Literature DB >> 35769686

Compassion Fatigue Among Practicing and Future Psychiatrists: A National Perspective.

Ahmad H Almadani1, Shuliweeh Alenezi1, Maha S Algazlan1, Ebraheem S Alrabiah1.   

Abstract

Compassion fatigue is a set of emotions and behaviors that occur as a result of assisting a person who is suffering. Compassion fatigue, burnout, and low compassion satisfaction are all hazards that professional caregivers encounter. However, in comparison to non-medical workers, psychiatrists were found to have higher levels of compassion fatigue. We conducted a cross-sectional study that targeted all psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees enlisted in Saudi Arabia at the only registering body, the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS). The SCFHS approved and sent an online survey consisting of a three-section questionnaire concerning sociodemographic, personal, and professional information and the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL 5). Compassion fatigue was found at an average level in 43.2% of participants, while 56.3% had a low level. An average level of burnout was found in 65.9% of participants, while 34.1% had a low level of burnout. Of all participants, 38.9% had an elevated level of compassion satisfaction. Participants who were diagnosed with psychiatric illness showed higher burnout scores (p<0.001). Divorced or separated participants had a higher compassion satisfaction score compared with single participants. A history of psychological trauma was associated with a higher compassion fatigue score (p=0.002). These findings supported the notion of trauma as a specific risk factor for compassion fatigue. They also attested to the huge burden among psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees as part of the nature of this profession. We advise developing systematic and proactive tools to screen for trauma and to support practicing and future psychiatrists, especially those at risk of compassion fatigue.
Copyright © 2022, Almadani et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  burnout; compassion fatigue; professional quality of life; psychiatric trainees; psychiatrists

Year:  2022        PMID: 35769686      PMCID: PMC9233942          DOI: 10.7759/cureus.25417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cureus        ISSN: 2168-8184


Introduction

Compassion fatigue (CF) is the set of emotions and behaviors that result from helping or desiring to help a suffering person. It is also an occupational hazard associated with severe emotional distress in clinical work [1]. As health care professionals are normally aware of patients’ suffering or delayed recovery, their sense of compassion toward their patients may lead to CF [2]. CF is described as a cost of caring, and it leads to desensitization to patients’ suffering and ineffective care in the form of misjudgment, clinical errors, and poor treatment planning [1-3]. In addition to “compassion fatigue,” numerous terms have been used to describe states resulting from continuous exposure to highly stressful circumstances in a professional context, such as “burnout” (BO) [4] and “secondary traumatic stress” (STS) [1]. These concepts are closely related, describing the negative impact on the quality of one’s professional life [5,6]. The definitions suffer from vagueness, however, as the terms “secondary stress” and “compassion fatigue” are often interchangeable in the literature [1,7,8]. Moreover, although CF has previously been defined as a form of burnout [9], recent literature has shown that CF, BO, and STS refer to related but distinct concepts [6]. BO is the physical, emotional, and mental exhaustion that results from prolonged work-related stress [4]. CF, in contrast, is characteristic of health care professionals; it may result from a single exposure to a traumatized patient [9]. Interestingly, CF can develop suddenly, and sufferers recover faster than those suffering from burnout [1]. However, CF and BO are linked to depersonalization, a state in which one experiences feelings of being estranged, detached, or disconnected from one’s own self [10], and to suboptimal standards of patient care [9]. CF was found to be related to decreased levels of productivity, increased sick leave, and increased likelihood of leaving the profession [11-13]. Health workers with CF suffer intrusive thoughts and feelings of distress or autonomic reactivity to reminders of the traumatic experience of the patient; numbness and avoidance; and exhaustion and fatigue [1,9,14]. Several risk factors might be responsible for the development of CF: having a personal history of traumatic events, encountering patients who have experienced trauma, absence of a support system, lack of experience, lack of balance between work and personal life, and lack of self-awareness [15,16]. However, adequate social support, personal and occupational development, and self-awareness have been shown to protect against CF [1,7,9,11,15,17-20]. Professional caregivers may be at risk of developing CF, BO, and low compassion satisfaction (CS), which is defined by the sense of pleasure experienced in helping others and the extent of support obtained from colleagues [21,22]. Psychiatrists were found to have higher levels of CF than non-medical workers, including psychologists and social workers [23,24]. Several studies have explored the prevalence of CS, BO, and STS in multiple domains and the related risk and protective factors. Multiple studies suggest that CF, which consists of STS and BO [25], is highly prevalent among health workers across different settings [21,23,26-32]. At a local level, studies exploring CF have only focused on the nurse population. In a study conducted in 2018 in Mecca, Saudi Arabia, it was concluded that a moderate risk of CF and CS was present during the special work assignment during the Hajj pilgrimage season among 542 nurses from large metropolitan hospitals. A positive correlation was found between the number of working days and CF and a negative relationship between the number of working days and CS. An association was reported between the level of competence (novice to expert) and CS and levels of BO. The results also demonstrated that CF is correlated with age, gender, education, nationality, years of experience, and competency [31]. Another study in Saudi Arabia carried out among 321 nurses in critical care in four public hospitals in 2019 examined the association between demographic variables and CF (as determined by levels of BO and CS), coping strategies, and resilience. It concluded that there are correlations between the personal characteristics of critical care nurses and levels of CF, CS, and resilience to the impact of CF [32]. Psychiatrists were reported to be at high risk of developing CF [23,24]. The characteristics of people attracted to the helping professions are the same factors that put them at risk of developing vicarious trauma and job BO [30]. To date, no research has examined CF among psychiatrists or psychiatric trainees in Saudi Arabia. The objective of our study is to examine the prevalence and predictive factors of CF in psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees in Saudi Arabia with the aim of devising a future management strategy.

