Literature DB >> 35768738

Timing is everything: outcomes of 30,259 delayed cholecystectomies in New York State.

Nina Devas1, Andrew Guenthart2, Gareth Morris-Stiff3, Aurora Pryor1, Lizhou Nie4, Isha Joshi1, Jie Yang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timing of cholecystectomy in relation to outcomes has been debated. To our knowledge, there are no large population-based studies looking at outcomes and complications of delayed cholecystectomy [DC] (> 72 h after presentation). This study utilizes a statewide database to determine whether there are differences in patient outcomes for DC performed at 3-4 days, 5-6 days, and ≥ 7 days after presentation.
METHODS: The New York SPARCS database was used to identify adult patients presenting with a diagnosis of acute cholecystitis from 2005 to 2017. Patients aged < 18, those with missing identifier or procedure-date information, those who underwent early cholecystectomy < 72 h or upon readmission, were excluded. Patients undergoing DC at 3-4 days, 5-6 days, and ≥ 7 days were compared in terms of overall complications, hospital length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmissions/emergency department (ED) visits, and 30-day mortality.
RESULTS: 30,259 patients were identified. DCs were performed within 3-4 days (n = 19,845, 65.6%), 5-6 days (n = 6432, 21.3%), and ≥ 7 days (n = 3982, 13.2%). There was a stepwise deterioration in outcomes with increased delay to surgery (Fig. 1). When comparing 3-4 and ≥ 7 days, overall complications (OR = 0.418, 95% CI: 0.387-0.452), 30-day readmissions (OR = 0.609, 95% CI: 0.549-0.674), 30-day ED visits (OR = 0.697, 95% CI: 0.637-0.763), 30-day mortality (OR = 0.601, 95% CI: 0.400-0.904), and LOS (OR = 0.729, 95% CI: 0.710-0.748) were lower in the 3-4 day cohort.
CONCLUSIONS: DC within 3-4 days is associated with fewer complications, readmissions and ED visits, and reduced LOS compared to DC at 5-6 or ≥ 7 days after presentation. In addition, 30-day mortality was also significantly different comparing 3-4 with ≥ 7-day cohorts. These data are important for guiding patients in the consent process and may point to choosing an earlier interval cholecystectomy for high-risk patients.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute cholecystitis; Bile duct injury; Cholecystectomy; Cholecystitis; Delayed cholecystectomy; ED visit; Hospitalization; Length of stay; Mortality; New York; Outcomes; Readmission; SPARCS database

Year:  2022        PMID: 35768738     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09251-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  2 in total

1.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in treatment of acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  M Rajcok; V Bak; L Danihel; M Kukucka; M Schnorrer
Journal:  Bratisl Lek Listy       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.278

2.  Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer.

Authors:  Laura M Stinton; Eldon A Shaffer
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2012-04-17       Impact factor: 4.519

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.