The WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone subdivides rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) into alveolar, embryonal, pleomorphic, and spindle cell RMS. Advances in molecular genetic diagnostics have made it possible to identify new RMS subgroups within traditional morphological entities. One of these subgroups comprises rare tumors characterized by epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, highly aggressive clinical course with pronounced tendency to intraosseous growth, and the presence of pathognomonic recurring genetic aberrations- chimeric genes/transcripts EWSR1::TFCP2, FUS::TFCP2, or MEIS1::NCOA2. Starting from 2018, only 26 reported cases of RMS have been assigned to this subgroup. The rarity of such tumors hampers their correct diagnostics for both anatomic pathologists and molecular oncologists. Here we describe a clinical case of intraosseous spindle cell RMS expressing EWSR1::TFCP2 fusion gene, encountered for the first time in our practice, in a 16-year-old female patient presenting with mandibular lesion. The diagnostic process took considerable time and involved RNA sequencing; a high-throughput method of molecular genetic research. The tumor was extremely aggressive, showing resistance to polychemotherapy, radiation therapy, and crizotinib targeted therapy, with the fatal outcome. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
The WHO Classification of Tumors of Soft Tissue and Bone subdivides rhabdomyosarcomas (RMS) into alveolar, embryonal, pleomorphic, and spindle cell RMS. Advances in molecular genetic diagnostics have made it possible to identify new RMS subgroups within traditional morphological entities. One of these subgroups comprises rare tumors characterized by epithelioid and spindle cell morphology, highly aggressive clinical course with pronounced tendency to intraosseous growth, and the presence of pathognomonic recurring genetic aberrations- chimeric genes/transcripts EWSR1::TFCP2, FUS::TFCP2, or MEIS1::NCOA2. Starting from 2018, only 26 reported cases of RMS have been assigned to this subgroup. The rarity of such tumors hampers their correct diagnostics for both anatomic pathologists and molecular oncologists. Here we describe a clinical case of intraosseous spindle cell RMS expressing EWSR1::TFCP2 fusion gene, encountered for the first time in our practice, in a 16-year-old female patient presenting with mandibular lesion. The diagnostic process took considerable time and involved RNA sequencing; a high-throughput method of molecular genetic research. The tumor was extremely aggressive, showing resistance to polychemotherapy, radiation therapy, and crizotinib targeted therapy, with the fatal outcome. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
Rhabdomyosarcomas (RMSs) account for more than one-half of pediatric soft tissue tumors (Emami et al. 2017). Spindle cell RMSs with primary intraosseous localization are extremely rare, which hampers their early accurate diagnosis (Watson et al. 2018; Agaram et al. 2019; Chrisinger et al. 2020; Le Loarer et al. 2020; Koutlas et al. 2021). Meanwhile, these tumors are aggressive, highly metastatic, and >60% lethal (Chrisinger et al. 2020; Koutlas et al. 2021). A recently recognized molecular subgroup of EWSR1/FUS/MEIS1::TFCP2/NCOA2-fused spindle cell RMSs (WHO Classification 2020) are typically presenting with primary intraosseous lesions. Here, we report a case of EWSR1::TFCP2-positive RMS with an outstandingly aggressive clinical course identified with this subgroup. Our experience complements the current knowledge for these rare tumors and facilitates their better understanding. Furthermore, we suggest the early implementation of the molecular techniques in parallel with the conventional histopathology to the diagnostic algorithm of intraosseous neoplasms. Apart from the enhanced personalized patient management, another important mission of the early molecular diagnostics is enrollment. The emerging status of TFCP2 as a plausible therapeutic target will require extensive clinical verification on cohorts with timely diagnosed tumors harboring corresponding aberrations (Willoughby et al. 2020). ALK overexpression observed in the majority of reported intraosseous RMSs implicates potential efficacy of ALK inhibitors (Lewin et al. 2019; Le Loarer et al. 2020). However, clinical data on the use of ALK inhibitors in RMSs are quite limited and the results are controversial. Here we report on an attempt to use the ALK inhibitor crizotinib that proved unsuccessful.