Materials and methods

Sample and setting A cross-sectional survey was conducted across Saudi Arabia from September to November 2021. The convenience sampling method included all psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees registered on the Saudi Commission for Health Specialties (SCFHS) registry (the only registering body in Saudi Arabia). In September 2021, there were 793 physicians registered under psychiatry: 438 fully certified independent psychiatrists (consultants), 355 board-certified/eligible, and 236 psychiatric trainees (206 residents and 30 fellows). Instruments This study used two instruments to collect the data: a self-designed questionnaire to collect sociodemographic, work-related, and personal clinical history information, and the Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL 5) to assess compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. The sociodemographic questionnaire The questionnaire consisted of three-component forms to collect: (1) demographic information about age, gender, nationality, marital status, children, the region in Saudi Arabia where the participant currently works, and if residing away from their hometown; (2) personal clinical history, including chronic medical or psychiatric illnesses and personal history of trauma; (3) professional characteristics to assess work-related demographics, including duration of experience, current position, involvement in managerial work or teaching, and satisfaction with financial income. The Professional Quality of Life Scale The Professional Quality of Life Scale (ProQOL) Compassion Satisfaction and Fatigue Version 5 assessed CS and CF [25]. It is a 30-item self-report tool that measures the experiences of helping others and has been in use since 1995. The ProQOL assesses both the positive and negative effects of caregiving. CS represents the positive effects, and the negative effects are seen as CF. CF is subdivided into two subscales: BO and STS. Items are evaluated on a 5-point Likert scale (from 1 = never to 5 = very often). Each subscale has a total score that can be classified as low, moderate, or high. Individual ranges are shown on each subscale, and scores beyond the limits of the range may indicate a possible risk [25]. Through psychometric testing, the ProQOL has demonstrated adequate reliability and validity [33,34]. The ProQOL is one of the most popular tools to measure CF in the literature [35]. Procedure and data collection Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at King Saud University, College of Medicine, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (protocol code 21/0483, July 11, 2021). A web link to the survey was sent to all the psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees in Saudi Arabia. The nature and purpose of the study, the primary investigator’s contact information, and an explanation of the confidentiality and data anonymity policy were provided. Consent to participate was obtained by clicking on the informed-consent link. After reading the informed-consent statement, the participants clicked on “Agree” to access the study’s survey. The survey took approximately five minutes to complete. An invitation to participate in the self-administered online survey was sent via email by the SCFHS to the participants’ registered emails between the months of September and November. The online survey link was also sent to participants through WhatsApp (a messaging social media application). Analysis Descriptive statistics are presented using mean and standard deviation for numerical variables, while numbers and percentages are used for the categorical variables. One-way ANOVA and independent samples t-test were used to compare CF, burnout, and STS levels across different participants’ groups. Multiple linear regression was used to study the variables associated with each subscale while controlling for other variables. IBM SPSS 26 for Windows software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) [36] was used for the analysis, and a p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Sample characteristics and response rate The response rate was reported to be 28.9% of the targeted sample. Of the 328 participants who filled in the survey, 99 surveys were excluded because of incomplete data, which would have affected the validity and representativeness of the sample if included. A total of 229 participants were included in this study. 63.8% of the participants were male in the whole sample, and 36.2% were females. Of the participants, 58.1% had children, while 41.9% did not have children. 74.7% of the participants were Saudi, while 25.3% were non-Saudis. Other sociodemographic characteristics are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Characteristics of participants (N = 229).

