Literature DB >> 35768178

A Deep Learning Approach for Automated Segmentation of Kidneys and Exophytic Cysts in Individuals with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Youngwoo Kim1, Cheng Tao2, Hyungchan Kim1, Geum-Yoon Oh1, Jeongbeom Ko1, Kyongtae T Bae3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Total kidney volume (TKV) is an important imaging biomarker in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). Manual computation of TKV, particularly with the exclusion of exophytic cysts, is laborious and time consuming.
METHODS: We developed a fully automated segmentation method for TKV using a deep learning network to selectively segment kidney regions while excluding exophytic cysts. We used abdominal T2 -weighted magnetic resonance images from 210 individuals with ADPKD who were divided into two groups: one group of 157 to train the network and a second group of 53 to test it. With a 3D U-Net architecture using dataset fingerprints, the network was trained by K-fold cross-validation, in that 80% of 157 cases were for training and the remaining 20% were for validation. We used Dice similarity coefficient, intraclass correlation coefficient, and Bland-Altman analysis to assess the performance of the automated segmentation method compared with the manual method.
RESULTS: The automated and manual reference methods exhibited excellent geometric concordance (Dice similarity coefficient: mean±SD, 0.962±0.018) on the test datasets, with kidney volumes ranging from 178.9 to 2776.0 ml (mean±SD, 1058.5±706.8 ml) and exophytic cysts ranging from 113.4 to 2497.6 ml (mean±SD, 549.0±559.1 ml). The intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.9994 (95% confidence interval, 0.9991 to 0.9996; P<0.001) with a minimum bias of -2.424 ml (95% limits of agreement, -49.80 to 44.95).
CONCLUSIONS: We developed a fully automated segmentation method to measure TKV that excludes exophytic cysts and has an accuracy similar to that of a human expert. This technique may be useful in clinical studies that require automated computation of TKV to evaluate progression of ADPKD and response to treatment.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Nephrology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADPKD; chronic kidney disease; chronic kidney failure; cystic kidney; deep learning; exophytic cyst; image segmentation; kidney volume; risk factors

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35768178      PMCID: PMC9342631          DOI: 10.1681/ASN.2021111400

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol        ISSN: 1046-6673            Impact factor:   14.978


  23 in total

Review 1.  Measuring agreement in method comparison studies.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 3.021

Review 2.  The benefit of stereology for quantitative radiology.

Authors:  N Roberts; M J Puddephat; V McNulty
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Kidney volume and functional outcomes in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Arlene B Chapman; James E Bost; Vicente E Torres; Lisa Guay-Woodford; Kyongtae Ty Bae; Douglas Landsittel; Jie Li; Bernard F King; Diego Martin; Louis H Wetzel; Mark E Lockhart; Peter C Harris; Marva Moxey-Mims; Mike Flessner; William M Bennett; Jared J Grantham
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 8.237

Review 4.  Imaging for the prognosis of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae; Jared J Grantham
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  Assessment of kidney volume in polycystic kidney disease using magnetic resonance imaging without contrast medium.

Authors:  Renzo Mignani; Cristiana Corsi; Mariangela De Marco; Enrico G Caiani; Gioele Santucci; Enrico Cavagna; Stefano Severi; Leonardo Cagnoli
Journal:  Am J Nephrol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.754

6.  Renal structure in early autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD): The Consortium for Radiologic Imaging Studies of Polycystic Kidney Disease (CRISP) cohort.

Authors:  Arlene B Chapman; Lisa M Guay-Woodford; Jared J Grantham; Vicente E Torres; Kyongtae T Bae; Deborah A Baumgarten; Philip J Kenney; Bernard F King; James F Glockner; Louis H Wetzel; Marijn E Brummer; W Charles O'Neill; Michelle L Robbin; William M Bennett; Saulo Klahr; Gladys H Hirschman; Paul L Kimmel; Paul A Thompson; J Philip Miller
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Automated Segmentation of Kidneys from MR Images in Patients with Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Youngwoo Kim; Yinghui Ge; Cheng Tao; Jianbing Zhu; Arlene B Chapman; Vicente E Torres; Alan S L Yu; Michal Mrug; William M Bennett; Michael F Flessner; Doug P Landsittel; Kyongtae T Bae
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 8.237

8.  Expanded Imaging Classification of Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Kyongtae T Bae; Tiange Shi; Cheng Tao; Alan S L Yu; Vicente E Torres; Ronald D Perrone; Arlene B Chapman; Godela Brosnahan; Theodore I Steinman; William E Braun; Avantika Srivastava; Maria V Irazabal; Kaleab Z Abebe; Peter C Harris; Douglas P Landsittel
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-06-02       Impact factor: 10.121

9.  Fully Automated Segmentation of Polycystic Kidneys From Noncontrast Computed Tomography: A Feasibility Study and Preliminary Results.

Authors:  Dario Turco; Maddalena Valinoti; Eva Maria Martin; Carlo Tagliaferri; Francesco Scolari; Cristiana Corsi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.173

10.  Total kidney volume: the most valuable predictor of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease progression.

Authors:  Cheng Xue; Chenchen Zhou; Changlin Mei
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 10.612

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.