| Literature DB >> 35768700 |
Caglar Eker1, Ozgur Tarkan2, Ozgur Surmelioglu2, Muhammed Dagkiran2, Ilda Tanrisever2, Sevinc Puren Yucel Karakaya3, Burak Ulas4, Elvan Onan2, Aysun Hatice Uguz5, Suleyman Ozdemir2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Our aim was to analyze the patients with diabetic rhino-orbital-cerebral mucormycosis that we have treated in our clinic in the last 5 years, and to reveal the altering conditions with COVID-19.Entities:
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic; COVID-19-associated mucormycosis; Orbital exenteration; Rhino-orbital–cerebral mucormycosis
Year: 2022 PMID: 35768700 PMCID: PMC9244150 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-022-07526-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ISSN: 0937-4477 Impact factor: 3.236
Comparison of demographical and clinical characteristics in COVID-19 associated and non-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis patients
| Non-CAM ( | CAM ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Age(years) | 49.5 (33.0–88.0) | 61.0 (15.0–77.0) | 0.831 |
| Gender, | > 0.999 | ||
| Male | 12 (50.0) | 8 (53.3) | |
| Female | 12 (50.0) | 7 (46.7) | |
| Facial/soft issue involvement, | 13 (54.2) | 9 (60.0) | 0.980 |
| Palate involvement, | 11 (45.8) | 7 (46.7) | > 0.999 |
| Orbital involvement, | 9 (37.5) | 14 (93.3) | 0.002 |
| Intracranial involvement, | 9 (37.5) | 9 (60.0) | 0.298 |
| Cavernous sinus involvement, | 13 (54.2) | 14 (93.3) | 0.013 |
| Nasal cavity involvement, | 0.658 | ||
| Unilateral | 21 (87.5) | 12 (80.0) | |
| Bilateral | 3 (12.5) | 3 (20.0) | |
| PPF involvement, | 10 (41.7) | 15 (100.0) | 0.001 |
| ITF involvement, | 9 (37.5) | 11 (73.3) | 0.064 |
| Mortality, | 10 (41.7) | 5 (33.3) | 0.855 |
| Laboratory markers | |||
| HbA1c% | 10.3 ± 2.8 | 10.9 ± 1.8 | 0.393 |
| WBC (cells × 109L) | 13.8 ± 8.1 | 14.1 ± 5.3 | 0.890 |
| CRP (mg/dL) | 15.5 (0.0–199.0) | 137.0 (26.9–335.0) | < 0.001 |
Unless otherwise specified data was expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median(min–max)
CAM COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, non-CAM non-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, PPF pterygopalatine fossa, ITF infratemporal fossa, WBC white blood cell count, CRP C-reactive protein
Fig. 1Mortality rates in patients with involvement according to non-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (Non-CAM) and COVID-19 associated mucormycosis (CAM) groups. The number of patients is different in each involvement and the mortality rate of each involvement is given for the relevant study group
Comparison of the mortality rates according to study groups in patients with involvement
| Non-CAM | CAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Facial soft tissue involvement ( | 9 (69.2) | 3 (33.3) | 0.192 |
| Palate involvement ( | 2 (18.2) | 2 (28.6) | > 0.999 |
| Orbital involvement ( | 6 (66.7) | 5 (35.7) | 0.214 |
| Intracranial involvement ( | 8 (88.9) | 2 (22.2) | 0.015 |
| Cavernous sinus involvement ( | 10 (76.9) | 4 (28.6) | 0.033 |
| Nasal cavity involvement (bilateral) ( | 2 (66.7) | 3 (100.0) | > 0.999 |
| PPF involvement ( | 7 (70.0) | 5 (33.3) | 0.111 |
| ITF involvement ( | 7 (77.8) | 4 (36.4) | 0.092 |
Data were expressed as n (%)
Non-CAM non-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, CAM COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, PPF pterygopalatine fossa, ITF infratemporal fossa
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves for the 39 patients with DM who were classified into two groups according to the post-COVID-19 status. Cum Survival cumulative survival, OS overall survival, CAM COVID-19 associated mucormycosis, Non-CAM non-COVID-19 associated mucormycosis,