  N %
Age Younger than 30 70 30.6
30–40 86 37.6
41–50 45 19.7
Older than 50 28 12.2
Gender Male 146 63.8
Female 83 36.2
Nationality Saudi 171 74.7
Non-Saudi 58 25.3
Marital status Single 73 31.9
Married 144 62.9
Divorced or separated 12 5.2
Have Children No 96 41.9
Yes 133 58.1
Region where currently work/train Central region 97 42.4
Western region 52 22.7
Eastern region 34 14.8
Northern region 13 5.7
Southern region 33 14.4
Residing away from hometown No 127 55.5
Yes 102 44.5
Has chronic medical illness No 178 77.7
Yes 51 22.3
Has psychiatric illness No 188 82.1
Yes 41 17.9
History of psychological trauma No 170 74.2
Yes 59 25.8
Position R1-R2 (junior level of training) 54 23.6
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 40 17.5
Board-certified/eligible 60 26.2
Consultants 75 32.8
Duration of experience Less than 3 months 16 7.0
3 months to 5 years 94 41.0
6 years to 10 years 33 14.4
11 years to 20 years 59 25.8
More than 20 years 27 11.8
Involved in managerial/administrative work No 130 56.8
Yes 99 43.2
Involved in teaching No 122 53.3
Yes 107 46.7
Satisfied with financial income No 65 28.4
Yes 164 71.6
Reliability of measures Cronbach’s alpha was used to test the reliability of each subscale (CF, BO, and STS). All subscales had acceptable levels of Cronbach’s alpha (Table 2).
Table 2

Reliability and summary of each sub-scale.

  No of Items Mean SD Cronbach’s Alpha
Compassion Satisfaction 10 39.06 5.72 0.87
Burnout 10 23.41 4.76 0.66
Secondary Traumatic Stress 10 22.09 6.02 0.83
Levels of compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress Compassion satisfaction showed high levels in 38.9% of participants; however, 59.8% had an average level and only 1.3% had a low level. None of the participants reported a high level of burnout, while 65.9% had an average level of burnout and 34.1% had a low level of burnout. Only one participant had a high level of secondary traumatic stress, while 43.2% had an average level of secondary traumatic stress and 56.3% had a low level (Table 3).
Table 3

Prevalence of different levels of Compassion Satisfaction, Burnout, and Secondary Traumatic Stress.

