| Literature DB >> 35768443 |
Chiara Mameli1,2, Carla Carnovale3, Federico Ambrogi4,5, Gabriele Infante4,6, Paulina Roux Biejat3, Alessandra Napoli3, Marco Coazzoli3, Valeria Calcaterra7,8, Laura Schneider7, Chiara Perazzi7, Gianvincenzo Zuccotti7,3, Emilio Clementi3,9, Claudia Moscheni3, Cristiana Perrotta3.
Abstract
The level of secretory acid sphingomyelinase (S-ASM), a key enzyme in the sphingolipid metabolism, is elevated in a variety of human diseases, including in the serum of obese adults. Alterations in S-ASM were also found to induce morphological changes in erythrocytes. Consequently, the inhibition of S-ASM by functional Inhibitors of ASM (FIASMA) may have broad clinical implications. The purpose of this study was to assess S-ASM activity in pediatric patients with obesity and healthy matched controls, as well as to investigate the erythrocyte morphology using transmission electron microscopy. We recruited 46 obese patients (mean age 11 ± 2.9 years) and 44 controls (mean age 10.8 ± 2.9 years). S-ASM activity was significantly higher (Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value: 0.004) in obese patients (mean 396.4 ± 49.7 pmol/ml/h) than in controls (mean 373.7 ± 23.1 pmol/ml/h). No evidence of morphological differences in erythrocytes was found between the two populations. We then carried out a case-control study based on the spontaneous reporting system database to compare FIASMAs with NON-FIASMAs in terms of weight gain risk. Children who received FIASMA had a significantly lower frequency of weight gain reports than patients who took NON-FIASMA agents (p < 0.001). Our findings suggest there is an intriguing possibility that S-ASM may play a role in pediatric obesity. This pilot study could serve as the basis for future studies in this interesting field of research.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35768443 PMCID: PMC9243121 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14687-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.996
Patients' characteristics.
| Patients (n = 46) | Controls (n = 44) | Wald test p-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.372 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 11.0 (2.9) | 10.8 (2.9) | |
| 1.000 | |||
| Male, n (%) | 19 (41.3) | 17 (38.6) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 59.8 (18.7) | 35.2 (13.4) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 146.3 (15.1) | 139.0 (16.7) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 0.5 (1.2) | -0.5 (1.4) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 27.1 (3.7) | 17.5 (2.8) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 2.7 (0.5) | 0.0 (0.9) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 85.2 (12.8) | 61.0 (8.8) | |
| 0.653 | |||
| Prepubertal | 20 (43.5) | 24 (54.5) | |
| Pubertal | 8 (17.4) | 3 (6.8) | |
| Postpubertal | 7 (15.2) | 9 (20.5) | |
| N/A | 11 (23.9) | 8 (18.2) | |
| 0.143 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 106.4 (10.8) | 102.9 (10.2) | |
| 0.622 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 66.9 (5.8) | 65.8 (7.9) | |
| < 0.001 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 82.6 (7.2) | 73.4 (8.3) | |
| 0.630 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 165.5 (23.3) | 157.6 (39.8) | |
| 0.115 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 49.7 (13.3) | 61.7 (9.6) | |
| 0.333 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 95.9 (21.0) | 103.0 (21.2) | |
| 0.246 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 98.0 (68.7) | 73.1 (22.8) | |
| 0.307 | |||
| Mean (SD) | 25.6 (12.9) | 22.8 (11.6) | |
BMI body mass index, DBP systolic blood pressure, HDL high density lipoprotein, LDL low-density lipoprotein, N Number, N/A Not available, SBP systolic blood pressure, TC total cholesterol, TG tryglicerides, WC waist circumference * applied to univariable conditional logistic model for matched data.
Figure 1Distribution of the activity of serum acute sphingomyelinase in obese pediatric patients and healthy controls.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression model with high- vs low S-ASM.
| Univariable | Multivariable | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (CI 95%) | Wald p-value | OR (CI 95%) | Wald p-value | |
| Sex (Female vs Male) | 4.34 (1.33–14.13) | 0.015 | 7.53 (1.86–30.55) | 0.005 |
| Age (1-year decrease) | 1.41 (1.14–1.74) | 0.002 | 1.44 (1.15–1.82) | 0.002 |
| BMI SDS (unit increase) | 1.50 (1.06–2.13) | 0.023 | 1.78 (1.16–2.74) | 0.008 |
BMI body mass index, CI confidence interval, OR odds ratio, S-ASM secretory acid sphingomyelinase, SDS standard deviation score.
Figure 2Representative transmission electron microscopy images of obese pediatric patients (a–c) and healthy controls (b–d) erythrocytes. In both situations the erythrocytes shape and membranes are well preserved and intracellular membrane vesicles are not detectable. Upper and lower panels scale bar = 1 μm.
Characteristics of cases and non-cases included in the pharmacovigilance analysis.
| Casesa:Weight gain (n = 2,620) | Non-casesb: Other ADRs (n = 9,115) | |
|---|---|---|
| Mean (SD) | 12(4) | 13(3) |
| Male | 2,453(94) | 5,347(59) |
| ADHD | 1,335 (51) | 1,491 (16) |
| Autism | 342 (13) | 404 (4) |
| Bipolar Disorder | 459 (18) | 706 (8) |
| Depression | 259 (10) | 1,394 (15) |
| Schizophrenia | 158 (6) | 447 (5) |
| Yes | 23 (1) | 356 (4) |
| Consumer | 2,411 (92) | 4,042 (44) |
| Lawyer | 13 (1) | 42 (1) |
| Physician | 89 (3) | 2,113 (23) |
| Pharmacist | 10 (0.4) | 672 (7) |
| Health professional | 67 (3) | 1,844 (20) |
ADHD Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, ADR adverse drug reactions, CI confidence interval, N number, ROR reporting odds ratio, SD standard deviation, yrs years.
aPediatric report (5–17 years old) involving at least one antidepressant/antipsychotic agent in the occurrence of weight gain.
bPediatric reports (5–17 years old) involving at least one antidepressant/antipsychotic agent in the occurrence of any type of adverse drug reactions.
Logistic regression analyses showing the reporting risk of weight gain after FIASMA based therapy compared to NON FIASMA (reference group), also according to gender (subgroup analysis).
| Cases (n) | Non cases (n) | ROR (95% CI) | aROR (95% CI)§ | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NON FIASMA (Ref. group) | 2,588 | 7,332 | – | – |
| FIASMA | 32 | 1,783 | 0.051 (0.035; 0.071)** | 0.055 (0.038; 0.076)** |
| NON FIASMA (Ref. group) | 2,441 | 4,639 | – | – |
| FIASMA | 12 | 708 | 0.032 (0.017; 0.055)** | 0.033 (0.018; 0.056)** |
| NON FIASMA (Ref. group) | 147 | 2,693 | – | – |
| FIASMA | 20 | 1,075 | 0.341 (0.206; 0.533)** | 0.344 (0.208; 0.538)** |
**P < 0.001.
§Adjustment for age, concomitant drugs related with the risk of weight gain.