RESULTS
Clinical Presentation
A 16-yr-old girl consulted a dentist about pain and swelling of the lower jaw on the left side. Computed tomography (CT) showed a 64-mm × 18-mm × 44-mm unossified mass in the mandible. A preliminary diagnosis of fibrosarcoma (from a biopsy) was revised by histological assessment of the resected tumor specimen after single-stage subtotal mandibulectomy and reconstruction with endoprosthesis. As the tumor was positive for SATB2, negative for CD34, desmin, MSA, S100, SMA, and weakly stained with anti-pan cytokeratin antibody (HCK AE1/AE3), the diagnosis was revised as fibroblastic osteosarcoma. The Ki-67 index was 50%. Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed neither residual tumor nor metastases. However, the patient presented with local relapse even before the commencement of polychemotherapy (PChT, the EURAMOS-2007 protocol for patients with osteogenic sarcoma). MRI performed after the first block of PChT (doxorubicin, cisplatin) showed tumor growth spreading to the maxilla, with metastatic involvement of lymph nodes in the neck, C1–C2 vertebrae, and the iliac wing on the left (Fig. 1). Thus, the tumor progression occurred 2 mo after primary diagnosis.
Figure 1.
T2-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of head and neck soft tissues (A–D) and pelvic bones (E) with arrows indicating primary and metastatic foci (A,B–E, respectively).
T2-weighted contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of head and neck soft tissues (A–D) and pelvic bones (E) with arrows indicating primary and metastatic foci (A,B–E, respectively).A follow-up histological assessment revealed solid tumor, invading beyond the mandibular cortex, lacking osteoid, composed of spindle-shaped and polymorphic cells showing extremely high mitotic activity with atypical mitotic figures, arranged in short multidirectional fascicles. Given the characteristic morphology, complemented with expression of vimentin, desmin, H3K27me3, and focal expression of myogenin (Myf4), HCK AE1/AE3, SATB2, and ALK D5F3 demonstrated by immunohistochemistry (Fig. 2; Supplemental Figs. 2–4), the diagnosis was revised to rhabdomyosarcoma, formally meeting the criteria for an embryonal variant.
Figure 2.
(A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) 200×. The tumor grows in short fascicles intersecting at various angles, composed of large spindle or polymorphic cells with a moderate amount of weakly eosinophilic cytoplasm. The ovoid or irregularly shaped nuclei are positioned eccentrically and contain clumped chromatin, occasionally hyperchromatic, with one to three nucleoli. The mitotic activity is very high, with atypical mitotic figures. The moderately developed stroma contains ubiquitously distributed collagen fibers and a diffuse capillary network. Bone trabeculae, partially destroyed, are encountered within the tumor mass. Immunohistochemical examination reveals positivity for desmin (B), along with focal positivity for myogenin, HCK AE1/AE3, SATB2, and ALK D5F3 (C–F, respectively).
(A) Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) 200×. The tumor grows in short fascicles intersecting at various angles, composed of large spindle or polymorphic cells with a moderate amount of weakly eosinophilic cytoplasm. The ovoid or irregularly shaped nuclei are positioned eccentrically and contain clumped chromatin, occasionally hyperchromatic, with one to three nucleoli. The mitotic activity is very high, with atypical mitotic figures. The moderately developed stroma contains ubiquitously distributed collagen fibers and a diffuse capillary network. Bone trabeculae, partially destroyed, are encountered within the tumor mass. Immunohistochemical examination reveals positivity for desmin (B), along with focal positivity for myogenin, HCK AE1/AE3, SATB2, and ALK D5F3 (C–F, respectively).With regard to the updated morphological diagnosis, the management strategy was switched to the CWS-2009 regimen for patients with distant metastases. With the first block of PChT (ifosfamide, vincristine, and dactinomycin), the primary focus showed no dynamics, but the distant metastasis in the iliac wing on the left grew. By the end of the second block (carboplatin, etoposide, and doxorubicin), progression of the disease was evident (4.5 mo after primary diagnosis), as the mass spread from corpus and ramus of the mandible and increased in volume by 39%.
Genomic Analyses
With consideration for the aggressive course of the disease and complete failure of first-line therapy, high-throughput DNA sequencing with a QIAseq custom panel comprising biomarkers of solid tumors in children (QIAGEN) was implemented for the molecular profile characterization and diagnosis verification (Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). The study revealed a TP53 c.559 + 1G > A (Table 1) somatic variant (reference transcript ENST00000269305.4) of high prognostic significance (the AMP/ASCO/CAP level IB) (Li et al. 2017).
Table 1.