  N %
Compassion Satisfaction Low (22 or less) 3 1.3
Average (Between 23 and 41) 137 59.8
High (42 or more) 89 38.9
Burnout Low (22 or less) 78 34.1
Average (Between 23 and 41) 151 65.9
High (42 or more) 0 0.0
Secondary Traumatic Stress Low (22 or less) 129 56.3
Average (Between 23 and 41) 99 43.2
High (42 or more) 1 0.4
Factors associated with compassion satisfaction To understand the relationship and the association between the different factors and the compassion satisfaction, we used independent samples t-test or one-way ANOVA, and post hoc testing was done using the Bonferroni adjustment (Table 4). The factors that showed a statistically significant association were marital status and having a history of psychiatric illness. Those who were divorced or separated had a higher compassion satisfaction score than those who were single. Not surprisingly, participants diagnosed with psychiatric illness showed a lower compassion satisfaction score than those who were not. Multiple linear regression was used to assess those variables further (Table 5). Those who were divorced or separated showed a higher compassion satisfaction score compared to those who were single by an average of 6.27 (95% CI: 2.31, 10.23), p-value = 0.002. Additionally, those diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses showed a lower compassion satisfaction score than those not diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses by an average of −3.79 (95% CI: −6.09, -1.50), p-value = 0.001.
Table 4

Factors associated with compassion satisfaction.

  N Mean SD p-Value
Age Younger than 30 70 38.73 5.69 0.199
30–40 86 38.56 5.96
41–50 45 39.24 4.93
Older than 50 28 41.14 6.02
Gender Male 146 39.23 5.51 0.564
Female 83 38.77 6.10
Nationality Saudi 171 38.98 5.86 0.702
Non-Saudi 58 39.31 5.33
Marital status Single 73 37.66 6.23 0.012
Married 144 39.47 5.40
Divorced or separated 12 42.75 3.84
Have Children No 96 38.40 5.99 0.135
Yes 133 39.54 5.49
Region where you currently work or train Central region 97 38.86 5.29 0.813
Western region 52 39.15 6.13
Eastern region 34 38.76 7.16
Northern region 13 38.31 4.48
Southern region 33 40.12 5.21
Residing away from home town No 127 38.51 5.67 0.105
Yes 102 39.75 5.74
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses No 178 38.93 5.57 0.508
Yes 51 39.53 6.24
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses No 188 39.60 5.14 0.018
Yes 41 36.61 7.45
History of psychological trauma No 170 39.01 5.40 0.823
Yes 59 39.22 6.60
Position R1-R2 (junior level of training) 54 38.48 5.94 0.350
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 40 38.63 6.46
Board-certified/eligible 60 38.65 4.96
Consultants 75 40.04 5.70
Duration of experience Less than 3 months 16 39.44 6.429 0.233
3 months to 5 years 94 38.27 6.119
6 years to 10 years 33 39.73 4.404
11 years to 20 years 59 38.95 5.158
More than 20 years 27 41.04 6.236
Involved in managerial/administrative work No 130 39.06 5.81 0.999
Yes 99 39.06 5.63
Involved in teaching No 122 38.79 5.91 0.440
Yes 107 39.37 5.51
Satisfied with financial income No 65 38.26 4.56 0.133
Yes 164 39.38 6.10
Table 5

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Compassion Satisfaction.

* Ref = Reference category.

