clustering tree of 126 samples of Schizothorax biddulphi. I: all individuals of the Aksu and Kyzyl rivers; II: all individuals of the Qarqan River.
FIGURE 4UPGMA clustering tree of 3 populations of Schizothorax biddulphi.
Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) in three populations of Schizothorax biddulphi.
| Source of variation |
| Sum of squares | Variance components | Percentage of variation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among populations | 2 | 408.829 | 5.282 | 20 |
| Within populations | 123 | 2524.794 | 21.217 | 80 |
| Total | 125 | 2933.623 | 26.499 | 100 |
FIGURE 5Model choice criterion lnP (D) of the structure analysis for each K value (A); K = 2, structure analysis in all three Schizothorax biddulphi populations (B), CEC (green), and other two populations (red).
Proportion of ancestry of each population in three gene pools defined with the model-based clustering method.
|
| AKS | CEC | KZL |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gene bank 1 | 0.9415 | 0.0067 | 0.9909 |
| Gene bank 2 | 0.0585 | 0.9933 | 0.0091 |