Variant table
Gene
Chromosome
HGVS DNA reference
HGVS protein reference
Variant type
Predicted effect
dbSNP/dbVar ID
Genotype
Interpretationa
TP53
17
c.559 + 1G > A
–
Substitution
Affecting splicing
rs1131691042
Heterozygous
Level IB
aAssociation for Molecular Pathology (AMP)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines AMP/ASCO/CAP Variant Evidence Guidelines.
Variant tableaAssociation for Molecular Pathology (AMP)/American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)/College of American Pathologists (CAP) guidelines AMP/ASCO/CAP Variant Evidence Guidelines.However, the atypical clinical patterns with intraosseous localization and the lack of response to PChT implicated the involvement of other molecular-genetic determinants, thus justifying the use of high-throughput RNA sequencing (TruSeq RNA Exome, Illumina). The analysis of RNA extracted from the primary formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tumor tissue revealed a EWSR1::TFCP2 chimeric transcript (Table 2; Fig. 3; Supplemental Table 3) of the recurrent type encountered in spindle cell RMSs (Chrisinger et al. 2020).
Table 2.
Fusion transcript variant
Sample name
Million aligned reads
Mb aligned bases
Fusion gene
Left breakpoint
Right breakpoint
Coverage bases gene 1
Coverage bases gene 2
RNA5
11.8
959
EWSR1::TFCP2
Chr 22: 29278216:+
Chr 12: 51118772:+
823
854
Figure 3.
Identification of the EWSR1::TFCP2 fusion transcript. (A) Schematic representation (Arriba v2.1.0) of the chimeric mRNA identified by high-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue, with the TruSeq RNA Exome kit (Illumina) used for the sequencing library construction. The sequencing was run in paired-end mode (2 × 100) on a NextSeq500 instrument (Illumina); the alignment to a reference human genome hg38 was performed in a Dragen RNA pipeline (v3.6.3, Illumina). (B) Validation of the finding: agarose gel with reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction products for EWSR1:TFCP2 chimeric product and ABL as a reference transcript, 340 and 130 bp, respectively. (C) Sanger sequencing chromatogram for the chimeric product, showing fusion between EWSR1 exon 5 ENST00000414183.6 and TFCP2 exon 2 ENST00000257915.9.
Identification of the EWSR1::TFCP2 fusion transcript. (A) Schematic representation (Arriba v2.1.0) of the chimeric mRNA identified by high-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue, with the TruSeq RNA Exome kit (Illumina) used for the sequencing library construction. The sequencing was run in paired-end mode (2 × 100) on a NextSeq500 instrument (Illumina); the alignment to a reference human genome hg38 was performed in a Dragen RNA pipeline (v3.6.3, Illumina). (B) Validation of the finding: agarose gel with reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction products for EWSR1:TFCP2 chimeric product and ABL as a reference transcript, 340 and 130 bp, respectively. (C) Sanger sequencing chromatogram for the chimeric product, showing fusion between EWSR1 exon 5 ENST00000414183.6 and TFCP2 exon 2 ENST00000257915.9.Fusion transcript variantSince 2020, RMSs harboring EWSR1::TFCP2, FUS::TFCP2, or MEIS1::NCOA2 fusions, sharing characteristic clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical, and molecular features, have been assigned to a distinct subgroup in WHO Classification 2020 termed “Rhabdomyosarcomas with TFCP2/NCOA2 fusions.” The EWSR1 rearrangement was additionally verified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (Fig. 4) confirming the diagnosis of intraosseous spindle cell RMS expressing EWSR1::TFCP2 chimeric transcript.
Figure 4.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization. A 600× image shows tumor cell nuclei with clumpy chromatin, most of them containing a couple of fused signals designated 2F, corresponding to the intact EWSR1 (no rearrangement). Small clusters of cells containing a combination of fused and broken apart signals indicating a translocation involving EWSR1 (1F1R1G) are scattered over the whole section area. The image was produced using ZytoLight SPEC EWSR1 Dual Color Break Apart Probe, with red and green fluorochromes corresponding to proximal and distal regions of EWSR1 (22q12), respectively.
Fluorescence in situ hybridization. A 600× image shows tumor cell nuclei with clumpy chromatin, most of them containing a couple of fused signals designated 2F, corresponding to the intact EWSR1 (no rearrangement). Small clusters of cells containing a combination of fused and broken apart signals indicating a translocation involving EWSR1 (1F1R1G) are scattered over the whole section area. The image was produced using ZytoLight SPEC EWSR1 Dual Color Break Apart Probe, with red and green fluorochromes corresponding to proximal and distal regions of EWSR1 (22q12), respectively.