  Compassion Satisfaction
Coefficient p-Value [95% Confidence Interval]
Age        
Younger than 30 Ref *      
30–40 −1.57 0.216 −4.07 0.93
41–50 −1.34 0.456 −4.88 2.20
Older than 50 −0.43 0.865 −5.45 4.59
Gender        
Male Ref *      
Female −0.26 0.768 −1.97 1.46
Nationality        
Saudi Ref *      
Non-Saudi −1.80 0.122 −4.09 0.49
Marital status        
Single Ref *      
Married 1.82 0.254 −1.32 4.96
Divorced or separated 6.27 0.002 2.31 10.23
Have Children        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.93 0.52 −3.79 1.92
Region in Saudi        
Central Ref*      
Western region 0.37 0.709 −1.60 2.35
Eastern region −0.18 0.878 −2.53 2.16
Northern region −1.09 0.522 −4.45 2.27
Southern region 1.66 0.175 −0.74 4.07
Residing away from hometown        
No Ref *      
Yes 1.79 0.034 0.13 3.44
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.23 0.826 −1.81 2.27
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes −3.79 0.001 −6.09 −1.50
Personal history of psychological trauma        
No Ref *      
Yes 1.47 0.164 −0.60 3.54
Position Ref *      
R1-R2 (junior level of training)        
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 0.26 0.849 −2.43 2.95
(Board-certified awaiting independent license) 0.78 0.629 −2.39 3.95
Consultants (independent license) 1.53 0.437 −2.34 5.40
Duration of experience        
Less than 3 months Ref *      
3 months to 5 years −1.05 0.532 −4.38 2.27
6 years to 10 years 1.19 0.586 −3.12 5.50
11 years to 20 years −0.09 0.97 −4.64 4.47
More than 20 years 0.74 0.81 −5.33 6.81
Involved in managerial (or administrative) work        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.56 0.561 −2.44 1.33
Involved in teaching        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.32 0.75 −2.32 1.67
Satisfied with financial income        
No Ref *      
Yes 1.10 0.214 −0.64 2.85

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Compassion Satisfaction.

* Ref = Reference category. Factors associated with burnout Using the same factors and statistical methods for CS, we examined the association between those factors and burnout (Table 6). Factors that showed statistically significant association were age, gender, satisfaction with financial income, and having a history of psychiatric illness (for the same findings in a multiple linear regression model, see Table 7). Those in the age group 30-40 had higher burnout scores compared to those older than 50. Interestingly, females had a higher burnout score compared to males. Furthermore, participants diagnosed with psychiatric illness showed higher burnout scores than those who were not. Those who were not satisfied with their financial income had higher burnout scores compared to those who were satisfied.
Table 6

Factors associated with burnout.

  N Mean SD p-Value
Age Younger than 30 70 23.59 4.29 0.021
30–40 86 24.06 4.73
41–50 45 23.36 4.69
Older than 50 28 21.04 5.54
Gender Male 146 22.86 4.70 0.020
Female 83 24.37 4.73
Nationality Saudi 171 23.51 4.66 0.576
Non-Saudi 58 23.10 5.07
Marital status Single 73 24.12 4.47 0.287
Married 144 23.04 4.88
Divorced or separated 12 23.42 4.85
Have Children No 96 23.98 4.32 0.122
Yes 133 22.99 5.03
Region in Saudi Arabia where you currently work or train Central region 97 23.26 4.36 0.959
Western region 52 23.19 4.92
Eastern region 34 23.82 5.10
Northern region 13 23.38 4.48
Southern region 33 23.76 5.56
Residing away from hometown No 127 23.35 4.93 0.833
Yes 102 23.48 4.55
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses No 178 23.42 4.47 0.937
Yes 51 23.35 5.70
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses No 188 22.88 4.55 <0.001
Yes 41 25.80 5.03
History of psychological trauma No 170 23.21 4.54 0.295
Yes 59 23.97 5.33
Position R1-R2 (junior level of training) 54.00 23.48 4.10 0.200
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 40.00 24.58 5.01
Board-certified/eligible 60.00 23.57 4.39
Consultants 75.00 22.60 5.26
Duration of experience Less than 3 months 16 23.00 4.274 0.062
3 months to 5 years 94 23.96 4.529
6 years to 10 years 33 23.06 4.847
11 years to 20 years 59 23.92 4.481
More than 20 years 27 21.04 5.754
Involved in administrative work No 130 23.38 4.58 0.916
Yes 99 23.44 5.01
Involved in teaching No 122 23.67 4.24 0.374
Yes 107 23.10 5.29
Satisfied with financial income No 65 24.54 4.50 0.023
Yes 164 22.96 4.80
Table 7

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Burnout.

* Ref = Reference category.

