Literature DB >> 35767941

EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION WITH A NATURALLY OCCURRING PROTOZOAN PARASITE REDUCES MONARCH BUTTERFLY (DANAUS PLEXIPPUS) MATING SUCCESS.

Tolulope S Babalola1, Jacobus C de Roode1, Scott M Villa1.   

Abstract

Parasitic infection is known to drive sexual selection in persuasive mating systems, where parasites influence the secondary sexual characteristics that underlie mate choice. However, comparatively little is known about their effects on animals that use coercive mating behavior. We use a tractable system consisting of monarch butterflies and their naturally occurring parasite Ophryocystis elektroscirrha to test how parasites influence host mating dynamics when males force females to copulate. Monarchs were placed in mating cages where all, half, or no individuals were experimentally infected with O. elektroscirrha. We found that parasites reduce a male's mating success such that infected males were not only less likely to copulate but obtained fewer lifetime copulations as well. This reduction in mating success was due primarily to the fact that infected males attempt to mate significantly less than uninfected males. However, we found that O. elektroscirrha did not influence male mate choice. Males chose to mate with both infected and uninfected females at similar rates, regardless of their infection status. Overall, our data highlight how mating dynamics in coercive systems are particularly vulnerable to parasites. © American Society of Parasitologists 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  zzm321990 Ophryocystis elektroscirrhazzm321990 ; Coercive behavior; Mate choice; Sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35767941      PMCID: PMC9235863          DOI: 10.1645/21-121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Parasitol        ISSN: 0022-3395            Impact factor:   1.343


  11 in total

Review 1.  Sexual selection and mate choice.

Authors:  Malte Andersson; Leigh W Simmons
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2006-04-03       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Virulence-transmission trade-offs and population divergence in virulence in a naturally occurring butterfly parasite.

Authors:  Jacobus C de Roode; Andrew J Yates; Sonia Altizer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-05-20       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Sexual selection and the role of parasites.

Authors:  A F Read
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 17.712

4.  The contagion indicator hypothesis for parasite-mediated sexual selection.

Authors:  D J Able
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-03-05       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The Size, Symmetry, and Color Saturation of a Male Guppy's Ornaments Forecast His Resistance to Parasites.

Authors:  Jessica F Stephenson; Martin Stevens; Jolyon Troscianko; Jukka Jokela
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Heritable true fitness and bright birds: a role for parasites?

Authors:  W D Hamilton; M Zuk
Journal:  Science       Date:  1982-10-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Two centuries of monarch butterfly collections reveal contrasting effects of range expansion and migration loss on wing traits.

Authors:  Micah G Freedman; Hugh Dingle; Sharon Y Strauss; Santiago R Ramírez
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Effects of a parasitic nematode on male mate choice in a livebearing fish with a coercive mating system (western mosquitofish, Gambusia affinis).

Authors:  Raelynn Deaton
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2008-08-14       Impact factor: 1.777

9.  Loss of migratory behaviour increases infection risk for a butterfly host.

Authors:  Dara A Satterfield; John C Maerz; Sonia Altizer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-02-22       Impact factor: 5.530

10.  Monarch butterfly migration and parasite transmission in eastern North America.

Authors:  Rebecca A Bartel; Karen S Oberhauser; Jacobus C De Roode; Sonia M Altizer
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 5.499

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.