Treatment Outcomes
The ultimate attempt to stop the tumor expansion was made with radiation therapy applied to the area of the primary focus and metastatic foci in the C1–C2 vertebrae and administered in single focal doses of 1.8 Gy to a total focal dose of 54 Gy. As the radiation therapy failed to suppress the continued tumor growth in the primary focus area, it was decided to escalate the intensity to 1.6 Gy focal doses twice a day, amounting to the same total focal dose of 54 Gy. A combination of vincristine, irinotecan, and temozolamide was used as systemic chemotherapy. With regard to the focal expression of ALK by the tumor, the regimen was complemented with crizotinib as a salvage treatment. Crizotinib was administered in dose 180 mg/m2 or 250 mg per os daily for 10 d until the subsequent disease progression. No crizotinib-related side effects were observed. Notwithstanding these efforts, the patient's clinical condition steadily worsened, and neither primary nor metastatic foci responded to the treatment. Because of exhaustion of therapeutic options, the patient was declared incurable and discharged to palliative care after 6.5 mo after primary diagnosis. Five months later, the patient died because of the cancer progression. The time line is presented as the Supplemental Figure 1.
DISCUSSION
Malignant neoplasms sharing their origin with skeletal muscles (RMSs) are classified in WHO Classification of Soft Tissue and Bone Tumors 2020 into embryonal, alveolar, pleomorphic, and spindle cell RMSs. Of those, spindle cell RMSs represent the least prevalent and most heterogeneous morphological entity with diverse molecular driver events, including VGLL2:NCOA2/CITED2 fusion-related congenital/infantile spindle cell RMSs, MYOD1-mutated spindle cell/sclerosing RMSs, and the intraosseous spindle cell RMSs with TFCP2/NCOA2 rearrangements. Accurate differentiation between molecular subgroups of spindle cell RMSs is important because of their strong clinical significance.Spindle cell RMSs harboring TFCP2/NCOA2 rearrangements have been distinguished as an entity since 2018. Initially characterized by Watson et al. (2018), this molecular subgroup comprises a total of 26 cases worldwide reported by the time of this writing (Chrisinger et al. 2020; Koutlas et al. 2021). The primary lesions emerge in skull bones (predominantly in the maxilla or the mandible) and much less typically in other skeletal areas (pelvic bones, spine, etc.) or abdominal/inguinal soft tissues (Le Loarer et al. 2020). Gross examination reveals solid tissue with residual bone trabeculae and signs of vascular invasion, with a capacity to invade soft tissues. The age at onset varies (11–86 yr), with the median in the third decade of life. The estimated gender-specific morbidity shows female prevalence (∼1.7:1) (Chrisinger et al. 2020). Histological assessment reveals layers/cords of epithelioid/spindle tumor cells with eosinophilic cytoplasm. The large nuclei are rounded or elongated (in rare cases—pleomorphic) and contain clumpy chromatin, occasionally hyperchromatic, with prominent nucleoli; the cytoplasm is scanty to moderate. Some of the tumors show round cell morphology. True rhabdomyoblasts may be missing. The moderately developed stroma is sclerotic and partially hyalinized. The positivity for MYOD1 and desmin, and to a lesser degree for myogenin, is revealed by immunohistochemistry. In addition, the tumors are cytokeratin-positive and may also express auxiliary markers ALK and S100. The intraosseous spindle cell RMS with TFCP2 rearrangements are extremely aggressive tumors with the most adverse prognosis (Agaram et al. 2019; Chrisinger et al. 2020; Le Loarer et al. 2020; Koutlas et al. 2021).The current case of EWSR1::TFCP2-fused RMS fairly complies with this description in terms of morphology and immunohistochemistry, and it showed the most aggressive clinical course. The involved gene EWSR1 (22q12.2) encodes a multifunctional RNA-binding protein related to FUS and TAF15 (Lee et al. 2019). The continuous transcriptional activity of the EWSR1 locus in certain tissues is associated with high risks of somatic chromosome rearrangements. Fusion of chromosome fragments may produce a chimeric oncogene comprising the 5′ region of EWSR1 and the 3′ region of another gene (e.g., TFCP2). Such variants act as transcription regulators with impaired specificity (Lindén et al. 2019) and promote oncogenesis. The EWSR1/FUS rearrangements are pathognomonic for certain soft tissue and bone neoplasms including Ewing sarcoma, desmoplastic small round cell tumor, and sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcoma. As a particular chimeric variant may serve an unambiguous marker of a particular tumor type, identification/exclusion of such rearrangements is indispensable for the diagnosis.The TFCP2 gene (12q13.12) contributes to the 3′ region of the EWSR1::TFCP2 and FUS::TFCP2 chimeric transcripts. TFCP2 encodes a transcription factor called α-globin