  Burnout
Coefficient p-Value [95% Confidence Interval]
Age        
Younger than 30 Ref *      
30–40 0.6 0.575 −1.51 2.7
41–50 −0.16 0.917 −3.14 2.82
Older than 50 −0.71 0.741 −4.93 3.52
Gender        
Male Ref *      
Female 1.22 0.096 −0.22 2.66
Nationality        
Saudi Ref *      
Non-Saudi 1 0.306 −0.92 2.93
Marital status        
Single Ref *      
Married −0.04 0.975 −2.68 2.6
Divorced or separated −1.64 0.332 −4.97 1.69
Have Children        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.29 0.811 −2.7 2.11
Region in Saudi        
Central Ref *      
Western region −0.22 0.798 −1.88 1.45
Eastern region 0.45 0.653 −1.52 2.42
Northern region 0.16 0.912 −2.67 2.99
Southern region 0.31 0.766 −1.72 2.33
Residing away from hometown        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.08 0.907 −1.31 1.48
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.6 0.489 −1.11 2.32
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes 2.64 0.008 0.71 4.57
Personal history of psychological trauma        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.45 0.611 −2.2 1.29
Position Ref *      
R1-R2 (junior level of training)        
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 0.82 0.474 −1.44 3.09
(Board-certified awaiting independent license) −0.43 0.753 −3.09 2.24
Consultants (independent license) −0.61 0.713 −3.86 2.65
Duration of experience        
Less than 3 months Ref *      
3 months to 5 years 1.33 0.349 −1.47 4.13
6 years to 10 years 0.75 0.683 −2.88 4.38
11 years to 20 years 1.92 0.325 −1.91 5.75
More than 20 years −0.13 0.959 −5.24 4.98
Involved in managerial (or administrative) work        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.79 0.324 −0.79 2.38
Involved in teaching        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.48 0.574 −2.16 1.2
Satisfied with financial income        
No Ref *      
Yes −1.18 0.116 −2.65 0.29

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Burnout.

* Ref = Reference category. Factors associated with secondary traumatic stress We also assessed the factors associated with secondary traumatic stress (Table 8). Nationality, a history of psychiatric illness, and a personal history of psychological trauma all exhibited statistically significant associations. In comparison to Saudi participants, non-Saudi participants had a higher secondary traumatic stress score. In comparison to those who were not diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, those who were showed a higher secondary traumatic stress score. Participants who had experienced psychological trauma in the past scored higher on secondary traumatic stress than those who had not (Table 9).
Table 8

Factors associated with Secondary Traumatic Stress.

Age Younger than 30
30–40
41–50
Older than 50
Gender Male
Female
Nationality Saudi
Non-Saudi
Marital status Single
Married
Divorced or separated
Have Children No
Yes
Region in Saudi Arabia where you currently work or train Central region
Western region
Eastern region
Northern region
Southern region
Residing away from hometown No
Yes
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses No
Yes
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses No
yes
History of psychological trauma No
Yes
Position R1-R2 (junior level of training)
R3-R4 (senior level of training)
Board-certified/eligible
Consultants
Duration of experience Less than 3 months
3 months to 5 years
6 years to 10 years
11 years to 20 years
More than 20 years
Involved in administrative work No
Yes
Involved in teaching No
Yes
Satisfied with financial income No
Yes
Table 9

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Secondary Traumatic Stress.

* Ref = Reference category.