transcription factor CP2 (a.k.a. late SV40 factor, LSF) considered as a prospective molecular target in certain tumors. Synthetic small inhibitory molecules termed factor quinolinone inhibitors (FQIs) interact with LSF and restrict its DNA-binding capacity. Sustained anti-tumor activity of FQIs without observable toxic effects was demonstrated in several preclinical models. According to functional studies, targeted inhibition of LSF with small molecules or microRNA effectively interferes with the mitotic cycle, promoting cell death or cell senescence (Willoughby et al. 2020). These findings support the emerging status of LSF as an actionable target, of vital significance under the lack of response to standard protocols. Apart from that, focal expression of ALK by an intraosseous tumor implicates potential efficacy of ALK inhibitors; however, clinical data on the use of ALK inhibitors in RMSs are quite limited and the results are controversial (Lewin et al. 2019; Le Loarer et al. 2020; Lee et al. 2021). Here we describe an attempt to use the ALK inhibitor crizotinib as a salvage therapy that proved unsuccessful.Because the intraosseous EWSR1::TFCP2-fused tumors are rare, they represent a major diagnostic challenge, particularly given the extensive list of competing possibilities for differential diagnosis. This flaw is crucial, as a delay with accurate diagnosis enabling correct choice of the treatment strategy most adversely impacts the prognosis. The diagnostic algorithm can be improved by explicitly expanding the scope of clinical situations for which the morphological/immunohistochemical assessment must be closely supported by comprehensive molecular genetic tests performed on an urgent basis.
METHODS
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the individual for participation in the study and the publication. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Dmitry Rogachev National Medical Research Center of Pediatric Hematology, Oncology, and Immunology.In this study, all genetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analyses were performed using primary FFPE tumor tissue.FISH studies were performed using FFPE specimens sectioned into 4-µm-thick tissue sections. Briefly, after dewaxing and hydration, the sections were immersed in Pretreatment Solution (Agilent Technologies) for 15 min at 95°C–100°C. After digestion in RTU pepsin (Agilent Technologies) 15 min at room temperature (RT), the sections were washed in Wash Buffer (Agilent Technologies) for 5 min at RT, then dehydrated in an ethanol series (70%, 85%, and 100%) for 1 min each at RT and air dried. The slides were hybridized with 10 µL SPEC EWSR1 Dual Color Break Apart FISH Probe (ZytoVision). Probes were applied to the tissue slide, coverslipped, and sealed with rubber cement. Denaturation was conducted for 5 min at 78°C and hybridized 12–18 h at 37°C in Hybridizer (Dako). Posthybridization washing was performed in Stringent Wash Buffer (Agilent Technologies) at a preheated temperature of 74°C. Air-dried slides were counterstained using Fluorescence Mounting Medium (Agilent Technologies) and coverslipped. The slides were observed using a fluorescence microscope with appropriate filters, and the resulting images were captured using a charge-coupled-device camera (Olympus BX63).High-throughput DNA sequencing: QIAseq (QIAGEN) custom panel comprising biomarkers of solid tumors in children (ATM, ALK, APC, ATRX, BRAF, BCOR, BRCA1, BRCA2, CDKN2A, CDKN2B, CIC, CREBBP, CTNNB1, DICER1, DROSHA, EGFR, FBXW7, FGFR1, HRAS, IDH1, IDH2, KDR, KIT, KRAS, MAP2K1, MAP2K2, MYOD1, MET, MSH6, MSH2, MLH1, NF1, NOTCH1, NRAS, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, PIK3CA, POLD, POLE, PTCH1, PTEN, PTPN11, RB1, ROS1, RET, SMARCA4, SMARCB1, SUFU, SMO, TSC1, TERT, TP53, TSC2, WT1, H3F3A, HISTH3B). Paired-end (2 × 150 bp) run was performed on the MiSeq instrument (Illumina) with a mean read depth 488 and subsequent analysis by alignment to a reference human genome hg37 in a GeneGlobe pipeline (QIAGEN).Сhimeric mRNA was identified by high-throughput sequencing of RNA isolated from paraffin-embedded tissue, with TruSeq RNA Exome kit (Illumina) used for the sequencing library construction. A paired-end (2 × 100 bp) run was performed on the NextSeq500 instrument (Illumina) with an average yield of 35 million read pairs and subsequent analysis by alignment to a reference human genome hg38 in a Dragen RNA pipeline (v3.6.3, Illumina). The identified transcript EWSR1::TFCP2 was validated by reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (forward primer—CTGTCCAGGGGTATGGCAC, reverse primer—CCTTCTGTCATGGAACACCACA) with subsequent Sanger sequencing.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Data Deposition and Access
Consent was obtained to make the patient's or the control's raw DNA or RNA sequencing data publicly available at the European Genome-phenome Archive (EGA) databases (https://ega-archive.org/) under number EGAC00001002710).