  Secondary Traumatic Stress (Compassion Fatigue)
Coefficient p-Value [95% Confidence Interval]
Age        
Younger than 30 Ref *      
30–40 −1.21 0.372 −3.87 1.45
41–50 −1.12 0.559 −4.89 2.65
Older than 50 −2.28 0.401 −7.63 3.07
Gender        
Male Ref *      
Female 1.29 0.164 −0.53 3.12
Nationality        
Saudi Ref *      
Non-Saudi 2.51 0.044 0.07 4.95
Marital status        
Single Ref *      
Married 1.72 0.312 −1.62 5.06
Divorced or separated 2.02 0.345 −2.19 6.24
Have Children        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.86 0.578 −3.9 2.18
Region in Saudi        
Central Ref *      
Western region 0.32 0.765 −1.78 2.42
Eastern region 0.76 0.549 −1.74 3.25
Northern region 0.88 0.628 −2.7 4.46
Southern region 1.87 0.152 −0.69 4.44
Residing away from hometown        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.27 0.76 −2.04 1.49
Diagnosed with chronic medical illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.87 0.433 −1.31 3.04
Diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses        
No Ref *      
Yes 1.31 0.291 −1.13 3.75
Personal history of psychological trauma        
No Ref *      
Yes 2.34 0.038 0.13 4.54
Position        
R1-R2 (junior level of training) Ref*      
R3-R4 (senior level of training) 1.22 0.402 −1.64 4.08
(Board-certified awaiting independent license) −0.54 0.751 −3.92 2.83
Consultants (independent license) −0.78 0.708 −4.9 3.33
Duration of experience        
Less than 3 months Ref *      
3 months to 5 years −0.13 0.943 −3.67 3.41
6 years to 10 years 2.33 0.317 −2.26 6.92
11 years to 20 years 2.62 0.288 −2.23 7.46
More than 20 years 1.73 0.598 −4.73 8.2
Involved in managerial (or administrative) work        
No Ref *      
Yes 0.44 0.668 −1.57 2.44
Involved in teaching        
No Ref *      
Yes −1.2 0.268 −3.32 0.93
Satisfied with financial income        
No Ref *      
Yes −0.44 0.643 −2.3 1.42

Multiple linear regression for the factors associated with Secondary Traumatic Stress.

* Ref = Reference category.

Discussion

This is the first study to report on CF and associated factors in psychiatrists and future psychiatrists in Saudi Arabia. The main goal of CF research is to maintain healthier care providers who can apply the principles of resiliency and quickly recover to high-functioning behaviors, both at work and outside of work, after being exposed to a patient’s or client’s traumatic event. Although percentages of CF were not high in this report, which was very reassuring, our findings still supported the notion of secondary traumatic stress being closely associated with high levels of burnout [37]. In our study, 99 (43.2%) of the participants experienced an average level of CF, while 129 (56.3%) had a low level of CF. CF in our study was found to be much lower than levels of CF found in other studies [21,23,26,27]. However, our finding was consistent with a study on cardiac physicians in a culturally related country, Pakistan [38]. We found that female psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees were more prone to score higher on the burnout domain scores than males, which agreed with a study conducted among family practitioners in Israel [21]. The reverse was found among nurses, where burnout rates were lower in females than in males [39], which was explained by culturally dictated gender roles [32]. In addition, younger physicians showed higher burnout scores than those older than 50 years. This finding was similar to studies done in Pakistan [38] and the UK [23]. It can be attributed to less professional experience, subsequent increased work-related stress [26], and lack of experience in coping with work-related stress [38]. Another alternative explanation may be the huge workload in the earlier years of the profession. Moreover, satisfaction with financial income was significantly associated with lower burnout scores. Regarding having children, this could not be identified as a protective factor against BO in our study, which disagreed with a study by Haik among burn-unit clinicians that found that having children decreases the risk of developing BO and CF and justified children as a source of emotional support and distraction from work-related stress [26]. Compassion satisfaction was significantly correlated with marital status, as divorced or separated participants showed a higher compassion satisfaction than those who were single, which was inconsistent with the results of a study in Israel suggesting that divorced participants are at greater risk of developing CF than single participants [26]. This finding appeared surprising. However, it may be seen as compensation for a perceived failure in one aspect of life. Further research is needed to explore it. Interestingly, doctors who reside away from home scored higher on the compassion satisfaction score, which has never been assessed in relation to compassion satisfaction in other studies, to our knowledge. More research is needed to ascertain the impact of residing away from home on compassion satisfaction and compassion fatigue. Consistent with the study in the UK [23] and Dallas, US [28], a personal history of psychological trauma was found to be a significant risk factor for the development of CF. Research has suggested that therapists with a previous history of trauma are vulnerable to the trauma stories of others [40]. No correlation between personal trauma and BO was found in our study, unlike the finding in a study in Israel [21]. In contrast to a study in the US [29], we found no association between the female gender and CF. Notably, in the three domains of CF, BO, and CS, diagnosis of psychiatric illness was significant and were found to have higher levels of BO and CF and lower levels of CS. Surprisingly, the position of psychiatrist and psychiatric trainee (including his/her level in residency) and duration of experience showed no significant association with any of the domains mentioned above. This contradicted the findings of a study among nurses that showed a negative relationship between years of experience and CF [31]. Furthermore, holding managerial positions and being teaching residents had no impact on CS, which was inconsistent with the study in Israel [21] that linked both of them with higher CS. Limitations and future directions Despite representing a fair response rate, our sample population was limited as it focused only on psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees. The cross-sectional nature of our study limited our ability to assess the prevalence of compassion fatigue longitudinally. A large-scale study of compassion fatigue among other mental health professionals such as psychologists and social workers could further understand the phenomena of compassion fatigue. Moreover, a qualitative approach could help explore psychiatrists' and psychiatric trainees’ perceptions of compassion fatigue and study protective measures to be utilized by doctors and hospitals if consistent reports of low CF were present.