Ethics Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the parents of the individual for participation in the study and the publication. All procedures performed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee.
Author Contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication. A.V.P. performed diagnostics (molecular oncology), analyzed the literature, and wrote and edited the molecular oncology sections. K.Y.S. managed the patient, handled the clinical data, and wrote and edited the clinical sections. M.A.J. managed the patient and handled clinical data. N.Y.U. analyzed the literature and drafted and wrote the manuscript. A.S.S. performed the diagnostics (immunohistochemistry, fluorescence in situ hybridization). V.Y.R. performed the diagnostics (morphology, immunohistochemistry). D.M.K. analyzed the literature and drafted and wrote the pathology sections. A.E.D. analyzed the literature and drafted and wrote the molecular oncology sections.
Funding
The study was supported by Foundation for support and development in the field of pediatric hematology, oncology, and immunology “Science for Children.”
Authors: John S A Chrisinger; Bret Wehrli; Brendan C Dickson; Samir Fasih; Angela C Hirbe; David B Shultz; Gelareh Zadeh; Abha A Gupta; Elizabeth G Demicco Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2020-06-19 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: Marilyn M Li; Michael Datto; Eric J Duncavage; Shashikant Kulkarni; Neal I Lindeman; Somak Roy; Apostolia M Tsimberidou; Cindy L Vnencak-Jones; Daynna J Wolff; Anas Younes; Marina N Nikiforova Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-01 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Narasimhan P Agaram; Lei Zhang; Yun-Shao Sung; Marcela S Cavalcanti; Dianne Torrence; Leonard Wexler; Glenn Francis; Scott Sommerville; David Swanson; Brendan C Dickson; Albert J H Suurmeijer; Richard Williamson; Cristina R Antonescu Journal: Am J Surg Pathol Date: 2019-05 Impact factor: 6.394
Authors: François Le Loarer; Arjen H G Cleven; Corinne Bouvier; Marie-Pierre Castex; Cleofe Romagosa; Anne Moreau; Sébastien Salas; Benjamin Bonhomme; Anne Gomez-Brouchet; Camille Laurent; Sophie Le Guellec; Virginie Audard; Antoine Giraud; Irma Ramos-Oliver; Anne-Marie Cleton-Jansen; Dilara C Savci-Heijink; Herman M Kroon; Jessica Baud; Daniel Pissaloux; Gaëlle Pierron; Anand Sherwood; Jean Michel Coindre; Judith V M G Bovée; Frédérique Larousserie; Franck Tirode Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2019-08-05 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Malin Lindén; Christer Thomsen; Pernilla Grundevik; Emma Jonasson; Daniel Andersson; Rikard Runnberg; Soheila Dolatabadi; Christoffer Vannas; Manuel Luna Santamarίa; Henrik Fagman; Anders Ståhlberg; Pierre Åman Journal: EMBO Rep Date: 2019-04-08 Impact factor: 8.807
Authors: Jennifer L S Willoughby; Kelly George; Mark P Roberto; Hang Gyeong Chin; Patrick Stoiber; Hyunjin Shin; Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu; Scott E Schaus; Kevin Fitzgerald; Jagesh Shah; Ulla Hansen Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2020-06-15 Impact factor: 4.430