Conclusions

Our findings supported the notion of trauma as a specific risk factor for compassion fatigue. We also found that burnout was more common in female psychiatrists and psychiatric trainees than in males. Psychiatrists who were divorced or separated had more compassion satisfaction than those who were single. Additionally, a personal history of psychological trauma was a considerable risk factor for compassion fatigue development. We suggest the Saudi Medical Association develop systematic and proactive tools to screen for trauma and support practicing and future psychiatrists at risk of compassion fatigue.
  23 in total

1.  Compassion fatigue: how much can I give?

Authors:  Peter Huggard
Journal:  Med Educ       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.251

Review 2.  Depersonalisation disorder: a contemporary overview.

Authors:  Daphne Simeon
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Compassion fatigue in pediatric palliative care providers.

Authors:  Mary T Rourke
Journal:  Pediatr Clin North Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.278

4.  Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, and burnout in a national sample of trauma treatment therapists.

Authors:  C D Craig; G Sprang
Journal:  Anxiety Stress Coping       Date:  2010-05

Review 5.  Compassion fatigue: A meta-narrative review of the healthcare literature.

Authors:  Shane Sinclair; Shelley Raffin-Bouchal; Lorraine Venturato; Jane Mijovic-Kondejewski; Lorraine Smith-MacDonald
Journal:  Int J Nurs Stud       Date:  2017-01-12       Impact factor: 5.837

6.  Compassion Fatigue in Surgical Trainees.

Authors:  Natashia M Seemann; Paul J Karanicolas; Matthew P Guttman; Avery B Nathens; Homer C Tien; Janet Ellis; Ari Zaretsky; Lesley Gotlib Conn
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2019-04-09       Impact factor: 2.891

7.  Compassion satisfaction, compassion fatigue, anxiety, depression and stress in registered nurses in Australia: phase 2 results.

Authors:  Vicki Drury; Mark Craigie; Karen Francis; Samar Aoun; Desley G Hegney
Journal:  J Nurs Manag       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Compassion fatigue and secondary traumatization: provider self care on intensive care units for children.

Authors:  Patrick Meadors; Angela Lamson
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2008 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.812

9.  Psychiatric caregiver stress: clinical implications of compassion fatigue.

Authors:  Francesco Franza; Gianfranco Del Buono; Ferdinando Pellegrino
Journal:  Psychiatr Danub       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.063

10.  Compassion satisfaction, burnout, and secondary traumatic stress in UK therapists who work with adult trauma clients.

Authors:  Ekundayo A Sodeke-Gregson; Sue Holttum; Jo Billings
Journal:  Eur J Psychotraumatol       Date:  2013-12-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.